docs: Added referenc to EUPL
PATCH 2/2 docs: Added referenc to EUPL
The first European Union Public Licence
--- docs/manual/legal-notice.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +3 -0
@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: * `Apache-2.0`: http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html[ Apache License, version 2.0]; +* `EUPL-1`: + http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl.html[ + The first European Union Public Licence]; == Complying with the Buildroot license
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 2/2 docs: Added referenc to EUPL
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"oli" == oli vogt <[email protected]> writes:
This patch was listed as 2/2, but I don't seem to have received 1/2?
Quoted 11 lines
The first European Union Public Licence
Signed-off-by oli vogt <[email protected]>--- docs/manual/legal-notice.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +0
-0
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: · line 127
Quoted 6 lines
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +3
-0@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: * `Apache-2.0`: http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html[ Apache License, version 2.0]; +* `EUPL-1`: + http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl.html[ + The first European Union Public Licence];
Is that really a widely used license? I don't know of any sw licensed under it and the string isn't present anywhere in Buildroot.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 2/2 docs: Added referenc to EUPL
Hi Peter.
- Sorry about [2/2]. I'm still learning git. I'll submit a second patch if this is accepted. <
https://launchpad.net/nfcpy> uses EUPL.
- In general don't care much about legal issues but I thought that it can just as well be included for completeness reasons.
Its major feature, in my opinion, is that it is available in many
languages. It breaks up the english monotony ;-)
Kind regards, Olivier
Quoted 25 lines · Peter Korsgaard
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"oli" == oli vogt <[email protected]> writes:
This patch was listed as 2/2, but I don't seem to have received 1/2?
Quoted 11 lines
The first European Union Public Licence
Signed-off-by oli vogt <[email protected]>--- docs/manual/legal-notice.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +0
-0docs/manual/legal-notice.txt Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: · line 127
Quoted 6 lines
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +3
-0@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: * `Apache-2.0`: http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html[ Apache License, version 2.0]; +* `EUPL-1`: + http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl.html[ + The first European Union Public Licence];Is that really a widely used license? I don't know of any sw licensed under it and the string isn't present anywhere in Buildroot.
Quoted 3 lines
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20140526/42e78b1b/attachment.html>
PATCH 2/2 docs: Added referenc to EUPL
In reply to oli vogtHi Olli,
It would make more sense to submit this patch as part of a series adding a
package that actually uses the license.
Also:
Quoted 12 lines · oli vogt
The first European Union Public Licence
Signed-off-by oli vogt <[email protected]>--- docs/manual/legal-notice.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +0
-0
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: · line 125
Quoted 4 lines
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +1
-0@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: * `Apache-2.0`: http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html[ Apache License, version 2.0]; +* `EUPL-1`:
spdx.org has EUPL-1.0 and EUPL-1.1. I expect only EUPL-1.1 is relevant.
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt Buildroot, with the name used in the manifest files: · line 127
Quoted 2 lines
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +2
-0+ http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl.html[ + The first European Union Public Licence];
"The first"? The website refers to it as v1.1. So I'd call it
European Union Public License, version 1.1
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 4 lines
docs/manual/legal-notice.txt +0
-0== Complying with the Buildroot license
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
PATCH 2/2 docs: Added referenc to EUPL
In reply to oli vogtDear oli vogt,
Quoted 6 lines · oli vogt
The first European Union Public Licence
Signed-off-by oli vogt <[email protected]>--- docs/manual/legal-notice.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Thanks for your patch. However, the feedback is that the patch is not correct (not following the SPDX code for the EUPL license) and that we prefer to wait to have one patch using this license to mention it in our documentation.
I'll therefore mark your patch as Rejected in our patchwork system.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com