package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
PATCH 1/1 package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
From: "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>
Since CPAN only ever keeps the latest version for download, CPAN now has only 5.08, so us packaging the 5.07 is causing autobuild failures:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/358/358f531f2db90b9bc3b1e4e2158c68d2bf6587fc/
Bump to the latest version.
--- package/perl-mojolicious/perl-mojolicious.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
package/perl-mojolicious/perl-mojolicious.mk +1 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_VERSION = 5.07 +PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_VERSION = 5.08 PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SOURCE = Mojolicious-$(PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_VERSION).tar.gz PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SITE = $(BR2_CPAN_MIRROR)/authors/id/S/SR/SRI/ PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_DEPENDENCIES = perl
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.2
PATCH 1/1 package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
2014-06-22 23:15 GMT+02:00 Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
From: "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>
Since CPAN only ever keeps the latest version for download, CPAN now has only 5.08, so us packaging the 5.07 is causing autobuild failures
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/358/358f531f2db90b9bc3b1e4e2158c68d2bf6587fc/Bump to the latest version.
The author of Mojolicious remove very quickly older versions from CPAN. It is not a usual policy.
So, I think that the best way for this module is to move to Backpan site which contains all releases.
PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SITE = http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/S/SR/SRI/
Fran?ois
Quoted 27 lines
Signed-off-by "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>Cc Francois Perrad <[email protected]>--- package/perl-mojolicious/perl-mojolicious.mk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)package/perl-mojolicious/perl-mojolicious.mk +1
-2@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_VERSION = 5.07 +PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_VERSION = 5.08 PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SOURCE = Mojolicious-$(PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_VERSION).tar.gz PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SITE = $(BR2_CPAN_MIRROR)/authors/id/S/SR/SRI/ PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_DEPENDENCIES = perl --1.8.3.2
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
PATCH 1/1 package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
Fran?ois, All,
On 2014-06-23 19:29 +0200, Fran?ois Perrad spake thusly:
Quoted 11 lines
2014-06-22 23:15 GMT+02:00 Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
From: "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>
Since CPAN only ever keeps the latest version for download, CPAN now has only 5.08, so us packaging the 5.07 is causing autobuild failures
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/358/358f531f2db90b9bc3b1e4e2158c68d2bf6587fc/Bump to the latest version.
The author of Mojolicious remove very quickly older versions from CPAN. It is not a usual policy.
Ah, OK. Thanks for the clarification.
Quoted 4 lines
So, I think that the best way for this module is to move to Backpan site which contains all releases.
PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SITE= http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/S/SR/SRI/
If backpan has all the versions of all modules (including the current versions), shouldn't we point $(BR2_CPAN_MIRROR) to default to backpan, then? I'll send a new patch doing so. You can still NAK it when it arrives. ;-)
Fran?ois, apart from this issue, is the bump still valid?
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/1 package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
2014-06-23 19:35 GMT+02:00 Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>:
Quoted 20 lines
Fran?ois, All,
On 2014-06-23 19:29 +0200, Fran?ois Perrad spake thusly:
Quoted 11 lines
2014-06-22 23:15 GMT+02:00 Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
From: "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>
Since CPAN only ever keeps the latest version for download, CPAN now has only 5.08, so us packaging the 5.07 is causing autobuild failures
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/358/358f531f2db90b9bc3b1e4e2158c68d2bf6587fc/Bump to the latest version.
The author of Mojolicious remove very quickly older versions from CPAN. It is not a usual policy.
Ah, OK. Thanks for the clarification.
Quoted 3 lines
So, I think that the best way for this module is to move to Backpan site which contains all releases.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
PERL_MOJOLICIOUS_SITE= http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/S/SR/SRI/If backpan has all the versions of all modules (including the current versions), shouldn't we point $(BR2_CPAN_MIRROR) to default to backpan, then? I'll send a new patch doing so. You can still NAK it when it arrives. ;-)
Fran?ois, apart from this issue, is the bump still valid?http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/SRI/Mojolicious-5.08/Changes
The bump to 5.08 is valid (for few days, see the actual delay between two releases in
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/SRI/Mojolicious-5.08/Changes).
I prefer that we use Backpan only the package Mojolicious. The use of Backpan must stay unusual.
Fran?ois
Quoted 11 lines
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/1 package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
On 23/06/14 19:50, Fran?ois Perrad wrote:
[snip]
Quoted 2 lines
I prefer that we use Backpan only the package Mojolicious. The use of Backpan must stay unusual.
Can you explain why it should stay unusual? Is Mojolicious the only package for
which the author removes old versions? If the general policy on CPAN is not to remove old versions, then I agree with you, but otherwise I think backpan is a better option.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
PATCH 1/1 package/perl-mojolicious: bump to 5.08
Arnout, All,
On 2014-06-24 18:40 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle spake thusly:
Quoted 9 lines · Fran?ois Perrad
[snip]
Quoted 2 lines
I prefer that we use Backpan only the package Mojolicious. The use of Backpan must stay unusual.
Can you explain why it should stay unusual? Is Mojolicious the only package for
which the author removes old versions? If the general policy on CPAN is not to remove old versions, then I agree with you, but otherwise I think backpan is a better option.
I initially thought it was a policy of CPAN to only keep the latest version. But Fran?ois said it was just that particular author that had this policy.
So, it makes sense to use BackPan only for mojolicious for now.
If it happens that more packages need to be converted over to BackPan, then we can revisit this later on by switching everything to BackPan. But until then, mojolicious is the only package that suffers from this policy.
So, I agree with Fran?ois: let's keep CPAN for now.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'