Skip to contentSkip to conversation

spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

PATCH New Masahiro Yamada 2 participants 6 messages Dec 11, 2014 – Jan 8, 2015

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

If CONFIG_SPL_NOR_SUPPORT is defined, spl_nor_load_image() requires spl_start_uboot(), CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE to be defined even if users just want to run U-Boot, not Linux. This is inconvenient.

---

 common/spl/spl_nor.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
common/spl/spl_nor.c +41 -33
index b444a3e..6f91176 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,45 @@
 #include <common.h>
 #include <spl.h>
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
+int load_linux(void)
+{
+	if (spl_start_uboot())
+		return -1;
+
+	spl_parse_image_header(
+		       (const struct image_header *)CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE);
+
+	memcpy((void *)spl_image.load_addr,
+	       (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE + sizeof(struct image_header)),
+	       spl_image.size);
+
+	/*
+	 * Copy DT blob (fdt) to SDRAM. Passing pointer to flash
+	 * doesn't work (16 KiB should be enough for DT)
+	 */
+	memcpy((void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE),
+	       16 << 10);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#else
+int load_linux(void)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
+#endif
+
+void load_uboot(void)
+{
+	spl_parse_image_header(
+			(const struct image_header *)CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE);
+
+	memcpy((void *)spl_image.load_addr,
+	       (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE + sizeof(struct image_header)),
+	       spl_image.size);
+}
+
 void spl_nor_load_image(void)
 {
 	/*
@@ -15,37 +54,6 @@ void spl_nor_load_image(void)
 	 */
 	spl_image.flags |= SPL_COPY_PAYLOAD_ONLY;
 
-	if (spl_start_uboot()) {
-		/*
-		 * Load real U-Boot from its location in NOR flash to its
-		 * defined location in SDRAM
-		 */
-		spl_parse_image_header(
-			(const struct image_header *)CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE);
-
-		memcpy((void *)spl_image.load_addr,
-		       (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_BASE +
-				sizeof(struct image_header)),
-		       spl_image.size);
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Load Linux from its location in NOR flash to its defined
-		 * location in SDRAM
-		 */
-		spl_parse_image_header(
-			(const struct image_header *)CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE);
-
-		memcpy((void *)spl_image.load_addr,
-		       (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE +
-				sizeof(struct image_header)),
-		       spl_image.size);
-
-		/*
-		 * Copy DT blob (fdt) to SDRAM. Passing pointer to flash
-		 * doesn't work (16 KiB should be enough for DT)
-		 */
-		memcpy((void *)CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR,
-		       (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE),
-		       (16 << 10));
-	}
+	if (load_linux() < 0)
+		load_uboot();
 }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

Quoted 6 lines · Masahiro Yamada

If CONFIG_SPL_NOR_SUPPORT is defined, spl_nor_load_image() requires spl_start_uboot(), CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE to be defined even if users just want to run U-Boot, not Linux. This is inconvenient.

Good idea, but the function to check on U-Boot or Linux should be called spl_start_uboot to match the other load methods :)

Signature · 8 lines
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20141210/97915a86/attachment.pgp>
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

Hi Tom,

Quoted 7 lines · On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:34:03 -0500 Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · Masahiro Yamada

If CONFIG_SPL_NOR_SUPPORT is defined, spl_nor_load_image() requires spl_start_uboot(), CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE to be defined even if users just want to run U-Boot, not Linux. This is inconvenient.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Good idea, but the function to check on U-Boot or Linux should be called spl_start_uboot to match the other load methods :)

I think I am following this way.

common/spl/spl_nor.c line 14

Quoted 5 lines
common/spl/spl_nor.c +5 -0
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
+int load_linux(void)
+{
+	if (spl_start_uboot())
+		return -1;

Here.
Any problem?

Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

ping?

2014-12-18 16:13 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>:

Quoted 42 lines

Hi Tom,

Quoted 7 lines · On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:34:03 -0500 Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · Masahiro Yamada

If CONFIG_SPL_NOR_SUPPORT is defined, spl_nor_load_image() requires spl_start_uboot(), CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE to be defined even if users just want to run U-Boot, not Linux. This is inconvenient.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Good idea, but the function to check on U-Boot or Linux should be called spl_start_uboot to match the other load methods :)

I think I am following this way.

common/spl/spl_nor.c line 14

Quoted 5 lines
common/spl/spl_nor.c +5 -0
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
+int load_linux(void)
+{
+     if (spl_start_uboot())
+             return -1;

Here.
Any problem?

Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Signature · 2 lines
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

In reply to Masahiro Yamada
Quoted 22 lines · Masahiro Yamada

Hi Tom,

Quoted 7 lines · On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:34:03 -0500 Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · Masahiro Yamada

If CONFIG_SPL_NOR_SUPPORT is defined, spl_nor_load_image() requires spl_start_uboot(), CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE to be defined even if users just want to run U-Boot, not Linux. This is inconvenient.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Good idea, but the function to check on U-Boot or Linux should be called spl_start_uboot to match the other load methods :)

I think I am following this way.

Quoted 9 lines

common/spl/spl_nor.c line 14

Quoted 5 lines
common/spl/spl_nor.c +5 -0
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
+int load_linux(void)
+{
+	if (spl_start_uboot())
+		return -1;

Here.
Any problem?

Yes, it should look like spl_nand_load_image().

Signature · 8 lines
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150107/01763d31/attachment.pgp>
#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 spl: spl_nor: surround Linux-load code with #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT

Quoted 33 lines · On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:47:36 -0500 Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 22 lines · Masahiro Yamada

Hi Tom,

Quoted 7 lines · On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 20:34:03 -0500 Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 5 lines · Masahiro Yamada

If CONFIG_SPL_NOR_SUPPORT is defined, spl_nor_load_image() requires spl_start_uboot(), CONFIG_SYS_OS_BASE, CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR, CONFIG_SYS_FDT_BASE to be defined even if users just want to run U-Boot, not Linux. This is inconvenient.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Good idea, but the function to check on U-Boot or Linux should be called spl_start_uboot to match the other load methods :)

I think I am following this way.

Quoted 9 lines

common/spl/spl_nor.c line 14

Quoted 5 lines
common/spl/spl_nor.c +5 -0
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT)
+int load_linux(void)
+{
+	if (spl_start_uboot())
+		return -1;

Here.
Any problem?

Quoted 2 lines

Yes, it should look like spl_nand_load_image().

OK.

I generally prefer to dividing shorter helper functions and shaller nests, but common/spl/spl_nand.c is what you want, v2 is here:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/426558/