net: cdc_ncm: fix typo in test for supported formats
Subsystems (5)
PATCH 1/1 net: cdc_ncm: fix typo in test for supported formats
There is a typo here where we test for USB_CDC_NCM_NTH32_SIGN instead of USB_CDC_NCM_NTB32_SUPPORTED. The test probably still works as written because 0x686D636E has (1 << 1) set and doesn't have (1 << 0) set.
---
Static analysis. Untested. Applies on -next
drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c +2 -1
@@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ static int cdc_ncm_init(struct usbnet *dev)* "The host shall only send this command while the NCM Data * Interface is in alternate setting 0." */ -if (le16_to_cpu (ctx->ncm_parm.bmNtbFormatsSupported) &USB_CDC_NCM_NTH32_SIGN ) { +if (le16_to_cpu (ctx->ncm_parm.bmNtbFormatsSupported) & +USB_CDC_NCM_NTB32_SUPPORTED ) {dev_dbg (&dev->intf->dev,"Setting NTB format to 16-bit\n" ); err =usbnet_write_cmd (dev,USB_CDC_SET_NTB_FORMAT , USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_DIR_OUT
Quoted 15 lines · Dan Carpenter
There is a typo here where we test for
USB_CDC_NCM_NTH32_SIGNinstead ofUSB_CDC_NCM_NTB32_SUPPORTED. The test probably still works as written because0x686D636Ehas (1 << 1) set and doesn't have (1 << 0) set.Fixes f8afb73da375 ('net: cdc_ncm: factor out one-time device initialization')Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>---
Static analysis. Untested. Applies on -nextdrivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c +0
-0
drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c static int cdc_ncm_init(struct usbnet *dev) · line 364
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/usb/cdc_ncm.c +2
-1@@ -357,7 +357,8 @@ static int cdc_ncm_init(struct usbnet *dev)* "The host shall only send this command while the NCM Data * Interface is in alternate setting 0." */ -if (le16_to_cpu (ctx->ncm_parm.bmNtbFormatsSupported) &USB_CDC_NCM_NTH32_SIGN ) { +if (le16_to_cpu (ctx->ncm_parm.bmNtbFormatsSupported) & +USB_CDC_NCM_NTB32_SUPPORTED ) {dev_dbg (&dev->intf->dev,"Setting NTB format to 16-bit\n" ); err =usbnet_write_cmd (dev,USB_CDC_SET_NTB_FORMAT , USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_DIR_OUT
Thanks! Yes, that is correct.
I actually thought I had fixed that bug a while ago, but instead I managed to just copy it while refactoring. Impressive...
It doesn't matter whether (1 << 0) is set. In fact it always will be. What makes this work despite the bug is that no other bits will ever be set - they are all reserved and must be zero. But the spec also requires us to ignore them, so your fix is definitely needed.
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:52:29 +0300
Quoted 7 lines
There is a typo here where we test for
USB_CDC_NCM_NTH32_SIGNinstead ofUSB_CDC_NCM_NTB32_SUPPORTED. The test probably still works as written because0x686D636Ehas (1 << 1) set and doesn't have (1 << 0) set.Fixes f8afb73da375 ('net: cdc_ncm: factor out one-time device initialization')Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Applied to net-next, thanks.