libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6
PATCH 1/1 libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6
Since libatomic_ops does not implement real atomic operations for ARMv4 and ARMv5, libunwind must define AO_REQUIRE_CAS do indicate it requires compare-and-swap operations, even if not available as real atomic operations for the current architecture. In this case, libatomic_ops will rely on emulated atomic operations, which also require linking against libatomic_ops, which was until now not done by libunwind.
This fixes the mysterious ltrace build issue:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e1b/e1b330abfa2d80f3f30bc3359428ea429c690eb8/
---
...ests.patch => libunwind-01-disable-tests.patch} | 0
...Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++
package/libunwind/libunwind.mk | 1 +
3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
rename package/libunwind/{libunwind-disable-tests.patch => libunwind-01-disable-tests.patch} (100%)
create mode 100644 package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patchpackage/libunwind/libunwind-01-disable-tests.patch renamed from package/libunwind/libunwind-disable-tests.patch +0 -0
package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch new file +56 -0
56 lines not on this page · raw message
package/libunwind/libunwind.mk +1 -0
@@ -9,5 +9,6 @@ LIBUNWIND_SITE = http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/libunwind LIBUNWIND_INSTALL_STAGING = YES LIBUNWIND_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING LIBUNWIND_LICENSE = MIT +LIBUNWIND_AUTORECONF = YES $(eval $(autotools-package))
Signature · 1 line
1.9.2
PATCH 1/1 libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
Since
libatomic_opsdoes not implement real atomic operations for ARMv4 and ARMv5, libunwind must defineAO_REQUIRE_CASdo indicate it requires compare-and-swap operations, even if not available as real atomic operations for the current architecture. In this case,libatomic_opswill rely on emulated atomic operations, which also require linking againstlibatomic_ops, which was until now not done by libunwind.
Quoted 6 lines
This fixes the mysterious ltrace build issue:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e1b/e1b330abfa2d80f3f30bc3359428ea429c690eb8/
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>Cc Baruch Siach <[email protected]>
Committed, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 1/1 libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniHi Thomas,
Quoted 62 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Since
libatomic_opsdoes not implement real atomic operations for ARMv4 and ARMv5, libunwind must defineAO_REQUIRE_CASdo indicate it requires compare-and-swap operations, even if not available as real atomic operations for the current architecture. In this case,libatomic_opswill rely on emulated atomic operations, which also require linking againstlibatomic_ops, which was until now not done by libunwind.This fixes the mysterious ltrace build issue:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e1b/e1b330abfa2d80f3f30bc3359428ea429c690eb8/
Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>Cc Baruch Siach <[email protected]>--- ...ests.patch => libunwind-01-disable-tests.patch} | 0 ...Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++ package/libunwind/libunwind.mk | 1 + 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+) rename package/libunwind/{libunwind-disable-tests.patch => libunwind-01-disable-tests.patch} (100%) create mode 100644 package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patchpackage/libunwind/libunwind-01-disable-tests.patch renamed from package/libunwind/libunwind-disable-tests.patch +0
-0package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch new file +30
-0@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +From 24484e80b3e329c9edee1995e102f8612eedb79c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> +Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 23:32:27 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] Add AO_REQUIRE_CAS to fix build on ARM < v6 + +ARM earlier than ARMv6, such as ARMv4 and ARMv5 do not provide +optimize atomic operations in libatomic_ops. Since libunwind is using +such operations, it should define AO_REQUIRE_CAS before including +<atomic_ops.h> so that libatomic_ops knows it should use emulated +atomic operations instead (even though they are obviously a lot more +expensive). + +Also, while real atomic operations are all inline functions and +therefore linking against libatomic_ops was not required, the emulated +atomic operations actually require linking against libatomic_ops, so +the commented AC_CHECK_LIB test in acinclude.m4 is uncommented to make +sure we link against libatomic_ops. + +Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> +--- + acinclude.m4 | 8 +------- + include/libunwind_i.h | 1 + + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4 +index 497f7c2..9c15af1 100644 +--- a/acinclude.m4 ++++ b/acinclude.m4 +@@ -22,11 +22,5 @@ fi]) + AC_DEFUN([CHECK_ATOMIC_OPS],
package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch line 40
Quoted 10 lines
package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch new file +10
-0+ [dnl Check whether the system has the atomic_ops package installed. + AC_CHECK_HEADERS(atomic_ops.h) +-# +-# Don't link against libatomic_ops for now. We don't want libunwind +-# to depend on libatomic_ops.so. Fortunately, none of the platforms +-# we care about so far need libatomic_ops.a (everything is done via +-# inline macros). +-# +-# AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main) ++ AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main)
For the sake of reproducibility shouldn't we add libatomic_ops to libunwind dependencies when libatomic_ops is enabled?
baruch
Quoted 28 lines
package/libunwind/libunwind-02-Add-AO_REQUIRE_CAS-to-fix-build-on-ARM-v6.patch new file +16
-0+ ]) +diff --git a/include/libunwind_i.h b/include/libunwind_i.h +index 23f615e..deabdfd 100644 +--- a/include/libunwind_i.h ++++ b/include/libunwind_i.h +@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. */ + (pthread_mutex_unlock != NULL ? pthread_mutex_unlock (l) : 0) + + #ifdef HAVE_ATOMIC_OPS_H ++# define AO_REQUIRE_CAS + # include <atomic_ops.h> + static inline int + cmpxchg_ptr (void *addr, void *old, void *new) +-- +1.9.2 +package/libunwind/libunwind.mk +1
-0@@ -9,5 +9,6 @@ LIBUNWIND_SITE = http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/libunwind LIBUNWIND_INSTALL_STAGING = YES LIBUNWIND_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING LIBUNWIND_LICENSE = MIT +LIBUNWIND_AUTORECONF = YES $(eval $(autotools-package))
Signature · 3 lines
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -PATCH 1/1 libunwind: add patch to fix behavior for ARM < v6
Dear Baruch Siach,
Quoted 10 lines · Baruch Siach
Quoted 7 lines
+-# Don't link against libatomic_ops for now. We don't want libunwind +-# to depend on libatomic_ops.so. Fortunately, none of the platforms +-# we care about so far need libatomic_ops.a (everything is done via +-# inline macros). +-# +-# AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main) ++ AC_CHECK_LIB(atomic_ops, main)For the sake of reproducibility shouldn't we add
libatomic_opsto libunwind dependencies whenlibatomic_opsis enabled?
Yes, you're right! I'll send a patch for that.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com