Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

PATCH New Steve Capper 3 participants 12 messages Nov 6, 2014 – Nov 19, 2014

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc3.

---

This patch applies on top of one I sent out earlier:
"arm64: xchg: Implement cmpxchg_double"
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-October/294705.html

My two least favourite things in the kernel are excessive pre-processor use and assembler, so this patch has been fun to write ;-).

I've tried to make the inline assembler clearer with named parameters, it really upset checkpatch, if it upsets people then please shout and I will change it.

Cheers,

Signature · 6 lines
Steve

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h  | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
index 3e02245..3e51f49 100644
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n);
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
 
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +231 -0

237 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
1.9.3
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

Hi Steve,

Quoted 8 lines · Steve Capper

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

Quoted 7 lines

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc3.

Got any numbers?

Quoted 133 lines

---

This patch applies on top of one I sent out earlier:
"arm64: xchg: Implement cmpxchg_double"
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-October/294705.html

My two least favourite things in the kernel are excessive pre-processor use and assembler, so this patch has been fun to write ;-).

I've tried to make the inline assembler clearer with named parameters, it really upset checkpatch, if it upsets people then please shout and I will change it.

Cheers,
--
Steve

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h  | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
index 3e02245..3e51f49 100644
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
        __ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-       cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n);
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
 
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
        cmpxchg_double(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +85 -0
index 5279e57..e751681 100644
@@ -44,6 +44,237 @@ static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+#define PERCPU_OP(op, asm_op)                                          \
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_##op(void *ptr,                   \
+                       unsigned long val, int size)                    \
+{                                                                      \
+       unsigned long loop, ret;                                        \
+                                                                       \
+       switch (size) {                                                 \
+       case 1:                                                         \
+               do {                                                    \
+                       asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_1\n"                  \
+                       "ldxrb    %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"                    \
+                       #asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"          \
+                       "stxrb    %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"          \
+                       : [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),       \
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr)                        \
+                       : [val] "Ir" (val));                            \
+               } while (loop);                                         \
+               break;                                                  \
+       case 2:                                                         \
+               do {                                                    \
+                       asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_2\n"                  \
+                       "ldxrh    %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"                    \
+                       #asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"          \
+                       "stxrh    %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"          \
+                       : [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),       \
+                         [ptr]  "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr)                      \
+                       : [val] "Ir" (val));                            \
+               } while (loop);                                         \
+               break;                                                  \
+       case 4:                                                         \
+               do {                                                    \
+                       asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_4\n"                  \
+                       "ldxr     %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"                    \
+                       #asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"          \
+                       "stxr     %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"          \
+                       : [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),       \
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr)                       \
+                       : [val] "Ir" (val));                            \
+               } while (loop);                                         \
+               break;                                                  \
+       case 8:                                                         \
+               do {                                                    \
+                       asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_8\n"                  \
+                       "ldxr     %[ret], %[ptr]\n"                     \
+                       #asm_op " %[ret], %[ret], %[val]\n"             \
+                       "stxr     %w[loop], %[ret], %[ptr]\n"           \
+                       : [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),       \
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr)                       \
+                       : [val] "Ir" (val));                            \
+               } while (loop);                                         \
+               break;                                                  \
+       default:                                                        \
+               BUILD_BUG();                                            \
+       }                                                               \
+                                                                       \
+       return ret;                                                     \
+}
+
+PERCPU_OP(add, add)
+PERCPU_OP(and, and)
+PERCPU_OP(or, orr)
+#undef PERCPU_OP
+
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_read(void *ptr, int size)
+{
+       unsigned long ret;
+
+       switch (size) {
+       case 1:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_1\n"
+                       "ldrb %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       case 2:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_2\n"
+                       "ldrh %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       case 4:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_4\n"
+                       "ldr %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       case 8:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_8\n"

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 141

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+                       "ldr %[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       default:
+               BUILD_BUG();
+       }
+
+       return ret;
+}
+

Why are the 'ptr' references '+Q' outputs here rather than 'Q' inputs?

Quoted 18 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +18 -0
+static inline void __percpu_write(void *ptr, unsigned long val, int size)
+{
+       switch (size) {
+       case 1:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_1\n"
+                       "strb %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;
+       case 2:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_2\n"
+                       "strh %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;
+       case 4:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_4\n"
+                       "str %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 169

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+       case 8:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_8\n"
+                       "str %[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;
+       default:
+               BUILD_BUG();
+       }
+}
+

... and similarly, why are these '+Q' and not just '=Q' ?

Quoted 119 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +108 -1
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_xchg(void *ptr, unsigned long val,
+                                               int size)
+{
+       unsigned long ret, loop;
+
+       switch (size) {
+       case 1:
+               do {
+                       asm ("//__percpu_xchg_1\n"
+                       "ldxrb %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"
+                       "stxrb %w[loop], %w[val], %[ptr]\n"
+                       : [loop] "=&r"(loop), [ret] "=&r"(ret),
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr)
+                       : [val] "r" (val));
+               } while (loop);
+               break;
+       case 2:
+               do {
+                       asm ("//__percpu_xchg_2\n"
+                       "ldxrh %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"
+                       "stxrh %w[loop], %w[val], %[ptr]\n"
+                       : [loop] "=&r"(loop), [ret] "=&r"(ret),
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr)
+                       : [val] "r" (val));
+               } while (loop);
+               break;
+       case 4:
+               do {
+                       asm ("//__percpu_xchg_4\n"
+                       "ldxr %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"
+                       "stxr %w[loop], %w[val], %[ptr]\n"
+                       : [loop] "=&r"(loop), [ret] "=&r"(ret),
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr)
+                       : [val] "r" (val));
+               } while (loop);
+               break;
+       case 8:
+               do {
+                       asm ("//__percpu_xchg_8\n"
+                       "ldxr %[ret], %[ptr]\n"
+                       "stxr %w[loop], %[val], %[ptr]\n"
+                       : [loop] "=&r"(loop), [ret] "=&r"(ret),
+                         [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr)
+                       : [val] "r" (val));
+               } while (loop);
+               break;
+       default:
+               BUILD_BUG();
+       }
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+#define _percpu_add(pcp, val) \
+       __percpu_add(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), val, sizeof(pcp))
+
+#define _percpu_add_return(pcp, val) (typeof(pcp)) (_percpu_add(pcp, val))
+
+#define _percpu_and(pcp, val) \
+       __percpu_and(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), val, sizeof(pcp))
+
+#define _percpu_or(pcp, val) \
+       __percpu_or(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), val, sizeof(pcp))
+
+#define _percpu_read(pcp) (typeof(pcp))        \
+       (__percpu_read(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), sizeof(pcp)))
+
+#define _percpu_write(pcp, val) \
+       __percpu_write(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), (unsigned long)(val), sizeof(pcp))
+
+#define _percpu_xchg(pcp, val) (typeof(pcp)) \
+       (__percpu_xchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), (unsigned long)(val), sizeof(pcp)))
+
+#define this_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_add_2(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_add_4(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_add_8(pcp, val) _percpu_add(pcp, val)
+
+#define this_cpu_add_return_1(pcp, val) _percpu_add_return(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_add_return_2(pcp, val) _percpu_add_return(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_add_return_4(pcp, val) _percpu_add_return(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_add_return_8(pcp, val) _percpu_add_return(pcp, val)
+
+#define this_cpu_and_1(pcp, val) _percpu_and(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_and_2(pcp, val) _percpu_and(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_and_4(pcp, val) _percpu_and(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_and_8(pcp, val) _percpu_and(pcp, val)
+
+#define this_cpu_or_1(pcp, val) _percpu_or(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_or_2(pcp, val) _percpu_or(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_or_4(pcp, val) _percpu_or(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_or_8(pcp, val) _percpu_or(pcp, val)
+
+#define this_cpu_read_1(pcp) _percpu_read(pcp)
+#define this_cpu_read_2(pcp) _percpu_read(pcp)
+#define this_cpu_read_4(pcp) _percpu_read(pcp)
+#define this_cpu_read_8(pcp) _percpu_read(pcp)
+
+#define this_cpu_write_1(pcp, val) _percpu_write(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_write_2(pcp, val) _percpu_write(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_write_4(pcp, val) _percpu_write(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_write_8(pcp, val) _percpu_write(pcp, val)
+
+#define this_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, val) _percpu_xchg(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_xchg_2(pcp, val) _percpu_xchg(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_xchg_4(pcp, val) _percpu_xchg(pcp, val)
+#define this_cpu_xchg_8(pcp, val) _percpu_xchg(pcp, val)
+
 #include <asm-generic/percpu.h>
 
 #endif /* __ASM_PERCPU_H */
--

1.9.3

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

Quoted 1 line · Ard Biesheuvel

Hi Steve,

Hey Ard,

Quoted 14 lines · Steve Capper
Quoted 12 lines

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc3.

Got any numbers?

For `./hackbench 100 process 1000' on a Juno system running all cores I get:

w/o patch | with patch
---------------+------------
mean 47.05 | 44.93
stddev 0.38 | 0.68
---------------+------------
(times in seconds, rounded to 2d.p., six runs performed)

So a just under 5% speed boost.

[...]

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +0 -0
index 5279e57..e751681 100644
@@ -44,6 +44,237 @@ static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)

[...]

Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 26 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +26 -0
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_read(void *ptr, int size)
+{
+       unsigned long ret;
+
+       switch (size) {
+       case 1:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_1\n"
+                       "ldrb %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       case 2:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_2\n"
+                       "ldrh %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       case 4:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_4\n"
+                       "ldr %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       case 8:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_read_8\n"
+                       "ldr %[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ret] "=&r"(ret), [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr));
+               break;
+       default:
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 141

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +6 -0
+               BUILD_BUG();
+       }
+
+       return ret;
+}
+

Why are the 'ptr' references '+Q' outputs here rather than 'Q' inputs?

Because I fudged the constraint :-).
Thanks, you're quite right it should be 'Q' constraint as we're only reading from that address.

Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 22 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +22 -0
+static inline void __percpu_write(void *ptr, unsigned long val, int size)
+{
+       switch (size) {
+       case 1:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_1\n"
+                       "strb %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;
+       case 2:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_2\n"
+                       "strh %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;
+       case 4:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_4\n"
+                       "str %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+               break;
+       case 8:
+               asm ("//__per_cpu_write_8\n"
+                       "str %[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+                       [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 141

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +6 -0
+               break;
+       default:
+               BUILD_BUG();
+       }
+}
+

... and similarly, why are these '+Q' and not just '=Q' ?

Another mistake on my part, it should be "=Q" as we're only writing to that address.

Thanks for going through this carefully Ard, I'll send out a corrected V2 once I've sanity checked it.

Cheers,

Signature · 1 line
Steve
#3 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc3.

---
Changed in V2: corrected address constraint for __percpu_read and __percpu_write.

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h  | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
index 3e02245..3e51f49 100644
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n);
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
 
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +231 -0

237 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
1.9.3
#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

In reply to Steve Capper

Hi Steve,

Thanks for looking at this!

Quoted 14 lines · Steve Capper

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc3.

[...]

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +0 -0
index 3e02245..3e51f49 100644

arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, · line 243

Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n);
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)

You can use cmpxchg_local here, as we don't require barrier semantics.

Quoted 18 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +0 -0
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +8 -0
index 5279e57..e751681 100644
@@ -44,6 +44,237 @@ static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+#define PERCPU_OP(op, asm_op)						\
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_##op(void *ptr,			\
+			unsigned long val, int size)			\
+{									\
+	unsigned long loop, ret;					\
+									\
+	switch (size) {							\
+	case 1:								\

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 64

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_1\n"			\
+			"ldxrb	  %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"		\
+			"stxrb	  %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\

Curious, but do you see any difference in code generation over an explicit cbnz, like we use in the ATOMIC_OP macro?

Quoted 33 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +33 -0
+	case 2:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_2\n"			\
+			"ldxrh	  %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"		\
+			"stxrh	  %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr]  "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\
+	case 4:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_4\n"			\
+			"ldxr	  %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"		\
+			"stxr	  %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\
+	case 8:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_8\n"			\
+			"ldxr	  %[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %[ret], %[ret], %[val]\n"		\
+			"stxr	  %w[loop], %[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 107

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+	default:							\
+		BUILD_BUG();						\
+	}								\
+									\
+	return ret;							\
+}
+
+PERCPU_OP(add, add)
+PERCPU_OP(and, and)
+PERCPU_OP(or, orr)

Can you use these to generate local_t versions too?

Will

#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

Quoted 3 lines · Will Deacon

Hi Steve,

Thanks for looking at this!

Hey Will,
No problem, it's quite beneficial for performance.

Quoted 27 lines · Steve Capper
Quoted 14 lines

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc3.

[...]

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +0 -0
index 3e02245..3e51f49 100644
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old, · line 243

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n);
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)

You can use cmpxchg_local here, as we don't require barrier semantics.

Agreed, thanks, I will update that.

Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 24 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +0 -0
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +13 -0
index 5279e57..e751681 100644
@@ -44,6 +44,237 @@ static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
+#define PERCPU_OP(op, asm_op)						\
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_##op(void *ptr,			\
+			unsigned long val, int size)			\
+{									\
+	unsigned long loop, ret;					\
+									\
+	switch (size) {							\
+	case 1:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_1\n"			\
+			"ldxrb	  %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"		\
+			"stxrb	  %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 64

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +5 -0
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr] "+Q"(*(u8 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\

Curious, but do you see any difference in code generation over an explicit cbnz, like we use in the ATOMIC_OP macro?

I've not noticed any substancial difference in the code paths I've inspected. Theoretically, a compiler that is extremely averse to branches could do some unrolling with this.

I decided to give the compiler as much control as possible, so elected to put the minimum amount of assembler in.

Quoted 38 lines
Quoted 38 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +37 -0
+	case 2:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_2\n"			\
+			"ldxrh	  %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"		\
+			"stxrh	  %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr]  "+Q"(*(u16 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\
+	case 4:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_4\n"			\
+			"ldxr	  %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %w[ret], %w[ret], %w[val]\n"		\
+			"stxr	  %w[loop], %w[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr] "+Q"(*(u32 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\
+	case 8:								\
+		do {							\
+			asm ("//__per_cpu_" #op "_8\n"			\
+			"ldxr	  %[ret], %[ptr]\n"			\
+			#asm_op " %[ret], %[ret], %[val]\n"		\
+			"stxr	  %w[loop], %[ret], %[ptr]\n"		\
+			: [loop] "=&r" (loop), [ret] "=&r" (ret),	\
+			  [ptr] "+Q"(*(u64 *)ptr)			\
+			: [val] "Ir" (val));				\
+		} while (loop);						\
+		break;							\
+	default:							\
+		BUILD_BUG();						\
+	}								\
+									\
Quoted 8 lines

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 107

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +6 -0
+	return ret;							\
+}
+
+PERCPU_OP(add, add)
+PERCPU_OP(and, and)
+PERCPU_OP(or, orr)

Can you use these to generate local_t versions too?

Sure, I forgot about them, I will add them to V3.

Cheers,

Signature · 1 line
Steve
#6 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc4.

---
Having thought more about it, I will send out a separate patch to implement local.h for arm64 as it's logically separate.

Changed in V3: use cmpxchg_local rather than cmpxchg for this_cpu_cmpxchg.

Changed in V2: corrected address constraint for __percpu_read and __percpu_write.

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h  | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
index 3e02245..9248066 100644
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n);
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
 
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +231 -0

237 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
1.9.3
#7 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

Hi Steve,

Quoted 8 lines · Steve Capper

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

Quoted 6 lines

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc4.

What does this patch apply against? I'm struggling to apply it to our for-next branch (perhaps it conflicts with your other cmpxchg patch?)

Anyway, one comment below.

Quoted 49 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +49 -0
+static inline unsigned long __percpu_read(void *ptr, int size)
+{
+	unsigned long ret;
+
+	switch (size) {
+	case 1:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_read_1\n"
+			"ldrb %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ret] "=&r"(ret) : [ptr] "Q"(*(u8 *)ptr));
+		break;
+	case 2:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_read_2\n"
+			"ldrh %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ret] "=&r"(ret) : [ptr] "Q"(*(u16 *)ptr));
+		break;
+	case 4:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_read_4\n"
+			"ldr %w[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ret] "=&r"(ret) : [ptr] "Q"(*(u32 *)ptr));
+		break;
+	case 8:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_read_8\n"
+			"ldr %[ret], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ret] "=&r"(ret) : [ptr] "Q"(*(u64 *)ptr));
+		break;
+	default:
+		BUILD_BUG();
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void __percpu_write(void *ptr, unsigned long val, int size)
+{
+	switch (size) {
+	case 1:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_write_1\n"
+			"strb %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ptr] "=Q"(*(u8 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+		break;
+	case 2:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_write_2\n"
+			"strh %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ptr] "=Q"(*(u16 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+		break;
+	case 4:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_write_4\n"
+			"str %w[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ptr] "=Q"(*(u32 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 168

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+		break;
+	case 8:
+		asm ("//__per_cpu_write_8\n"
+			"str %[val], %[ptr]\n" :
+			[ptr] "=Q"(*(u64 *)ptr) : [val] "r"(val));
+		break;
+	default:
+		BUILD_BUG();
+	}
+}

Can you implement the read/write accessors with ACCESS_ONCE instead? I think we're just after a single-copy atomic access without barrier semantics, so that should work if you get your types right.

Will

#8 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc4.

---
Changed in V4: rebased to allow for merge in Will's for-next branch. (I had erroneously changed my cmpxchg_double patch).

Changed the read/write accessors to use ACCESS_ONCE rather than asm.

Changed in V3: use cmpxchg_local rather than cmpxchg for this_cpu_cmpxchg.

Changed in V2: corrected address constraint for __percpu_read and __percpu_write.

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h  | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
index 89e397b..cb95930 100644
@@ -246,8 +246,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
 
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +215 -0

221 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
1.9.3
#9 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

Hi Steve,

Quoted 8 lines · Steve Capper

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

Quoted 6 lines

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc4.

Looks good. I notice that this change drops the compiler barriers too, which we used to get via local_irq_{enable/disable}. I *think* that's fine (at least, I couldn't find a place that breaks due to that) but it would be nice to know that it was deliberate :)

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +5 -0
+static inline void __percpu_write(void *ptr, unsigned long val, int size)
+{
+	switch (size) {
+	case 1:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u8 *)ptr)) = (u8) val;

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 148

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+		break;
+	case 2:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u16 *)ptr)) = (u16) val;
+		break;
+	case 4:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u32 *)ptr)) = (u32) val;
+		break;
+	case 8:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u64 *)ptr)) = (u64) val;
+		break;

I think you've gone a bit overboard with brackets and spacing here. Can't you just do something like:

  ACCESS_ONCE(*(u64 *)ptr) = (u64)val;

Anyway:

Will

#10 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

Quoted 1 line · Will Deacon

Hi Steve,

Hey Will,

[sorry for the late reply, was recovering from plague]

Quoted 14 lines · Steve Capper
Quoted 12 lines

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc4.

Looks good. I notice that this change drops the compiler barriers too, which we used to get via local_irq_{enable/disable}. I *think* that's fine (at least, I couldn't find a place that breaks due to that) but it would be nice to know that it was deliberate :)

Yes it was deliberate. :-)

My understanding of the this_cpu... set of accessors is that they are there to solely protect the access with respect to pre-emption, not other CPUs, thus we shouldn't need barriers?

Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +5 -0
+static inline void __percpu_write(void *ptr, unsigned long val, int size)
+{
+	switch (size) {
+	case 1:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u8 *)ptr)) = (u8) val;

arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void) · line 148

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +10 -0
+		break;
+	case 2:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u16 *)ptr)) = (u16) val;
+		break;
+	case 4:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u32 *)ptr)) = (u32) val;
+		break;
+	case 8:
+		ACCESS_ONCE(*((u64 *)ptr)) = (u64) val;
+		break;

I think you've gone a bit overboard with brackets and spacing here. Can't you just do something like:

Quoted 1 line
  ACCESS_ONCE(*(u64 *)ptr) = (u64)val;

Yeah, I went a little paranthesis crazy there, I'll correct this lest it gets confused with LISP.

Quoted 4 lines

Anyway:

Ta Will,
I'll send out a V5 with the parantheses sanetised.

Cheers,

Signature · 1 line
Steve
#11 lore raw

PATCH v5 1/1 arm64: percpu: Implement this_cpu operations

The generic this_cpu operations disable interrupts to ensure that the requested operation is protected from pre-emption. For arm64, this is overkill and can hurt throughput and latency.

This patch provides arm64 specific implementations for the this_cpu operations. Rather than disable interrupts, we use the exclusive monitor or atomic operations as appropriate.

The following operations are implemented: add, add_return, and, or, read, write, xchg. We also wire up a cmpxchg implementation from cmpxchg.h.

Testing was performed using the percpu_test module and hackbench on a Juno board running 3.18-rc4.

---
Changed in V5: spacing and parantheses sanetised for read/write accessors.

Changed in V4: rebased to allow for merge in Will's for-next branch. (I had erroneously changed my cmpxchg_double patch).

Changed the read/write accessors to use ACCESS_ONCE rather than asm.

Changed in V3: use cmpxchg_local rather than cmpxchg for this_cpu_cmpxchg.

Changed in V2: corrected address constraint for __percpu_read and __percpu_write.

---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |   6 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h  | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h +4 -2
index 89e397b..cb95930 100644
@@ -246,8 +246,10 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_mb(volatile void *ptr, unsigned long old,
 	__ret; \
 })
 
-#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) \
-	cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
+#define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(ptr, o, n) cmpxchg_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr)), o, n)
 
 #define this_cpu_cmpxchg_double_8(ptr1, ptr2, o1, o2, n1, n2) \
 	cmpxchg_double_local(raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr1)), raw_cpu_ptr(&(ptr2)), \
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +215 -0

221 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
1.9.3