Skip to contentSkip to conversation

rcu: use __this_cpu_read helper instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id())

PATCH In review Pranith Kumar 3 participants 4 messages Jun 19, 2014 RCU

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 rcu: use __this_cpu_read helper instead of per_cpu_ptr(p, raw_smp_processor_id())

Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr() for optimized access.

Last time when Shan Wei posted this, you wanted before/after code for ARM and x86.
(http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1211.2/00498.html).

There are few other location which use per_cpu_ops instead of this_cpu_ops. I can convert them accordingly if you are accept this :)

Using gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-12ubuntu1) 4.7.3, I get (trimmed to relevant assembly, from make kernel/rcu/tree.s)

ARMv7 per_cpu_ptr():

force_quiescent_state:

    mov    r3, sp    @,
    bic    r1, r3, #8128    @ tmp171,,
    ldr    r2, .L98    @ tmp169,
    bic    r1, r1, #63    @ tmp170, tmp171,
    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ __ptr, rsp_6(D)->rda
    ldr    r1, [r1, #20]    @ D.35903_68->cpu, D.35903_68->cpu
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    ldr    r2, [r2, r1, asl #2]    @ tmp173, __per_cpu_offset
    add    r3, r3, r2    @ tmp175, __ptr, tmp173
    ldr    r5, [r3, #12]    @ rnp_old, D.29162_13->mynode

ARMv7 using __this_cpu_read():

force_quiescent_state:

    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ rsp_7(D)->rda, rsp_7(D)->rda
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    add    r3, r3, #12    @ __ptr, rsp_7(D)->rda,
    ldr    r5, [r2, r3]    @ rnp_old, *D.29176_13

Using gcc 4.8.2:

x86_64 per_cpu_ptr():

movl %gs:cpu_number,%edx # cpu_number, pscr_ret__
movslq %edx, %rdx # pscr_ret__, pscr_ret__
movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdx,8), %rdx # __per_cpu_offset, tmp93
movq %rdi, %r13 # rsp, rsp
movq 1000(%rdi), %rax # rsp_9(D)->rda, __ptr
movq 24(%rdx,%rax), %r12 # _15->mynode, rnp_old

x86_64 __this_cpu_read():

    movq    %rdi, %r13    # rsp, rsp
    movq    1000(%rdi), %rax    # rsp_9(D)->rda, rsp_9(D)->rda
    movq %gs:24(%rax),%r12    # _10->mynode, rnp_old
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/rcu/tree.c +1 -1
index f1ba773..c6de285 100644
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
     struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
 
     /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
-    rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
+    rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
     for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
         ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
               !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
Signature · 1 line
2.0.0
maintainer Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Pranith Kumar

Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr() for optimized access.

Last time when Shan Wei posted this, you wanted before/after code for ARM and x86.
(http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1211.2/00498.html).

There are few other location which use per_cpu_ops instead of this_cpu_ops. I can convert them accordingly if you are accept this :)

Please do.

Quoted 37 lines

Using gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-12ubuntu1) 4.7.3, I get (trimmed to relevant assembly, from make kernel/rcu/tree.s)

ARMv7 per_cpu_ptr():

force_quiescent_state:

    mov    r3, sp    @,
    bic    r1, r3, #8128    @ tmp171,,
    ldr    r2, .L98    @ tmp169,
    bic    r1, r1, #63    @ tmp170, tmp171,
    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ __ptr, rsp_6(D)->rda
    ldr    r1, [r1, #20]    @ D.35903_68->cpu, D.35903_68->cpu
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    ldr    r2, [r2, r1, asl #2]    @ tmp173, __per_cpu_offset
    add    r3, r3, r2    @ tmp175, __ptr, tmp173
    ldr    r5, [r3, #12]    @ rnp_old, D.29162_13->mynode

ARMv7 using __this_cpu_read():

force_quiescent_state:

    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ rsp_7(D)->rda, rsp_7(D)->rda
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    add    r3, r3, #12    @ __ptr, rsp_7(D)->rda,
    ldr    r5, [r2, r3]    @ rnp_old, *D.29176_13

Using gcc 4.8.2:

x86_64 per_cpu_ptr():

movl %gs:cpu_number,%edx # cpu_number, pscr_ret__
movslq %edx, %rdx # pscr_ret__, pscr_ret__
movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdx,8), %rdx # __per_cpu_offset, tmp93
movq %rdi, %r13 # rsp, rsp
movq 1000(%rdi), %rax # rsp_9(D)->rda, __ptr
movq 24(%rdx,%rax), %r12 # _15->mynode, rnp_old

x86_64 __this_cpu_read():

Quoted 8 lines
    movq    %rdi, %r13    # rsp, rsp
    movq    1000(%rdi), %rax    # rsp_9(D)->rda, rsp_9(D)->rda
    movq %gs:24(%rax),%r12    # _10->mynode, rnp_old
Quoted 20 lines
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/rcu/tree.c +1 -1
index f1ba773..c6de285 100644
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
     struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
 
     /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
-    rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
+    rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
     for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
         ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
               !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
Signature · 1 line
2.0.0
#2 lore raw
Quoted 53 lines · On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:17:02PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Pranith Kumar

Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr() for optimized access.

Last time when Shan Wei posted this, you wanted before/after code for ARM and x86.
(http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1211.2/00498.html).

There are few other location which use per_cpu_ops instead of this_cpu_ops. I can convert them accordingly if you are accept this :)

Please do.

Quoted 42 lines

Using gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-12ubuntu1) 4.7.3, I get (trimmed to relevant assembly, from make kernel/rcu/tree.s)

ARMv7 per_cpu_ptr():

force_quiescent_state:

    mov    r3, sp    @,
    bic    r1, r3, #8128    @ tmp171,,
    ldr    r2, .L98    @ tmp169,
    bic    r1, r1, #63    @ tmp170, tmp171,
    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ __ptr, rsp_6(D)->rda
    ldr    r1, [r1, #20]    @ D.35903_68->cpu, D.35903_68->cpu
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    ldr    r2, [r2, r1, asl #2]    @ tmp173, __per_cpu_offset
    add    r3, r3, r2    @ tmp175, __ptr, tmp173
    ldr    r5, [r3, #12]    @ rnp_old, D.29162_13->mynode

ARMv7 using __this_cpu_read():

force_quiescent_state:

    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ rsp_7(D)->rda, rsp_7(D)->rda
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    add    r3, r3, #12    @ __ptr, rsp_7(D)->rda,
    ldr    r5, [r2, r3]    @ rnp_old, *D.29176_13

Using gcc 4.8.2:

x86_64 per_cpu_ptr():

movl %gs:cpu_number,%edx # cpu_number, pscr_ret__
movslq %edx, %rdx # pscr_ret__, pscr_ret__
movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdx,8), %rdx # __per_cpu_offset, tmp93
movq %rdi, %r13 # rsp, rsp
movq 1000(%rdi), %rax # rsp_9(D)->rda, __ptr
movq 24(%rdx,%rax), %r12 # _15->mynode, rnp_old

x86_64 __this_cpu_read():

    movq    %rdi, %r13    # rsp, rsp
    movq    1000(%rdi), %rax    # rsp_9(D)->rda, rsp_9(D)->rda
    movq %gs:24(%rax),%r12    # _10->mynode, rnp_old
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Queued for 3.17!

Thanx, Paul

Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 20 lines
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/rcu/tree.c +1 -1
index f1ba773..c6de285 100644
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
     struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
 
     /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
-    rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
+    rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
     for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
         ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
               !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
Signature · 1 line
2.0.0
#3 lore raw
In reply to Pranith Kumar
Quoted 4 lines · Pranith Kumar

Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr() for optimized access.

Last time when Shan Wei posted this, you wanted before/after code for ARM and x86.
(http://lkml.iu.edu//hypermail/linux/kernel/1211.2/00498.html).

That was some time back, wasn't it?

Anyway, yes, this does look quite a bit more convincing.

Thanx, Paul

Quoted 68 lines

There are few other location which use per_cpu_ops instead of this_cpu_ops. I can convert them accordingly if you are accept this :)

Using gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-12ubuntu1) 4.7.3, I get (trimmed to relevant assembly, from make kernel/rcu/tree.s)

ARMv7 per_cpu_ptr():

force_quiescent_state:

    mov    r3, sp    @,
    bic    r1, r3, #8128    @ tmp171,,
    ldr    r2, .L98    @ tmp169,
    bic    r1, r1, #63    @ tmp170, tmp171,
    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ __ptr, rsp_6(D)->rda
    ldr    r1, [r1, #20]    @ D.35903_68->cpu, D.35903_68->cpu
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    ldr    r2, [r2, r1, asl #2]    @ tmp173, __per_cpu_offset
    add    r3, r3, r2    @ tmp175, __ptr, tmp173
    ldr    r5, [r3, #12]    @ rnp_old, D.29162_13->mynode

ARMv7 using __this_cpu_read():

force_quiescent_state:

    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ rsp_7(D)->rda, rsp_7(D)->rda
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    add    r3, r3, #12    @ __ptr, rsp_7(D)->rda,
    ldr    r5, [r2, r3]    @ rnp_old, *D.29176_13

Using gcc 4.8.2:

x86_64 per_cpu_ptr():

movl %gs:cpu_number,%edx # cpu_number, pscr_ret__
movslq %edx, %rdx # pscr_ret__, pscr_ret__
movq __per_cpu_offset(,%rdx,8), %rdx # __per_cpu_offset, tmp93
movq %rdi, %r13 # rsp, rsp
movq 1000(%rdi), %rax # rsp_9(D)->rda, __ptr
movq 24(%rdx,%rax), %r12 # _15->mynode, rnp_old

x86_64 __this_cpu_read():

    movq    %rdi, %r13    # rsp, rsp
    movq    1000(%rdi), %rax    # rsp_9(D)->rda, rsp_9(D)->rda
    movq %gs:24(%rax),%r12    # _10->mynode, rnp_old
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/rcu/tree.c +1 -1
index f1ba773..c6de285 100644
@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
     struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
 
     /* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
-    rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
+    rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
     for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
         ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
               !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
Signature · 1 line
2.0.0