dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on virt_dma
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt | 44 ++ drivers/dma/Kconfig | 9 + drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 + drivers/dma/k3dma.c | 794 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 848 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt create mode 100644 drivers/dma/k3dma.c
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt new file +44 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +* Hisilicon K3 DMA controller + +See dma.txt first + +Required properties: +- compatible: Should be "hisilicon,k3-dma-1.0" +- reg: Should contain DMA registers location and length. +- interrupts: Should contain one interrupt shared by all channel +- #dma-cells: see dma.txt, should be 1, para number +- dma-channels: virtual channels supported, each virtual channel + have specific request line +- clocks: clock required + +Example: + +Controller: + dma0: dma at fcd02000 { + compatible = "hisilicon,k3-dma-1.0"; + reg = <0xfcd02000 0x1000>; + #dma-cells = <1>; + dma-channels = <27>; + interrupts = <0 12 4>; + clocks = <&pclk>; + status = "disable"; + }; + +Client: +Use specific request line passing from dmax +For example, i2c0 read channel request line is 18, while write channel use 19 + + i2c0: i2c at fcb08000 { + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; + dmas = <&dma0 18 /* read channel */ + &dma0 19>; /* write channel */ + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at fcb09000 { + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; + dmas = <&dma0 20 /* read channel */ + &dma0 21>; /* write channel */ + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; + }; +
drivers/dma/Kconfig +9 -0
@@ -312,6 +312,15 @@ config MMP_PDMA help Support the MMP PDMA engine for PXA and MMP platfrom. +config K3_DMA + tristate "Hisilicon K3 DMA support" + depends on ARCH_HI3xxx + select DMA_ENGINE + select DMA_VIRTUAL_CHANNELS + help + Support the DMA engine for Hisilicon K3 platform + devices. + config DMA_ENGINE bool
drivers/dma/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -38,3 +38,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_SA11X0) += sa11x0-dma.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMP_TDMA) += mmp_tdma.o obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_OMAP) += omap-dma.o obj-$(CONFIG_MMP_PDMA) += mmp_pdma.o +obj-$(CONFIG_K3_DMA) += k3dma.o
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +794 -0
794 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on
virt_dmaSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Tested-by Kai Yang <[email protected]>
Quoted 39 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt new file +33
-0@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +* Hisilicon K3 DMA controller + +See dma.txt first + +Required properties: +- compatible: Should be "hisilicon,k3-dma-1.0" +- reg: Should contain DMA registers location and length. +- interrupts: Should contain one interrupt shared by all channel +- #dma-cells: see dma.txt, should be 1, para number +- dma-channels: virtual channels supported, each virtual channel + have specific request line +- clocks: clock required + +Example: + +Controller: + dma0: dma at fcd02000 { + compatible = "hisilicon,k3-dma-1.0"; + reg = <0xfcd02000 0x1000>; + #dma-cells = <1>; + dma-channels = <27>; + interrupts = <0 12 4>; + clocks = <&pclk>; + status = "disable"; + }; + +Client: +Use specific request line passing from dmax +For example, i2c0 read channel request line is 18, while write channel use 19 + + i2c0: i2c at fcb08000 { + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; + dmas = <&dma0 18 /* read channel */
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt line 43
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt new file +10
-0+ &dma0 19>; /* write channel */ + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; + }; + + i2c1: i2c at fcb09000 { + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c"; + dmas = <&dma0 20 /* read channel */ + &dma0 21>; /* write channel */ + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; + };
The binding looks good to me.
I'd like to make sure the "dma-channels" property is right though:
You specify that number in DT but ...
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt new file +3
-0+#define DRIVER_NAME "k3-dma" +#define NR_PHY_CHAN 16 +#define DMA_ALIGN 3
... you also hardcode the number to 16. Shouldn't the channels be allocated dynamically based on the dma-channels property?
You do allocate "virtual channels" based on the "dma-channels" later. Wouldn't that be request line numbers, i.e. "dma-requests" rather than "dma-channels"?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt new file +5
-0+static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; +static bool k3_dma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param) +{ + return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id); +}
This filter function works only as long as there is no more than one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and code complexity without any need.
How about something like
int dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
{
/* lock against __dma_request_channel */
mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
if (chan->client_count == 0)
ret = dma_chan_get(chan);
else
ret = -EBUSY;
mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
return ret;
}EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt
Quoted 13 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/k3dma.txt new file +13
-0+ /* init virtual channel */ + for (i = 0; i < dma_channels; i++) { + struct k3_dma_chan *c; + + c = devm_kzalloc(&op->dev, + sizeof(struct k3_dma_chan), GFP_KERNEL); + if (c == NULL) + return -ENOMEM; + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->node); + c->vc.desc_free = k3_dma_free_desc; + vchan_init(&c->vc, &d->slave); + }
Note that a single devm_kzalloc would be slightly more space efficient here.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 7 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on
virt_dmaSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Tested-by Kai Yang <[email protected]>Acked-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Thanks Arnd
Quoted 10 lines
I'd like to make sure the "dma-channels" property is right though:
You specify that number in DT but ...drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 29
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +3
-0+#define DRIVER_NAME "k3-dma" +#define NR_PHY_CHAN 16 +#define DMA_ALIGN 3... you also hardcode the number to 16. Shouldn't the channels be allocated dynamically based on the dma-channels property?
Quoted 3 lines
You do allocate "virtual channels" based on the "dma-channels" later. Wouldn't that be request line numbers, i.e. "dma-requests" rather than "dma-channels"?
Ya, I made misunderstood, thanks for point out.
- dma-channels: Number of DMA channels supported by the controller.
- dma-requests: Number of DMA requests signals supported by the
controller.
So dma-channels is physical channel num, while dma-requests is virtual channel num.
Will update.
Quoted 34 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 606
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +5
-0+static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; +static bool k3_dma_filter_fn (struct dma_chan *chan,void *param) +{ +return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id); +}This filter function works only as long as there is no more than one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and code complexity without any need.
How about something like
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex); return ret; }
Quoted 1 line
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
Want to double check here.
Device need specific channel via request line, the requirement still can be met, right?
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +3
-0+/* init virtual channel */ +for (i =0 ; i < dma_channels; i++) { +struct k3_dma_chan *c;drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 680
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+ + c =devm_kzalloc (&op->dev, +sizeof (struct k3_dma_chan ),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (c ==NULL ) +return -ENOMEM ; + +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&c->node); + c->vc.desc_free = k3_dma_free_desc; +vchan_init (&c->vc, &d->slave); + }Note that a single
devm_kzallocwould be slightly more space efficient here.
Got it.
Thanks
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 33 lines · zhangfei gao
Quoted 32 lines · Arnd Bergmann
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 606
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +5
-0+static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; +static bool k3_dma_filter_fn (struct dma_chan *chan,void *param) +{ +return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id); +}This filter function works only as long as there is no more than one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and code complexity without any need.
How about something like
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
return ret; }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);Want to double check here.
Device need specific channel via request line, the requirement still can be met, right?
The driver can have a simple array of pointers that is indexed by the request number, so you end up with something like
struct dma_chan *of_dma_simple_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
struct of_dma *ofdma)
{
struct k3_dma_dev *dev = ofdma->of_dma_data;
unsigned int vchan = dma_spec->args[0];
if (vchan > dev->nr_channels)
return NULL;
return dma_get_slave_channel(dev->vchan[vchan]);
}With no need to have a filter function.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 57 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 33 lines · zhangfei gao
Quoted 32 lines · Arnd Bergmann
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 606
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +5
-0+static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; +static bool k3_dma_filter_fn (struct dma_chan *chan,void *param) +{ +return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id); +}This filter function works only as long as there is no more than one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and code complexity without any need.
How about something like
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
return ret; }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);Want to double check here.
Device need specific channel via request line, the requirement still can be met, right?The driver can have a simple array of pointers that is indexed by the request number, so you end up with something like
struct
dma_chan*of_dma_simple_xlate(structof_phandle_args*dma_spec,
structof_dma*ofdma){ struct k3_dma_dev *dev = ofdma->of_dma_data; unsigned int vchan = dma_spec->args[0]; if (vchan > dev->nr_channels) return NULL; return dma_get_slave_channel(dev->vchan[vchan]); }
Quoted 1 line
With no need to have a filter function.
Cool, then I would like to wait for the patch.
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 3 lines · On Tuesday 18 June 2013 22:22:17 zhangfei wrote:
Quoted 1 line
With no need to have a filter function.
Cool, then I would like to wait for the patch.
Maybe you can try to add the dma_get_slave_channel() function I proposed here as a first patch and add your driver on top. There may be issues I missed, and Vinod needs to agree to the concept first, but that would probably get his attention.
Or you could send your the new interface as an add-on patch and convert your driver along with adding it.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 9 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 3 lines · On Tuesday 18 June 2013 22:22:17 zhangfei wrote:
Quoted 1 line
With no need to have a filter function.
Cool, then I would like to wait for the patch.
Maybe you can try to add the
dma_get_slave_channel()function I proposed here as a first patch and add your driver on top. There may be issues I missed, and Vinod needs to agree to the concept first, but that would probably get his attention.
You have it now :)
Quoted 3 lines
Or you could send your the new interface as an add-on patch and convert your driver along with adding it.
patch is always welcome
--
~Vinod
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
In reply to Arnd BergmannQuoted 57 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 33 lines · zhangfei gao
Quoted 32 lines · Arnd Bergmann
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 606
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +5
-0+static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; +static bool k3_dma_filter_fn (struct dma_chan *chan,void *param) +{ +return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id); +}This filter function works only as long as there is no more than one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and code complexity without any need.
How about something like
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
return ret; }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);Want to double check here.
Device need specific channel via request line, the requirement still can be met, right?The driver can have a simple array of pointers that is indexed by the request number, so you end up with something like
struct
dma_chan*of_dma_simple_xlate(structof_phandle_args*dma_spec,
structof_dma*ofdma){ struct k3_dma_dev *dev = ofdma->of_dma_data; unsigned int vchan = dma_spec->args[0]; if (vchan > dev->nr_channels) return NULL; return dma_get_slave_channel(dev->vchan[vchan]); }
Quoted 1 line
With no need to have a filter function.
for SW muxes this may work well IMO
--
~Vinod
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
In reply to Arnd BergmannQuoted 36 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 4 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on
virt_dmaSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Tested-by Kai Yang <[email protected]>Acked-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>This filter function works only as long as there is no more than one DMA engine in the system, which is something that needs to be documented better. Unfortunately, providing a filter function to be called by .xlate is currently the only way that the dma-engine API supports, but we should really get over that.
Vinod: I think we need to add a way for a dmaengine driver to just return one of its channels to the xlate function. The current method is getting very silly, and it adds run-time and code complexity without any need.
How about something like
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex); return ret; }
Quoted 1 line
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
and you add filter on top?
This is getting you any channel and maynot work where we need to do some filtering.
--
~vinod
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 13 lines · Vinod Koul
Quoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 17 June 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY;
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex); return ret; }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);and you add filter on top?
No, the idea is to no longer require a filter function when we use dma_request_slave_channel with a DT specifier.
Quoted 2 lines
This is getting you any channel and maynot work where we need to do some filtering.
This function would be called only by the dmaengine driver's xlate function. That driver obviously has to ensure that the channel works for the specification from DT (or ACPI or something else), but that part is easy, since that is the same information that we currently pass into the filter function.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 27 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 13 lines · Vinod Koul
Quoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 17 June 2013, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
int
dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan){ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex); if (chan->client_count == 0) ret = dma_chan_get(chan); else ret = -EBUSY;Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex); return ret; }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);and you add filter on top?
No, the idea is to no longer require a filter function when we use
dma_request_slave_channelwith a DT specifier.Quoted 2 lines
This is getting you any channel and maynot work where we need to do some filtering.
Quoted 7 lines
This function would be called only by the dmaengine driver's xlate function. That driver obviously has to ensure that the channel works for the specification from DT (or ACPI or something else), but that part is easy, since that is the same information that we currently pass into the filter function.
Dear Arnd & Vinod
The suggestion of using dma_get_slave_channel instead of filter works here. Dma driver should modify accordingly.
Here is draft patch:
drivers/dma/dmaengine.c +0 -0
@@ -504,6 +504,32 @@ static struct dma_chan *private_candidate(const
dma_cap_mask_t *mask,
}
/**
+ * dma_request_channel - try to get specific channel exclusively
+ * @chan: target channel
+ */
+struct dma_chan *dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan) +{
+ int err = -EBUSY;
+
+ /* lock against __dma_request_channel */
+ mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
+
+ if (chan->client_count == 0)
+ err = dma_chan_get(chan);
+ else
+ chan = NULL;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
+
+ if (err)
+ pr_debug("%s: failed to get %s: (%d)\n",
+ __func__, dma_chan_name(chan), err);
+
+ return chan;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
+
+/**
* dma_request_channel - try to allocate an exclusive channel
* @mask: capabilities that the channel must satisfy
* @fn: optional callback to disposition available channels
drivers/dma/k3dma.c +3 -2
@@ -99,9 +99,11 @@ struct k3_dma_dev {spinlock_t lock;struct list_head chan_pending;struct k3_dma_phy *phy; +struct k3_dma_chan *chans;struct dma_pool *pool;struct clk *clk;u32 dma_channels; +u32 dma_requests; };#define to_k3_dma (dmadev) container_of(dmadev, struct k3_dma_dev, slave)
@@ -599,10 +601,17 @@ static struct of_device_id k3_pdma_dt_ids[] = { };MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, k3_pdma_dt_ids); -static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; -static bool k3_dma_filter_fn (struct dma_chan *chan,void *param) +static struct dma_chan *k3_of_dma_simple_xlate(struct of_phandle_args
*dma_spec,
+ struct of_dma *ofdma)
{
- return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id);
+ struct k3_dma_dev *d = ofdma->of_dma_data;
+ unsigned int request = dma_spec->args[0];
+
+ if (request > d->dma_requests)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return dma_get_slave_channel(&(d->chans[request].vc.chan)); }
static int k3_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
@@ -611,8 +620,6 @@ static int k3_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
const struct of_device_id *of_id;
struct resource *iores;
int i, ret, irq = 0;
- int dma_requests = 0;
- struct k3_dma_chan *chans;
iores = platform_get_resource(op, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
if (!iores)
@@ -631,7 +638,7 @@ static int k3_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
of_property_read_u32((&op->dev)->of_node,
"dma-channels", &d->dma_channels); of_property_read_u32((&op->dev)->of_node,
- "dma-requests", &dma_requests);
+ "dma-requests", &d->dma_requests);
}
d->clk = devm_clk_get(&op->dev, NULL);
@@ -672,16 +679,16 @@ static int k3_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
d->slave.device_issue_pending = k3_dma_issue_pending; d->slave.device_control = k3_dma_control; d->slave.copy_align = DMA_ALIGN;
- d->slave.chancnt = dma_requests;
+ d->slave.chancnt = d->dma_requests;
/* init virtual channel */
- chans = devm_kzalloc(&op->dev,
- dma_requests * sizeof(struct k3_dma_chan), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (chans == NULL)
+ d->chans = devm_kzalloc(&op->dev,
+ d->dma_requests * sizeof(struct k3_dma_chan), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (d->chans == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; i < dma_requests; i++) {
- struct k3_dma_chan *c = &chans[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < d->dma_requests; i++) {
+ struct k3_dma_chan *c = &d->chans[i];
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&c->node);
c->vc.desc_free = k3_dma_free_desc;
@@ -707,9 +714,8 @@ static int k3_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
if (ret)
goto of_dma_register_fail;
- k3_dma_filter.dma_cap = d->slave.cap_mask;
- k3_dma_filter.filter_fn = k3_dma_filter_fn;
- ret = of_dma_controller_register((&op->dev)->of_node, of_dma_simple_xlate, &k3_dma_filter);
+ ret = of_dma_controller_register((&op->dev)->of_node,
+ k3_of_dma_simple_xlate, d);
if (ret)
goto dma_async_regitster_fail;
include/linux/dmaengine.h +1 -0
@@ -1000,6 +1000,7 @@ int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device);void dma_async_device_unregister (struct dma_device *device);void dma_run_dependencies (struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx);struct dma_chan *dma_find_channel (enum dma_transaction_type tx_type); +struct dma_chan *dma_get_slave_channel (struct dma_chan *chan);struct dma_chan *net_dma_find_channel (void );#define dma_request_channel (mask, x, y) __dma_request_channel(&(mask), x, y)#define dma_request_slave_channel_compat (mask, x, y, dev, name) \
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 5 lines · On Monday 24 June 2013 16:49:08 zhangfei gao wrote:
Dear Arnd & Vinod
The suggestion of using
dma_get_slave_channelinstead of filter works here. Dma driver should modify accordingly.
The changes all look good to me, thanks a lot for following up!
However, you should really follow the procedure for posting patches even if it's just for the sake of discussion:
* always provide a signed-off-by and a patch description
* use an email client that doesn't break whitespace
* I would have split this up into two separate patches, one for the subsystem and one for the new driver.
Arnd
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 9 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 5 lines · On Monday 24 June 2013 16:49:08 zhangfei gao wrote:
Dear Arnd & Vinod
The suggestion of using
dma_get_slave_channelinstead of filter works here. Dma driver should modify accordingly.The changes all look good to me, thanks a lot for following up!
Quoted 7 lines
However, you should really follow the procedure for posting patches even if it's just for the sake of discussion:
* always provide a signed-off-by and a patch description
* use an email client that doesn't break whitespace
* I would have split this up into two separate patches, one for the subsystem and one for the new driver.
Thanks Arnd for for kind education,
Will send two patches, one is subsystem, the other is updated host driver.
Thanks
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
In reply to Zhangfei GaoQuoted 5 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on
virt_dmaSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Tested-by Kai Yang <[email protected]>---
[snip]
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 114
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +8
-0+#define to_k3_dma (dmadev) container_of(dmadev, struct k3_dma_dev, slave) + +static struct k3_dma_chan *to_k3_chan (struct dma_chan *chan) +{ + return container_of(chan, struct k3_dma_chan, vc.chan); +} + +static void terminate_chan (struct k3_dma_phy *phy,struct k3_dma_dev *d)
namespace pls
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +4
-0+{ +u32 val =0 ; + + val =readl_relaxed (phy->base +CX_CONFIG );
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 128
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+ val &= ~CCFG_EN ; +writel_relaxed (val, phy->base +CX_CONFIG ); + + val =0x1 << phy->idx; +writel_relaxed (val, d->base +INT_TC1_RAW ); +writel_relaxed (val, d->base +INT_ERR1_RAW ); +writel_relaxed (val, d->base +INT_ERR2_RAW ); +} + +static void set_desc (struct k3_dma_phy *phy,struct k3_desc_hw *hw)
namespace pls
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 137
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +9
-0+{ +writel_relaxed (hw->lli, phy->base +CX_LLI ); +writel_relaxed (hw->count, phy->base +CX_CNT ); +writel_relaxed (hw->saddr, phy->base +CX_SRC ); +writel_relaxed (hw->daddr, phy->base +CX_DST ); +writel_relaxed (hw->config, phy->base +CX_CONFIG ); +} + +static u32 get_curr_cnt (struct k3_dma_dev *d,struct k3_dma_phy *phy)
ditto
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +9
-0+{ +u32 cnt =0 ; + + cnt =readl_relaxed (d->base +CX_CUR_CNT + phy->idx *0x10 ); + cnt &=0xffff ; +return cnt; +} + +static u32 get_curr_lli (struct k3_dma_phy *phy)
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 156
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+{ +return readl_relaxed (phy->base +CX_LLI ); +} + +static u32 get_chan_stat (struct k3_dma_dev *d) +{ +return readl_relaxed (d->base +CH_STAT ); +} + +static void trigger_dma (struct k3_dma_dev *d,bool on)
ditto
Quoted 79 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +79
-0+{ +if (on) { +/* set same priority */ +writel_relaxed (0x0 , d->base +CH_PRI ); + +/* unmask irq */ +writel_relaxed (0xffff , d->base +INT_TC1_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (0xffff , d->base +INT_ERR1_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (0xffff , d->base +INT_ERR2_MASK ); + }else { +/* mask irq */ +writel_relaxed (0x0 , d->base +INT_TC1_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (0x0 , d->base +INT_ERR1_MASK ); +writel_relaxed (0x0 , d->base +INT_ERR2_MASK ); + } +} + +static irqreturn_t k3_dma_int_handler (int irq,void *dev_id) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d = (struct k3_dma_dev *)dev_id; +struct k3_dma_phy *p; +u32 stat =readl_relaxed (d->base +INT_STAT ); +u32 tc1 =readl_relaxed (d->base +INT_TC1 ); +u32 err1 =readl_relaxed (d->base +INT_ERR1 ); +u32 err2 =readl_relaxed (d->base +INT_ERR2 ); +u32 i, irq_chan =0 ; + +while (stat) { + i =__ffs (stat); + stat &= (stat -1 ); +if (likely (tc1 &BIT (i))) { + p = &d->phy[i]; + p->ds_done = p->ds_run; +vchan_cookie_complete (&p->ds_run->vd); + irq_chan |=BIT (i); + } +if (unlikely ((err1 &BIT (i)) || (err2 &BIT (i)))) +dev_warn (d->slave.dev,"DMA ERR\n" ); + } + +writel_relaxed (irq_chan, d->base +INT_TC1_RAW ); +writel_relaxed (err1, d->base +INT_ERR1_RAW ); +writel_relaxed (err2, d->base +INT_ERR2_RAW ); + +if (irq_chan) { +tasklet_schedule (&d->task); +return IRQ_HANDLED ; + }else +return IRQ_NONE ; +} + +static int k3_dma_start_txd (struct k3_dma_chan *c) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (c->vc.chan.device); +struct virt_dma_desc *vd =vchan_next_desc (&c->vc); + +if (BIT (c->phy->idx) &get_chan_stat (d)) +return -EAGAIN ; + +if (vd) { +struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds = + container_of(vd, struct k3_dma_desc_sw, vd); +/* +* fetch and remove request from vc->desc_issued +* so vc->desc_issued only contains desc pending +*/ +list_del (&ds->vd.node); + c->phy->ds_run = ds; + c->phy->ds_done =NULL ; +/* start dma */ +set_desc (c->phy, &ds->desc_hw[0 ]); +return 0 ; + } + c->phy->ds_done =NULL ; + c->phy->ds_run =NULL ; +return -EAGAIN ; +} + +static void k3_dma_tasklet (unsigned long arg)
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 245
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d = (struct k3_dma_dev *)arg; +struct k3_dma_phy *p; +struct k3_dma_chan *c; +unsigned pch, pch_alloc =0 ; + +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"tasklet enter\n" ); + +/* check new dma request of running channel in vc->desc_issued */ +list_for_each_entry (c, &d->slave.channels, vc.chan.device_node) {
this should use _safe, you might be adding a new txn while executing this
Quoted 156 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +156
-0+spin_lock_irq (&c->vc.lock); + p = c->phy; +if (p && p->ds_done) { +if (k3_dma_start_txd (c)) { +/* No current txd associated with this channel */ +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"pchan %u: free\n" , p->idx); +/* Mark this channel free */ + c->phy =NULL ; + p->vchan =NULL ; + } + } +spin_unlock_irq (&c->vc.lock); + } + +/* check new channel request in d->chan_pending */ +spin_lock_irq (&d->lock); +for (pch =0 ; pch <NR_PHY_CHAN ; pch++) { + p = &d->phy[pch]; + +if (p->vchan ==NULL && !list_empty (&d->chan_pending)) { + c =list_first_entry (&d->chan_pending, + struct k3_dma_chan, node); +/* remove from d->chan_pending */ +list_del_init (&c->node); + + pch_alloc |=1 << pch; + +/* Mark this channel allocated */ + p->vchan = c; +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"pchan %u: alloc vchan %p\n" , pch, &c->vc); + } + } +spin_unlock_irq (&d->lock); + +for (pch =0 ; pch <NR_PHY_CHAN ; pch++) { +if (pch_alloc & (1 << pch)) { + p = &d->phy[pch]; + c = p->vchan; +spin_lock_irq (&c->vc.lock); + c->phy = p; +k3_dma_start_txd (c); +spin_unlock_irq (&c->vc.lock); + } + } + +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"tasklet exit\n" ); +} + +static int k3_dma_alloc_chan_resources (struct dma_chan *chan) +{ +return 0 ; +} + +static void k3_dma_free_chan_resources (struct dma_chan *chan) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&d->lock, flags); +list_del_init (&c->node); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&d->lock, flags); + +vchan_free_chan_resources (&c->vc); + c->ccfg =0 ; +} + +static enum dma_status k3_dma_tx_status (struct dma_chan *chan, +dma_cookie_t cookie,struct dma_tx_state *state) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +struct k3_dma_phy *p; +struct virt_dma_desc *vd; +unsigned long flags; +enum dma_status ret; +size_t bytes =0 ; + + ret =dma_cookie_status (&c->vc.chan, cookie, state); +if (ret ==DMA_SUCCESS ) +return ret; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&c->vc.lock, flags); + p = c->phy; + +/* +* If the cookie is on our issue queue, then the residue is +* its total size. +*/ + vd =vchan_find_desc (&c->vc, cookie); +if (vd) { + bytes = container_of(vd, struct k3_dma_desc_sw, vd)->size; + }else if ((!p) || (!p->ds_run)) { + bytes =0 ; + }else { +struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds = p->ds_run; +u32 clli =0 , index =0 ; + + bytes =get_curr_cnt (d, p); + clli =get_curr_lli (p); + index = (clli - ds->desc_hw_lli) /sizeof (struct k3_desc_hw ); +for (; index <LLI_MAX_NUM ; index++) { + bytes += ds->desc_hw[index].count; +/* end of lli */ +if (!ds->desc_hw[index].lli) +break ; + } + } +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&c->vc.lock, flags); +dma_set_residue (state, bytes); +return ret; +} + +static void k3_dma_issue_pending (struct dma_chan *chan) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&c->vc.lock, flags); +/* add request to vc->desc_issued */ +if (vchan_issue_pending (&c->vc)) { +if (!c->phy) { +spin_lock (&d->lock); +if (list_empty (&c->node)) { +/* if new channel, add chan_pending */ +list_add_tail (&c->node, &d->chan_pending); +/* check in tasklet */ +tasklet_schedule (&d->task); +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"vchan %p: issued\n" , &c->vc); + } +spin_unlock (&d->lock); + } + }else +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"vchan %p: nothing to issue\n" , &c->vc); +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&c->vc.lock, flags); +} + +static void k3_fill_desc (struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds,dma_addr_t dst, +dma_addr_t src,size_t len,u32 num,u32 ccfg) +{ +BUG_ON (num >=LLI_MAX_NUM ); + + ds->desc_hw[num].lli = ds->desc_hw_lli + (num +1 ) * +sizeof (struct k3_desc_hw ); + ds->desc_hw[num].lli |=CX_LLI_CHAIN_EN ; + ds->desc_hw[num].count = len; + ds->desc_hw[num].saddr = src; + ds->desc_hw[num].daddr = dst; + ds->desc_hw[num].config = ccfg; +} + +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *k3_dma_prep_memcpy ( +struct dma_chan *chan,dma_addr_t dst,dma_addr_t src, +size_t len,unsigned long flags) +{
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 411
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds; +size_t copy =0 ; +int num_desc =0 ; + +if (!len) +return NULL ; + + ds =kzalloc (sizeof (struct k3_dma_desc_sw ),GFP_NOWAIT );
sizeof (* ds) would be a better approach
Quoted 46 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +46
-0+if (!ds) { +dev_dbg (chan->device->dev,"vchan %p: kzalloc fail\n" , &c->vc); +return NULL ; + } + + ds->desc_hw =dma_pool_alloc (d->pool,GFP_NOWAIT , &ds->desc_hw_lli); +if (!ds->desc_hw) { +kfree (ds); +dev_dbg (chan->device->dev,"vchan %p: poolalloc fail\n" , &c->vc); +return NULL ; + } + ds->size = len; + +if (!c->ccfg) { +/* default is memtomem, without calling device_control */ + c->ccfg =CCFG_SRCINCR |CCFG_DSTINCR |CCFG_EN ; + c->ccfg |= (0xf <<20 ) | (0xf <<24 );/* burst = 16 */ + c->ccfg |= (0x3 <<12 ) | (0x3 <<16 );/* width = 64 bit */ + } + +do { + copy =min_t (size_t, len,DMA_MAX_SIZE ); +k3_fill_desc (ds, dst, src, copy, num_desc++, c->ccfg); + +if (c->dir ==DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ) { + src += copy; + }else if (c->dir ==DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ) { + dst += copy; + }else { + src += copy; + dst += copy; + } + len -= copy; + }while (len); + +/* end of link */ + ds->desc_hw[num_desc-1 ].lli =0 ; +return vchan_tx_prep (&c->vc, &ds->vd, flags); +} + +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *k3_dma_prep_slave_sg ( +struct dma_chan *chan,struct scatterlist *sgl,unsigned int sglen, +enum dma_transfer_direction dir,unsigned long flags,void *context) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device);
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 467
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds; +size_t len, avail, total =0 ; +struct scatterlist *sg; +dma_addr_t addr, src =0 , dst =0 ; +int num_desc =0 , i; + +if (sgl ==0 ) +return NULL ; + + ds =kzalloc (sizeof (struct k3_dma_desc_sw ),GFP_NOWAIT );
ditto
Quoted 59 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +59
-0+if (!ds) { +dev_dbg (chan->device->dev,"vchan %p: kzalloc fail\n" , &c->vc); +return NULL ; + } + + ds->desc_hw =dma_pool_alloc (d->pool,GFP_NOWAIT , &ds->desc_hw_lli); +if (!ds->desc_hw) { +kfree (ds); +dev_dbg (chan->device->dev,"vchan %p: poolalloc fail\n" , &c->vc); +return NULL ; + } + +for_each_sg (sgl, sg, sglen, i) { + addr =sg_dma_address (sg); + avail =sg_dma_len (sg); + total += avail; + +do { + len =min_t (size_t, avail,DMA_MAX_SIZE ); + +if (dir ==DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ) { + src = addr; + dst = c->dev_addr; + }else if (dir ==DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ) { + src = c->dev_addr; + dst = addr; + } + +k3_fill_desc (ds, dst, src, len, num_desc++, c->ccfg); + + addr += len; + avail -= len; + }while (avail); + } + +/* end of link */ + ds->desc_hw[num_desc-1 ].lli =0 ; + ds->size = total; +return vchan_tx_prep (&c->vc, &ds->vd, flags); +} + +static int k3_dma_control (struct dma_chan *chan,enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +struct dma_slave_config *cfg = (void *)arg; +struct k3_dma_phy *p =NULL ; +unsigned long flags; +u32 maxburst =0 , val =0 ; +enum dma_slave_buswidth width =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED ; +LIST_HEAD (head); + +switch (cmd) { +case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG : +if (cfg ==NULL ) +return -EINVAL ; + c->dir = cfg->direction; +if (c->dir ==DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ) {
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 536
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+ c->ccfg =CCFG_DSTINCR ; + c->dev_addr = cfg->src_addr; + maxburst = cfg->src_maxburst; + width = cfg->src_addr_width; + }else if (c->dir ==DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ) { + c->ccfg =CCFG_SRCINCR ; + c->dev_addr = cfg->dst_addr; + maxburst = cfg->dst_maxburst; + width = cfg->dst_addr_width; + }
looks like this could use some empty line above
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 545
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +9
-0+ +if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE ) + val =0 ; +else if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES ) + val =1 ; +else if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES ) + val =2 ; +else if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ) + val =3 ;
and perhpas a switch case here or better a get_width macro
Quoted 101 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +101
-0+ c->ccfg |= (val <<12 ) | (val <<16 ); + +if ((maxburst ==0 ) || (maxburst >16 )) + val =16 ; +else + val = maxburst -1 ; + c->ccfg |= (val <<20 ) | (val <<24 ); + c->ccfg |=CCFG_MEM2PER |CCFG_EN ; + +/* specific request line */ + c->ccfg |= c->vc.chan.chan_id <<4 ; +break ; + +case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL : +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"vchan %p: terminate all\n" , &c->vc); +/* Clear the tx descriptor lists */ +spin_lock_irqsave (&c->vc.lock, flags); +vchan_get_all_descriptors (&c->vc, &head); +if (c) + p = c->phy; +if (p) { +/* vchan is assigned to a pchan - stop the channel */ +terminate_chan (p, d); + c->phy =NULL ; + p->vchan =NULL ; + p->ds_run = p->ds_done =NULL ; +tasklet_schedule (&d->task); + } +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&c->vc.lock, flags); +vchan_dma_desc_free_list (&c->vc, &head); +break ; +default : +return -ENXIO ; + } +return 0 ; +} + +static void k3_dma_free_desc (struct virt_dma_desc *vd) +{ +struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds = + container_of(vd, struct k3_dma_desc_sw, vd); +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (vd->tx.chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (c->vc.chan.device); + +if (ds->desc_hw) +dma_pool_free (d->pool, ds->desc_hw, ds->desc_hw_lli); + +kfree (ds); +} + +static struct of_device_id k3_pdma_dt_ids[] = { + { .compatible ="hisilicon,k3-dma-1.0" , }, + {} +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, k3_pdma_dt_ids); + +static struct of_dma_filter_info k3_dma_filter; +static bool k3_dma_filter_fn (struct dma_chan *chan,void *param) +{ +return (*(int *)param == chan->chan_id); +} + +static int k3_dma_probe (struct platform_device *op) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d; +const struct of_device_id *of_id; +struct resource *iores; +int i, ret, irq =0 ; +int dma_channels =0 ; + + iores =platform_get_resource (op,IORESOURCE_MEM ,0 ); +if (!iores) +return -EINVAL ; + + d =devm_kzalloc (&op->dev,sizeof (*d),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!d) +return -ENOMEM ; + + d->base =devm_request_and_ioremap (&op->dev, iores); +if (!d->base) +return -EADDRNOTAVAIL ; + + of_id =of_match_device (k3_pdma_dt_ids, &op->dev); +if (of_id) +of_property_read_u32 ((&op->dev)->of_node, +"dma-channels" , &dma_channels); + + d->clk =devm_clk_get (&op->dev,NULL ); +if (IS_ERR (d->clk)) { +dev_err (&op->dev,"no dma clk\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (d->clk); + } + + irq =platform_get_irq (op,0 ); + ret =devm_request_irq (&op->dev, irq, + k3_dma_int_handler,IRQF_DISABLED ,DRIVER_NAME , d); +if (ret) +return ret; + +/* init phy channel */ +for (i =0 ; i <NR_PHY_CHAN ; i++) {
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 656
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+struct k3_dma_phy *p = &d->phy[i]; + + p->idx = i; + p->base = d->base + i *0x40 ; + } + +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&d->slave.channels); +dma_cap_set (DMA_SLAVE , d->slave.cap_mask); +dma_cap_set (DMA_MEMCPY , d->slave.cap_mask); +dma_cap_set (DMA_SLAVE , d->slave.cap_mask);
DMA_SLAVE set twice?
Quoted 23 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +23
-0+ d->slave.dev = &op->dev; + d->slave.device_alloc_chan_resources = k3_dma_alloc_chan_resources; + d->slave.device_free_chan_resources = k3_dma_free_chan_resources; + d->slave.device_tx_status = k3_dma_tx_status; + d->slave.device_prep_dma_memcpy = k3_dma_prep_memcpy; + d->slave.device_prep_slave_sg = k3_dma_prep_slave_sg; + d->slave.device_issue_pending = k3_dma_issue_pending; + d->slave.device_control = k3_dma_control; + d->slave.copy_align =DMA_ALIGN ; + d->slave.chancnt = dma_channels; + +/* init virtual channel */ +for (i =0 ; i < dma_channels; i++) { +struct k3_dma_chan *c; + + c =devm_kzalloc (&op->dev, +sizeof (struct k3_dma_chan ),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (c ==NULL ) +return -ENOMEM ; + +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&c->node); + c->vc.desc_free = k3_dma_free_desc; +vchan_init (&c->vc, &d->slave);
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 689
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+ } + +/* Enable clock before accessing registers */ + ret =clk_prepare_enable (d->clk); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (&op->dev,"clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n" , ret); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +trigger_dma (d, true);
is this turning on dma, if so why at probe?
Quoted 41 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +41
-0+ +/* A DMA memory pool for LLIs */ + d->pool =dma_pool_create (DRIVER_NAME , &op->dev, +LLI_SIZE , __alignof__(struct k3_desc_hw ),0 ); +if (!d->pool) +return -ENOMEM ; + + ret =dma_async_device_register (&d->slave); +if (ret) + goto of_dma_register_fail; + + k3_dma_filter.dma_cap = d->slave.cap_mask; + k3_dma_filter.filter_fn = k3_dma_filter_fn; + ret =of_dma_controller_register ((&op->dev)->of_node, of_dma_simple_xlate, &k3_dma_filter); +if (ret) + goto dma_async_regitster_fail; + +spin_lock_init (&d->lock); +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&d->chan_pending); +tasklet_init (&d->task, k3_dma_tasklet, (unsigned long )d); +platform_set_drvdata (op, d); +dev_info (&op->dev,"initialized\n" ); + +return 0 ; + +of_dma_register_fail: +dma_async_device_unregister (&d->slave); +dma_async_regitster_fail: +dma_pool_destroy (d->pool); +return ret; +} + +static int k3_dma_remove (struct platform_device *op) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c, *cn; +struct k3_dma_dev *d =platform_get_drvdata (op); + +dma_async_device_unregister (&d->slave); +of_dma_controller_free ((&op->dev)->of_node); + +list_for_each_entry_safe (c, cn, &d->slave.channels, vc.chan.device_node) {
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 740
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+list_del (&c->vc.chan.device_node); +tasklet_kill (&c->vc.task); + } +tasklet_kill (&d->task); +dma_pool_destroy (d->pool); +clk_disable_unprepare (d->clk); +return 0 ; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
PM_SLEEP?
Quoted 23 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +23
-0+static int k3_dma_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d =dev_get_drvdata (dev); +u32 stat =0 ; + + stat =get_chan_stat (d); +if (stat) { +dev_warn (d->slave.dev, +"chan %d is running fail to suspend\n" , stat); +return -1 ; + } +trigger_dma (d, false); +clk_disable_unprepare (d->clk); +return 0 ; +} + +static int k3_dma_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d =dev_get_drvdata (dev); +int ret =0 ; + + ret =clk_prepare_enable (d->clk); +if (ret <0 ) {
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 773
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+dev_err (d->slave.dev,"clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n" , ret); + return -EINVAL; + } +trigger_dma (d, true); +return 0 ; +} +#else +#define k3_dma_suspend NULL +#define k3_dma_resume NULL +#endif
you can use SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro instead
Quoted 24 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +21
-0+ +static const struct dev_pm_ops k3_dma_pm_ops = { + .suspend = k3_dma_suspend, + .resume = k3_dma_resume, +}; + +static struct platform_driver k3_pdma_driver = { + .driver = { + .name =DRIVER_NAME , + .owner =THIS_MODULE , + .pm = &k3_dma_pm_ops, + .of_match_table = k3_pdma_dt_ids, + }, + .probe = k3_dma_probe, + .remove = k3_dma_remove, +}; + +module_platform_driver (k3_pdma_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Hisilicon k3 DMA Driver" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL v2" );Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Signature · 1 line
~Vinod
PATCH 1/1 dmaengine: Add hisilicon k3 DMA engine driver
Quoted 8 lines · Vinod Koul
Quoted 5 lines · Zhangfei Gao
Add dmaengine driver for hisilicon k3 platform based on
virt_dmaSigned-off-by Zhangfei Gao <[email protected]>Tested-by Kai Yang <[email protected]>---
[snip]
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 114
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +8
-0+#define to_k3_dma (dmadev) container_of(dmadev, struct k3_dma_dev, slave) + +static struct k3_dma_chan *to_k3_chan (struct dma_chan *chan) +{ + return container_of(chan, struct k3_dma_chan, vc.chan); +} + +static void terminate_chan (struct k3_dma_phy *phy,struct k3_dma_dev *d)namespace pls
Thanks Vinod for careful review, will add namespace in v2.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +4
-0+static void k3_dma_tasklet (unsigned long arg) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d = (struct k3_dma_dev *)arg; +struct k3_dma_phy *p;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 245
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +7
-0+struct k3_dma_chan *c; +unsigned pch, pch_alloc =0 ; + +dev_dbg (d->slave.dev,"tasklet enter\n" ); + +/* check new dma request of running channel in vc->desc_issued */ +list_for_each_entry (c, &d->slave.channels, vc.chan.device_node) {this should use
_safe, you might be adding a new txn while executing this
OK,
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +7
-0+static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *k3_dma_prep_memcpy ( +struct dma_chan *chan,dma_addr_t dst,dma_addr_t src, +size_t len,unsigned long flags) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 411
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +7
-0+size_t copy =0 ; +int num_desc =0 ; + +if (!len) +return NULL ; + + ds =kzalloc (sizeof (struct k3_dma_desc_sw ),GFP_NOWAIT );sizeof (* ds) would be a better approach
OK, thanks
Quoted 38 lines
Quoted 18 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +18
-0+static int k3_dma_control (struct dma_chan *chan,enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd, +unsigned long arg) +{ +struct k3_dma_chan *c =to_k3_chan (chan); +struct k3_dma_dev *d =to_k3_dma (chan->device); +struct dma_slave_config *cfg = (void *)arg; +struct k3_dma_phy *p =NULL ; +unsigned long flags; +u32 maxburst =0 , val =0 ; +enum dma_slave_buswidth width =DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED ; +LIST_HEAD (head); + +switch (cmd) { +case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG : +if (cfg ==NULL ) +return -EINVAL ; + c->dir = cfg->direction; +if (c->dir ==DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ) {drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 536
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +10
-0+ c->ccfg =CCFG_DSTINCR ; + c->dev_addr = cfg->src_addr; + maxburst = cfg->src_maxburst; + width = cfg->src_addr_width; + }else if (c->dir ==DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ) { + c->ccfg =CCFG_SRCINCR ; + c->dev_addr = cfg->dst_addr; + maxburst = cfg->dst_maxburst; + width = cfg->dst_addr_width; + }looks like this could use some empty line above
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 545
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +9
-0+ +if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE ) + val =0 ; +else if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES ) + val =1 ; +else if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES ) + val =2 ; +else if (width ==DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES ) + val =3 ;
Quoted 1 line
and perhpas a switch case here or better a
get_widthmacro
Will use switch instead for efficiency.
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 656
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +5
-0+ +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&d->slave.channels); +dma_cap_set (DMA_SLAVE , d->slave.cap_mask); +dma_cap_set (DMA_MEMCPY , d->slave.cap_mask); +dma_cap_set (DMA_SLAVE , d->slave.cap_mask);
DMA_SLAVEset twice?
Thanks for point out
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +26
-0+ d->slave.dev = &op->dev; + d->slave.device_alloc_chan_resources = k3_dma_alloc_chan_resources; + d->slave.device_free_chan_resources = k3_dma_free_chan_resources; + d->slave.device_tx_status = k3_dma_tx_status; + d->slave.device_prep_dma_memcpy = k3_dma_prep_memcpy; + d->slave.device_prep_slave_sg = k3_dma_prep_slave_sg; + d->slave.device_issue_pending = k3_dma_issue_pending; + d->slave.device_control = k3_dma_control; + d->slave.copy_align =DMA_ALIGN ; + d->slave.chancnt = dma_channels; + +/* init virtual channel */ +for (i =0 ; i < dma_channels; i++) { +struct k3_dma_chan *c; + + c =devm_kzalloc (&op->dev, +sizeof (struct k3_dma_chan ),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (c ==NULL ) +return -ENOMEM ; + +INIT_LIST_HEAD (&c->node); + c->vc.desc_free = k3_dma_free_desc; +vchan_init (&c->vc, &d->slave); + } + +/* Enable clock before accessing registers */
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 689
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +7
-0+ ret =clk_prepare_enable (d->clk); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (&op->dev,"clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n" , ret); +return -EINVAL ; + } + +trigger_dma (d, true);is this turning on dma, if so why at probe?
Will change the confusing name to enable_dma
Quoted 29 lines
Quoted 1 line
+#ifdef
CONFIG_PM
PM_SLEEP?Quoted 26 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +26
-0+static int k3_dma_suspend (struct device *dev) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d =dev_get_drvdata (dev); +u32 stat =0 ; + + stat =get_chan_stat (d); +if (stat) { +dev_warn (d->slave.dev, +"chan %d is running fail to suspend\n" , stat); +return -1 ; + } +trigger_dma (d, false); +clk_disable_unprepare (d->clk); +return 0 ; +} + +static int k3_dma_resume (struct device *dev) +{ +struct k3_dma_dev *d =dev_get_drvdata (dev); +int ret =0 ; + + ret =clk_prepare_enable (d->clk); +if (ret <0 ) { +dev_err (d->slave.dev,"clk_prepare_enable failed: %d\n" , ret); +return -EINVAL ; + }
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c line 773
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/dma/k3dma.c new file +7
-0+trigger_dma (d, true); + return 0; +} +#else +#define k3_dma_suspend NULL +#define k3_dma_resume NULL +#endif you can use
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPSmacro instead
Make sense.