Skip to contentSkip to conversation

MX28: leds/pwm: Using pwm driven led as heartbeat leads to kernel warning

DISCUSSION Stefan Wahren 3 participants 11 messages Mar 27, 2014 – Apr 8, 2014

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

i'm using a i.MX28 custom board with two leds and Kernel 3.14-rc5.

Here is the relevant dts part:

pwmleds {
        compatible = "pwm-leds";
        pinctrl-names = "default";
        pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_pins_b>; /* MX28_PAD_AUART1_RX__PWM_0 */
       
        led0 {
            label = "duckbill:red";
            pwms = <&pwm 0 7812500>;
            max-brightness = <127>;
            linux,default-trigger = "none";
        };
};
gpioleds {
        compatible = "gpio-leds";
        pinctrl-names = "default";
        pinctrl-0 = <&led_pins>;

        led1 {
            label = "duckbill:green";
            gpios = <&gpio3 5 0>;
            linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
        };
};

The gpio driven led works perfect as heartbeat. But if i change the trigger of the pwm
driven led from none to heartbeat, it results always in a kernel warning and the pwm led
keeps on:

[  248.916168] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:856
mutex_trylock+0x184/0x1a4()
[  248.924745] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(in_interrupt())
[  248.929136] Modules linked in:
[  248.932517] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.14.0-rc5 #18
[  248.938781] [<c0015420>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0012cb0>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[  248.946672] [<c0012cb0>] (show_stack) from [<c001daf8>]
(warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0x8c)
[  248.954902] [<c001daf8>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c001dbac>]
(warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
[  248.963742] [<c001dbac>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c045df74>]
(mutex_trylock+0x184/0x1a4)
[  248.972147] [<c045df74>] (mutex_trylock) from [<c0360950>]
(clk_prepare_lock+0xc/0xec)
[  248.980132] [<c0360950>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c0362020>]
(clk_get_rate+0xc/0x68)
[  248.988105] [<c0362020>] (clk_get_rate) from [<c028d07c>]
(mxs_pwm_config+0x20/0x198)
[  248.996098] [<c028d07c>] (mxs_pwm_config) from [<c028bde8>]
(pwm_config+0x60/0x70)
[  249.003824] [<c028bde8>] (pwm_config) from [<c034b61c>]
(__led_pwm_set+0x1c/0x3c)
[  249.011442] [<c034b61c>] (__led_pwm_set) from [<c034bc3c>]
(led_heartbeat_function+0x70/0x110)
[  249.020114] [<c034bc3c>] (led_heartbeat_function) from [<c00292f0>]
(call_timer_fn+0x7c/0x164)
[  249.028856] [<c00292f0>] (call_timer_fn) from [<c00295c8>]
(run_timer_softirq+0x1f0/0x260)
[  249.037267] [<c00295c8>] (run_timer_softirq) from [<c002255c>]
(__do_softirq+0xc4/0x2f0)
[  249.045507] [<c002255c>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0022890>]
(irq_exit+0xa4/0x10c)
[  249.052966] [<c0022890>] (irq_exit) from [<c0010240>]
(handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84)
[  249.060079] [<c0010240>] (handle_IRQ) from [<c0013524>]
(__irq_svc+0x44/0x54)
[  249.067358] [<c0013524>] (__irq_svc) from [<c00107f8>]
(arch_cpu_idle+0x40/0x48)
[  249.074916] [<c00107f8>] (arch_cpu_idle) from [<c005deb8>]
(cpu_startup_entry+0x70/0x198)
[  249.083258] [<c005deb8>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c060aac8>]

(start_kernel+0x2a8/0x2f8)

Best regards
Stefan Wahren

#1 lore raw

Hello again,

Am 27.03.2014 18:14, schrieb Stefan Wahren:

Quoted 79 lines

Hello,

i'm using a i.MX28 custom board with two leds and Kernel 3.14-rc5.

Here is the relevant dts part:

pwmleds {
        compatible = "pwm-leds";
        pinctrl-names = "default";
        pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_pins_b>; /* MX28_PAD_AUART1_RX__PWM_0 */
       
        led0 {
            label = "duckbill:red";
            pwms = <&pwm 0 7812500>;
            max-brightness = <127>;
            linux,default-trigger = "none";
        };
};
gpioleds {
        compatible = "gpio-leds";
        pinctrl-names = "default";
        pinctrl-0 = <&led_pins>;

        led1 {
            label = "duckbill:green";
            gpios = <&gpio3 5 0>;
            linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
        };
};

The gpio driven led works perfect as heartbeat. But if i change the trigger of the pwm
driven led from none to heartbeat, it results always in a kernel warning and the pwm led
keeps on:

[  248.916168] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:856
mutex_trylock+0x184/0x1a4()
[  248.924745] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(in_interrupt())
[  248.929136] Modules linked in:
[  248.932517] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.14.0-rc5 #18
[  248.938781] [<c0015420>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0012cb0>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[  248.946672] [<c0012cb0>] (show_stack) from [<c001daf8>]
(warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0x8c)
[  248.954902] [<c001daf8>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c001dbac>]
(warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
[  248.963742] [<c001dbac>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c045df74>]
(mutex_trylock+0x184/0x1a4)
[  248.972147] [<c045df74>] (mutex_trylock) from [<c0360950>]
(clk_prepare_lock+0xc/0xec)
[  248.980132] [<c0360950>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c0362020>]
(clk_get_rate+0xc/0x68)
[  248.988105] [<c0362020>] (clk_get_rate) from [<c028d07c>]
(mxs_pwm_config+0x20/0x198)
[  248.996098] [<c028d07c>] (mxs_pwm_config) from [<c028bde8>]
(pwm_config+0x60/0x70)
[  249.003824] [<c028bde8>] (pwm_config) from [<c034b61c>]
(__led_pwm_set+0x1c/0x3c)
[  249.011442] [<c034b61c>] (__led_pwm_set) from [<c034bc3c>]
(led_heartbeat_function+0x70/0x110)
[  249.020114] [<c034bc3c>] (led_heartbeat_function) from [<c00292f0>]
(call_timer_fn+0x7c/0x164)
[  249.028856] [<c00292f0>] (call_timer_fn) from [<c00295c8>]
(run_timer_softirq+0x1f0/0x260)
[  249.037267] [<c00295c8>] (run_timer_softirq) from [<c002255c>]
(__do_softirq+0xc4/0x2f0)
[  249.045507] [<c002255c>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0022890>]
(irq_exit+0xa4/0x10c)
[  249.052966] [<c0022890>] (irq_exit) from [<c0010240>]
(handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84)
[  249.060079] [<c0010240>] (handle_IRQ) from [<c0013524>]
(__irq_svc+0x44/0x54)
[  249.067358] [<c0013524>] (__irq_svc) from [<c00107f8>]
(arch_cpu_idle+0x40/0x48)
[  249.074916] [<c00107f8>] (arch_cpu_idle) from [<c005deb8>]
(cpu_startup_entry+0x70/0x198)
[  249.083258] [<c005deb8>] (cpu_startup_entry) from [<c060aac8>]
Quoted 5 lines

(start_kernel+0x2a8/0x2f8)

Best regards
Stefan Wahren

the problem is still reproducable in Mainline 3.14.0 and gives the same warning message.
Also i add linux-leds in CC.

Are there any advices to narrow down the problem?

Is this problem specific to i.MX28 PWM (i don't have other kind of hardware)?

Can anybody reproduce this problem?

Kind regards
Stefan Wahren

#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Stefan Wahren

the problem is still reproducable in Mainline 3.14.0 and gives the same warning message.
Also i add linux-leds in CC.

Are there any advices to narrow down the problem?

Is this problem specific to i.MX28 PWM (i don't have other kind of hardware)?

I don't think it's specific to i.MX28 PWM. Since the .config hook of pwm_ops will be called from interrupt context in this case, any pwm drivers that do sleeping calls in the hook will have this problem, e.g. the clk APIs that hold mutex like clk_prepare() and clk_get_rate() etc.

Shawn

#3 lore raw

Hi Shawn,

Am 04.04.2014 16:26, schrieb Shawn Guo:

Quoted 7 lines · Stefan Wahren
Quoted 6 lines

the problem is still reproducable in Mainline 3.14.0 and gives the same warning message.
Also i add linux-leds in CC.

Are there any advices to narrow down the problem?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Is this problem specific to i.MX28 PWM (i don't have other kind of hardware)?

I don't think it's specific to i.MX28 PWM. Since the .config hook of pwm_ops will be called from interrupt context in this case, any pwm drivers that do sleeping calls in the hook will have this problem, e.g. the clk APIs that hold mutex like clk_prepare() and clk_get_rate() etc.

Shawn

that sounds like the problem should be easier to reproduce.

Is there anything i can do to support bugfixing, beside sending the patch?

Stefan

#4 lore raw
In reply to Shawn Guo
Quoted 7 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 6 lines · Stefan Wahren

the problem is still reproducable in Mainline 3.14.0 and gives the same warning message.
Also i add linux-leds in CC.

Are there any advices to narrow down the problem?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Is this problem specific to i.MX28 PWM (i don't have other kind of hardware)?

I don't think it's specific to i.MX28 PWM. Since the .config hook of pwm_ops will be called from interrupt context in this case, any pwm drivers that do sleeping calls in the hook will have this problem, e.g. the clk APIs that hold mutex like clk_prepare() and clk_get_rate() etc.

Yeah, I'm wondering whether we should set pwm->chip->can_sleep then.

Thierry, do you have an opinion ?

Signature · 3 lines
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#5 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Alexandre Belloni
Quoted 10 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 8 lines · Stefan Wahren

the problem is still reproducable in Mainline 3.14.0 and gives the same warning message.
Also i add linux-leds in CC.

Are there any advices to narrow down the problem?

Is this problem specific to i.MX28 PWM (i don't have other kind of hardware)?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines

I don't think it's specific to i.MX28 PWM. Since the .config hook of pwm_ops will be called from interrupt context in this case, any pwm drivers that do sleeping calls in the hook will have this problem, e.g. the clk APIs that hold mutex like clk_prepare() and clk_get_rate() etc.

Yeah, I'm wondering whether we should set pwm->chip->can_sleep then.

Right, per kerneldoc of struct pwm_chip, we should set can_sleep.

/**
* struct pwm_chip - abstract a PWM controller
* ...
* @can_sleep: must be true if the .config(), .enable() or .disable()
* operations may sleep
*/

But how does setting the flag make a difference there? I see pwm core does nothing about the flag, or am I missing something?

Shawn

#6 lore raw
Quoted 29 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 11 lines · Alexandre Belloni
Quoted 10 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 8 lines · Stefan Wahren

the problem is still reproducable in Mainline 3.14.0 and gives the same warning message.
Also i add linux-leds in CC.

Are there any advices to narrow down the problem?

Is this problem specific to i.MX28 PWM (i don't have other kind of hardware)?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines

I don't think it's specific to i.MX28 PWM. Since the .config hook of pwm_ops will be called from interrupt context in this case, any pwm drivers that do sleeping calls in the hook will have this problem, e.g. the clk APIs that hold mutex like clk_prepare() and clk_get_rate() etc.

Yeah, I'm wondering whether we should set pwm->chip->can_sleep then.

Right, per kerneldoc of struct pwm_chip, we should set can_sleep.

/**
* struct pwm_chip - abstract a PWM controller
* ...
* @can_sleep: must be true if the .config(), .enable() or .disable()
* operations may sleep
*/

Quoted 3 lines

But how does setting the flag make a difference there? I see pwm core does nothing about the flag, or am I missing something?

The driver using the PWM should test the flag, have a look at:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c#L183

Signature · 3 lines
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#8 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 2 lines · Alexandre Belloni

The driver using the PWM should test the flag, have a look at:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c#L183

Ah, right, that' how the flag works. Thanks, Alexandre. I send a patch to set the flag for pwm-mxs driver shortly.

Actually, I had a closer look and I believe using clk_prepare_enable() in .config is wrong. Let me prepare a patch.

Signature · 3 lines
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#9 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Alexandre Belloni
Quoted 7 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 2 lines · Alexandre Belloni

The driver using the PWM should test the flag, have a look at:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c#L183

Ah, right, that' how the flag works. Thanks, Alexandre. I send a patch to set the flag for pwm-mxs driver shortly.

Actually, I had a closer look and I believe using clk_prepare_enable() in .config is wrong. Let me prepare a patch.

Yes, we can split clk_prepare_enable() into clk_prepare() and clk_enable(), call the former in .probe() and only the later in .config hook.

But it only fixes the problem partially. If you look at Stefan's report closely, you can see the warning actually comes from the clk_get_rate() call which holds a mutex too.

Shawn

#10 lore raw
Quoted 13 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 11 lines · Alexandre Belloni
Quoted 7 lines · Shawn Guo
Quoted 2 lines · Alexandre Belloni

The driver using the PWM should test the flag, have a look at:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c#L183

Ah, right, that' how the flag works. Thanks, Alexandre. I send a patch to set the flag for pwm-mxs driver shortly.

Actually, I had a closer look and I believe using clk_prepare_enable() in .config is wrong. Let me prepare a patch.

Quoted 8 lines

Yes, we can split clk_prepare_enable() into clk_prepare() and clk_enable(), call the former in .probe() and only the later in .config hook.

But it only fixes the problem partially. If you look at Stefan's report closely, you can see the warning actually comes from the clk_get_rate() call which holds a mutex too.

Right, I missed that one. I would say it is still worth doing that change anyway as using test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags) is unnecessary because clk_enable()/clk_disable() maintain a usage count.

Signature · 3 lines
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com