ARM: ux500: Correct Ux500 family names usage
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: ux500: Correct Ux500 family names usage
From: Loic PALLARDY <[email protected]>
Update users with cpu_is_ux540_family() to keep x540 family functional.
---
Hi Arnd, Olof:
This patch goes on top of the ux500-asicid patches pulled earlier, into your ux500/asic-id branch, it'd be best if you just applied this one on top manually. If you prefer I can send a new pull request from the same branch.
Linus
--- arch/arm/mach-ux500/clock.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-ux500/timer.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-ux500/clock.c +1 -1
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_mtu_get_rate(struct clk *clk)unsigned long mturate;unsigned long retclk; -if (cpu_is_u8500_family ()) +if (cpu_is_u8500_family () ||cpu_is_ux540_family ()) addr =__io_address (U8500_PRCMU_BASE );else ux500_unknown_soc ();
arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c +1 -1
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void __init wakeup_secondary(void) {void __iomem *backupram; -if (cpu_is_u8500_family ()) +if (cpu_is_u8500_family () ||cpu_is_ux540_family ()) backupram =__io_address (U8500_BACKUPRAM0_BASE );else ux500_unknown_soc ();
arch/arm/mach-ux500/timer.c +1 -1
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void __init ux500_timer_init(void)void __iomem *tmp_base;struct device_node *np; -if (cpu_is_u8500_family ()) { +if (cpu_is_u8500_family () ||cpu_is_ux540_family ()) { mtu_timer_base =__io_address (U8500_MTU0_BASE ); prcmu_timer_base =__io_address (U8500_PRCMU_TIMER_4_BASE ); }else {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.11.3
PATCH 1/1 ARM: ux500: Correct Ux500 family names usage
Quoted 7 lines · Linus Walleij
From: Loic PALLARDY <[email protected]>
Update users with
cpu_is_ux540_family()to keep x540 family functional.Signed-off-by Loic Pallardy <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
---
Hi Arnd, Olof:This patch goes on top of the ux500-asicid patches pulled earlier, into your ux500/asic-id branch, it'd be best if you just applied this one on top manually. If you prefer I can send a new pull request from the same branch.
Sure, applied.
-Olof