stunnel: bump to version 5.16
PATCH 1/1 stunnel: bump to version 5.16
Signed-off-by Gustavo Zacarias <[email protected]>
--- package/stunnel/stunnel.hash | 4 ++-- package/stunnel/stunnel.mk | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
package/stunnel/stunnel.hash +2 -2
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -# From http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-announce/2015-January/000090.html -sha256 87b34a74061861d1edd2ab238c73eb989b3d0a17e44574b7b6ead1a16aae38c8 stunnel-5.09.tar.gz +# From https://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-announce/2015-April/000098.html +sha256 b6b7e93fb2626eaabae1c8474e1dfa23962cfde8fa35c8602289fcaa4f53608d stunnel-5.16.tar.gz
package/stunnel/stunnel.mk +2 -1
@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@ # ################################################################################ -STUNNEL_VERSION = 5.09 +STUNNEL_VERSION = 5.16 STUNNEL_SITE = http://www.usenix.org.uk/mirrors/stunnel/archive/5.x STUNNEL_DEPENDENCIES = openssl STUNNEL_CONF_OPTS = --with-ssl=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr --with-threads=fork \ --disable-libwrap +STUNNEL_CONF_ENV = ax_cv_check_cflags___fstack_protector=no STUNNEL_LICENSE = GPLv2+ STUNNEL_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING COPYRIGHT.GPL
Signature · 1 line
2.0.5
PATCH 1/1 stunnel: bump to version 5.16
Dear Gustavo Zacarias,
Quoted 1 line · Gustavo Zacarias
+STUNNEL_CONF_ENV = ax_cv_check_cflags___fstack_protector=no
Shouldn't this be:
STUNNEL_CONF_ENV = \ ax_cv_check_cflags___fstack_protector=$(if $(BR2_ENABLE_SSP),yes,no)
?
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/1 stunnel: bump to version 5.16
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Quoted 1 line
+STUNNEL_CONF_ENV = ax_cv_check_cflags___fstack_protector=no
Shouldn't this be:
STUNNEL_CONF_ENV = \ ax_cv_check_cflags___fstack_protector=$(if $(BR2_ENABLE_SSP),yes,no)?
Oi, yes.
The problem is that the detection is too optimistic, it assumes it's ok under most circumstances, and breaks in a non-trivial way. Sent V2.
Regards.