Skip to contentSkip to conversation

enlightment: xtensa workaround no longer required

PATCH New Waldemar Brodkorb 2 participants 3 messages Jun 26, 2015 – Jul 10, 2015

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 enlightment: xtensa workaround no longer required

With the update to uClibc-ng 1.0.3, this is no longer needed, as the problem is fixed upstream.

---
 package/enlightenment/enlightenment.mk |    5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
package/enlightenment/enlightenment.mk +0 -5
index ac15642..ddebe06 100644
@@ -34,11 +34,6 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC)$(BR2_powerpc)$(BR2_sparc),yy)
 ENLIGHTENMENT_CONF_ENV += ac_cv_header_sys_ptrace_h=no
 endif
 
-# uClibc-ng has an old incomplete sys/ptrace.h for xtensa
-ifeq ($(BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_NG)$(BR2_xtensa),yy)
-ENLIGHTENMENT_CONF_ENV += ac_cv_header_sys_ptrace_h=no
-endif
-
 # alsa backend needs mixer support
 ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_ALSA_LIB)$(BR2_PACKAGE_ALSA_LIB_MIXER),yy)
 ENLIGHTENMENT_DEPENDENCIES += alsa-lib
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 enlightment: xtensa workaround no longer required

Dear Waldemar Brodkorb,

Quoted 4 lines · Waldemar Brodkorb

With the update to uClibc-ng 1.0.3, this is no longer needed, as the problem is fixed upstream.

We have an external Xtensa toolchain in the autobuilders, see
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/toolchains/configs/br-xtensa-full.config.
It has been built with Buildroot 2015.05, so I believe it was already using uClibc-ng. Can you just confirm that this package builds fine with this toolchain?

Best regards,

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 enlightment: xtensa workaround no longer required

In reply to Waldemar Brodkorb

Dear Waldemar Brodkorb,

Quoted 7 lines · Waldemar Brodkorb

With the update to uClibc-ng 1.0.3, this is no longer needed, as the problem is fixed upstream.

---
 package/enlightenment/enlightenment.mk |    5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

Since my comment, all Buildroot external toolchains have been rebuilt,
so: applied, thanks!

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com