Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

PATCH New Jonathan Jin 3 participants 6 messages Dec 15, 2014 ATM

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

This patch cleans up the following coding style issues that are detected by checkpatch:
ERROR: trailing whitespace
ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line

---
 drivers/atm/he.h | 25 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
drivers/atm/he.h +11 -14
index 110a27d..a9750c6 100644
@@ -191,9 +191,9 @@ struct he_tpdrq {
 
 struct he_hsp {
 	struct he_hsp_entry {
-		volatile u32 tbrq_tail; 
+		volatile u32 tbrq_tail;
 		volatile u32 reserved1[15];
-		volatile u32 rbrq_tail; 
+		volatile u32 rbrq_tail;
 		volatile u32 reserved2[15];
 	} group[HE_NUM_GROUPS];
 };
@@ -236,13 +236,11 @@ struct he_group {
 
 #define HE_LOOKUP_VCC(dev, cid) ((dev)->he_vcc_table[(cid)].vcc)
 
-struct he_vcc_table 
-{
+struct he_vcc_table {
 	struct atm_vcc *vcc;
 };
 
-struct he_cs_stper
-{
+struct he_cs_stper {
 	long pcr;
 	int inuse;
 };
@@ -316,8 +314,7 @@ struct he_dev {
 
 #define HE_MAXIOV 20
 
-struct he_vcc
-{
+struct he_vcc {
 	struct list_head buffers;
 	int pdu_len;
 	int rc_index;
@@ -457,7 +454,7 @@ struct he_vcc
 #define G0_RBPS_BS	0x8040c
 #define G0_RBPL_S	0x80410
 #define G0_RBPL_T	0x80414
-#define G0_RBPL_QI	0x80418 
+#define G0_RBPL_QI	0x80418
 #define G0_RBPL_BS	0x8041c
 
 #define	G1_RBPS_S	0x80420
@@ -616,11 +613,11 @@ struct he_vcc
 #define  TM_RW_WAIT(x)		(x<<2)
 #define  TM_SRAM_TYPE(x)	(x)
 
-#define TSRB_BA		0x80744	
-#define TSRC_BA		0x80748	
-#define TMABR_BA	0x8074c	
-#define TPD_BA		0x80750	
-#define TSRD_BA		0x80758	
+#define TSRB_BA		0x80744
+#define TSRC_BA		0x80748
+#define TMABR_BA	0x8074c
+#define TPD_BA		0x80750
+#define TSRD_BA		0x80758
 
 #define TX_CONFIG	0x80760
 #define  DRF_THRESH(x)		(x<<22)
Signature · 1 line
2.1.3
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

Quoted 81 lines · Jonathan Jin

This patch cleans up the following coding style issues that are detected by checkpatch:
ERROR: trailing whitespace
ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line

---
 drivers/atm/he.h | 25 +++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
drivers/atm/he.h +11 -14
index 110a27d..a9750c6 100644
@@ -191,9 +191,9 @@ struct he_tpdrq {
 
 struct he_hsp {
 	struct he_hsp_entry {
-		volatile u32 tbrq_tail; 
+		volatile u32 tbrq_tail;
 		volatile u32 reserved1[15];
-		volatile u32 rbrq_tail; 
+		volatile u32 rbrq_tail;
 		volatile u32 reserved2[15];
 	} group[HE_NUM_GROUPS];
 };
@@ -236,13 +236,11 @@ struct he_group {
 
 #define HE_LOOKUP_VCC(dev, cid) ((dev)->he_vcc_table[(cid)].vcc)
 
-struct he_vcc_table 
-{
+struct he_vcc_table {
 	struct atm_vcc *vcc;
 };
 
-struct he_cs_stper
-{
+struct he_cs_stper {
 	long pcr;
 	int inuse;
 };
@@ -316,8 +314,7 @@ struct he_dev {
 
 #define HE_MAXIOV 20
 
-struct he_vcc
-{
+struct he_vcc {
 	struct list_head buffers;
 	int pdu_len;
 	int rc_index;
@@ -457,7 +454,7 @@ struct he_vcc
 #define G0_RBPS_BS	0x8040c
 #define G0_RBPL_S	0x80410
 #define G0_RBPL_T	0x80414
-#define G0_RBPL_QI	0x80418 
+#define G0_RBPL_QI	0x80418
 #define G0_RBPL_BS	0x8041c
 
 #define	G1_RBPS_S	0x80420
@@ -616,11 +613,11 @@ struct he_vcc
 #define  TM_RW_WAIT(x)		(x<<2)
 #define  TM_SRAM_TYPE(x)	(x)
 
-#define TSRB_BA		0x80744	
-#define TSRC_BA		0x80748	
-#define TMABR_BA	0x8074c	
-#define TPD_BA		0x80750	
-#define TSRD_BA		0x80758	
+#define TSRB_BA		0x80744
+#define TSRC_BA		0x80748
+#define TMABR_BA	0x8074c
+#define TPD_BA		0x80750
+#define TSRD_BA		0x80758
 
 #define TX_CONFIG	0x80760
 #define  DRF_THRESH(x)		(x<<22)
Signature · 1 line
2.1.3

Sorry all, I neglected to mention why I'm sending this patch to the mailing list.

I'd like to get some feedback on the patch before I send it out to Chas Williams, who scripts/get_maintainer.pl reports as the maintainer of drivers/atm/he.h. I also plan to CC kernel-janitors at vger.kernel.org in the patch email.

Thanks in advance for the help and education, everybody.

Signature · 4 lines
Jonathan Jin
University of Chicago '15
(224) 623-9758
jjin.me
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

In reply to Jonathan Jin
Quoted 4 lines · Jonathan Jin

This patch cleans up the following coding style issues that are detected by checkpatch:
ERROR: trailing whitespace
ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line

Don't do multiple things in the same patch, make this at least 2 patches.

greg k-h

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 7:31 AM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

Quoted 1 line · Jonathan Jin

This patch cleans up the following coding style issues that are detected

by

Quoted 3 lines

checkpatch:
ERROR: trailing whitespace
ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line

Don't do multiple things in the same patch, make this at least 2 patches.

greg k-h

(Sorry, replied on my phone, default was not set to reply all.)

Wouldn't this count as one checkpatch fix patch? I mean, being the same file.

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20141215/970f4ff2/attachment.html

#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

Quoted 10 lines · karthik nayak

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 7:31 AM?Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 07:36:23PM -0600, Jonathan Jin wrote:
> This patch cleans up the following coding style issues that are detected by
> checkpatch:
>? ? ? ? ?ERROR: trailing whitespace
>? ? ? ? ?ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line

Quoted 8 lines

Don't do multiple things in the same patch, make this at least 2 patches.

greg k-h

(Sorry, replied on my phone, default was not set to reply all.)

Wouldn't this count as one checkpatch fix patch? I mean, being the same file.

Nope, you are doing two different _types_ of checkpatch fixes. So it needs to be more than one patch.

Remember, you need to make it as easy as possible for a maintainer to read your patch, doing more than one thing in a patch makes it much harder, and it gives them an easy reason to reject to it.

greg k-h

#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ATM: HE: Cleanup coding style

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 10:04 AM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

Quoted 5 lines · karthik nayak

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, 7:31 AM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 07:36:23PM -0600, Jonathan Jin wrote:
> This patch cleans up the following coding style issues that are

detected

Quoted 5 lines

by
> checkpatch:
> ERROR: trailing whitespace
> ERROR: open brace '{' following struct go on the same line

Quoted 8 lines

Don't do multiple things in the same patch, make this at least 2 patches.

greg k-h

(Sorry, replied on my phone, default was not set to reply all.)

Wouldn't this count as one checkpatch fix patch? I mean, being the same

file.

Nope, you are doing two different _types_ of checkpatch fixes. So it needs to be more than one patch.

Remember, you need to make it as easy as possible for a maintainer to read your patch, doing more than one thing in a patch makes it much harder, and it gives them an easy reason to reject to it.

greg k-h

Thank you for that
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20141215/a50ae3ec/attachment-0001.html