ipv6: send NEWLINK on RA managed/otherconf changes
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ipv6: send NEWLINK on RA managed/otherconf changes
The kernel is applying the RA managed/otherconf flags silently and forgets to send ifinfo notify to inform about their change when the router provides a zero reachable_time and retrans_timer as dnsmasq and many routers send it, which just means unspecified by this router and the host should continue using whatever value it is already using. Userspace may monitor the ifinfo notifications to activate dhcpv6.
net/ipv6/ndisc.c +5 -0
@@ -1074,6 +1074,7 @@ static void ndisc_router_discovery(struct sk_buff *skb)struct ndisc_options ndopts;int optlen;unsigned int pref =0 ; +__u32 old_if_flags;__u8 *opt = (__u8 *)(ra_msg +1 );
@@ -1144,6 +1145,7 @@ static void ndisc_router_discovery(struct sk_buff *skb)* Remember the managed/otherconf flags from most recently * received RA message (RFC 2462) -- yoshfuji */ + old_if_flags = in6_dev->if_flags; in6_dev->if_flags = (in6_dev->if_flags & ~(IF_RA_MANAGED | IF_RA_OTHERCONF)) | (ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_addrconf_managed ?
@@ -1151,6 +1153,9 @@ static void ndisc_router_discovery(struct sk_buff *skb) (ra_msg->icmph.icmp6_addrconf_other ?IF_RA_OTHERCONF :0 ); +if (old_if_flags != in6_dev->if_flags) +inet6_ifinfo_notify (RTM_NEWLINK , in6_dev); +if (!in6_dev->cnf.accept_ra_defrtr) { ND_PRINTK(2, info, "RA: %s, defrtr is false for dev: %s\n",
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
From: Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:59:22 +0200
Quoted 8 lines
The kernel is applying the RA managed/otherconf flags silently and forgets to send ifinfo notify to inform about their change when the router provides a zero
reachable_timeandretrans_timeras dnsmasq and many routers send it, which just means unspecified by this router and the host should continue using whatever value it is already using. Userspace may monitor the ifinfo notifications to activate dhcpv6.Signed-off-by Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>
Applied, but more ideally this function should emit only a single NEWLINK message rather than potentially 3.
Am 01.09.2015 um 00:13 schrieb David Miller:
Quoted 10 lines
From: Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:59:22 +0200Quoted 7 lines
The kernel is applying the RA managed/otherconf flags silently and forgets to send ifinfo notify to inform about their change when the router provides a zero
reachable_timeandretrans_timeras dnsmasq and many routers send it, which just means unspecified by this router and the host should continue using whatever value it is already using. Userspace may monitor the ifinfo notifications to activate dhcpv6.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>Applied, but more ideally this function should emit only a single NEWLINK message rather than potentially 3.
Yes, you're right of course.
I've attached a follow-up patch doing this. Please let me know if you need it in a separate mail.
Gruesse / Regards,
Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Signature · 3 lines
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg), Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Quoted 1 line
From
b6b55b5383c9b89cfd5ad9b4584c044c6c8d3722Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 01:40:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ipv6: send only one NEWLINK when RA causes changes
net/ipv6/ndisc.c +10 -3
@@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ static void ndisc_router_discovery(struct sk_buff *skb)int optlen;unsigned int pref =0 ;__u32 old_if_flags; +int send_ifinfo_notify =0 ;__u8 *opt = (__u8 *)(ra_msg +1 );
@@ -1154,7 +1155,7 @@ static void ndisc_router_discovery(struct sk_buff *skb) IF_RA_OTHERCONF : 0);if (old_if_flags != in6_dev->if_flags) -inet6_ifinfo_notify (RTM_NEWLINK , in6_dev); + send_ifinfo_notify =1 ;if (!in6_dev->cnf.accept_ra_defrtr) { ND_PRINTK(2, info,
@@ -1259,7 +1260,7 @@ skip_defrtr: rtime =HZ /10 ;NEIGH_VAR_SET (in6_dev->nd_parms,RETRANS_TIME , rtime); in6_dev->tstamp = jiffies; -inet6_ifinfo_notify (RTM_NEWLINK , in6_dev); + send_ifinfo_notify =1 ; } rtime =ntohl (ra_msg->reachable_time);
@@ -1276,11 +1277,17 @@ skip_defrtr: GC_STALETIME, 3 * rtime); in6_dev->nd_parms->reachable_time =neigh_rand_reach_time (rtime); in6_dev->tstamp = jiffies; -inet6_ifinfo_notify (RTM_NEWLINK , in6_dev); + send_ifinfo_notify =1 ; } } } +/* +* Send a notify if RA changed managed/otherconf flags or timer settings +*/ +if (send_ifinfo_notify) +inet6_ifinfo_notify (RTM_NEWLINK , in6_dev); + skip_linkparms:/*
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Marius Tomaschewski <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 01:43:39 +0200
Quoted 2 lines
I've attached a follow-up patch doing this. Please let me know if you need it in a separate mail.
I want it in a separate mail, and please use "bool" for the type.