Skip to contentSkip to conversation

radvd: bump to version 1.10.0

PATCH New Gustavo Zacarias 4 participants 8 messages Mar 29, 2014 – Mar 30, 2014

lore
Share & tools
lore

Gustavo Zacarias

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 radvd: bump to version 1.10.0

Adds 6LoWPAN support.

Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
---
 package/radvd/radvd.mk | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
package/radvd/radvd.mk +1 -1
index bc782fd..e82774e 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-RADVD_VERSION = 1.9.9
+RADVD_VERSION = 1.10.0
 RADVD_SOURCE = radvd-$(RADVD_VERSION).tar.xz
 RADVD_SITE = http://www.litech.org/radvd/dist
 RADVD_DEPENDENCIES = host-bison flex libdaemon host-flex host-pkgconf
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 libcgicc: bump to version 3.2.13

Also add license files and docs license definition.

Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
---
 package/libcgicc/libcgicc.mk | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/libcgicc/libcgicc.mk +3 -2
index f1c181f..f0b373b 100644
@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-LIBCGICC_VERSION = 3.2.12
+LIBCGICC_VERSION = 3.2.13
 LIBCGICC_SITE = $(BR2_GNU_MIRROR)/cgicc
 LIBCGICC_SOURCE = cgicc-$(LIBCGICC_VERSION).tar.gz
-LIBCGICC_LICENSE = LGPLv3+
+LIBCGICC_LICENSE = LGPLv3+, docs: GFDL1.2+
+LIBCGICC_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING.LIB COPYING.DOC
 LIBCGICC_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
 LIBCGICC_AUTORECONF = YES
 LIBCGICC_CONFIG_SCRIPTS = cgicc-config
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2
Applied
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 libcgicc: bump to version 3.2.13

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

Quoted 6 lines · Gustavo Zacarias

Also add license files and docs license definition.

Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
---
 package/libcgicc/libcgicc.mk | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks, with one minor change.

Quoted 1 line

+LIBCGICC_LICENSE = LGPLv3+, docs: GFDL1.2+

I've changed this to the more traditional:

	LGPLv3+ (library), GFDL1.2+ (docs)

Though I'm wondering if:

* We shouldn't use GFDLv1.2+ instead, like we do for GPL/LGPL.

* Whether we should really worry about the documentation license, since we don't allow the installation of the documentation on the target. I don't think we have any other package that describe the license of their documentation.

Cc'ing Luca and Yann to get an opinion on this.

Thanks,

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
author
#3 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 libcgicc: bump to version 3.2.13

Quoted 6 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

I've changed this to the more traditional:

	LGPLv3+ (library), GFDL1.2+ (docs)

Though I'm wondering if:

Quoted 8 lines

* We shouldn't use GFDLv1.2+ instead, like we do for GPL/LGPL.

* Whether we should really worry about the documentation license, since we don't allow the installation of the documentation on the target. I don't think we have any other package that describe the license of their documentation.

Cc'ing Luca and Yann to get an opinion on this.

At this point we nuke docs so +1 from me, i added it because i saw COPYING.* included it and there was one other package that mentions the FDL (valgrind).
But yeah, it won't be in staging or target any time soon so +1 about the second point.
Regards.

#4 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 libcgicc: bump to version 3.2.13

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

Quoted 5 lines · Gustavo Zacarias

At this point we nuke docs so +1 from me, i added it because i saw COPYING.* included it and there was one other package that mentions the FDL (valgrind).
But yeah, it won't be in staging or target any time soon so +1 about the second point.

So you can send a patch that removes it? :-)

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#5 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 libcgicc: bump to version 3.2.13

In reply to Thomas Petazzoni

Thomas, All,

On 2014-03-30 11:30 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:

Quoted 12 lines · Gustavo Zacarias
Quoted 6 lines

Also add license files and docs license definition.

Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
---
 package/libcgicc/libcgicc.mk | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks, with one minor change.

Quoted 1 line

+LIBCGICC_LICENSE = LGPLv3+, docs: GFDL1.2+

Quoted 7 lines

I've changed this to the more traditional:

	LGPLv3+ (library), GFDL1.2+ (docs)

Though I'm wondering if:

* We shouldn't use GFDLv1.2+ instead, like we do for GPL/LGPL.

For the sake of consistency, yes.i

For the records, however, SPDX does not list any 'or-later' for the GFDL:
http://spdx.org/licenses/

---
GNU Free Documentation License v1.1 GFDL-1.1
GNU Free Documentation License v1.2 GFDL-1.2
GNU Free Documentation License v1.3 GFDL-1.3
GNU General Public License v1.0 only GPL-1.0
GNU General Public License v1.0 or later GPL-1.0+
GNU General Public License v2.0 only GPL-2.0
GNU General Public License v2.0 or later GPL-2.0+
---

But that is valid for an author to specify this 'or later', so OK for the 'GFDLv1.2+'

Quoted 4 lines

* Whether we should really worry about the documentation license, since we don't allow the installation of the documentation on the target. I don't think we have any other package that describe the license of their documentation.

Well, if we're sure there's no installed doc, then we do not need this in the licensing info. But if in doubt, better let the user check on his side if the license indeed applies or not.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
#6 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 libcgicc: bump to version 3.2.13

In reply to Thomas Petazzoni

Hi Thomas,

Quoted 14 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

Quoted 6 lines · Gustavo Zacarias

Also add license files and docs license definition.

Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
---
  package/libcgicc/libcgicc.mk | 5 +++--
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks, with one minor change.

Quoted 1 line

+LIBCGICC_LICENSE = LGPLv3+, docs: GFDL1.2+

Quoted 7 lines

I've changed this to the more traditional:

	LGPLv3+ (library), GFDL1.2+ (docs)

Though I'm wondering if:

* We shouldn't use GFDLv1.2+ instead, like we do for GPL/LGPL.

Unless there is a good reason, we should the same style for all licenses.

So, yes, we should use GFDLv1.2+.

Or... We may sync with SPDX: GPL-3.0, LGPL-2.1+, BSD-3-Clause, etc.

Quoted 5 lines

* Whether we should really worry about the documentation license, since we don't allow the installation of the documentation on the target. I don't think we have any other package that describe the license of their documentation.

I'm quite neutral on this point, but I would like at least a comment to make it clear that whoever added the license info has checked, not just missed the other license(s).

Example:

# The docs are GFDLv1.2+, but not installed
LIBFOO_LICENSE = LGPLv3+

Signature · 1 line
Luca
Applied
#7 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 radvd: bump to version 1.10.0

In reply to Gustavo Zacarias

Dear Gustavo Zacarias,

Quoted 6 lines · Gustavo Zacarias

Adds 6LoWPAN support.

Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
---
 package/radvd/radvd.mk | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks.

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com