Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arm: specify PMU type in platform data

PATCH Superseded Mark Rutland 4 participants 12 messages Jan 20, 2015 – Feb 6, 2015

Subsystems (6)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v2 cover arm: specify PMU type in platform data

Currently the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers are coupled with each other, and all included in the same c file. To enable the splitting of the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers, and the conversion of the arm_pmu framework to a pure library, we need to be a be more precise when describing PMUs, to enable association of the PMU with the right driver. In device tree this is already implicit in the compatible string, but platform data currently only specifies "arm-pmu".

Commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific platform device IDs) added "armv6-pmu", "armv7-pmu", and "xscale-pmu" platform device IDs, enabling the three to be distinguished. This series updates platform code to use these strings.

A later patch series will decouple the drivers.

Since v1 [1]:
* Rebase to v3.19-rc4.
* Add Acks.
* Drop vexpress patches (platform code deleted).

Simon, in v1 you mentioned you were happy to take the shmobile patch through your tree. Are you still happy to do so, or to give your ack such that these can go through arm-soc together?

While I'm not too concerned which route these patches take, it would be nice to have a single base for the patches splitting the drivers.

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304078.html

Mark Rutland (5):
arm: realview: specify PMU types
arm: pxa: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: iop: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs
arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c                | 5 +++--
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c              | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c                  | 2 +-
 10 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/5 arm: realview: specify PMU types

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the realview board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers.

The Realview EB may be used with ARMv6 or ARMv7 CPUs, but luckily there's only a single ARMv7 CPU, so we can match that explicitly to determine whether or not we have an ARMv7 PMU.

---
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c +2 -1
index 739d4f1..64c88d6 100644
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
 #include <asm/smp_twd.h>
+#include <asm/system_info.h>
 
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -296,7 +297,6 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name			= "arm-pmu",
 	.id			= -1,
 	.num_resources		= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource		= pmu_resources,
@@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ static void __init realview_eb_init(void)
 		 */
 		l2x0_init(__io_address(REALVIEW_EB11MP_L220_BASE), 0x00790000, 0xfe000fff);
 #endif
+		pmu_device.name = core_tile_a9mp() ? "armv7-pmu" : "armv6-pmu";
 		platform_device_register(&pmu_device);
 	}
 
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c +1 -1
index b0e0dca..ce92c18 100644
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resource = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name			= "arm-pmu",
+	.name			= "armv6-pmu",
 	.id			= -1,
 	.num_resources		= 1,
 	.resource		= &pmu_resource,
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c +1 -1
index 47bf55f..15c45e2 100644
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name			= "arm-pmu",
+	.name			= "armv6-pmu",
 	.id			= -1,
 	.num_resources		= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource		= pmu_resources,
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c +1 -1
index 4e57a85..4c64662 100644
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resource = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name			= "arm-pmu",
+	.name			= "armv7-pmu",
 	.id			= -1,
 	.num_resources		= 1,
 	.resource		= &pmu_resource,
arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c +1 -1
index d89eb40..9a22b86 100644
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name			= "arm-pmu",
+	.name			= "armv7-pmu",
 	.id			= -1,
 	.num_resources		= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource		= pmu_resources,
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/5 arm: pxa: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs

In reply to Mark Rutland

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the pxa board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers.

Cc Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc Daniel Mack <[email protected]>
Cc Haojian Zhuang <[email protected]>
Cc Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c +1 -1
index ac7b3ea..3543466 100644
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static struct resource pxa_resource_pmu = {
 };
 
 struct platform_device pxa_device_pmu = {
-	.name		= "arm-pmu",
+	.name		= "xscale-pmu",
 	.id		= -1,
 	.resource	= &pxa_resource_pmu,
 	.num_resources	= 1,
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#3 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/5 arm: iop: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs

In reply to Mark Rutland

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the iop board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers.

---
 arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c +1 -1
index ad9f974..c6d979a 100644
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resource = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name		= "arm-pmu",
+	.name		= "xscale-pmu",
 	.id		= -1,
 	.resource	= &pmu_resource,
 	.num_resources	= 1,
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#4 lore raw

PATCH v2 4/5 arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

In reply to Mark Rutland

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the shmobile board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers

Cc Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
Cc Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
Cc Simon Horman <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c +1 -1
index 79ad93d..6edde2f 100644
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name	= "arm-pmu",
+	.name	= "armv7-pmu",
 	.id	= -1,
 	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource = pmu_resources,
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c +1 -1
index 93ebe34..bdfa7a5 100644
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name		= "arm-pmu",
+	.name		= "armv7-pmu",
 	.id		= -1,
 	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource	= pmu_resources,
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#5 lore raw

PATCH v2 4/5 arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

Quoted 9 lines · Mark Rutland

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the shmobile board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers

Cc Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
Cc Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
Cc Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Quoted 40 lines
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c +1 -1
index 79ad93d..6edde2f 100644
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name	= "arm-pmu",
+	.name	= "armv7-pmu",
 	.id	= -1,
 	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource = pmu_resources,
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c +1 -1
index 93ebe34..bdfa7a5 100644
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static struct resource pmu_resources[] = {
 };
 
 static struct platform_device pmu_device = {
-	.name		= "arm-pmu",
+	.name		= "armv7-pmu",
 	.id		= -1,
 	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_resources),
 	.resource	= pmu_resources,
Signature · 7 lines
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
#6 lore raw

PATCH v2 5/5 arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

In reply to Mark Rutland

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the omap board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers.

The unnecessary include of asm/pmu.h is also removed.

---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c +3 -2
index 33c8846..a69e9a3 100644
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  */
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
-#include <asm/pmu.h>
+#include <asm/system_info.h>
 
 #include "soc.h"
 #include "omap_hwmod.h"
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ static int __init omap2_init_pmu(unsigned oh_num, char *oh_names[])
 {
 	int i;
 	struct omap_hwmod *oh[3];
-	char *dev_name = "arm-pmu";
+	char *dev_name = cpu_architecture() == CPU_ARCH_ARMv6 ?
+			 "armv6-pmu" : "armv7-pmu";
 
 	if ((!oh_num) || (oh_num > 3))
 		return -EINVAL;
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
maintainer
#7 lore raw

PATCH v2 5/5 arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

Quoted 28 lines · Mark Rutland

Now that we can specify which PMU variant we're likely to deal with, do so in the omap board code. This will allow us to split the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers.

The unnecessary include of asm/pmu.h is also removed.

---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c +1 -1
index 33c8846..a69e9a3 100644
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  */
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
-#include <asm/pmu.h>
+#include <asm/system_info.h>
 
 #include "soc.h"
 #include "omap_hwmod.h"

arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c static int __init omap2_init_pmu(unsigned oh_num, char *oh_names[]) · line 44

Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c +2 -1
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ static int __init omap2_init_pmu(unsigned oh_num, char *oh_names[])
 {
 	int i;
 	struct omap_hwmod *oh[3];
-	char *dev_name = "arm-pmu";
+	char *dev_name = cpu_architecture() == CPU_ARCH_ARMv6 ?
+			 "armv6-pmu" : "armv7-pmu";
 
 	if ((!oh_num) || (oh_num > 3))
 		return -EINVAL;

Looks OK to me and should not conflict with anything I have queued:

#8 lore raw

v2 cover arm: specify PMU type in platform data

In reply to Mark Rutland
Quoted 20 lines · Mark Rutland

Currently the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers are coupled with each other, and all included in the same c file. To enable the splitting of the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers, and the conversion of the arm_pmu framework to a pure library, we need to be a be more precise when describing PMUs, to enable association of the PMU with the right driver. In device tree this is already implicit in the compatible string, but platform data currently only specifies "arm-pmu".

Commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific platform device IDs) added "armv6-pmu", "armv7-pmu", and "xscale-pmu" platform device IDs, enabling the three to be distinguished. This series updates platform code to use these strings.

A later patch series will decouple the drivers.

Since v1 [1]:
* Rebase to v3.19-rc4.
* Add Acks.
* Drop vexpress patches (platform code deleted).

Quoted 6 lines

Simon, in v1 you mentioned you were happy to take the shmobile patch through your tree. Are you still happy to do so, or to give your ack such that these can go through arm-soc together?

While I'm not too concerned which route these patches take, it would be nice to have a single base for the patches splitting the drivers.

Hi Mark,

assuming that this is targeted at v3.20 then it looks like your changes do not conflict with anything I have queued up and I am not likely to queue anything more up for the files in question for that release. As my main concern is about conflicts I'm therefore quite happy for you to take the shmobile patch through your tree. I'll supply an ack accordingly.

Quoted 33 lines

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304078.html

Mark Rutland (5):
arm: realview: specify PMU types
arm: pxa: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: iop: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs
arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c                | 5 +++--
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c              | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c                  | 2 +-
 10 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
#9 lore raw

v2 cover arm: specify PMU type in platform data

Quoted 28 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 20 lines · Mark Rutland

Currently the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers are coupled with each other, and all included in the same c file. To enable the splitting of the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers, and the conversion of the arm_pmu framework to a pure library, we need to be a be more precise when describing PMUs, to enable association of the PMU with the right driver. In device tree this is already implicit in the compatible string, but platform data currently only specifies "arm-pmu".

Commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific platform device IDs) added "armv6-pmu", "armv7-pmu", and "xscale-pmu" platform device IDs, enabling the three to be distinguished. This series updates platform code to use these strings.

A later patch series will decouple the drivers.

Since v1 [1]:
* Rebase to v3.19-rc4.
* Add Acks.
* Drop vexpress patches (platform code deleted).

Quoted 6 lines

Simon, in v1 you mentioned you were happy to take the shmobile patch through your tree. Are you still happy to do so, or to give your ack such that these can go through arm-soc together?

While I'm not too concerned which route these patches take, it would be nice to have a single base for the patches splitting the drivers.

Quoted 8 lines

Hi Mark,

assuming that this is targeted at v3.20 then it looks like your changes do not conflict with anything I have queued up and I am not likely to queue anything more up for the files in question for that release. As my main concern is about conflicts I'm therefore quite happy for you to take the shmobile patch through your tree. I'll supply an ack accordingly.

Thanks, Simon, it's much appreciated.

Arnd, Olof, are you happy to pick this up for v3.20? I believe all the patches have now been appropriately acked.

If it makes things any easier I've placed the series (with new acks) on my arm/perf/platform-updates branch [2], based atop of v3.19-rc4.

Thanks,
Mark.

[2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm/perf/platform-updates

Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 34 lines

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304078.html

Mark Rutland (5):
arm: realview: specify PMU types
arm: pxa: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: iop: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs
arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c                | 5 +++--
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c              | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c                  | 2 +-
 10 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
#10 lore raw

v2 cover arm: specify PMU type in platform data

[adding arm at kernel.org]

Arnd/Olof, are you happy to take these?

Everything has been appropriately acked, and as mentioned below the series can also be found on my kernel.org tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm/perf/platform-updates

Thanks,
Mark.

Quoted 92 lines · Mark Rutland
Quoted 28 lines · Simon Horman
Quoted 20 lines · Mark Rutland

Currently the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers are coupled with each other, and all included in the same c file. To enable the splitting of the ARMv6, ARMv7, and XScale PMU drivers, and the conversion of the arm_pmu framework to a pure library, we need to be a be more precise when describing PMUs, to enable association of the PMU with the right driver. In device tree this is already implicit in the compatible string, but platform data currently only specifies "arm-pmu".

Commit 253d8c3d2518ca6f (arm: perf: add more specific platform device IDs) added "armv6-pmu", "armv7-pmu", and "xscale-pmu" platform device IDs, enabling the three to be distinguished. This series updates platform code to use these strings.

A later patch series will decouple the drivers.

Since v1 [1]:
* Rebase to v3.19-rc4.
* Add Acks.
* Drop vexpress patches (platform code deleted).

Quoted 6 lines

Simon, in v1 you mentioned you were happy to take the shmobile patch through your tree. Are you still happy to do so, or to give your ack such that these can go through arm-soc together?

While I'm not too concerned which route these patches take, it would be nice to have a single base for the patches splitting the drivers.

Quoted 8 lines

Hi Mark,

assuming that this is targeted at v3.20 then it looks like your changes do not conflict with anything I have queued up and I am not likely to queue anything more up for the files in question for that release. As my main concern is about conflicts I'm therefore quite happy for you to take the shmobile patch through your tree. I'll supply an ack accordingly.

Thanks, Simon, it's much appreciated.

Arnd, Olof, are you happy to pick this up for v3.20? I believe all the patches have now been appropriately acked.

If it makes things any easier I've placed the series (with new acks) on my arm/perf/platform-updates branch [2], based atop of v3.19-rc4.

Thanks,
Mark.

[2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm/perf/platform-updates

Quoted 29 lines
Quoted 29 lines

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304078.html

Mark Rutland (5):
arm: realview: specify PMU types
arm: pxa: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: iop: specify PMUs are for XScale CPUs
arm: shmobile: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs
arm: omap: specify PMUs are for ARMv7 CPUs

 arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c                | 5 +++--
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/devices.c              | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_eb.c     | 3 ++-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb1176.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pb11mp.c | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pba8.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-realview/realview_pbx.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c    | 2 +-
 arch/arm/plat-iop/pmu.c                  | 2 +-
 10 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

#11 lore raw

v2 cover arm: specify PMU type in platform data

Quoted 8 lines · Mark Rutland

[adding arm at kernel.org]

Arnd/Olof, are you happy to take these?

Everything has been appropriately acked, and as mentioned below the series can also be found on my kernel.org tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm/perf/platform-updates

Thanks, applied the patches to next/cleanup.

-Olof