snapshot: add bdrv_drain_all() to bdrv_snapshot_delete() to avoid concurrency problem
PATCH 1/1 snapshot: add bdrv_drain_all() to bdrv_snapshot_delete() to avoid concurrency problem
If there are still pending i/o while deleting snapshot,
because deleting snapshot is done in non-coroutine context, and the pending i/o read/write (bdrv_co_do_rw) is done in coroutine context, so it's possible to cause concurrency problem between above two operations. Add bdrv_drain_all() to bdrv_snapshot_delete() to avoid this problem.
--- block/snapshot.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
block/snapshot.c +4 -0
@@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ int bdrv_snapshot_delete(BlockDriverState *bs,error_setg (errp,"snapshot_id and name are both NULL" );return -EINVAL ; } + +/* drain all pending i/o before deleting snapshot */ +bdrv_drain_all (); +if (drv->bdrv_snapshot_delete) {return drv->bdrv_snapshot_delete (bs, snapshot_id, name, errp); }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.12.4
Quoted 17 lines · Zhang Haoyu
If there are still pending i/o while deleting snapshot,
because deleting snapshot is done in non-coroutine context, and the pending i/o read/write (bdrv_co_do_rw) is done in coroutine context, so it's possible to cause concurrency problem between above two operations. Addbdrv_drain_all()tobdrv_snapshot_delete()to avoid this problem.Signed-off-by Zhang Haoyu <[email protected]>--- block/snapshot.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)block/snapshot.c +0
-0
block/snapshot.c int bdrv_snapshot_delete(BlockDriverState *bs, · line 245
Quoted 10 lines
block/snapshot.c +4
-0@@ -236,6 +236,10 @@ int bdrv_snapshot_delete(BlockDriverState *bs,error_setg (errp,"snapshot_id and name are both NULL" );return -EINVAL ; } + +/* drain all pending i/o before deleting snapshot */ +bdrv_drain_all (); +if (drv->bdrv_snapshot_delete) {return drv->bdrv_snapshot_delete (bs, snapshot_id, name, errp); }
Stefan Hajnoczi
AppliedQuoted 10 lines · Zhang Haoyu
If there are still pending i/o while deleting snapshot,
because deleting snapshot is done in non-coroutine context, and the pending i/o read/write (bdrv_co_do_rw) is done in coroutine context, so it's possible to cause concurrency problem between above two operations. Addbdrv_drain_all()tobdrv_snapshot_delete()to avoid this problem.Signed-off-by Zhang Haoyu <[email protected]>--- block/snapshot.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Thanks, applied to my block tree:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
Stefan