mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for THP
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for THP
memcg currently uses hardcoded GFP_TRANSHUGE gfp flags for all THP charges. THP allocations, however, might be using different flags depending on /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/{,khugepaged/}defrag and the current allocation context.
The primary difference is that defrag configured to "madvise" value will clear __GFP_WAIT flag from the core gfp mask to make the allocation lighter for all mappings which are not backed by VM_HUGEPAGE vmas. If memcg charge path ignores this fact we will get light allocation but the a potential memcg reclaim would kill the whole point of the configuration.
Fix the mismatch by providing the same gfp mask used for the allocation to the charge functions. This is quite easy for all paths except for hugepaged kernel thread with !CONFIG_NUMA which is doing a pre-allocation long before the allocated page is used in collapse_huge_page via khugepaged_alloc_page. To prevent from cluttering the whole code path from khugepaged_do_scan we simply return the current flags as per khugepaged_defrag() value which might have changed since the preallocation. If somebody changed the value of the knob we would charge differently but this shouldn't happen often and it is definitely not critical because it would only lead to a reduced success rate of one-off THP promotion.
--- mm/huge_memory.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
mm/huge_memory.c +20 -16
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static inline pmd_t mk_huge_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page (struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr,pmd_t *pmd, -struct page *page) +struct page *page,gfp_t gfp) {struct mem_cgroup *memcg;pgtable_t pgtable;
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm,VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (!PageCompound (page), page); -if (mem_cgroup_try_charge (page, mm,GFP_TRANSHUGE , &memcg)) +if (mem_cgroup_try_charge (page, mm, gfp, &memcg))return VM_FAULT_OOM ; pgtable =pte_alloc_one (mm, haddr);
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,count_vm_event (THP_FAULT_FALLBACK );return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK ; } -if (unlikely (__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page (mm, vma, haddr, pmd, page))) { +if (unlikely (__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page (mm, vma, haddr, pmd, page, gfp))) {put_page (page);count_vm_event (THP_FAULT_FALLBACK );return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK ;
@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t huge_gfp =GFP_TRANSHUGE ;/* for allocation and charge */ ptl =pmd_lockptr (mm, pmd);VM_BUG_ON_VMA (!vma->anon_vma, vma);
@@ -1106,10 +1107,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, alloc:if (transparent_hugepage_enabled (vma) && !transparent_hugepage_debug_cow ()) { -gfp_t gfp; - - gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (transparent_hugepage_defrag (vma),0 ); - new_page =alloc_hugepage_vma (gfp, vma, haddr,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); + huge_gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (transparent_hugepage_defrag (vma),0 ); + new_page =alloc_hugepage_vma (huge_gfp, vma, haddr,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); }else new_page =NULL ;
@@ -1131,7 +1130,7 @@ alloc: }if (unlikely (mem_cgroup_try_charge (new_page, mm, -GFP_TRANSHUGE , &memcg))) { + huge_gfp, &memcg))) {put_page (new_page);if (page) {split_huge_page (page);
@@ -2354,16 +2353,14 @@ static bool khugepaged_prealloc_page(struct page **hpage, bool *wait) }static struct page -*khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,struct mm_struct *mm, +*khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t *gfp,struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,int node) { -gfp_t flags; -VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (*hpage, *hpage);/* Only allocate from the target node */ - flags =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (), __GFP_OTHER_NODE) | + *gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (), __GFP_OTHER_NODE) | __GFP_THISNODE;/*
@@ -2374,7 +2371,7 @@ static struct page*/ up_read (&mm->mmap_sem); - *hpage =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, flags,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); + *hpage =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, *gfp,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER );if (unlikely (!*hpage)) {count_vm_event (THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED ); *hpage =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );
@@ -2428,12 +2425,18 @@ static bool khugepaged_prealloc_page(struct page **hpage, bool *wait) }static struct page -*khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,struct mm_struct *mm, +*khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t *gfp,struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,int node) {up_read (&mm->mmap_sem);VM_BUG_ON (!*hpage); + +/* +* khugepaged_alloc_hugepage is doing the preallocation, use the same +* gfp flags here. +*/ + *gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (),0 );return *hpage; }#endif
@@ -2468,16 +2471,17 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,struct mem_cgroup *memcg;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t gfp;VM_BUG_ON (address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK );/* release the mmap_sem read lock. */ - new_page =khugepaged_alloc_page (hpage, mm, vma, address, node); + new_page =khugepaged_alloc_page (hpage, &gfp, mm, vma, address, node);if (!new_page)return ;if (unlikely (mem_cgroup_try_charge (new_page, mm, -GFP_TRANSHUGE , &memcg))) + gfp, &memcg)))return ;/*
Signature · 7 lines
2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 24 lines · Michal Hocko
memcg currently uses hardcoded
GFP_TRANSHUGEgfp flags for all THP charges. THP allocations, however, might be using different flags depending on/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/{,khugepaged/}defragand the current allocation context.The primary difference is that defrag configured to "madvise" value will clear
__GFP_WAITflag from the core gfp mask to make the allocation lighter for all mappings which are not backed byVM_HUGEPAGEvmas. If memcg charge path ignores this fact we will get light allocation but the a potential memcg reclaim would kill the whole point of the configuration.Fix the mismatch by providing the same gfp mask used for the allocation to the charge functions. This is quite easy for all paths except for hugepaged kernel thread with !CONFIG_NUMA which is doing a pre-allocation long before the allocated page is used in
collapse_huge_pageviakhugepaged_alloc_page. To prevent from cluttering the whole code path fromkhugepaged_do_scanwe simply return the current flags as perkhugepaged_defrag()value which might have changed since the preallocation. If somebody changed the value of the knob we would charge differently but this shouldn't happen often and it is definitely not critical because it would only lead to a reduced success rate of one-off THP promotion.
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
(a nitpick below)
Quoted 36 lines
--- mm/huge_memory.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)mm/huge_memory.c +3
-3@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static inline pmd_t mk_huge_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page (struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr,pmd_t *pmd, -struct page *page) +struct page *page,gfp_t gfp) {struct mem_cgroup *memcg;pgtable_t pgtable;@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static int __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm,VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (!PageCompound (page), page); -if (mem_cgroup_try_charge (page, mm,GFP_TRANSHUGE , &memcg)) +if (mem_cgroup_try_charge (page, mm, gfp, &memcg))return VM_FAULT_OOM ; pgtable =pte_alloc_one (mm, haddr);@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,count_vm_event (THP_FAULT_FALLBACK );return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK ; } -if (unlikely (__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page (mm, vma, haddr, pmd, page))) { +if (unlikely (__do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page (mm, vma, haddr, pmd, page, gfp))) {put_page (page);count_vm_event (THP_FAULT_FALLBACK );return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK ;
mm/huge_memory.c int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, · line 1083
Quoted 4 lines
mm/huge_memory.c +1
-0@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t huge_gfp =GFP_TRANSHUGE ;/* for allocation and charge */
This value is actually never used. Is it here because the compiler emits a spurious non-initialized value warning otherwise? It should be easy for it to prove that setting new_page to something non-null implies initializing huge_gfp (in the hunk below), and NULL new_page means it doesn't reach the mem_cgroup_try_charge() call?
Quoted 17 lines
mm/huge_memory.c +2
-4ptl =pmd_lockptr (mm, pmd);VM_BUG_ON_VMA (!vma->anon_vma, vma);@@ -1106,10 +1107,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, alloc:if (transparent_hugepage_enabled (vma) && !transparent_hugepage_debug_cow ()) { -gfp_t gfp; - - gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (transparent_hugepage_defrag (vma),0 ); - new_page =alloc_hugepage_vma (gfp, vma, haddr,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); + huge_gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (transparent_hugepage_defrag (vma),0 ); + new_page =alloc_hugepage_vma (huge_gfp, vma, haddr,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); }else new_page =NULL ;
mm/huge_memory.c alloc: · line 1136
Quoted 8 lines
mm/huge_memory.c +1
-1@@ -1131,7 +1130,7 @@ alloc: }if (unlikely (mem_cgroup_try_charge (new_page, mm, -GFP_TRANSHUGE , &memcg))) { + huge_gfp, &memcg))) {put_page (new_page);if (page) {split_huge_page (page);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 25 lines · Vlastimil Babka
Quoted 24 lines · Michal Hocko
memcg currently uses hardcoded
GFP_TRANSHUGEgfp flags for all THP charges. THP allocations, however, might be using different flags depending on/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/{,khugepaged/}defragand the current allocation context.The primary difference is that defrag configured to "madvise" value will clear
__GFP_WAITflag from the core gfp mask to make the allocation lighter for all mappings which are not backed byVM_HUGEPAGEvmas. If memcg charge path ignores this fact we will get light allocation but the a potential memcg reclaim would kill the whole point of the configuration.Fix the mismatch by providing the same gfp mask used for the allocation to the charge functions. This is quite easy for all paths except for hugepaged kernel thread with !CONFIG_NUMA which is doing a pre-allocation long before the allocated page is used in
collapse_huge_pageviakhugepaged_alloc_page. To prevent from cluttering the whole code path fromkhugepaged_do_scanwe simply return the current flags as perkhugepaged_defrag()value which might have changed since the preallocation. If somebody changed the value of the knob we would charge differently but this shouldn't happen often and it is definitely not critical because it would only lead to a reduced success rate of one-off THP promotion.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Michal Hocko <[email protected]>Acked-by Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Thanks!
[...]
Quoted 11 lines
mm/huge_memory.c int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, · line 1083
Quoted 5 lines
mm/huge_memory.c +1
-0@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t huge_gfp =GFP_TRANSHUGE ;/* for allocation and charge */ This value is actually never used. Is it here because the compiler emits a spurious non-initialized value warning otherwise? It should be easy for it to prove that setting
new_pageto something non-null implies initializinghuge_gfp(in the hunk below), and NULLnew_pagemeans it doesn't reach themem_cgroup_try_charge()call?
No, I haven't tried to workaround the compiler. It just made the code more obvious to me. I can remove the initialization if you prefer, of course.
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 24 lines
mm/huge_memory.c +3
-5ptl =pmd_lockptr (mm, pmd);VM_BUG_ON_VMA (!vma->anon_vma, vma);@@ -1106,10 +1107,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, alloc:if (transparent_hugepage_enabled (vma) && !transparent_hugepage_debug_cow ()) { -gfp_t gfp; - - gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (transparent_hugepage_defrag (vma),0 ); - new_page =alloc_hugepage_vma (gfp, vma, haddr,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); + huge_gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (transparent_hugepage_defrag (vma),0 ); + new_page =alloc_hugepage_vma (huge_gfp, vma, haddr,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); }else new_page =NULL ;@@ -1131,7 +1130,7 @@ alloc: }if (unlikely (mem_cgroup_try_charge (new_page, mm, -GFP_TRANSHUGE , &memcg))) { + huge_gfp, &memcg))) {put_page (new_page);if (page) {split_huge_page (page);
Signature · 8 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 14 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 12 lines · Vlastimil Babka
mm/huge_memory.c int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, · line 1083
Quoted 5 lines · Michal Hocko
mm/huge_memory.c +1
-0@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t huge_gfp =GFP_TRANSHUGE ;/* for allocation and charge */ This value is actually never used. Is it here because the compiler emits a spurious non-initialized value warning otherwise? It should be easy for it to prove that setting
new_pageto something non-null implies initializinghuge_gfp(in the hunk below), and NULLnew_pagemeans it doesn't reach themem_cgroup_try_charge()call?
Quoted 3 lines
No, I haven't tried to workaround the compiler. It just made the code more obvious to me. I can remove the initialization if you prefer, of course.
Yeah IMHO it would be better to remove it, if possible. Leaving it has the (albeit small) chance that future patch will again use the value in the code before it's determined based on defrag setting.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 15 lines · Vlastimil Babka
Quoted 14 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 12 lines · Vlastimil Babka
mm/huge_memory.c int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, · line 1083
Quoted 5 lines · Michal Hocko
mm/huge_memory.c +1
-0@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t huge_gfp =GFP_TRANSHUGE ;/* for allocation and charge */ This value is actually never used. Is it here because the compiler emits a spurious non-initialized value warning otherwise? It should be easy for it to prove that setting
new_pageto something non-null implies initializinghuge_gfp(in the hunk below), and NULLnew_pagemeans it doesn't reach themem_cgroup_try_charge()call?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
No, I haven't tried to workaround the compiler. It just made the code more obvious to me. I can remove the initialization if you prefer, of course.
Yeah IMHO it would be better to remove it, if possible. Leaving it has the (albeit small) chance that future patch will again use the value in the code before it's determined based on defrag setting.
Wouldn't an uninitialized value be used in such a case?
Signature · 8 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 20 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 19 lines · Vlastimil Babka
Quoted 17 lines · Michal Hocko
Quoted 12 lines · Vlastimil Babka
mm/huge_memory.c int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, · line 1083
Quoted 5 lines · Michal Hocko
mm/huge_memory.c +1
-0@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long haddr;unsigned long mmun_start;/* For mmu_notifiers */ unsigned long mmun_end;/* For mmu_notifiers */ +gfp_t huge_gfp =GFP_TRANSHUGE ;/* for allocation and charge */ This value is actually never used. Is it here because the compiler emits a spurious non-initialized value warning otherwise? It should be easy for it to prove that setting
new_pageto something non-null implies initializinghuge_gfp(in the hunk below), and NULLnew_pagemeans it doesn't reach themem_cgroup_try_charge()call?No, I haven't tried to workaround the compiler. It just made the code more obvious to me. I can remove the initialization if you prefer, of course.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Yeah IMHO it would be better to remove it, if possible. Leaving it has the (albeit small) chance that future patch will again use the value in the code before it's determined based on defrag setting.
Wouldn't an uninitialized value be used in such a case?
Yeah, but then you should get a (correct) warning :)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH 1/1 mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for THP
Updated version
---
PATCH 1/1 mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for thp fix fix
"mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for THP" in -mm introduces a formal to pass the gfp mask for khugepaged's hugepage allocation. This is just too ugly to live.
alloc_hugepage_gfpmask() cannot differ between NUMA and UMA configs by anything in GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, which is the only thing that matters for memcg reclaim, so just determine the gfp flags once in collapse_huge_page() and avoid the complexity.
---
-mm: intended to be folded into
mm-memcg-sync-allocation-and-memcg-charge-gfp-flags-for-thp.patch
mm/huge_memory.c | 21 ++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
mm/huge_memory.c +8 -13
@@ -2373,16 +2373,12 @@ static bool khugepaged_prealloc_page(struct page **hpage, bool *wait) }static struct page * -khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t *gfp,struct mm_struct *mm, +khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t gfp,struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,int node) {VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (*hpage, *hpage); -/* Only allocate from the target node */ - *gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (), __GFP_OTHER_NODE) | - __GFP_THISNODE; -/* * Before allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock. * The allocation can take potentially a long time if it involves
@@ -2391,7 +2387,7 @@ khugepaged_alloc_page(struct page **hpage, gfp_t *gfp, struct mm_struct *mm,*/ up_read (&mm->mmap_sem); - *hpage =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, *gfp,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); + *hpage =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, gfp,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER );if (unlikely (!*hpage)) {count_vm_event (THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED ); *hpage =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );
@@ -2445,18 +2441,13 @@ static bool khugepaged_prealloc_page(struct page **hpage, bool *wait) }static struct page * -khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t *gfp,struct mm_struct *mm, +khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t gfp,struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,int node) {up_read (&mm->mmap_sem);VM_BUG_ON (!*hpage); -/* -* khugepaged_alloc_hugepage is doing the preallocation, use the same -* gfp flags here. -*/ - *gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (),0 );return *hpage; }#endif
@@ -2495,8 +2486,12 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,VM_BUG_ON (address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK ); +/* Only allocate from the target node */ + gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (), __GFP_OTHER_NODE) | + __GFP_THISNODE; +/* release the mmap_sem read lock. */ - new_page =khugepaged_alloc_page (hpage, &gfp, mm, vma, address, node); + new_page =khugepaged_alloc_page (hpage, gfp, mm, vma, address, node);if (!new_page)return ;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for thp fix fix
Quoted 10 lines · David Rientjes
"mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for THP" in -mm introduces a formal to pass the gfp mask for khugepaged's hugepage allocation. This is just too ugly to live.
alloc_hugepage_gfpmask()cannot differ between NUMA and UMA configs by anything inGFP_RECLAIM_MASK, which is the only thing that matters for memcg reclaim, so just determine the gfp flags once incollapse_huge_page()and avoid the complexity.Signed-off-by David Rientjes <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [patch] mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for thp fix fix
In reply to David RientjesQuoted 10 lines · David Rientjes
"mm, memcg: sync allocation and memcg charge gfp flags for THP" in -mm introduces a formal to pass the gfp mask for khugepaged's hugepage allocation. This is just too ugly to live.
alloc_hugepage_gfpmask()cannot differ between NUMA and UMA configs by anything inGFP_RECLAIM_MASK, which is the only thing that matters for memcg reclaim, so just determine the gfp flags once incollapse_huge_page()and avoid the complexity.Signed-off-by David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Thanks for this cleanup!
Quoted 77 lines
---
-mm: intended to be folded into
mm-memcg-sync-allocation-and-memcg-charge-gfp-flags-for-thp.patchmm/huge_memory.c | 21 ++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)mm/huge_memory.c +8
-14@@ -2373,16 +2373,12 @@ static bool khugepaged_prealloc_page(struct page **hpage, bool *wait) }static struct page * -khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t *gfp,struct mm_struct *mm, +khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t gfp,struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,int node) {VM_BUG_ON_PAGE (*hpage, *hpage); -/* Only allocate from the target node */ - *gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (), __GFP_OTHER_NODE) | - __GFP_THISNODE; -/* * Before allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock. * The allocation can take potentially a long time if it involves @@ -2391,7 +2387,7 @@ khugepaged_alloc_page(struct page **hpage, gfp_t *gfp, struct mm_struct *mm,*/ up_read (&mm->mmap_sem); - *hpage =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, *gfp,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER ); + *hpage =alloc_pages_exact_node (node, gfp,HPAGE_PMD_ORDER );if (unlikely (!*hpage)) {count_vm_event (THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED ); *hpage =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );@@ -2445,18 +2441,13 @@ static bool khugepaged_prealloc_page(struct page **hpage, bool *wait) }static struct page * -khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t *gfp,struct mm_struct *mm, +khugepaged_alloc_page (struct page **hpage,gfp_t gfp,struct mm_struct *mm,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,int node) {up_read (&mm->mmap_sem);VM_BUG_ON (!*hpage); -/* -* khugepaged_alloc_hugepage is doing the preallocation, use the same -* gfp flags here. -*/ - *gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (),0 );return *hpage; }#endif @@ -2495,8 +2486,12 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,VM_BUG_ON (address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK ); +/* Only allocate from the target node */ + gfp =alloc_hugepage_gfpmask (khugepaged_defrag (), __GFP_OTHER_NODE) | + __GFP_THISNODE; +/* release the mmap_sem read lock. */ - new_page =khugepaged_alloc_page (hpage, &gfp, mm, vma, address, node); + new_page =khugepaged_alloc_page (hpage, gfp, mm, vma, address, node);if (!new_page)return ; --To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Signature · 8 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 24 lines · Michal Hocko
memcg currently uses hardcoded
GFP_TRANSHUGEgfp flags for all THP charges. THP allocations, however, might be using different flags depending on/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/{,khugepaged/}defragand the current allocation context.The primary difference is that defrag configured to "madvise" value will clear
__GFP_WAITflag from the core gfp mask to make the allocation lighter for all mappings which are not backed byVM_HUGEPAGEvmas. If memcg charge path ignores this fact we will get light allocation but the a potential memcg reclaim would kill the whole point of the configuration.Fix the mismatch by providing the same gfp mask used for the allocation to the charge functions. This is quite easy for all paths except for hugepaged kernel thread with !CONFIG_NUMA which is doing a pre-allocation long before the allocated page is used in
collapse_huge_pageviakhugepaged_alloc_page. To prevent from cluttering the whole code path fromkhugepaged_do_scanwe simply return the current flags as perkhugepaged_defrag()value which might have changed since the preallocation. If somebody changed the value of the knob we would charge differently but this shouldn't happen often and it is definitely not critical because it would only lead to a reduced success rate of one-off THP promotion.
Quoted 2 lines
Acked-by Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
I'm slightly surprised that this issue never got reported before.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Quoted 26 lines · David Rientjes
Quoted 24 lines · Michal Hocko
memcg currently uses hardcoded
GFP_TRANSHUGEgfp flags for all THP charges. THP allocations, however, might be using different flags depending on/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/{,khugepaged/}defragand the current allocation context.The primary difference is that defrag configured to "madvise" value will clear
__GFP_WAITflag from the core gfp mask to make the allocation lighter for all mappings which are not backed byVM_HUGEPAGEvmas. If memcg charge path ignores this fact we will get light allocation but the a potential memcg reclaim would kill the whole point of the configuration.Fix the mismatch by providing the same gfp mask used for the allocation to the charge functions. This is quite easy for all paths except for hugepaged kernel thread with !CONFIG_NUMA which is doing a pre-allocation long before the allocated page is used in
collapse_huge_pageviakhugepaged_alloc_page. To prevent from cluttering the whole code path fromkhugepaged_do_scanwe simply return the current flags as perkhugepaged_defrag()value which might have changed since the preallocation. If somebody changed the value of the knob we would charge differently but this shouldn't happen often and it is definitely not critical because it would only lead to a reduced success rate of one-off THP promotion.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Acked-by Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Michal Hocko <[email protected]>Acked-by David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Quoted 1 line
I'm slightly surprised that this issue never got reported before.
I am afraid not many people are familiar with the effect of /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/{,khugepaged/}defrag knob(s).
Signature · 8 lines
Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>