FIT image AES support and PPC4xx/85xx boards
Hey guys,
Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140418/3c20fcc3/attachment.pgp>
Quoted 6 lines · Tom Rini
Hey guys,
Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
Tom,
Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
York
Quoted 8 lines · York Sun
Quoted 6 lines · Tom Rini
Hey guys,
Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
Quoted 4 lines
Tom,
Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
Not many:
io neo iocon MPC8572DS MPC8572DS_36BIT dlvision-10g
Signature · 8 lines
Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20140418/09c3793a/attachment.pgp>
Quoted 9 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 8 lines · York Sun
Quoted 6 lines · Tom Rini
Hey guys,
Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Tom,
Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
Not many:
io neo iocon MPC8572DSMPC8572DS_36BITdlvision-10g
In this case, let me try to address the size. I can't test other than Freescale boards. The change should be similar to commit c6e8f49a16915822ffe25904daf1fc9c28115ed4 and/or e222b1f36fedb0363dbc21e0add7dc3848bae553.
York
Quoted 9 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 8 lines · York Sun
Quoted 6 lines · Tom Rini
Hey guys,
Adding AES256 support to FIT images means that a handful of boards (ion, MPC8572DS, others) now don't link because of growth in the binary. Can we come up with something to fix these boards again? Thanks!
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Tom,
Freescale board maintainers have been increasing the image size on some boards to 768KB. How many are still broken if adding AES256 support?
Not many:
io neo iocon MPC8572DSMPC8572DS_36BITdlvision-10g
Tom,
I sent a patch to increase the size for these boards. Please review
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/342009/.
York