arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
PATCH 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
In e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out to map_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at the pmd_t immediately after the pmds we updated, and thus flush_pmd_entry(pmd) won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.
This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to flush_pmd_entry.
--- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +2 -1
@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p = pmd;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to
@@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end); -flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +flush_pmd_entry (p); } static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.1
PATCH 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
Quoted 34 lines · Mark Rutland
In
e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping inalloc_init_sectionfor unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out tomap_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at thepmd_timmediately after the pmds we updated, and thusflush_pmd_entry(pmd)won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to
flush_pmd_entry.Signed-off-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Cc R Sricharan <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Cc Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>Cc Russell King <[email protected]>Cc stable at vger.kernel.org--- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +1
-0@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p = pmd;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 645
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +1
-1@@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end); -flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +flush_pmd_entry (p); } static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
Refresh my memory here again, why are we not flushing every pmd entry we update? Is it because we assume the cache lines cover the maximum span between addr and end?
Theoretically, shouldn't you also increment p in the non-LPAE case?
-Christoffer
PATCH 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
Quoted 41 lines · Christoffer Dall
Quoted 40 lines · Mark Rutland
In
e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping inalloc_init_sectionfor unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out tomap_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at thepmd_timmediately after the pmds we updated, and thusflush_pmd_entry(pmd)won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to
flush_pmd_entry.Signed-off-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Cc R Sricharan <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Cc Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>Cc Russell King <[email protected]>Cc stable at vger.kernel.org--- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +2
-1@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p = pmd;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to @@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end); -flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +flush_pmd_entry (p); }
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 645
Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +0
-0static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,Refresh my memory here again, why are we not flushing every pmd entry we update? Is it because we assume the cache lines cover the maximum span between addr and end?
Yup, we assume a minimum cache line size of 8 bytes. I'm not so keen on this, but I suspect others might not be happy with moving the flush into the loop.
Quoted 2 lines
Theoretically, shouldn't you also increment p in the non-LPAE case?
Yes, I should. v2 shortly...
Thanks,
Mark.
PATCH 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
Quoted 49 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 41 lines · Christoffer Dall
Quoted 40 lines · Mark Rutland
In
e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping inalloc_init_sectionfor unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out tomap_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at thepmd_timmediately after the pmds we updated, and thusflush_pmd_entry(pmd)won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to
flush_pmd_entry.Signed-off-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Cc R Sricharan <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Cc Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>Cc Russell King <[email protected]>Cc stable at vger.kernel.org--- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +2
-1@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p = pmd;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to @@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end); -flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +flush_pmd_entry (p); }Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 645
Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +0
-0static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,Refresh my memory here again, why are we not flushing every pmd entry we update? Is it because we assume the cache lines cover the maximum span between addr and end?
Quoted 3 lines
Yup, we assume a minimum cache line size of 8 bytes. I'm not so keen on this, but I suspect others might not be happy with moving the flush into the loop.
A comment on the call to flush_pmd_entry could solve it.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Theoretically, shouldn't you also increment p in the non-LPAE case?
Yes, I should. v2 shortly...
Thanks,
Mark.
PATCH v2 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
In e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out to map_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at the pmd_t immediately after the pmds we updated, and thus flush_pmd_entry(pmd) won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.
This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to flush_pmd_entry.
---
Since v1:
* Take the incremented value of pmd for !LPAE.
* Comment why only one cache flush is necessary.
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +8 -1
@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to
@@ -633,12 +634,18 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,if (addr &SECTION_SIZE ) pmd++;#endif + p = pmd; +do { *pmd =__pmd (phys | type->prot_sect); phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end); -flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +/* +* We expect a minimum cache line of 8 bytes, so this will flush both +* pmd entries with classic tables, and will be a nop for LPAE systems. +*/ +flush_pmd_entry (p); } static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.1
PATCH v2 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
Quoted 47 lines · Mark Rutland
In
e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping inalloc_init_sectionfor unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out tomap_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at thepmd_timmediately after the pmds we updated, and thusflush_pmd_entry(pmd)won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to
flush_pmd_entry.Signed-off-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Cc R Sricharan <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Cc Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>Cc Russell King <[email protected]>Cc stable at vger.kernel.org---
Since v1:
* Take the incremented value of pmd for !LPAE.
* Comment why only one cache flush is necessary.arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +3
-0@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to @@ -633,12 +634,18 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,if (addr &SECTION_SIZE ) pmd++;#endif + p = pmd; +do { *pmd =__pmd (phys | type->prot_sect); phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end);
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 651
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +5
-1-flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +/* +* We expect a minimum cache line of 8 bytes, so this will flush both +* pmd entries with classic tables, and will be a nop for LPAE systems. +*/ +flush_pmd_entry (p); } static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
PATCH v2 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
In reply to Mark RutlandQuoted 10 lines · Mark Rutland
In
e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping inalloc_init_sectionfor unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out tomap_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at thepmd_timmediately after the pmds we updated, and thusflush_pmd_entry(pmd)won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to
flush_pmd_entry.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Cc R Sricharan <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Cc Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>Cc Russell King <[email protected]>Cc stable at vger.kernel.org
PATCH 1/1 arm: fix pmd flushing in map_init_section
In reply to Christoffer DallQuoted 41 lines · Christoffer Dall
Quoted 40 lines · Mark Rutland
In
e651eab0af: "ARM: 7677/1: LPAE: Fix mapping inalloc_init_sectionfor unaligned addresses", the pmd flushing was broken when split out tomap_init_section. At the end of the final iteration of the while loop, pmd will point at thepmd_timmediately after the pmds we updated, and thusflush_pmd_entry(pmd)won't flush the newly modified pmds. This has been observed to prevent an 11MPCore system from booting.This patch fixes this by remembering the address of the first pmd we update and using this as the argument to
flush_pmd_entry.Signed-off-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>Cc R Sricharan <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Cc Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>Cc Russell King <[email protected]>Cc stable at vger.kernel.org--- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +2
-1@@ -620,6 +620,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys, const struct mem_type *type) { + pmd_t *p = pmd;#ifndef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE /* * In classic MMU format, puds and pmds are folded in to @@ -638,7 +639,7 @@ static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, phys +=SECTION_SIZE ; }while (pmd++, addr +=SECTION_SIZE , addr != end); -flush_pmd_entry (pmd); +flush_pmd_entry (p); }
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c static void __init map_init_section(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 645
Quoted 2 lines
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +0
-0static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,Refresh my memory here again, why are we not flushing every pmd entry we update? Is it because we assume the cache lines cover the maximum span between addr and end?
Theoretically, shouldn't you also increment p in the non-LPAE case?
It wouldn't make any difference. With classic MMU we assume that we write 2 pmds at the same time (to form a pgd covering 2MB) but the above increment is a workaround to only allow 1MB section mappings. Either way, it's harmless.
Signature · 1 line
Catalin