coredump: prevent double-free on an error path in core dumper
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 coredump: prevent double-free on an error path in core dumper
In !CORE_DUMP_USE_REGSET case, if elf_note_info_init fails to allocate memory for info->fields, it frees already allocated stuff and returns error to its caller, fill_note_info. Which in turn returns
error to its caller, elf_core_dump. Which jumps to cleanup
label and calls free_note_info, which will happily try to
free all info->fields again. BOOM.
This is the fix.
--- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
fs/binfmt_elf.c +4 -15
@@ -1695,30 +1695,19 @@ static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info *info)return 0 ; info->psinfo =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->psinfo),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->psinfo) - goto notes_free; +return 0 ; info->prstatus =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->prstatus),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->prstatus) - goto psinfo_free; +return 0 ; info->fpu =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->fpu),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->fpu) - goto prstatus_free; +return 0 ;#ifdef ELF_CORE_COPY_XFPREGS info->xfpu =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->xfpu),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->xfpu) - goto fpu_free; +return 0 ;#endif return 1 ; -#ifdef ELF_CORE_COPY_XFPREGS - fpu_free: -kfree (info->fpu); -#endif - prstatus_free: -kfree (info->prstatus); - psinfo_free: -kfree (info->psinfo); - notes_free: -kfree (info->notes); -return 0 ; } static int fill_note_info(struct elfhdr *elf, int phdrs,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7.6
Quoted 32 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-kernel- [email protected]] On Behalf Of Denys Vlasenko
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:07 PM
To: Oleg Nesterov; [email protected]; Andrew Morton; Roland McGrath
Cc: Denys Vlasenko
Subject: [PATCH] coredump: prevent double-free on an error path in core dumperIn !CORE_DUMP_USE_REGSET case, if
elf_note_info_initfails to allocate memory
forinfo->fields, it frees already allocated stuff and returns error to its caller,fill_note_info. Which in turn returns error to its caller,elf_core_dump. Which jumps to cleanup label and callsfree_note_info, which will happily try to free allinfo->fieldsagain. BOOM.This is the fix.
Signed-off-by Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>--- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)fs/binfmt_elf.c +0
-0
fs/binfmt_elf.c static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info · line 1697
Quoted 3 lines
fs/binfmt_elf.c +0
-0@@ -1695,30 +1695,19 @@ static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info *info)return 0 ; info->psinfo =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->psinfo),GFP_KERNEL );
Why don't you change kmalloc to devm_kzalloc, so that free can be ignored altogether.
Quoted 40 lines
fs/binfmt_elf.c +4
-15if (!info->psinfo) - goto notes_free; +return 0 ; info->prstatus =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->prstatus),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->prstatus) - goto psinfo_free; +return 0 ; info->fpu =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->fpu),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->fpu) - goto prstatus_free; +return 0 ;#ifdef ELF_CORE_COPY_XFPREGS info->xfpu =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->xfpu),GFP_KERNEL );if (!info->xfpu) - goto fpu_free; +return 0 ;#endif return 1 ; -#ifdef ELF_CORE_COPY_XFPREGS - fpu_free: -kfree (info->fpu); -#endif - prstatus_free: -kfree (info->prstatus); - psinfo_free: -kfree (info->psinfo); - notes_free: -kfree (info->notes); -return 0 ; }static int fill_note_info(struct elfhdr *elf, int phdrs,
--
1.7.7.6--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 9 lines · Venu Byravarasu
fs/binfmt_elf.c static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info · line 1697
Quoted 7 lines
fs/binfmt_elf.c +0
-0@@ -1695,30 +1695,19 @@ static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info *info)return 0 ; info->psinfo =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->psinfo),GFP_KERNEL );Why don't you change kmalloc to
devm_kzalloc, so that free can be ignored altogether.
kzalloc(), I guess...
Still I can't understand what did you mean. If kmalloc() fails we return "fail" and ->psinfo = NULL, the subsequent kfree(NULL) is nop.
Oleg.
Quoted 12 lines · Oleg Nesterov
Quoted 9 lines · Venu Byravarasu
fs/binfmt_elf.c static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info · line 1697
Quoted 7 lines
fs/binfmt_elf.c +0
-0@@ -1695,30 +1695,19 @@ static int elf_note_info_init(struct elf_note_info *info)return 0 ; info->psinfo =kmalloc (sizeof (*info->psinfo),GFP_KERNEL );Why don't you change kmalloc to
devm_kzalloc, so that free can be ignored altogether.
Quoted 3 lines
kzalloc(), I guess...Still I can't understand what did you mean.
Denys explained me privately what did you mean.
Well. elf_core_dump() does a lot of kmalloc's. We should either change them all or nothing. And even if we do this, I think this particular patch makes sense anyway.
Not sure we want "struct device" for this, perhaps this devres code should be generalized somehow.
Oleg.