bio: skip atomic inc/dec of ->bi_remaining for non-chains
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 bio: skip atomic inc/dec of ->bi_remaining for non-chains
Hi,
Struct bio has an atomic ref count for chained bio's, and we use this to know when to end IO on the bio. However, most bio's are not chained, so we don't need to always introduce this atomic operation as part of ending IO.
Add a helper to elevate the bi_remaining count, and flag the bio as now actually needing the decrement at end_io time. Rename the field to __bi_remaining to catch any current users of this doing the incrementing manually.
For high IOPS workloads, this reduces the overhead of bio_endio() substantially.
---
block/bio.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-raid1.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-snap.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/bio.h | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/blk_types.h | 3 ++- 7 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
block/bio.c +29 -9
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void bio_init(struct bio *bio) {memset (bio,0 ,sizeof (*bio)); bio->bi_flags =1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ; -atomic_set (&bio->bi_remaining,1 ); +atomic_set (&bio->__bi_remaining,1 );atomic_set (&bio->bi_cnt,1 ); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (bio_init);
@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)__bio_free (bio);memset (bio,0 ,BIO_RESET_BYTES ); - bio->bi_flags = flags|(1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ); -atomic_set (&bio->bi_remaining,1 ); + bio->bi_flags = flags |1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ; +atomic_set (&bio->__bi_remaining,1 ); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (bio_reset);
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ void bio_chain(struct bio *bio, struct bio *parent) bio->bi_private = parent; bio->bi_end_io = bio_chain_endio; -atomic_inc (&parent->bi_remaining); +bio_inc_remaining (parent); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (bio_chain);
@@ -1741,6 +1741,23 @@ void bio_flush_dcache_pages(struct bio *bi)EXPORT_SYMBOL (bio_flush_dcache_pages);#endif +static inline bool bio_remaining_done (struct bio *bio) +{ +/* +* If we're not chaining, then ->__bi_remaining is always 1 and +* we always end io on the first invocation. +*/ +if (!bio_flagged (bio,BIO_CHAIN )) +return true; + +BUG_ON (atomic_read (&bio->__bi_remaining) <=0 ); + +if (atomic_dec_and_test (&bio->__bi_remaining)) +return true; + +return false; +} +/** * bio_endio - end I/O on a bio * @bio: bio
@@ -1758,15 +1775,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_flush_dcache_pages);void bio_endio (struct bio *bio,int error) {while (bio) { -BUG_ON (atomic_read (&bio->bi_remaining) <=0 ); -if (error)clear_bit (BIO_UPTODATE , &bio->bi_flags);else if (!test_bit (BIO_UPTODATE , &bio->bi_flags)) error = -EIO ; -if (!atomic_dec_and_test (&bio->bi_remaining)) -return ; +if (unlikely (!bio_remaining_done (bio))) +break ;/* * Need to have a real endio function for chained bios,
@@ -1799,7 +1814,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_endio);**/ void bio_endio_nodec (struct bio *bio,int error) { -atomic_inc (&bio->bi_remaining); +/* +* If it's not flagged as a chain, we are not going to dec the count +*/ +if (bio_flagged (bio,BIO_CHAIN )) +bio_inc_remaining (bio); +bio_endio (bio, error); }EXPORT_SYMBOL (bio_endio_nodec);
drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c +1 -1
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void dm_unhook_bio(struct dm_hook_info *h, struct bio *bio)* Must bump bi_remaining to allow bio to complete with * restored bi_end_io. */ -atomic_inc (&bio->bi_remaining); +bio_inc_remaining (bio); }/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
drivers/md/dm-raid1.c +1 -1
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ static int mirror_end_io(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio, int error)dm_bio_restore (bd, bio); bio_record->details.bi_bdev =NULL ; -atomic_inc (&bio->bi_remaining); +bio_inc_remaining (bio);queue_bio (ms, bio, rw);return DM_ENDIO_INCOMPLETE ;
drivers/md/dm-snap.c +1 -1
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ out:if (full_bio) { full_bio->bi_end_io = pe->full_bio_end_io; full_bio->bi_private = pe->full_bio_private; -atomic_inc (&full_bio->bi_remaining); +bio_inc_remaining (full_bio); }increment_pending_exceptions_done_count ();
drivers/md/dm-thin.c +2 -2
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void process_prepared_mapping_fail(struct dm_thin_new_mapping *m) {if (m->bio) { m->bio->bi_end_io = m->saved_bi_end_io; -atomic_inc (&m->bio->bi_remaining); +bio_inc_remaining (m->bio); }cell_error (m->tc->pool, m->cell);list_del (&m->list);
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static void process_prepared_mapping(struct dm_thin_new_mapping *m) bio = m->bio;if (bio) { bio->bi_end_io = m->saved_bi_end_io; -atomic_inc (&bio->bi_remaining); +bio_inc_remaining (bio); }if (m->err) {
include/linux/bio.h +11 -0
@@ -645,6 +645,17 @@ static inline struct bio *bio_list_get(struct bio_list *bl) }/* +* Increment chain count for the bio. Make sure the CHAIN flag update +* is visible before the raised count. +*/ +static inline void bio_inc_remaining (struct bio *bio) +{ + bio->bi_flags |= (1 <<BIO_CHAIN ); +smp_mb__before_atomic (); +atomic_inc (&bio->__bi_remaining); +} + +/* * bio_set is used to allow other portions of the IO system to * allocate their own private memory pools for bio and iovec structures. * These memory pools in turn all allocate from the bio_slab
include/linux/blk_types.h +2 -1
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct bio {unsigned int bi_seg_front_size;unsigned int bi_seg_back_size; -atomic_t bi_remaining; +atomic_t __bi_remaining;bio_end_io_t *bi_end_io;
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct bio {#define BIO_NULL_MAPPED 8/* contains invalid user pages */ #define BIO_QUIET 9/* Make BIO Quiet */ #define BIO_SNAP_STABLE 10/* bio data must be snapshotted during write */ +#define BIO_CHAIN 11/* chained bio, ->bi_remaining in effect */ /* * Flags starting here get preserved by bio_reset() - this includes
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Jan Kara
reviewerblock/bio.c void bio_reset(struct bio *bio) · line 295
Quoted 7 lines · Jens Axboe
block/bio.c +1
-2@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)__bio_free (bio);memset (bio,0 ,BIO_RESET_BYTES ); - bio->bi_flags = flags|(1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ); -atomic_set (&bio->bi_remaining,1 ); + bio->bi_flags = flags |1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ;
Although this is correct, I'd prefer to keep parenthesis around 1 <<BIO_UPTODATE. Maybe I'm not a real C hacker but I had to lookup the operator precedence of | vs << :).
Otherwise the patch looks good to me (but I'm not an expert in this area, I just looked into the patch by accident because I thought it's another respin of your direct IO patch ;).
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
Quoted 11 lines · Jan Kara
block/bio.c void bio_reset(struct bio *bio) · line 295
Quoted 7 lines · Jens Axboe
block/bio.c +1
-2@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)__bio_free (bio);memset (bio,0 ,BIO_RESET_BYTES ); - bio->bi_flags = flags|(1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ); -atomic_set (&bio->bi_remaining,1 ); + bio->bi_flags = flags |1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ;Although this is correct, I'd prefer to keep parenthesis around 1 <<
BIO_UPTODATE. Maybe I'm not a real C hacker but I had to lookup the operator precedence of | vs << :).
Heh, I think we can safely say you are a real C hacker, lets just keep the parenthesis if that makes it easier to read/verify.
Quoted 3 lines
Otherwise the patch looks good to me (but I'm not an expert in this area, I just looked into the patch by accident because I thought it's another respin of your direct IO patch ;).
It's a parallel effort, getting rid of the atomics where we can... Thanks for looking at it, can I add your reviewed-by tag with the parenthesis change?
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Jan Kara
reviewerQuoted 16 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 11 lines · Jan Kara
block/bio.c void bio_reset(struct bio *bio) · line 295
Quoted 7 lines · Jens Axboe
block/bio.c +1
-2@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ void bio_reset(struct bio *bio)__bio_free (bio);memset (bio,0 ,BIO_RESET_BYTES ); - bio->bi_flags = flags|(1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ); -atomic_set (&bio->bi_remaining,1 ); + bio->bi_flags = flags |1 <<BIO_UPTODATE ;Although this is correct, I'd prefer to keep parenthesis around 1 <<
BIO_UPTODATE. Maybe I'm not a real C hacker but I had to lookup the operator precedence of | vs << :).Heh, I think we can safely say you are a real C hacker, lets just keep the parenthesis if that makes it easier to read/verify.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Otherwise the patch looks good to me (but I'm not an expert in this area, I just looked into the patch by accident because I thought it's another respin of your direct IO patch ;).
It's a parallel effort, getting rid of the atomics where we can... Thanks for looking at it, can I add your reviewed-by tag with the parenthesis change?
Yes, you can.
Honza
Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR