pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label
PATCH 1/1 pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label
A previous patch added the ac_draw_failed goto and label to pda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call to regulator_get().
However the way ac_draw is used - always after a check for NULL - suggests that a failed call to regulator_get() was not fatal.
This patch removes the ac_draw_failed goto and label, partly reverting the previous patch.
This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a failed call to regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.
--- drivers/power/pda_power.c | 3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/power/pda_power.c +0 -3
@@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ac_draw =regulator_get (dev,"ac_draw" );if (IS_ERR (ac_draw)) {dev_dbg (dev,"couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n" ); - ret =PTR_ERR (ac_draw); ac_draw =NULL ; - goto ac_draw_failed; }update_status ();
@@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:regulator_put (ac_draw); ac_draw =NULL ; } -ac_draw_failed:if (pdata->exit) pdata->exit (dev); init_failed:
Signature · 1 line
1.7.8.6
Quoted 24 lines · Paul Parsons
A previous patch added the
ac_draw_failedgoto and label topda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call toregulator_get().However the way
ac_drawis used - always after a check for NULL - suggests that a failed call toregulator_get()was not fatal.This patch removes the
ac_draw_failedgoto and label, partly reverting the previous patch.This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a failed call to
regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.Signed-off-by Paul Parsons <[email protected]>Cc Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>--- drivers/power/pda_power.c | 3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/power/pda_power.c +0
-0
drivers/power/pda_power.c static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 289
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/power/pda_power.c +0
-2@@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ac_draw =regulator_get (dev,"ac_draw" );if (IS_ERR (ac_draw)) {dev_dbg (dev,"couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n" ); - ret =PTR_ERR (ac_draw); ac_draw =NULL ; - goto ac_draw_failed;
For some reason you have a bit different code, so your patch is not based on the battery tree. (In my tree ret and ac_draw assignments are swapped.) Maybe that's because I had to manually redo your first patch...
Anyway, I repeated your patch by hand again and thus applied it.
Thank you!
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/power/pda_power.c +0
-1}update_status ();@@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:regulator_put (ac_draw); ac_draw =NULL ; } -ac_draw_failed:if (pdata->exit) pdata->exit (dev); init_failed:Signature · 1 line
1.7.8.6
Hello Anton,
Quoted 36 lines · Anton Vorontsov
Quoted 24 lines · Paul Parsons
A previous patch added the
ac_draw_failedgoto and label topda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call toregulator_get().However the way
ac_drawis used - always after a check for NULL - suggests that a failed call toregulator_get()was not fatal.This patch removes the
ac_draw_failedgoto and label, partly reverting the previous patch.This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a failed call to
regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.Signed-off-by Paul Parsons <[email protected]>Cc Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>--- drivers/power/pda_power.c | 3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/power/pda_power.c +0
-0drivers/power/pda_power.c static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) · line 289
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/power/pda_power.c +0
-2@@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ac_draw =regulator_get (dev,"ac_draw" );if (IS_ERR (ac_draw)) {dev_dbg (dev,"couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n" ); - ret =PTR_ERR (ac_draw); ac_draw =NULL ; - goto ac_draw_failed;For some reason you have a bit different code, so your patch is not based on the battery tree. (In my tree ret and
ac_drawassignments are swapped.) Maybe that's because I had to manually redo your first patch...
Quoted 1 line
Anyway, I repeated your patch by hand again and thus applied it.
Yes, in my first patch I had swapped the ret and ac_draw assignments when I moved the regulator_get() call to before the update_charger() call. This was because the original order of the assignments:
ac_draw = NULL;
ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);
is obviously incorrect; the ac_draw assignment overwrites the error code that should be returned by PTR_ERR().
Anyway, thank you for sorting this out!
Regards,
Paul
Quoted 15 lines
Thank you!
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/power/pda_power.c +0
-2}update_status ();@@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:regulator_put (ac_draw); ac_draw =NULL ; } -ac_draw_failed:if (pdata->exit) pdata->exit (dev); init_failed: --1.7.8.6