bfin: disable newer binutils for internal toolchain
PATCH 1/1 bfin: disable newer binutils for internal toolchain
You get following linking error, when trying to build a
toolchain for bfin with newer binutils:
bfin-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld: fde encoding in _divdi3_s.o(.eh_frame) prevents .eh_frame_hdr table being created.
--- package/binutils/Config.in.host | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/binutils/Config.in.host +2 -2
@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ choice bool "binutils 2.22" config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_23_2 - depends on !BR2_avr32 && !BR2_aarch64 && !BR2_microblaze && !BR2_powerpc64le + depends on !BR2_avr32 && !BR2_aarch64 && !BR2_bfin && !BR2_microblaze && !BR2_powerpc64le bool "binutils 2.23.2" config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_24 - depends on !BR2_avr32 + depends on !BR2_avr32 && !BR2_bfin bool "binutils 2.24" endchoice
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH 1/1 bfin: disable newer binutils for internal toolchain
Dear Waldemar Brodkorb,
Quoted 8 lines · Waldemar Brodkorb
You get following linking error, when trying to build a
toolchain for bfin with newer binutils:
bfin-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld: fde encoding in_divdi3_s.o(.eh_frame)prevents .eh_frame_hdr table being created.Signed-off-by Waldemar Brodkorb <[email protected]>--- package/binutils/Config.in.host | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Could you report the bug to upstream binutils? I'd like to be able to get rid of binutils 2.22 at some point.
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/1 bfin: disable newer binutils for internal toolchain
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,
Quoted 12 lines
Dear Waldemar Brodkorb,
Quoted 8 lines · Waldemar Brodkorb
You get following linking error, when trying to build a
toolchain for bfin with newer binutils:
bfin-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld: fde encoding in_divdi3_s.o(.eh_frame)prevents .eh_frame_hdr table being created.Signed-off-by Waldemar Brodkorb <[email protected]>--- package/binutils/Config.in.host | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Quoted 4 lines
Could you report the bug to upstream binutils? I'd like to be able to get rid of binutils 2.22 at some point.
Thanks a lot!
Done:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334
best regards
Waldemar
PATCH 1/1 bfin: disable newer binutils for internal toolchain
Dear Waldemar Brodkorb,
Quoted 7 lines · Waldemar Brodkorb
Quoted 4 lines
Could you report the bug to upstream binutils? I'd like to be able to get rid of binutils 2.22 at some point.
Thanks a lot!
Great. Could you respin a new version of your patch that references this bug report in the comment, such as:
# bfin disabled due to # https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17334 config ... depends on !BR2_bfin
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com