clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/3 clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
'exynos4_plls' is used only in this file. Make it static.
--- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +1 -1
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = { {}, }; -struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { [apll] =PLL_A (pll_35xx, fout_apll,"fout_apll" ,"fin_pll" ,APLL_LOCK ,APLL_CON0 ,"fout_apll" ,NULL ), [mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 2/3 clk: exynos5250: Make exynos5250_plls static
exynos5250_plls is used only in this file. Make it static.
--- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c +1 -1
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ static __initdata struct samsung_pll_rate_table epll_24mhz_tbl[] = { { }, }; -struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5250_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5250_plls[nr_plls] = { [apll] =PLL_A (pll_35xx, fout_apll,"fout_apll" ,"fin_pll" ,APLL_LOCK ,APLL_CON0 ,"fout_apll" ,NULL ), [mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 3/3 clk: exynos5420: Make exynos5420_plls static
In reply to Sachin Kamat'exynos5420_plls' is used only in this file. Make is static.
--- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c +1 -1
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5420_gate_clks[] __initdata = { GATE(smmu_mscl2, "smmu_mscl2", "aclk400_mscl", GATE_IP_MSCL, 10, 0, 0), }; -struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5420_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5420_plls[nr_plls] = { [apll] =PLL (pll_2550, fout_apll,"fout_apll" ,"fin_pll" ,APLL_LOCK ,APLL_CON0 ,NULL ), [cpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/3 clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
In reply to Sachin KamatQuoting Sachin Kamat (2013-08-06 04:31:13)
Quoted 3 lines
'
exynos4_plls' is used only in this file. Make it static.Signed-off-by Sachin Kamat <[email protected]>
Taken all three into clk-next. Seems like a lot of static-ization patches for Exynos lately.
Regards,
Mike
Quoted 19 lines
--- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +1
-1@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = { {}, }; -struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { [apll] =PLL_A (pll_35xx, fout_apll,"fout_apll" ,"fin_pll" ,APLL_LOCK ,APLL_CON0 ,"fout_apll" ,NULL ), [mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll",Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/3 clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
In reply to Sachin KamatAlso note:
Review static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
Quoted 1 line · Sachin Kamat
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
For the declaration above...
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = { · line 987
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +1
-1-struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {
And this one... __initdata should come just before the '=', not at the start, not in the middle and not before the variable.
The reasoning is that with how you have it above, the attributes are applied to the structure. You want to apply the attributes to the declaration instead, so it should come after the variable name.
So, for example:
struct foo *foo __attribute__((section(".foo"))) = (void *)1;will place the "foo" variable into a section called ".foo", but:
struct __attribute__((section(".foo"))) foo *foo = (void *)1;will place "foo" into the normal .data section.
So, the rule with variable declarations is that the __ specifiers we have as macros in the kernel always come after the variable name being declared and nowhere else. We consider anywhere else buggy.
PATCH 1/3 clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
+CC Joe Perches
Quoted 23 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Also note:
Review static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
Quoted 1 line · Sachin Kamat
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {For the declaration above...
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = { · line 987
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +1
-1-struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {And this one...
__initdatashould come just before the '=', not at the start, not in the middle and not before the variable.The reasoning is that with how you have it above, the attributes are applied to the structure. You want to apply the attributes to the declaration instead, so it should come after the variable name.
So, for example:
struct foo *foo __attribute__((section(".foo"))) = (void *)1;will place the "foo" variable into a section called ".foo", but:
Quoted 7 lines
struct __attribute__((section(".foo"))) foo *foo = (void *)1;will place "foo" into the normal .data section.
So, the rule with variable declarations is that the __ specifiers we have as macros in the kernel always come after the variable name being declared and nowhere else. We consider anywhere else buggy.
Thanks for this useful tip, Russell. There are several instances in the kernel where these attributes are used at the beginning of the variable declaration.
Probably it would be useful to add this to checkpatch. Joe?
Signature · 2 lines
With warm regards, Sachin
PATCH 1/3 clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
Quoted 34 lines · Sachin Kamat
+CC Joe Perches
Quoted 23 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Also note:
Review static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
Quoted 1 line · Sachin Kamat
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {For the declaration above...
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = { · line 987
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +1
-1-struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {And this one...
__initdatashould come just before the '=', not at the start, not in the middle and not before the variable.The reasoning is that with how you have it above, the attributes are applied to the structure. You want to apply the attributes to the declaration instead, so it should come after the variable name.
So, for example:
struct foo *foo __attribute__((section(".foo"))) = (void *)1;will place the "foo" variable into a section called ".foo", but:
Quoted 7 lines
struct __attribute__((section(".foo"))) foo *foo = (void *)1;will place "foo" into the normal .data section.
So, the rule with variable declarations is that the __ specifiers we have as macros in the kernel always come after the variable name being declared and nowhere else. We consider anywhere else buggy.
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks for this useful tip, Russell. There are several instances in the kernel where these attributes are used at the beginning of the variable declaration.
Probably it would be useful to add this to checkpatch. Joe?
I think Russell is using the royal "We".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_plural
There's no way for checkpatch to look at an __<foo> use and determine it should be before or after a variable.
__scanf, __printf, __cold, etc are often place before declarations.
PATCH 1/3 clk: exynos4: Make exynos4_plls static
Quoted 35 lines · Joe Perches
Quoted 34 lines · Sachin Kamat
+CC Joe Perches
Quoted 30 lines · Russell King - ARM Linux
Also note:
Review static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
Quoted 1 line · Sachin Kamat
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {For the declaration above...
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = { · line 987
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +1
-1-struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = { +static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {And this one...
__initdatashould come just before the '=', not at the start, not in the middle and not before the variable.The reasoning is that with how you have it above, the attributes are applied to the structure. You want to apply the attributes to the declaration instead, so it should come after the variable name.
So, for example:
struct foo *foo __attribute__((section(".foo"))) = (void *)1;will place the "foo" variable into a section called ".foo", but:
struct __attribute__((section(".foo"))) foo *foo = (void *)1;will place "foo" into the normal .data section.
So, the rule with variable declarations is that the __ specifiers we have as macros in the kernel always come after the variable name being declared and nowhere else. We consider anywhere else buggy.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks for this useful tip, Russell. There are several instances in the kernel where these attributes are used at the beginning of the variable declaration.
Probably it would be useful to add this to checkpatch. Joe?
I think Russell is using the royal "We".
No I'm not. There have been many patches to fix errors like the above in the past. If it's not considered a bug by the community as a whole, it damn well should be.