libubox: new package
PATCH 1/1 libubox: new package
From: Yegor Yefremov <[email protected]>
--- package/Config.in | 1 + package/libubox/Config.in | 6 ++++++ package/libubox/libubox.mk | 13 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 package/libubox/Config.in create mode 100644 package/libubox/libubox.mk
package/Config.in +1 -0
@@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ source "package/libsigc/Config.in" source "package/libsigsegv/Config.in" source "package/libtasn1/Config.in" source "package/libtpl/Config.in" +source "package/libubox/Config.in" source "package/libunwind/Config.in" source "package/liburcu/Config.in" source "package/linux-pam/Config.in"
package/libubox/Config.in new file +6 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUBOX + bool "libubox" + help + Small utility library for OpenWrt. + + http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=luci2/libubox.git;a=summary
package/libubox/libubox.mk new file +13 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# libubox +# +################################################################################ + +LIBUBOX_VERSION = bbd846ec2d72b2629758b69dc122ac0b0f2c3e4b +LIBUBOX_SITE = git://nbd.name/luci2/libubox.git +LIBUBOX_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1 +LIBUBOX_INSTALL_STAGING = YES +LIBUBOX_CONF_OPT = -DBUILD_LUA:BOOL=OFF + +$(eval $(cmake-package))
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7
PATCH 1/1 libubox: new package
Yegor, All,
Thanks for your contribution! Some comments below...
On 2014-01-30 12:11 +0100, yegorslists at googlemail.com spake thusly:
[--SNIP--]
package/libubox/Config.in line 4
Quoted 10 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUBOX + bool "libubox" + help + Small utility library for OpenWrt.
In what way would this be of interest to Buildroot?
Since this is "for OpenWRT", I fail to see the relevance to Buildroot.
Quoted 7 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +1
-0+ http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=luci2/libubox.git;a=summarypackage/libubox/libubox.mk new file +0
-0
package/libubox/libubox.mk line 9
Quoted 9 lines
package/libubox/libubox.mk new file +9
-0@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# libubox +# +################################################################################ + +LIBUBOX_VERSION = bbd846ec2d72b2629758b69dc122ac0b0f2c3e4b +LIBUBOX_SITE = git://nbd.name/luci2/libubox.git +LIBUBOX_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1
This is not correct:
- most of the files have a license header that do not reference the LGPLv2.1, but which I did not recognise [0]
- some have a BSD-3c license: avl.c
- at least one file is GPLv2: md5.c
[0]
* Copyright (C) 2012 Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
* purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
* copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. *
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
* WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
* MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
* ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
* WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
package/libubox/libubox.mk line 11
Quoted 2 lines
package/libubox/libubox.mk new file +2
-0+LIBUBOX_INSTALL_STAGING = YES +LIBUBOX_CONF_OPT = -DBUILD_LUA:BOOL=OFF
Maybe that could be made conditional on whether lua is enabled or not?
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/1 libubox: new package
Quoted 19 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Yegor, All,
Thanks for your contribution! Some comments below...
On 2014-01-30 12:11 +0100, yegorslists at googlemail.com spake thusly:
[--SNIP--]package/libubox/Config.in line 4
Quoted 10 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUBOX + bool "libubox" + help + Small utility library for OpenWrt.In what way would this be of interest to Buildroot?
Quoted 1 line
Since this is "for OpenWRT", I fail to see the relevance to Buildroot.
My goal is to port libuci to Buildroot as I have some software, that I've written for OpenWRT and now would like to use in BR too. The software uses /etc/config/* infrastructure to access its configuration files via libuci.
libubox it a dependency of libuci.
I've also found libuci installation tutorials for Ubuntu :-)
http://www.wakoond.hu/2013/06/using-uci-on-ubuntu.html
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +1
-0+ http://nbd.name/gitweb.cgi?p=luci2/libubox.git;a=summarypackage/libubox/libubox.mk new file +7
-0@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# libubox +# +################################################################################ + +LIBUBOX_VERSION = bbd846ec2d72b2629758b69dc122ac0b0f2c3e4b
Quoted 8 lines
package/libubox/libubox.mk line 9
Quoted 2 lines
package/libubox/libubox.mk new file +2
-0+LIBUBOX_SITE = git://nbd.name/luci2/libubox.git +LIBUBOX_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1This is not correct:
- most of the files have a license header that do not reference the LGPLv2.1, but which I did not recognise [0]
- some have a BSD-3c license:avl.c
- at least one file is GPLv2:md5.c
Hm. That's really odd. Should I omit license information for now?
Quoted 15 lines
[0]
* Copyright (C) 2012 Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
* purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
* copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. *
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
* WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
* MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR
* ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
* WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
Quoted 4 lines
package/libubox/libubox.mk line 11
Quoted 2 lines
package/libubox/libubox.mk new file +2
-0+LIBUBOX_INSTALL_STAGING = YES +LIBUBOX_CONF_OPT = -DBUILD_LUA:BOOL=OFFMaybe that could be made conditional on whether lua is enabled or not?
I wanted to start with a simple configuration, as I don't need Lua right now, but I'll incorporate this feature in the v2.
Yegor
PATCH 1/1 libubox: new package
On 2014-03-04 07:59 +0100, Yegor Yefremov spake thusly:
Quoted 20 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 19 lines
Yegor, All,
Thanks for your contribution! Some comments below...
On 2014-01-30 12:11 +0100, yegorslists at googlemail.com spake thusly:
[--SNIP--]package/libubox/Config.in line 4
Quoted 10 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUBOX + bool "libubox" + help + Small utility library for OpenWrt.In what way would this be of interest to Buildroot?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Since this is "for OpenWRT", I fail to see the relevance to Buildroot.
My goal is to port libuci to Buildroot as I have some software, that I've written for OpenWRT and now would like to use in BR too. The software uses
/etc/config/*infrastructure to access its configuration files via libuci.
libubox it a dependency of libuci.
Ah, I see. Then, please say so in the help text (the one you provided is not really interesting, as it does not say what libubox does).
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
This is not correct:
- most of the files have a license header that do not reference the LGPLv2.1, but which I did not recognise [0]
It might be MIT:
http://spdx.org/licenses/MIT
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
- some have a BSD-3c license:
avl.c
- at least one file is GPLv2:md5.cHm. That's really odd. Should I omit license information for now?
No, just state all of them:
_LICENSES = GPLv2, BSD-3c, MIT
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
package/libubox/Config.in line 6
Quoted 2 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +2
-0+LIBUBOX_INSTALL_STAGING = YES +LIBUBOX_CONF_OPT = -DBUILD_LUA:BOOL=OFFMaybe that could be made conditional on whether lua is enabled or not?
I wanted to start with a simple configuration, as I don't need Lua right now, but I'll incorporate this feature in the v2.
OK, that's fine. If you don't use it, and so don't test it, there's no reason to add it. If someone (or you, later) is interested in it, he'll send a patch.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/1 libubox: new package
Quoted 23 lines · Yann E. MORIN
On 2014-03-04 07:59 +0100, Yegor Yefremov spake thusly:
Quoted 22 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 20 lines
Yegor, All,
Thanks for your contribution! Some comments below...
On 2014-01-30 12:11 +0100, yegorslists at googlemail.com spake thusly:
[--SNIP--]package/libubox/Config.in line 4
Quoted 10 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUBOX + bool "libubox" + help + Small utility library for OpenWrt.In what way would this be of interest to Buildroot?
Since this is "for OpenWRT", I fail to see the relevance to Buildroot.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
My goal is to port libuci to Buildroot as I have some software, that I've written for OpenWRT and now would like to use in BR too. The software uses
/etc/config/*infrastructure to access its configuration files via libuci.
libubox it a dependency of libuci.Ah, I see. Then, please say so in the help text (the one you provided is not really interesting, as it does not say what libubox does).
You're right. I'll post both patches for libubox and libuci. And who knows, perhaps we would be able to run LuCI especially LuCI2 on BR.
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
This is not correct:
- most of the files have a license header that do not reference the LGPLv2.1, but which I did not recognise [0]It might be MIT:
http://spdx.org/licenses/MITQuoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
- some have a BSD-3c license:
avl.c
- at least one file is GPLv2:md5.cHm. That's really odd. Should I omit license information for now?
No, just state all of them:
_LICENSES= GPLv2, BSD-3c, MITQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
package/libubox/Config.in line 6
Quoted 2 lines
package/libubox/Config.in new file +2
-0+LIBUBOX_INSTALL_STAGING = YES +LIBUBOX_CONF_OPT = -DBUILD_LUA:BOOL=OFFMaybe that could be made conditional on whether lua is enabled or not?
I wanted to start with a simple configuration, as I don't need Lua right now, but I'll incorporate this feature in the v2.
OK, that's fine. If you don't use it, and so don't test it, there's no reason to add it. If someone (or you, later) is interested in it, he'll send a patch.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'