Skip to contentSkip to conversation

usb: host: xhci: New system added for Compliance Mode Patch on SN65LVPE502CP

PATCH In review Alexis R. Cortes 3 participants 3 messages Oct 17, 2012

Subsystems (2)
USB USB xHCI driver
lore
Share & tools
lore

Alexis R. Cortes

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 usb: host: xhci: New system added for Compliance Mode Patch on SN65LVPE502CP

This minor change adds a new system to which the "Fix Compliance Mode on SN65LVPE502CP Hardware" patch has to be applied also.

System added:
Vendor: Hewlett-Packard. System Model: Z1

Signed-off-by Alexis R. Cortes <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c +2 -1
index 8d7fcbb..7d462bf 100644
@@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ static bool compliance_mode_recovery_timer_quirk_check(void)
 
 	if (strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z420") ||
 			strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z620") ||
-			strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z820"))
+			strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z820") ||
+			strstr(dmi_product_name, "Z1"))
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Alexis R. Cortes

This minor change adds a new system to which the "Fix Compliance Mode on SN65LVPE502CP Hardware" patch has to be applied also.

System added:
Vendor: Hewlett-Packard. System Model: Z1

Signed-off-by Alexis R. Cortes <[email protected]>

Sarah, if you don't mind, I can take this one now, it's trivial enough. Want to give me your ack?

Also, I'm guessing that backporting it would be a good idea as well? I'll add the stable tree to it.

greg k-h

Acked-by
#2 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Greg KH
Quoted 7 lines · Alexis R. Cortes

This minor change adds a new system to which the "Fix Compliance Mode on SN65LVPE502CP Hardware" patch has to be applied also.

System added:
Vendor: Hewlett-Packard. System Model: Z1

Signed-off-by Alexis R. Cortes <[email protected]>

Sarah, if you don't mind, I can take this one now, it's trivial enough. Want to give me your ack?

Sure, looks fine.

Acked-by Sarah Sharp <[email protected]>
Quoted 2 lines

Also, I'm guessing that backporting it would be a good idea as well? I'll add the stable tree to it.

Yes, it should go back to stable trees as old as 3.2, since that was what commit 71c731a was marked for.

Sarah Sharp