Skip to contentSkip to conversation

sched/fair: Remove duplicate code from can_migrate_task()

PATCH Superseded Kirill Tkhai 1 participant 7 messages Sep 22, 2014 Scheduler

v2 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/6 sched/fair: Remove duplicate code from can_migrate_task()

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

Combine two branches which do the same.

---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   16 ++--------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/fair.c +2 -14
index 2a1e6ac..420bc98 100644
@@ -5292,24 +5292,12 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
 	if (!tsk_cache_hot)
 		tsk_cache_hot = migrate_degrades_locality(p, env);
 
-	if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env)) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
+	if (migrate_improves_locality(p, env) || !tsk_cache_hot ||
+	    env->sd->nr_balance_failed > env->sd->cache_nice_tries) {
 		if (tsk_cache_hot) {
 			schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
 			schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
 		}
-#endif
-		return 1;
-	}
-
-	if (!tsk_cache_hot ||
-		env->sd->nr_balance_failed > env->sd->cache_nice_tries) {
-
-		if (tsk_cache_hot) {
-			schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
-			schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
-		}
-
 		return 1;
 	}
 
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/6 sched: Do not pick a task which is switching on other cpu

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

Architectures, which define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW, may pull a task when it's in the middle of schedule().

CPU1(task1 calls schedule) CPU2
... schedule()
... idle_balance()
... load_balance()

...                                            ...
schedule()                                     ...
   prepare_lock_switch()                       ...
      raw_spin_unlock(&rq1->lock)              ...
      ...                                      raw_spin_lock(&rq1->lock)
      ...                                         detach_tasks();
      ...                                            can_migrate_task(task1)
      ...                                         attach_tasks(); <--- move task1 to rq2
      ...                                      raw_spin_unlock(&rq1->lock)
      ...                                context_switch() <--- switch to task1's stack
      ...                                ...
   (using task1's stack)                 (using task1's stack)
   ...                                   ...
   context_switch()                      ...

Parallel use of a single stack is not a good idea.

Cc <[email protected]> # Should this go to stable?
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     |   11 +++--------
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |    7 ++++++-
 kernel/sched/fair.c     |    3 +++
 kernel/sched/rt.c       |    7 ++++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/core.c +3 -8
index 2a93b87..5b864e9 100644
@@ -1700,15 +1700,10 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/*
-	 * If the owning (remote) cpu is still in the middle of schedule() with
-	 * this task as prev, wait until its done referencing the task.
+	 * Note, that p is dequeued at the moment. But it still
+	 * may be "prev" in the middle of schedule() on other cpu.
 	 */
-	while (p->on_cpu)
-		cpu_relax();
-	/*
-	 * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in finish_lock_switch().
-	 */
-	smp_rmb();
+	cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(p);
 
 	p->sched_contributes_to_load = !!task_contributes_to_load(p);
 	p->state = TASK_WAKING;
kernel/sched/deadline.c +6 -1
index aaa5abb..ea0ba33 100644
@@ -1364,7 +1364,9 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
 		next_task = task;
 		goto retry;
 	}
-
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
+	cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(next_task);
+#endif
 	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
 	set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu);
 	activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0);
@@ -1451,6 +1453,9 @@ static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 
 			ret = 1;
 
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
+			cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(p);
+#endif
 			deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
 			set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
 			activate_task(this_rq, p, 0);
kernel/sched/fair.c +3 -0
index 420bc98..80c5064 100644
@@ -5298,6 +5298,9 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
 			schedstat_inc(env->sd, lb_hot_gained[env->idle]);
 			schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_forced_migrations);
 		}
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
+		cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(p);
+#endif
 		return 1;
 	}
 
kernel/sched/rt.c +6 -1
index 2e6a774..de356b0 100644
@@ -1734,7 +1734,9 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
 		next_task = task;
 		goto retry;
 	}
-
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
+	cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(next_task);
+#endif
 	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
 	set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
 	activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0);
@@ -1823,6 +1825,9 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 
 			ret = 1;
 
+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW
+			cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(p);
+#endif
 			deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
 			set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
 			activate_task(this_rq, p, 0);
kernel/sched/sched.h +16 -0
index 1bc6aad..9c07d72 100644
@@ -1034,6 +1034,22 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 #endif /* __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW */
 
 /*
+ * If the owning (remote) cpu is still in the middle of schedule() with
+ * this task as prev, wait until its done referencing the task.
+ */
+static inline void cpu_relax__while_on_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	while (p->on_cpu)
+		cpu_relax();
+	/*
+	 * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in finish_lock_switch().
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
  * wake flags
  */
 #define WF_SYNC		0x01		/* waker goes to sleep after wakeup */
#2 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/6 sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock

In reply to Kirill Tkhai

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

dl_bw_of() dereferences rq->rd which has to have RCU read lock held. Probability of use-after-free isn't zero here.

Also add lockdep assert into dl_bw_cpus().

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
kernel/sched/core.c +10 -0
index 5b864e9..a300fce 100644
@@ -1989,6 +1989,8 @@ unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
 {
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+			   "sched RCU must be held");
 	return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
 }
 
@@ -1997,6 +1999,8 @@ static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
 	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
 	int cpus = 0;
 
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+			   "sched RCU must be held");
 	for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
 		cpus++;
 
@@ -7623,6 +7627,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
 	/*
 	 * Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
 	 * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@@ -7644,6 +7650,8 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
 			break;
 	}
 
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -7659,6 +7667,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 	if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
 		new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: As above...
 	 */
@@ -7669,6 +7678,7 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
 		dl_b->bw = new_bw;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)
#3 lore raw

PATCH v2 4/6 sched: cleanup: Rename out_unlock to out_free_new_mask

In reply to Kirill Tkhai

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

Nothing is locked there, so label's name only confuses a reader.

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/core.c +4 -4
index a300fce..3b07710 100644
@@ -4003,14 +4003,14 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
 			rcu_read_unlock();
-			goto out_unlock;
+			goto out_free_new_mask;
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 
 	retval = security_task_setscheduler(p);
 	if (retval)
-		goto out_unlock;
+		goto out_free_new_mask;
 
 
 	cpuset_cpus_allowed(p, cpus_allowed);
@@ -4028,7 +4028,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 
 		if (dl_bandwidth_enabled() && !cpumask_subset(span, new_mask)) {
 			retval = -EBUSY;
-			goto out_unlock;
+			goto out_free_new_mask;
 		}
 	}
 #endif
@@ -4047,7 +4047,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 			goto again;
 		}
 	}
-out_unlock:
+out_free_new_mask:
 	free_cpumask_var(new_mask);
 out_free_cpus_allowed:
 	free_cpumask_var(cpus_allowed);
#4 lore raw

PATCH v2 5/6 sched: Use rq->rd in sched_setaffinity() under RCU read lock

In reply to Kirill Tkhai

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

task_rq(p)->rd and task_rq(p)->rd->span may be used-after-free here. Probability of NULL pointer derefference isn't zero in this place.

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/core.c +5 -4
index 3b07710..643ee99 100644
@@ -4023,13 +4023,14 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
 	 * root_domain.
 	 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-	if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
-		const struct cpumask *span = task_rq(p)->rd->span;
-
-		if (dl_bandwidth_enabled() && !cpumask_subset(span, new_mask)) {
+	if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) {
 			retval = -EBUSY;
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			goto out_free_new_mask;
 		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 #endif
 again:
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] sched: Use rq->rd in sched_setaffinity() under RCU read lock

22.09.2014, 22:32, "Kirill Tkhai" <[email protected]>:

Quoted 4 lines

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

task_rq(p)->rd and task_rq(p)->rd->span may be used-after-free here. Probability of NULL pointer derefference isn't zero in this place.

Wrong comment, sorry. I'll resend

Quoted 36 lines

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    9 +++++----

 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/sched/core.c +5 -4
index 3b07710..643ee99 100644
@@ -4023,13 +4023,14 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
           * root_domain.
           */
  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) {
- const struct cpumask *span = task_rq(p)->rd->span;
-
- if (dl_bandwidth_enabled() && !cpumask_subset(span, new_mask)) {
+ if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && dl_bandwidth_enabled()) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!cpumask_subset(task_rq(p)->rd->span, new_mask)) {
                          retval = -EBUSY;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
                          goto out_free_new_mask;
                  }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
          }
  #endif

 again:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

#6 lore raw

PATCH v2 6/6 sched/rt: Use resched_curr() in task_tick_rt()

In reply to Kirill Tkhai

From: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>

Some time ago PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED was implemented, so reschedule technics is a little more difficult now.

---
 kernel/sched/rt.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
kernel/sched/rt.c +1 -1
index de356b0..c322071 100644
@@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
 	for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
 		if (rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next) {
 			requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
-			set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+			resched_curr(rq);
 			return;
 		}
 	}