iommu/amd: Track when amd_iommu_v2 init is complete
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 iommu/amd: Track when amd_iommu_v2 init is complete
This patch adds a new exported function to amd_iommu_v2, which returns 1 if the amd_iommu_v2 initialization function has completed, and 0 otherwise.
This is necessary for the case when amd_iommu_v2 is compiled inside the kernel image (not as module) and another module (e.g. amdkfd), which is also compiled inside the kernel image, is dependent on amd_iommu_v2 functionality.
In that case, there is no mechanism in the kernel that enforces the order of loading between the two modules. Therefore, If the amd_iommu_v2 is loaded _after_ the other module, and the other module calls one of amd_iommu_v2 exported functions _before_ amd_iommu_v2 is loaded, than that function will fail, and as a result, the calling module may fail as well.
Note that when the two modules are compiled as modules, this situation can't occur as the kernel enforces the order of loading.
--- drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/amd-iommu.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c +11 -0
@@ -895,6 +895,14 @@ out_unlock: }EXPORT_SYMBOL (amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb); +static int iommu_v2_init_completed; + +int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed (void ) +{ +return iommu_v2_init_completed; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed); +static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init (void ) {int ret;
@@ -903,6 +911,7 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void)if (!amd_iommu_v2_supported ()) {pr_info ("AMD IOMMUv2 functionality not available on this system\n" ); + iommu_v2_init_completed =1 ;/* * Load anyway to provide the symbols to other modules * which may use AMD IOMMUv2 optionally.
@@ -919,6 +928,8 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void)amd_iommu_register_ppr_notifier (&ppr_nb); + iommu_v2_init_completed =1 ; +return 0 ; out:
include/linux/amd-iommu.h +2 -0
@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ typedef void (*amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx)(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid);extern int amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb (struct pci_dev *pdev,amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx cb); +extern int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed (void ); +#else static inline int amd_iommu_detect (void ) {return -ENODEV ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.1.0
Quoted 64 lines · Oded Gabbay
This patch adds a new exported function to
amd_iommu_v2, which returns 1 if theamd_iommu_v2initialization function has completed, and 0 otherwise.This is necessary for the case when
amd_iommu_v2is compiled inside the kernel image (not as module) and another module (e.g. amdkfd), which is also compiled inside the kernel image, is dependent onamd_iommu_v2functionality.In that case, there is no mechanism in the kernel that enforces the order of loading between the two modules. Therefore, If the
amd_iommu_v2is loaded _after_ the other module, and the other module calls one ofamd_iommu_v2exported functions _before_amd_iommu_v2is loaded, than that function will fail, and as a result, the calling module may fail as well.Note that when the two modules are compiled as modules, this situation can't occur as the kernel enforces the order of loading.
Signed-off-by Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/amd-iommu.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c +11
-0@@ -895,6 +895,14 @@ out_unlock: }EXPORT_SYMBOL (amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb); +static int iommu_v2_init_completed; + +int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed (void ) +{ +return iommu_v2_init_completed; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed); +static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init (void ) {int ret;@@ -903,6 +911,7 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void)if (!amd_iommu_v2_supported ()) {pr_info ("AMD IOMMUv2 functionality not available on this system\n" ); + iommu_v2_init_completed =1 ;/* * Load anyway to provide the symbols to other modules * which may use AMD IOMMUv2 optionally. @@ -919,6 +928,8 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void)amd_iommu_register_ppr_notifier (&ppr_nb); + iommu_v2_init_completed =1 ; +return 0 ; out:include/linux/amd-iommu.h +0
-0
include/linux/amd-iommu.h typedef void (*amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx)(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid); · line 176
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/amd-iommu.h +2
-0@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ typedef void (*amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx)(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid);extern int amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb (struct pci_dev *pdev,amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx cb); +extern int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed (void ); +#else static inline int amd_iommu_detect (void ) {return -ENODEV ; }
Hi Joerg,
This patch follows our IRC conversations from the last week.
Last update from me was that using subsys_initcall instead of module_init does enforce amd_iommu_v2 to load _before_ amdkfd (apparently I didn't check it correctly the first time). However, this won't help us because:
1. I don't know what effect this has when amd_iommu_v2 is compiled as module.
2. amd_iommu_v2 depends on amd_iommu which is not subsys, so amd_iommu_v2 init function fails when it is called this early, and thus, amd_iommu_v2 doesn't work.
I want to fix this situation in rc1/2, so I'm sending the complementary patches to dri-devel in the meantime.
Oded
Quoted 86 lines · Oded Gabbay
Quoted 64 lines · Oded Gabbay
This patch adds a new exported function to
amd_iommu_v2, which returns 1 if theamd_iommu_v2initialization function has completed, and 0 otherwise.This is necessary for the case when
amd_iommu_v2is compiled inside the kernel image (not as module) and another module (e.g. amdkfd), which is also compiled inside the kernel image, is dependent onamd_iommu_v2functionality.In that case, there is no mechanism in the kernel that enforces the order of loading between the two modules. Therefore, If the
amd_iommu_v2is loaded _after_ the other module, and the other module calls one ofamd_iommu_v2exported functions _before_amd_iommu_v2is loaded, than that function will fail, and as a result, the calling module may fail as well.Note that when the two modules are compiled as modules, this situation can't occur as the kernel enforces the order of loading.
Signed-off-by Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/amd-iommu.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_v2.c +11
-0@@ -895,6 +895,14 @@ out_unlock: }EXPORT_SYMBOL (amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb); +static int iommu_v2_init_completed; + +int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed (void ) +{ +return iommu_v2_init_completed; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL (amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed); +static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init (void ) {int ret;@@ -903,6 +911,7 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void)if (!amd_iommu_v2_supported ()) {pr_info ("AMD IOMMUv2 functionality not available on this system\n" ); + iommu_v2_init_completed =1 ;/* * Load anyway to provide the symbols to other modules * which may use AMD IOMMUv2 optionally. @@ -919,6 +928,8 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_v2_init(void)amd_iommu_register_ppr_notifier (&ppr_nb); + iommu_v2_init_completed =1 ; +return 0 ; out:include/linux/amd-iommu.h +0
-0include/linux/amd-iommu.h typedef void (*amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx)(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid); · line 176
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/amd-iommu.h +2
-0@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ typedef void (*amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx)(struct pci_dev *pdev, int pasid);extern int amd_iommu_set_invalidate_ctx_cb (struct pci_dev *pdev,amd_iommu_invalidate_ctx cb); +extern int amd_iommu_v2_is_init_completed (void ); +#else static inline int amd_iommu_detect (void ) {return -ENODEV ; }Hi Joerg,
This patch follows our IRC conversations from the last week.
Last update from me was that usingsubsys_initcallinstead ofmodule_initdoes enforceamd_iommu_v2to load _before_ amdkfd (apparently I didn't check it correctly the first time). However, this won't help us because:
1. I don't know what effect this has whenamd_iommu_v2is compiled as module.
2.amd_iommu_v2depends onamd_iommuwhich is not subsys, soamd_iommu_v2init function fails when it is called this early, and thus,amd_iommu_v2doesn't work.
Quoted 9 lines
I want to fix this situation in rc1/2, so I'm sending the complementary patches to dri-devel in the meantime.
Oded
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Hi,
The drm guys suggested we move iommu/ subsystem before gpu/ subsystem in drivers/Makefile instead of the above patch (and the complementing patch-set in amdkfd).
I did that and it works, so please see this patch as discarded for now. I will send a new patch-set shortly.
ODed
Joerg Roedel
maintainerHi Oded,
Quoted 5 lines · Oded Gabbay
The drm guys suggested we move iommu/ subsystem before gpu/ subsystem in
drivers/Makefileinstead of the above patch (and the complementing patch-set in amdkfd).
I did that and it works, so please see this patch as discarded for now. I will send a new patch-set shortly.
Yeah, this is still a hack, but a better solution than tracking the initialization order manually.
Joerg