perf/powerpc/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page buffer
PATCH 1/2 perf/powerpc/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page buffer
Quoted 1 line
From
470c16c8955672103a9529c78dffbb239e9e27b8Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:17:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/poweprc/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page buffer
The 24x7 counters are continuously running and not updated on an interrupt. So we record the event counts when stopping the event or deleting it.
But to "read" a single counter in 24x7, we allocate a page and pass it into the hypervisor (The HV returns the page full of counters from which we extract the specific counter for this event).
We allocate a page using GFP_USER and when deleting the event, we end up with the following warning because we are blocking in interrupt context.
[ 698.641709] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10010000
We could use GFP_ATOMIC but that could result in failures. Pre-allocate a buffer so we don't have to allocate in interrupt context. Further as Michael Ellerman suggested, use Per-CPU buffer so we only need to allocate once per CPU.
--- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +9 -12
@@ -217,11 +217,14 @@ static bool is_physical_domain(int domain) domain ==HV_24X7_PERF_DOMAIN_PHYSICAL_CORE ; } +DEFINE_PER_CPU (char, hv_24x7_reqb[4096 ]); +DEFINE_PER_CPU (char, hv_24x7_resb[4096 ]); +static unsigned long single_24x7_request (u8 domain,u32 offset,u16 ix,u16 lpar,u64 *res,bool success_expected) { -unsigned long ret = -ENOMEM ; +unsigned long ret;/* * request_buffer and result_buffer are not required to be 4k aligned,
@@ -243,13 +246,11 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (*request_buffer) >4096 );BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (*result_buffer) >4096 ); - request_buffer =kmem_cache_zalloc (hv_page_cache,GFP_USER ); -if (!request_buffer) - goto out; + request_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var (hv_24x7_reqb); + result_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var (hv_24x7_resb); - result_buffer =kmem_cache_zalloc (hv_page_cache,GFP_USER ); -if (!result_buffer) - goto out_free_request_buffer; +memset (request_buffer,0 ,4096 ); +memset (result_buffer,0 ,4096 ); *request_buffer = (struct reqb ) { .buf = {
@@ -278,15 +279,11 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix, domain, offset, ix, lpar, ret, ret, result_buffer->buf.detailed_rc, result_buffer->buf.failing_request_ix); - goto out_free_result_buffer; + goto out; } *res =be64_to_cpu (result_buffer->result); -out_free_result_buffer: -kfree (result_buffer); -out_free_request_buffer: -kfree (request_buffer); out:return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
PATCH 2/2 perf/power/hv-24x7: Use kmem_cache_free() instead of kfree
Quoted 1 line
From
982bf5a660ae33fbe2f9187187caa6752c66783dMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:43:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] power/perf: hv-24x7: Use kmem_cache_free() instead of
kfree
Use kmem_cache_free() to free a buffer allocated with kmem_cache_alloc().
p# set2.log
--- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +1 -1
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static ssize_t _name##_show(struct device *dev, \ } \ ret =sprintf (buf, _fmt, _expr); \ e_free: \ -kfree (page); \ +kmem_cache_free (hv_page_cache, page); \return ret; \ } \static DEVICE_ATTR_RO (_name)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
Michael Ellerman
reviewerRe: [PATCH 2/2] perf/power/hv-24x7: Use kmem_cache_free() instead of kfree
Quoted 5 lines · Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From
982bf5a660ae33fbe2f9187187caa6752c66783dMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 01:43:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] power/perf: hv-24x7: Usekmem_cache_free()instead of
kfree
This got a bit munged, ...
Quoted 5 lines
Use
kmem_cache_free()to free a buffer allocated withkmem_cache_alloc().Signed-off-by Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>p# set2.log
.. and here too.
I can fix it up this time.
cheers
Michael Ellerman
reviewerQuoted 10 lines · Sukadev Bhattiprolu
From
470c16c8955672103a9529c78dffbb239e9e27b8Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:17:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/poweprc/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page bufferarch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +0
-0
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c static bool is_physical_domain(int domain) · line 221
Quoted 5 lines
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +2
-0@@ -217,11 +217,14 @@ static bool is_physical_domain(int domain) domain ==HV_24X7_PERF_DOMAIN_PHYSICAL_CORE ; } +DEFINE_PER_CPU (char, hv_24x7_reqb[4096 ]); +DEFINE_PER_CPU (char, hv_24x7_resb[4096 ]);
Do we need it to be 4K aligned also? I would guess so.
Rather than declaring these as char arrays and then casting below, can you pull the struct definitions up and then declare the per cpu variables with the proper type.
Quoted 14 lines
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +1
-2static unsigned long single_24x7_request (u8 domain,u32 offset,u16 ix,u16 lpar,u64 *res,bool success_expected) { -unsigned long ret = -ENOMEM ; +unsigned long ret;/* * request_buffer and result_buffer are not required to be 4k aligned, @@ -243,13 +246,11 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (*request_buffer) >4096 );BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (*result_buffer) >4096 ); - request_buffer =kmem_cache_zalloc (hv_page_cache,GFP_USER );
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix, · line 253
Quoted 10 lines
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +4
-5-if (!request_buffer) - goto out; + request_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var (hv_24x7_reqb); + result_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var (hv_24x7_resb); - result_buffer =kmem_cache_zalloc (hv_page_cache,GFP_USER ); -if (!result_buffer) - goto out_free_request_buffer; +memset (request_buffer,0 ,4096 ); +memset (result_buffer,0 ,4096 );
Do we have to memset them? That's not going to speed things up.
cheers
Michael Ellerman [[email protected]] wrote:
| On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 23:06 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: | > From 470c16c8955672103a9529c78dffbb239e9e27b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]> | > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:17:46 -0500 | > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/poweprc/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page buffer | > | > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | > index dba3408..18e1f49 100644 | > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | > @@ -217,11 +217,14 @@ static bool is_physical_domain(int domain) | > domain == HV_24X7_PERF_DOMAIN_PHYSICAL_CORE; | > } | > | > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_reqb[4096]); | > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_resb[4096]); | | Do we need it to be 4K aligned also? I would guess so.
Yes, fixed in the patch below.
| | Rather than declaring these as char arrays and then casting below, can you pull | the struct definitions up and then declare the per cpu variables with the | proper type.
Well, the structures, used for communication with HV, have variable length arrays, like:
struct hv_24x7_request_buffer {
...
struct hv_24x7_request requests[];
};i.e the buffer needs to be larger than reported by sizeof(). So we allocate a large buffer and cast it. Not sure if there is a trick to get DEFINE_PER_CPU() to do that. We could add code to allocate pages per cpu during init, but that would mean more code, error handling etc.
|
|
| > static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,
| > u16 lpar, u64 *res,
| > bool success_expected)
| > {
| > - unsigned long ret = -ENOMEM;
| > + unsigned long ret;
| >
| > /*
| > * request_buffer and result_buffer are not required to be 4k aligned,
| > @@ -243,13 +246,11 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,
| > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*request_buffer) > 4096);
| > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*result_buffer) > 4096);
| >
| > - request_buffer = kmem_cache_zalloc(hv_page_cache, GFP_USER);
| > - if (!request_buffer)
| > - goto out;
| > + request_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var(hv_24x7_reqb);
| > + result_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var(hv_24x7_resb);
| >
| > - result_buffer = kmem_cache_zalloc(hv_page_cache, GFP_USER);
| > - if (!result_buffer)
| > - goto out_free_request_buffer;
| > + memset(request_buffer, 0, 4096);
| > + memset(result_buffer, 0, 4096);
|
| Do we have to memset them? That's not going to speed things up.I agree about the speed, specially since we have a larger buffer. But we are reusing the buffer for independent events and some fields need to be 0 (hence the zalloc in the current code).
---
Quoted 1 line
From
545ad0771ef8f22085ed8bb486f0a81b3afc5757Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:17:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page buffer
The 24x7 counters are continuously running and not updated on an interrupt. So we record the event counts when stopping the event or deleting it.
But to "read" a single counter in 24x7, we allocate a page and pass it into the hypervisor (The HV returns the page full of counters from which we extract the specific counter for this event).
We allocate a page using GFP_USER and when deleting the event, we end up with the following warning because we are blocking in interrupt context.
[ 698.641709] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10010000
We could use GFP_ATOMIC but that could result in failures. Pre-allocate a buffer so we don't have to allocate in interrupt context. Further as Michael Ellerman suggested, use Per-CPU buffer so we only need to allocate once per CPU.
--- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Changelog[v2]:
[Michael Ellerman] Ensure buffer is aligned to 4K.
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +9 -12
@@ -217,11 +217,14 @@ static bool is_physical_domain(int domain) domain ==HV_24X7_PERF_DOMAIN_PHYSICAL_CORE ; } +DEFINE_PER_CPU (char, hv_24x7_reqb[4096 ])__aligned(4096) ; +DEFINE_PER_CPU (char, hv_24x7_resb[4096 ])__aligned(4096) ; +static unsigned long single_24x7_request (u8 domain,u32 offset,u16 ix,u16 lpar,u64 *res,bool success_expected) { -unsigned long ret = -ENOMEM ; +unsigned long ret;/* * request_buffer and result_buffer are not required to be 4k aligned,
@@ -243,13 +246,11 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix,BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (*request_buffer) >4096 );BUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (*result_buffer) >4096 ); - request_buffer =kmem_cache_zalloc (hv_page_cache,GFP_USER ); -if (!request_buffer) - goto out; + request_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var (hv_24x7_reqb); + result_buffer = (void *)get_cpu_var (hv_24x7_resb); - result_buffer =kmem_cache_zalloc (hv_page_cache,GFP_USER ); -if (!result_buffer) - goto out_free_request_buffer; +memset (request_buffer,0 ,4096 ); +memset (result_buffer,0 ,4096 ); *request_buffer = (struct reqb ) { .buf = {
@@ -278,15 +279,11 @@ static unsigned long single_24x7_request(u8 domain, u32 offset, u16 ix, domain, offset, ix, lpar, ret, ret, result_buffer->buf.detailed_rc, result_buffer->buf.failing_request_ix); - goto out_free_result_buffer; + goto out; } *res =be64_to_cpu (result_buffer->result); -out_free_result_buffer: -kfree (result_buffer); -out_free_request_buffer: -kfree (request_buffer); out:return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
Michael Ellerman
reviewerQuoted 20 lines · On Wed, 2014-10-12 at 22:29:13 UTC, [email protected] wrote:
Michael Ellerman [[email protected]] wrote:
| On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 23:06 -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: | > From 470c16c8955672103a9529c78dffbb239e9e27b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[email protected]> | > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:17:46 -0500 | > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/poweprc/hv-24x7: Use per-cpu page buffer | > | > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | > index dba3408..18e1f49 100644 | > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | > @@ -217,11 +217,14 @@ static bool is_physical_domain(int domain) | > domain == HV_24X7_PERF_DOMAIN_PHYSICAL_CORE; | > } | > | > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_reqb[4096]); | > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(char, hv_24x7_resb[4096]); | | Do we need it to be 4K aligned also? I would guess so.
Quoted 1 line
Yes, fixed in the patch below.
OK.
Quoted 8 lines
| | Rather than declaring these as char arrays and then casting below, can you pull | the struct definitions up and then declare the per cpu variables with the | proper type.Well, the structures, used for communication with HV, have variable length arrays, like:
Quoted 8 lines
struct hv_24x7_request_buffer { ... struct hv_24x7_request requests[]; };i.e the buffer needs to be larger than reported by
sizeof(). So we allocate a large buffer and cast it. Not sure if there is a trick to getDEFINE_PER_CPU()to do that.
So the array is variable length, but no larger than 4K - at least I hope because you're using a 4K buffer :)
The neatest way to handle that is to make it a union, with the struct and a 4K char buffer.
But we can do that as a cleanup later.
Quoted 8 lines
| > + memset(request_buffer, 0, 4096); | > + memset(result_buffer, 0, 4096); | | Do we have to memset them? That's not going to speed things up.I agree about the speed, specially since we have a larger buffer. But we are reusing the buffer for independent events and some fields need to be 0 (hence the zalloc in the current code).
Sure, so you could explicitly initialise those fields to zero.
But that also can be another cleanup.
I'll take this as it is.
cheers