Enable loading of bitmaps for dm-md-raid1.
PATCH 1/1 Enable loading of bitmaps for dm-md-raid1.
This is also a hack for systems with junk in the rest of the bitmap super (instead of zeroes) to boot. This is done by checking mddev->sync_super (which is exclusively set by dm-raid) is null.
These changes also include zeroing of most bitmap pages while allocating so we are sure that the junk is not coming from memory.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100491
---
drivers/md/bitmap.c +13 -5
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)bitmap_super_t *sb;unsigned long chunksize, daemon_sleep, write_behind; - bitmap->storage.sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL ); + bitmap->storage.sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);if (bitmap->storage.sb_page ==NULL )return -ENOMEM ; bitmap->storage.sb_page->index =0 ;
@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) sb->state =cpu_to_le32 (bitmap->flags); bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events; sb->events_cleared =cpu_to_le64 (bitmap->mddev->events); + bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.nodes =0 ;kunmap_atomic (sb);
@@ -568,7 +569,7 @@ static int bitmap_read_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) goto out_no_sb; }/* page 0 is the superblock, read it... */ - sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL ); + sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);if (!sb_page)return -ENOMEM ; bitmap->storage.sb_page = sb_page;
@@ -611,8 +612,15 @@ re_read: daemon_sleep =le32_to_cpu (sb->daemon_sleep) *HZ ; write_behind =le32_to_cpu (sb->write_behind); sectors_reserved =le32_to_cpu (sb->sectors_reserved); - nodes =le32_to_cpu (sb->nodes); -strlcpy (bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, sb->cluster_name,64 ); +/* XXX: This is an ugly hack to ensure that we don't use clustering +in case dm-raid is in use and the nodes written in bitmap_sb +is erroneous. +*/ +if (!bitmap->mddev->sync_super) { + nodes =le32_to_cpu (sb->nodes); +strlcpy (bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, + sb->cluster_name,64 ); + }/* verify that the bitmap-specific fields are valid */ if (sb->magic !=cpu_to_le32 (BITMAP_MAGIC ))
@@ -649,7 +657,7 @@ re_read: goto out; } events =le64_to_cpu (sb->events); -if (!nodes && (events < bitmap->mddev->events)) { +if (err ==0 && !nodes && (events < bitmap->mddev->events)) { printk(KERN_INFO "%s: bitmap file is out of date (%llu < %llu) " "-- forcing full recovery\n",
drivers/md/md.c +1 -1
@@ -7415,7 +7415,7 @@ int md_setup_cluster(struct mddev *mddev, int nodes) err =request_module ("md-cluster" );if (err) {pr_err ("md-cluster module not found.\n" ); -return err; +return -ENOENT ; }spin_lock (&pers_lock);
Quoted 75 lines · On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:06:28 -0500 Goldwyn Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote:
This is also a hack for systems with junk in the rest of the bitmap super (instead of zeroes) to boot. This is done by checking
mddev->sync_super(which is exclusively set by dm-raid) is null.These changes also include zeroing of most bitmap pages while allocating so we are sure that the junk is not coming from memory.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100491
Signed-off-by Neil Brown <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Goldwyn Rodrigues <[email protected]>---
drivers/md/bitmap.c +13
-5@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)bitmap_super_t *sb;unsigned long chunksize, daemon_sleep, write_behind; - bitmap->storage.sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL ); + bitmap->storage.sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);if (bitmap->storage.sb_page ==NULL )return -ENOMEM ; bitmap->storage.sb_page->index =0 ;@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) sb->state =cpu_to_le32 (bitmap->flags); bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events; sb->events_cleared =cpu_to_le64 (bitmap->mddev->events); + bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.nodes =0 ;kunmap_atomic (sb);@@ -568,7 +569,7 @@ static int bitmap_read_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) goto out_no_sb; }/* page 0 is the superblock, read it... */ - sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL ); + sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);if (!sb_page)return -ENOMEM ; bitmap->storage.sb_page = sb_page;@@ -611,8 +612,15 @@ re_read: daemon_sleep =le32_to_cpu (sb->daemon_sleep) *HZ ; write_behind =le32_to_cpu (sb->write_behind); sectors_reserved =le32_to_cpu (sb->sectors_reserved); - nodes =le32_to_cpu (sb->nodes); -strlcpy (bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, sb->cluster_name,64 ); +/* XXX: This is an ugly hack to ensure that we don't use clustering +in case dm-raid is in use and the nodes written in bitmap_sb +is erroneous. +*/ +if (!bitmap->mddev->sync_super) { + nodes =le32_to_cpu (sb->nodes); +strlcpy (bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, + sb->cluster_name,64 ); + }/* verify that the bitmap-specific fields are valid */ if (sb->magic !=cpu_to_le32 (BITMAP_MAGIC ))@@ -649,7 +657,7 @@ re_read: goto out; } events =le64_to_cpu (sb->events); -if (!nodes && (events < bitmap->mddev->events)) { +if (err ==0 && !nodes && (events < bitmap->mddev->events)) { printk(KERN_INFO "%s: bitmap file is out of date (%llu < %llu) " "-- forcing full recovery\n",drivers/md/md.c +0
-0
drivers/md/md.c int md_setup_cluster(struct mddev *mddev, int nodes) · line 7421
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/md/md.c +1
-1@@ -7415,7 +7415,7 @@ int md_setup_cluster(struct mddev *mddev, int nodes) err =request_module ("md-cluster" );if (err) {pr_err ("md-cluster module not found.\n" ); -return err; +return -ENOENT ; }spin_lock (&pers_lock);
Thanks... but I think this is about 3 patches.
The patch to md.c is because request_module() returns a status different from what the documentation says. And
(though it doesn't need to go to stable.
Adding "err == 0 &&' test is ... why is that? It looks to me like err == -EINVAL at that point, always. Can you explain/
Using __GFP_ZERO in read_sb_page seems wrong and so misleading.
The rest are for the main bug you are trying to fix .. though I think it could be described better.
-------------------
There is a bug that the bitmap superblock isn't initialised properly for dm-raid, so a new field can have garbage in new fields. (dm-raid does initialisation in the kernel - md initialised the superblock in mdadm).
This means that for dm-raid we cannot currently trust the new ->nodes field.
So:
- use __GFP_ZERO to initialise the superblock properly for all new arrays
- initialise all field in bitmap_info in bitmap_new_disk_sb
- ignore ->nodes for dm arrays (yes, this is a hack)
-----------------
Could you make it 3 patches for me please?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Quoted 90 lines · NeilBrown
Quoted 75 lines · On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:06:28 -0500 Goldwyn Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote:
This is also a hack for systems with junk in the rest of the bitmap super (instead of zeroes) to boot. This is done by checking
mddev->sync_super(which is exclusively set by dm-raid) is null.These changes also include zeroing of most bitmap pages while allocating so we are sure that the junk is not coming from memory.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100491
Signed-off-by Neil Brown <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Goldwyn Rodrigues <[email protected]>---
drivers/md/bitmap.c +13
-5@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap)bitmap_super_t *sb;unsigned long chunksize, daemon_sleep, write_behind; - bitmap->storage.sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL ); + bitmap->storage.sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);if (bitmap->storage.sb_page ==NULL )return -ENOMEM ; bitmap->storage.sb_page->index =0 ;@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static int bitmap_new_disk_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) sb->state =cpu_to_le32 (bitmap->flags); bitmap->events_cleared = bitmap->mddev->events; sb->events_cleared =cpu_to_le64 (bitmap->mddev->events); + bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.nodes =0 ;kunmap_atomic (sb);@@ -568,7 +569,7 @@ static int bitmap_read_sb(struct bitmap *bitmap) goto out_no_sb; }/* page 0 is the superblock, read it... */ - sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL ); + sb_page =alloc_page (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);if (!sb_page)return -ENOMEM ; bitmap->storage.sb_page = sb_page;@@ -611,8 +612,15 @@ re_read: daemon_sleep =le32_to_cpu (sb->daemon_sleep) *HZ ; write_behind =le32_to_cpu (sb->write_behind); sectors_reserved =le32_to_cpu (sb->sectors_reserved); - nodes =le32_to_cpu (sb->nodes); -strlcpy (bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, sb->cluster_name,64 ); +/* XXX: This is an ugly hack to ensure that we don't use clustering +in case dm-raid is in use and the nodes written in bitmap_sb +is erroneous. +*/ +if (!bitmap->mddev->sync_super) { + nodes =le32_to_cpu (sb->nodes); +strlcpy (bitmap->mddev->bitmap_info.cluster_name, + sb->cluster_name,64 ); + }/* verify that the bitmap-specific fields are valid */ if (sb->magic !=cpu_to_le32 (BITMAP_MAGIC ))@@ -649,7 +657,7 @@ re_read: goto out; } events =le64_to_cpu (sb->events); -if (!nodes && (events < bitmap->mddev->events)) { +if (err ==0 && !nodes && (events < bitmap->mddev->events)) { printk(KERN_INFO "%s: bitmap file is out of date (%llu < %llu) " "-- forcing full recovery\n",drivers/md/md.c +0
-0drivers/md/md.c int md_setup_cluster(struct mddev *mddev, int nodes) · line 7421
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/md/md.c +1
-1@@ -7415,7 +7415,7 @@ int md_setup_cluster(struct mddev *mddev, int nodes) err =request_module ("md-cluster" );if (err) {pr_err ("md-cluster module not found.\n" ); -return err; +return -ENOENT ; }spin_lock (&pers_lock);Thanks... but I think this is about 3 patches.
Quoted 7 lines
The patch to
md.cis becauserequest_module()returns a status different from what the documentation says. AndFixes edb39c9deda8 ("Introduce md_cluster_operations to handle cluster functions")(though it doesn't need to go to stable.
Adding "err == 0 &&' test is ... why is that? It looks to me like err ==
-EINVALat that point, always. Can you explain/
Oh no! This is placed at the incorrect location. It should have been placed before setting up the cluster.
Quoted 20 lines
Using
__GFP_ZEROinread_sb_pageseems wrong and so misleading.The rest are for the main bug you are trying to fix .. though I think it could be described better.
-------------------
There is a bug that the bitmap superblock isn't initialised properly for dm-raid, so a new field can have garbage in new fields. (dm-raid does initialisation in the kernel - md initialised the superblock in mdadm).
This means that for dm-raid we cannot currently trust the new ->nodes field.
So:
- use__GFP_ZEROto initialise the superblock properly for all new arrays
- initialise all field inbitmap_infoinbitmap_new_disk_sb
- ignore ->nodes for dm arrays (yes, this is a hack)
-----------------
Quoted 2 lines
Could you make it 3 patches for me please?
Sure, I will post the 3 patches.
Signature · 1 line
Goldwyn