New image target (x86/x64): raw disk image
v2 cover New image target (x86/x64): raw disk image
Hi list,
These 3 patches allow the building of a new target for x86 and x64. The "raw" image is a disk image, with a valid partition table and MBR, that can directly written to a disk and will boot, or the file is bootable in QEMU. Also cloud providers who use KVM (like Google) should accept this as their VM image format.
Regards,
Karoly
Changes v1 -> v2:
- package/util-linux: minimal wording
- fs/rawimg: separated script into new host package like mke2img
- package/mkrawimg: new host package
Karoly Kasza (3):
util-linux: enable host fdisk
package/mkrawimg: new package
fs/rawimg: new rootfs target
fs/Config.in | 1 + fs/rawimg/Config.in | 15 ++++++++ fs/rawimg/rawimg.mk | 13 +++++++ package/Config.in.host | 1 + package/mkrawimg/Config.in.host | 13 +++++++ package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++ package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg.mk | 14 ++++++++ package/util-linux/Config.in.host | 9 +++++ .../util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch | 34 ++++++++++++++++++ package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 5 +++ 10 files changed, 143 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/rawimg/Config.in create mode 100644 fs/rawimg/rawimg.mk create mode 100644 package/mkrawimg/Config.in.host create mode 100755 package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg create mode 100644 package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg.mk create mode 100644 package/util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 1/3 util-linux: enable host fdisk
Enable the building of fdisk utility for host.
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Wording.
package/util-linux/Config.in.host | 9 ++++++ .../util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++ package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 5 +++ 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch
package/util-linux/Config.in.host +9 -0
@@ -6,3 +6,12 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX Things like mkfs, mkswap, swapon, fdisk, mount, dmesg, etc... http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/ + +if BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX + +config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX_FDISK + bool "fdisk" + help + Enable compiling fdisk for the host + +endif
package/util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch new file +34 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +Add options to enable/disable libfdisk and fdisk + +This is needed to be able to just build an fdisk binary +for the host package. + +Signed-off-by: Karoly Kasza <[email protected]> + +--- util-linux-2.25.1.orig/configure.ac 2014-10-11 13:47:52.000000000 +0200 ++++ util-linux-2.25.1/configure.ac 2014-10-11 13:45:50.065076171 +0200 +@@ -820,12 +820,22 @@ + dnl + dnl libfdisk is enabled at all times if possible + dnl +-UL_BUILD_INIT([libfdisk], [check]) ++# this behaviour changed for buildroot, along with fdisk ++AC_ARG_ENABLE([libfdisk], ++ AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-libfdisk], [do not build libfdisk]), ++ [], [UL_DEFAULT_ENABLE([libfdisk], [check])] ++) ++UL_BUILD_INIT([libfdisk]) + UL_REQUIRES_BUILD([libfdisk], [libuuid]) + UL_REQUIRES_BUILD([libfdisk], [libsmartcols]) + AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_LIBFDISK], [test "x$build_libfdisk" = xyes]) + +-UL_BUILD_INIT([fdisk], [check]) ++ ++AC_ARG_ENABLE([fdisk], ++ AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-fdisk], [do not build fdisk]), ++ [], [UL_DEFAULT_ENABLE([fdisk], [check])] ++) ++UL_BUILD_INIT([fdisk]) + UL_REQUIRES_BUILD([fdisk], [libfdisk]) + AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_FDISK], [test "x$build_fdisk" = xyes]) +
package/util-linux/util-linux.mk +5 -0
@@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += \ --disable-libblkid --disable-libmount \ --disable-all-programs --without-ncurses +# Build host fdisk if selected +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX_FDISK),y) +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --enable-fdisk --enable-libfdisk --enable-libsmartcols +endif + # Avoid building the tools if they are disabled since we can't install on # a per-directory basis. ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES),)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 1/3 util-linux: enable host fdisk
Karoly, All,
On 2014-12-09 17:03 +0100, Karoly Kasza spake thusly:
Quoted 1 line
Enable the building of fdisk utility for host.
We've reviewed your patch series yesterday during the Patchwork cleanup session, and cam e to this conclusion about this patch: we think there is a better solution as proposed by Thierry Bultel in:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/419247/
The patch from Thierry is better because it is simpler and does not need patching util-linux.
The solution to build all or nothing is an acceptable trade-off for simplicity. Also, if later the need arise to install yet another host util-linux program, we'd have to add yet another option and further patch util-linux. The gain is not that important when compared to maintainability and simplicity.
So, we marked this patch as Rejected in Patchwork.
Thank you for contribution!
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 92 lines
Signed-off-by Karoly Kasza <[email protected]>---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Wording.package/util-linux/Config.in.host | 9 ++++++ .../util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++ package/util-linux/util-linux.mk | 5 +++ 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patchpackage/util-linux/Config.in.host +9
-0@@ -6,3 +6,12 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX Things like mkfs, mkswap, swapon, fdisk, mount, dmesg, etc... http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/ + +if BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX + +config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX_FDISK + bool "fdisk" + help + Enable compiling fdisk for the host + +endifpackage/util-linux/util-linux-004-enable-fdisk.patch new file +34
-0@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +Add options to enable/disable libfdisk and fdisk + +This is needed to be able to just build an fdisk binary +for the host package. + +Signed-off-by: Karoly Kasza <[email protected]> + +--- util-linux-2.25.1.orig/configure.ac 2014-10-11 13:47:52.000000000 +0200 ++++ util-linux-2.25.1/configure.ac 2014-10-11 13:45:50.065076171 +0200 +@@ -820,12 +820,22 @@ + dnl + dnl libfdisk is enabled at all times if possible + dnl +-UL_BUILD_INIT([libfdisk], [check]) ++# this behaviour changed for buildroot, along with fdisk ++AC_ARG_ENABLE([libfdisk], ++ AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-libfdisk], [do not build libfdisk]), ++ [], [UL_DEFAULT_ENABLE([libfdisk], [check])] ++) ++UL_BUILD_INIT([libfdisk]) + UL_REQUIRES_BUILD([libfdisk], [libuuid]) + UL_REQUIRES_BUILD([libfdisk], [libsmartcols]) + AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_LIBFDISK], [test "x$build_libfdisk" = xyes]) + +-UL_BUILD_INIT([fdisk], [check]) ++ ++AC_ARG_ENABLE([fdisk], ++ AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-fdisk], [do not build fdisk]), ++ [], [UL_DEFAULT_ENABLE([fdisk], [check])] ++) ++UL_BUILD_INIT([fdisk]) + UL_REQUIRES_BUILD([fdisk], [libfdisk]) + AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_FDISK], [test "x$build_fdisk" = xyes]) +package/util-linux/util-linux.mk +5
-0@@ -97,6 +97,11 @@ HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += \ --disable-libblkid --disable-libmount \ --disable-all-programs --without-ncurses +# Build host fdisk if selected +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX_FDISK),y) +HOST_UTIL_LINUX_CONF_OPTS += --enable-fdisk --enable-libfdisk --enable-libsmartcols +endif + # Avoid building the tools if they are disabled since we can't install on # a per-directory basis. ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL_LINUX_BINARIES),)Signature · 6 lines
1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v2 2/3 package/mkrawimg: new package
In reply to Karoly Kaszamkrawimg is a helper script like mke2img.
It a host package, useful to build a complete raw disk image, with grub in the MBR and one ext* partition. Creates a bootable raw disk image as a new rootfs image. Boots in QEMU or on bare metal after written (dd) to disk.
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Created a new package from the script in v1.
- Fdisk now specifies head and sector.
- Sector size of ext* image is calculated properly.
package/Config.in.host | 1 + package/mkrawimg/Config.in.host | 13 +++++++++++++ package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg.mk | 14 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/mkrawimg/Config.in.host create mode 100755 package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg create mode 100644 package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg.mk
package/Config.in.host +1 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ menu "Host utilities" source "package/genpart/Config.in.host" source "package/lpc3250loader/Config.in.host" source "package/mke2img/Config.in.host" + source "package/mkrawimg/Config.in.host" source "package/mtd/Config.in.host" source "package/mtools/Config.in.host" source "package/omap-u-boot-utils/Config.in.host"
package/mkrawimg/Config.in.host new file +12 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_MKRAWIMG + bool "host mkrawimg" + select BR2_TARGET_GRUB + select BR2_TARGET_GRUB_FS_EXT2 + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UTIL_LINUX_FDISK + help + Easily create raw disk images. + + This tool is bundled by, and specific to Buildroot. + It does not make much sense, to use it without + the "raw disk image" rootfs target.
package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg new file +38 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +#!/bin/bash + +# Buildroot tool to generate bootable raw disk image +# GRUB in MBR, boot first primary partition (ext*) + +set -e + +BINARIES_DIR="$1" +OUTPUT_IMG="$2" +# Size of generated ext* fs in sectors +SECTORS=`fdisk -l $BINARIES_DIR/rootfs.ext2 | grep $BINARIES_DIR/rootfs.ext2 | cut -d" " -f7` +# Size of image with MBR and partition table (512 block size with fdisk image file) +SECTOR_COUNT=$(($SECTORS+2048)) + +# Create an empty file, final size +dd if=/dev/zero of=$OUTPUT_IMG bs=512 count=$SECTOR_COUNT 2>/dev/null + +# Create a partition table - call our own fdisk in $PATH from host-util-linux +fdisk -H 16 -S 63 $OUTPUT_IMG >/dev/null 2>/dev/null <<EOB +n +p +1 + + +w +EOB + +# Write the rootfs to the 1st partition +dd if=$BINARIES_DIR/rootfs.ext2 of=$OUTPUT_IMG conv=notrunc bs=512 iflag=fullblock seek=2048 skip=0 2>/dev/null + +# Write MBR, grub is also called from $PATH +grub --no-floppy --batch >/dev/null 2>/dev/null <<EOB +device (hd0) $OUTPUT_IMG +geometry (hd0) +root (hd0,0) +setup (hd0) +quit +EOB
package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg.mk new file +14 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# mkrawimg +# +################################################################################ + +HOST_MKRAWIMG_SOURCE = +HOST_MKRAWIMG_DEPENDENCIES = host-util-linux grub + +define HOST_MKRAWIMG_INSTALL_CMDS + $(INSTALL) -D -m 0755 package/mkrawimg/mkrawimg $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/mkrawimg +endef + +$(eval $(host-generic-package))
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 3/3 fs/rawimg: new rootfs target
In reply to Karoly KaszaRootfs target to call the new mkrawimg package.
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Removed script into new mkrawimg package.
fs/Config.in | 1 + fs/rawimg/Config.in | 15 +++++++++++++++ fs/rawimg/rawimg.mk | 13 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/rawimg/Config.in create mode 100644 fs/rawimg/rawimg.mk
fs/Config.in +1 -0
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ source "fs/initramfs/Config.in" source "fs/iso9660/Config.in" source "fs/jffs2/Config.in" source "fs/romfs/Config.in" +source "fs/rawimg/Config.in" source "fs/squashfs/Config.in" source "fs/tar/Config.in" source "fs/ubifs/Config.in"
fs/rawimg/Config.in new file +15 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_RAWIMG + bool "raw disk image" + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 + depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_MKRAWIMG + select BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INSTALL_TARGET + select BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2 + help + Build a bootable raw disk image, that can be booted in a VM (e.g. QEMU), + or directly written to disk. Creates a valid partition table with MBR, + and one primary ext* partition. + +comment "raw disk image needs a Linux kernel to be built" + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 + depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
fs/rawimg/rawimg.mk new file +13 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# Build the raw disk image +# +################################################################################ + +ROOTFS_RAWIMG_DEPENDENCIES = rootfs-ext2 host-mkrawimg + +define ROOTFS_RAWIMG_CMD + PATH=$(BR_PATH) mkrawimg $(BINARIES_DIR) $@ +endef + +$(eval $(call ROOTFS_TARGET,rawimg))
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH v2 3/3 fs/rawimg: new rootfs target
Karoly, All,
On 2014-12-09 17:03 +0100, Karoly Kasza spake thusly:
Quoted 1 line
Rootfs target to call the new mkrawimg package.
We (Peter, Thomas P., Samuel and I) discussed your patch during the Patchwork cleanup session yesterday. We came up to the following conclusion.
We believe this is trying to cover a very specific use-case, and should better be done in a post-image script.
Basically, we believe that Buildroot should not try to be too smart about the filesystem generation. We offer a set of options to build basic filesystem images for basic use-cases, as a mean to get kick-started more easily and for simple systems.
However, more complex filesystem layouts ought to be outside the scope of what Buildroot should try to automate, given the unlimited combinations that may exist.
We are however willing to add host packages that provide the tools required for generating various filesystems or manipulating various partition types (some of them are already present in the "Host utilities" sub-menu) and delegate to the user to provide one or more post-image scripts that can use those tools and assemble the required filesystem and/or disk images from the rootfs.tar tarball.
Another point in the conclusion was that we should provide some sample post-image scripts that users can have a look at to see how to write their own.
As an aside, I add a personal note that was not discussed yesterday: we should document in the manual all of the above.
As a consequence, we've marked your two patches as Rejected on Patchwork:
- [2/3] package/mkrawimg: new package
- [3/3] fs/rawimg: new rootfs target
Thank you for your numerous contributions so far, they are much appreciated! :-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 72 lines
Signed-off-by Karoly Kasza <[email protected]>---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Removed script into new mkrawimg package.fs/Config.in | 1 + fs/rawimg/Config.in | 15 +++++++++++++++ fs/rawimg/rawimg.mk | 13 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/rawimg/Config.in create mode 100644 fs/rawimg/rawimg.mkfs/Config.in +1
-0@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ source "fs/initramfs/Config.in" source "fs/iso9660/Config.in" source "fs/jffs2/Config.in" source "fs/romfs/Config.in" +source "fs/rawimg/Config.in" source "fs/squashfs/Config.in" source "fs/tar/Config.in" source "fs/ubifs/Config.in"fs/rawimg/Config.in new file +15
-0@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +config BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_RAWIMG + bool "raw disk image" + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 + depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_MKRAWIMG + select BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INSTALL_TARGET + select BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2 + help + Build a bootable raw disk image, that can be booted in a VM (e.g. QEMU), + or directly written to disk. Creates a valid partition table with MBR, + and one primary ext* partition. + +comment "raw disk image needs a Linux kernel to be built" + depends on BR2_i386 || BR2_x86_64 + depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNELfs/rawimg/rawimg.mk new file +13
-0@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# Build the raw disk image +# +################################################################################ + +ROOTFS_RAWIMG_DEPENDENCIES = rootfs-ext2 host-mkrawimg + +define ROOTFS_RAWIMG_CMD + PATH=$(BR_PATH) mkrawimg $(BINARIES_DIR) $@ +endef + +$(eval $(call ROOTFS_TARGET,rawimg))Signature · 6 lines
1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v2 3/3 fs/rawimg: new rootfs target
Hi Yann, list,
We believe this is trying to cover a very specific use-case, and should
Quoted 7 lines
better be done in a post-image script.
Basically, we believe that Buildroot should not try to be too smart about the filesystem generation. We offer a set of options to build basic filesystem images for basic use-cases, as a mean to get kick-started more easily and for simple systems.
However, more complex filesystem layouts ought to be outside the scope
Quoted 3 lines
of what Buildroot should try to automate, given the unlimited combinations that may exist.
OK
Another point in the conclusion was that we should provide some sample
Quoted 3 lines
post-image scripts that users can have a look at to see how to write their own.
Should I just create a mock-up of this script into the support/scripts directory or so?
By the way, the build-ext3-img script does something very similar, but needs root privileges. It also creates a vmx file but no vmdk conversion is involved, so I think it is broken.
As an aside, I add a personal note that was not discussed yesterday: we
Quoted 2 lines
should document in the manual all of the above.
You are right - just the manual seems to follow the development of BR with some delay :)
Some explanation from my perspective regarding this patch:
I am building BR for various VMs. I use VMware (that's why I sent in openvmtools obviously), QEMU, KVM and various Cloud providers based on KVM. I think that BR has a great potential in purpose built VMs (vApps), because of a few reasons:
- the user is completely in control what runs in his/her VM, this adds security
- the current VM model is one App per one VM - for which BR is a good choice as it contains no bloatware like a general purpose Linux distro
- it is sparing with the resources, which means two things: greater VM density and lower pay-per-go costs in case of hosted VMs (like in Google Cloud's payment model)
So I started this series, and planned to add at least 2 other functionalities later:
- build as an OVA file (with the use of host-qemu's "qemu-img convert" command)
- build directly for Google Cloud Compute Engine, which is a special KVM (thus QEMU) image
If you guys think, that this could be a fair use-case for BR, I would be happy to continue to provide patches or post build scripts for at least these VM formats.
Best regards,
Karoly
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141211/167d025f/attachment.html>