gru: fix a sanity test in gru_set_context_option()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 gru: fix a sanity test in gru_set_context_option()
"req.val1 = -1" is valid but it doesn't make sense to check gru_base[-1]. gru_base[] is a global array.
drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c +2 -1
@@ -876,7 +876,8 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long arg)switch (req.op) {case sco_blade_chiplet:/* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */ -if (req.val1 <-1 || req.val1 >=GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] || +if (req.val1 <-1 || req.val1 >=GRU_MAX_BLADES || + (req.val1 !=-1 && !gru_base[req.val1]) || req.val0 <-1 || req.val0 >=GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB ) { ret = -EINVAL ; }else {
Quoted 10 lines · Dan Carpenter
"req.val1 = -1" is valid but it doesn't make sense to check gru_base[-1]. gru_base[] is a global array.
Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c +0
-0
drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long arg) · line 883
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c +2
-1@@ -876,7 +876,8 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long arg)switch (req.op) {case sco_blade_chiplet:/* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */ -if (req.val1 <-1 || req.val1 >=GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] || +if (req.val1 <-1 || req.val1 >=GRU_MAX_BLADES || + (req.val1 !=-1 && !gru_base[req.val1]) || req.val0 <-1 || req.val0 >=GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB ) { ret = -EINVAL ; }else {
Since we're here, maybe we should neaten this up a little?
--- drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c =================================--- linux.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c +++ linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
@@ -876,8 +876,9 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long
switch (req.op) {
case sco_blade_chiplet:
/* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */
- if (req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] ||
- req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB) {
+ if (req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB ||+ req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES ||
+ (req.val1 >= 0 && !gru_base[req.val1])) {
ret = -EINVAL;
} else {
gts->ts_user_blade_id = req.val1;
Quoted 12 lines · Dimitri Sivanich
Since we're here, maybe we should neaten this up a little?
Signed-off-by Dimitri Sivanich <[email protected]>--- drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Index:
linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c=================================> ---linux.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c+++linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
Review int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long · line 882
Quoted 9 lines
(quoted diff) +3
-2@@ -876,8 +876,9 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long switch (req.op) { case sco_blade_chiplet: /* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */ - if (req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] || - req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB) { + if (req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB || + req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || + (req.val1 >= 0 && !gru_base[req.val1])) { ret = -EINVAL;
I generally prefer how in the original code all the sub conditions were aligned nicely but I will Ack your version as well. Thanks.
regards,
dan carpenter
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0} else { gts->ts_user_blade_id = req.val1;
Quoted 9 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 8 lines · Dimitri Sivanich
Since we're here, maybe we should neaten this up a little?
Signed-off-by Dimitri Sivanich <[email protected]>--- drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Quoted 17 lines
Review int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long · line 882
Quoted 13 lines
Index:
linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c=================================> > ---linux.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c+++linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c(quoted diff) +3
-2@@ -876,8 +876,9 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long switch (req.op) { case sco_blade_chiplet: /* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */ - if (req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] || - req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB) { + if (req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB || + req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || + (req.val1 >= 0 && !gru_base[req.val1])) { ret = -EINVAL;I generally prefer how in the original code all the sub conditions were aligned nicely but I will Ack your version as well. Thanks.
I guess I'd have to agree. How about this?
--- drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c =================================--- linux.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c +++ linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
@@ -876,8 +876,9 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long
switch (req.op) {
case sco_blade_chiplet:
/* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */
- if (req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] ||
- req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB) {
+ if (req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB ||
+ req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES ||+ (req.val1 >= 0 && !gru_base[req.val1])) {
ret = -EINVAL;
} else {
gts->ts_user_blade_id = req.val1;
Dan Carpenter
Acked-byQuoted 28 lines · Dimitri Sivanich
Quoted 9 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 8 lines · Dimitri Sivanich
Since we're here, maybe we should neaten this up a little?
Signed-off-by Dimitri Sivanich <[email protected]>--- drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Quoted 17 lines
Review int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long · line 882
Quoted 13 lines
Index:
linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c=================================> > > ---linux.orig/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c+++linux/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c(quoted diff) +3
-2@@ -876,8 +876,9 @@ int gru_set_context_option(unsigned long switch (req.op) { case sco_blade_chiplet: /* Select blade/chiplet for GRU context */ - if (req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || !gru_base[req.val1] || - req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB) { + if (req.val0 < -1 || req.val0 >= GRU_CHIPLETS_PER_HUB || + req.val1 < -1 || req.val1 >= GRU_MAX_BLADES || + (req.val1 >= 0 && !gru_base[req.val1])) { ret = -EINVAL;I generally prefer how in the original code all the sub conditions were aligned nicely but I will Ack your version as well. Thanks.
Quoted 1 line
I guess I'd have to agree. How about this?
Looks nice. Starting with zero is obviously better than the original.
regards,
dan carpenter