tty: Add driver unthrottle in ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..).
PATCH v4 1/1 tty: Add driver unthrottle in ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..).
Sorry. More correct.
Regression 'tty: fix "IRQ45: nobody cared"' Regression commit 7b292b4bf9a9d6098440d85616d6ca4c608b8304
Function reset_buffer_flags() also invoked during the ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..).
At the time of request we can have full buffers and throttled driver too. If we don't unthrottle driver, we can get forever throttled driver, because, after request, we will have empty buffers and throttled driver and there is no place to unthrottle driver.
It simple reproduce with "pty" pair then one side sleep on tty->write_wait, and other side do ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..). Then there is no place to do writers wake up.
---
drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c +6 -2
@@ -1096,12 +1096,16 @@ int tty_perform_flush(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned long arg) ld =tty_ldisc_ref_wait (tty);switch (arg) {case TCIFLUSH : -if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) +if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) { ld->ops->flush_buffer (tty); +tty_unthrottle (tty); + }break ;case TCIOFLUSH : -if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) +if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) { ld->ops->flush_buffer (tty); +tty_unthrottle (tty); + }/* fall through */ case TCOFLUSH :tty_driver_flush_buffer (tty);
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 1 line · Ilya Zykov
Sorry. More correct.
In what way? Should I wait for the 6th version? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 1 line · Ilya Zykov
Sorry. More correct.
In what way? Should I wait for the 6th version? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
No, if only you will accept:
[PATCH]tty: Incorrect use tty_ldisc_flush() in TTY drivers.
It can be done another way, simple revert:
'tty: fix "IRQ45: nobody cared"'
commit 7b292b4bf9a9d6098440d85616d6ca4c608b8304
Quoted 7 lines
No, if only you will accept:
[PATCH]tty: Incorrect usetty_ldisc_flush()in TTY drivers.It can be done another way, simple revert:
'tty: fix "IRQ45: nobody cared"'
commit7b292b4bf9a9d6098440d85616d6ca4c608b8304
NAK that revert - that swaps a minor glitch you've discovered that does want fixing for a nasty bug.
PATCH 1/1 tty: Add driver unthrottle in ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..).
Regression 'tty: fix "IRQ45: nobody cared"' Regression commit 7b292b4bf9a9d6098440d85616d6ca4c608b8304
Function reset_buffer_flags() also invoked during the ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..).
At the time of request we can have full buffers and throttled driver too. If we don't unthrottle driver, we can get forever throttled driver, because, after request, we will have empty buffers and throttled driver and there is no place to unthrottle driver.
It simple reproduce with "pty" pair then one side sleep on tty->write_wait, and other side do ioctl(...,TCFLSH,..). Then there is no place to do writers wake up.
--- drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c +6 -2
@@ -1096,12 +1096,16 @@ int tty_perform_flush(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned long arg) ld =tty_ldisc_ref_wait (tty);switch (arg) {case TCIFLUSH : -if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) +if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) { ld->ops->flush_buffer (tty); +tty_unthrottle (tty); + }break ;case TCIOFLUSH : -if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) +if (ld && ld->ops->flush_buffer) { ld->ops->flush_buffer (tty); +tty_unthrottle (tty); + }/* fall through */ case TCOFLUSH :tty_driver_flush_buffer (tty);