ARM: Kirkwood: Use hw_pci.ops instead of hw_pci.scan
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: Kirkwood: Use hw_pci.ops instead of hw_pci.scan
The kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus function duplicates the common code in bios32.c, passing ops in will use the common code..
--- arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c | 18 +----------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Just a little clean up I found while reviewing the PCI-E code.
arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c +1 -17
@@ -224,22 +224,6 @@ static void __devinit rc_pci_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) }DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL ,PCI_ANY_ID , rc_pci_fixup); -static struct pci_bus __init * -kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus (int nr,struct pci_sys_data *sys) -{ -struct pci_bus *bus; - -if (nr < num_pcie_ports) { - bus =pci_scan_root_bus (NULL , sys->busnr, &pcie_ops, sys, - &sys->resources); - }else { - bus =NULL ; -BUG (); - } - -return bus; -} -static int __init kirkwood_pcie_map_irq (const struct pci_dev *dev,u8 slot,u8 pin) {
@@ -251,8 +235,8 @@ static int __init kirkwood_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot,static struct hw_pci kirkwood_pci__initdata = { .setup = kirkwood_pcie_setup, - .scan = kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus, .map_irq = kirkwood_pcie_map_irq, + .ops = &pcie_ops, };static void __init add_pcie_port (int index,void __iomem *base)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/1 ARM: Kirkwood: Use hw_pci.ops instead of hw_pci.scan
Quoted 9 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
The
kirkwood_pcie_scan_busfunction duplicates the common code inbios32.c, passing ops in will use the common code..Signed-off-by Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c | 18 +----------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)Just a little clean up I found while reviewing the PCI-E code.
Hi Jason
Have you tested this on a kirkwood platform? Its hard for me to test, i don't have a kirkwood with a used PICE slot.
Thanks
Andrew
Quoted 41 lines
arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c +1
-17@@ -224,22 +224,6 @@ static void __devinit rc_pci_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) }DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL ,PCI_ANY_ID , rc_pci_fixup); -static struct pci_bus __init * -kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus (int nr,struct pci_sys_data *sys) -{ -struct pci_bus *bus; - -if (nr < num_pcie_ports) { - bus =pci_scan_root_bus (NULL , sys->busnr, &pcie_ops, sys, - &sys->resources); - }else { - bus =NULL ; -BUG (); - } - -return bus; -} -static int __init kirkwood_pcie_map_irq (const struct pci_dev *dev,u8 slot,u8 pin) {@@ -251,8 +235,8 @@ static int __init kirkwood_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot,static struct hw_pci kirkwood_pci__initdata = { .setup = kirkwood_pcie_setup, - .scan = kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus, .map_irq = kirkwood_pcie_map_irq, + .ops = &pcie_ops, };static void __init add_pcie_port (int index,void __iomem *base)Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1
PATCH 1/1 ARM: Kirkwood: Use hw_pci.ops instead of hw_pci.scan
Quoted 8 lines · Andrew Lunn
Quoted 7 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
The
kirkwood_pcie_scan_busfunction duplicates the common code inbios32.c, passing ops in will use the common code..Signed-off-by Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c | 18 +----------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Just a little clean up I found while reviewing the PCI-E code.
Hi Jason
Have you tested this on a kirkwood platform? Its hard for me to test, i don't have a kirkwood with a used PICE slot.
Yes, I have a system that uses the PCI-E.
CPU: Feroceon 88FR131 [56251311] revision 1 (ARMv5TE), cr=00053977
Kirkwood: MV88F6282-Rev-A1, TCLK=200000000.
PCI: bus0 uses PCIe port 0
PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000-0xffff]pci_bus 0000:00: No busn resource found for root bus, will use [bus 00-ff] pci 0000:00:00.0: [11ab:6282] type 00 class 0x058000
pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 10: [mem 0xf1000000-0xf10fffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0x00000000-0x07ffffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1 D2
PCI: bus0: Fast back to back transfers disabledpci_bus 0000:00: busn_res: [bus 00-ff] end is updated to 00 pci 0000:00:01.0: [170c:0001] type 00 class 0x058000
pci 0000:00:01.0: reg 10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff]
pci 0000:00:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot
pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xe0000000-0xe000ffff]
PCI: enabling device 0000:00:01.0 (0000 -> 0002)
Jason
PATCH 1/1 ARM: Kirkwood: Use hw_pci.ops instead of hw_pci.scan
In reply to Jason GunthorpeQuoted 9 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
The
kirkwood_pcie_scan_busfunction duplicates the common code inbios32.c, passing ops in will use the common code..Signed-off-by Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c | 18 +----------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)Just a little clean up I found while reviewing the PCI-E code.
Andrew
Quoted 41 lines
arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/pcie.c +1
-17@@ -224,22 +224,6 @@ static void __devinit rc_pci_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) }DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER (PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL ,PCI_ANY_ID , rc_pci_fixup); -static struct pci_bus __init * -kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus (int nr,struct pci_sys_data *sys) -{ -struct pci_bus *bus; - -if (nr < num_pcie_ports) { - bus =pci_scan_root_bus (NULL , sys->busnr, &pcie_ops, sys, - &sys->resources); - }else { - bus =NULL ; -BUG (); - } - -return bus; -} -static int __init kirkwood_pcie_map_irq (const struct pci_dev *dev,u8 slot,u8 pin) {@@ -251,8 +235,8 @@ static int __init kirkwood_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot,static struct hw_pci kirkwood_pci__initdata = { .setup = kirkwood_pcie_setup, - .scan = kirkwood_pcie_scan_bus, .map_irq = kirkwood_pcie_map_irq, + .ops = &pcie_ops, };static void __init add_pcie_port (int index,void __iomem *base)Signature · 1 line
1.7.4.1