KVM: always initialize *pdata in get_msr()
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 KVM: always initialize *pdata in get_msr()
Smatch complains that there are some paths where we use uninitialized data in em_sysenter().
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:2410 em_sysenter()
error: potentially using uninitialized 'msr_data'.
A couple examples of paths which don't set "pdata" are found in get_msr_hyperv() and kvm_x2apic_msr_read(). I looked at this code and it seems like setting it to zero is a common default behaviour.
---
From static analysis only, not from real life.
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +2 -0
@@ -3063,6 +3063,8 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 *data) {struct vcpu_svm *svm =to_svm (vcpu); + *data =0 ; +switch (ecx) {case MSR_IA32_TSC : { *data = svm->vmcb->control.tsc_offset +
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +1 -0
@@ -2544,6 +2544,7 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)printk (KERN_ERR "BUG: get_msr called with NULL pdata\n" );return -EINVAL ; } + *pdata =0 ;switch (msr_index) {#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
2015-01-23 17:32+0300, Dan Carpenter:
Quoted 6 lines
Smatch complains that there are some paths where we use uninitialized data in
em_sysenter().
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:2410em_sysenter()
error: potentially using uninitialized 'msr_data'.
I have two hypotheses why smatch thinks so
1) vmcs_readl() return value is treated as potentially uninitialized
2) even non-reachable switch cases are considered
Both of them would likely throw other false positives and I think the rest is covered in analysis at the bottom ... have I missed something? (I presume that this patch fixes that message.)
Quoted 3 lines
A couple examples of paths which don't set "pdata" are found in
get_msr_hyperv()andkvm_x2apic_msr_read(). I looked at this code and it seems like setting it to zero is a common default behaviour.
This patch will prevent future detection of functional bugs :( But those bugs could be CVEs (the fear!) and zero is sane,
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 *data) · line 3066
Quoted 6 lines
+++
b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.carch/x86/kvm/svm.c +1
-0@@ -3063,6 +3063,8 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 *data) {struct vcpu_svm *svm =to_svm (vcpu); + *data =0 ;
(Not sure why we don't check data for NULL too, or don't remove the
check from vmx_get_msr() ...)
---msr_data is always initialized.
It is set with
ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, &msr_data);
emulator_get_msr(ctxt, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, &msr_data);
kvm_get_msr(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, &msr_data);
kvm_x86_ops->get_msr(emul_to_vcpu(ctxt), MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, &msr_data);where kvm_x86_ops->get_msr is either svm_get_msr or vmx_get_msr. (If smatch thinks that it can also be something else, fixing it there
won't shut it up.)
svm_get_msr: msr_data is always initialized.
svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 *data) {
[...]
switch (ecx) {
[...]
case MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS:
*data = svm->vmcb->save.sysenter_cs;
break;
[...]
}return 0;
}
vmx_get_msr: msr_data can only remain uninitialized if msr_data is located at memory offset 0. (Won't happen in Linux and still wouldn't suppress the warning, because the patch sets msr_data after the check.)
vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata) {
[...]
if (!pdata) {
[...]
return -EINVAL;
}
switch (msr_index) {
[...]
case MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS:
data = vmcs_read32(GUEST_SYSENTER_CS);
break;
[...]
}
*pdata = data;
return 0;Quoted 1 line · Radim Krčmář
This patch will prevent future detection of functional bugs :(
Hm. You're right. Smatch should be able to follow the logic. The code to handle this is pretty new. I'll look into why it wasn't working.
regards,
dan carpenter
Paolo Bonzini
maintainerQuoted 5 lines · Dan Carpenter
Smatch complains that there are some paths where we use uninitialized data in
em_sysenter().
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:2410em_sysenter()
error: potentially using uninitialized 'msr_data'.
The right thing to do is to ensure that the value is set if get_msr returns 0. If it returns 1, msr_data is not used.
This one is obviously a false positive, so I'm not applying the patch for now.
Paolo
Quoted 7 lines
A couple examples of paths which don't set "pdata" are found in
get_msr_hyperv()andkvm_x2apic_msr_read(). I looked at this code and it seems like setting it to zero is a common default behaviour.Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>---
From static analysis only, not from real life.