Fujitsu pull part1: cleanup
Hi Chris,
Would you please consider merging the following fixes for your integration-4.3 branch?
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.3_part1_cleanup
Most of them are harmless cleanups, like removing unused parameters/judgment, or comment/variant name change.
We have already tested them for about 2 days, and it would be safe.
Based on 46cd28555ffaa40162290dba203daad0ff6f7abd.
And can be merged with pull from Filipe automatically without any conflict.
P.S:
Schedule for rest pull:
Part2: btrfs/070 fix.
The patchset is already updated sometime ago, but we are using more test to make sure it won't cause any new bug.
PartN: qgroup reserve space leak fix. (maybe for 4.4)
This one will involve some huge change in btrfs qgroup reserve mechanism.
The idea is to keep a per-inode map for which range of space is already reserved, to avoid double reserve for same range but only freed once case.
It's still under development, and it may not be able to meet current merge windows.
So it's will be for 4.4.
PartN+1: Metadata and data qgroup support. (maybe for 4.4 with PartN)
Some old patches from Yang, but needs some updates for new qgroup accounting/reserve mechanism.
Thanks,
Qu
Qu Wenruo (1):
btrfs: async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
initializing
Tsutomu Itoh (1):
Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check before btrfs_free_path is
called
Zhao Lei (6):
btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
btrfs: Remove noused chunk_tree and chunk_objectid from
scrub_enumerate_chunks and scrub_chunk
btrfs: Cleanup for btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance
btrfs: Remove useless condition in start_log_trans
btrfs: Remove unused arguments in tree-log.c
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 2 +- fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 ++------ fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 +++----------- 10 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
Please send your patches to the mailing list for reviews by everybody.
Quoted 75 lines · Qu Wenruo
Hi Chris,
Would you please consider merging the following fixes for your integration-4.3 branch?
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.3_part1_cleanup
Most of them are harmless cleanups, like removing unused parameters/judgment, or comment/variant name change.
We have already tested them for about 2 days, and it would be safe.
Based on
46cd28555ffaa40162290dba203daad0ff6f7abd.
And can be merged with pull from Filipe automatically without any conflict.
P.S:
Schedule for rest pull:
Part2: btrfs/070 fix.
The patchset is already updated sometime ago, but we are using more test to make sure it won't cause any new bug.PartN: qgroup reserve space leak fix. (maybe for 4.4)
This one will involve some huge change in btrfs qgroup reserve mechanism.The idea is to keep a per-inode map for which range of space is already reserved, to avoid double reserve for same range but only freed once case.
It's still under development, and it may not be able to meet current merge windows.
So it's will be for 4.4.PartN+1: Metadata and data qgroup support. (maybe for 4.4 with PartN)
Some old patches from Yang, but needs some updates for new qgroup accounting/reserve mechanism.Thanks,
QuQu Wenruo (1):
btrfs:async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
initializingTsutomu Itoh (1):
Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check beforebtrfs_free_pathis
calledZhao Lei (6):
btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
btrfs: Remove nousedchunk_treeandchunk_objectidfrom
scrub_enumerate_chunksandscrub_chunk
btrfs: Cleanup forbtrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failuresinbtrfs_balance
btrfs: Remove useless condition instart_log_trans
btrfs: Remove unused arguments intree-log.cfs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 2 +- fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 ++------ fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 +++----------- 10 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Stefan,
Quoted 1 line
Please send your patches to the mailing list for reviews by everybody.
Do you see any patch below which wasn't posted to the mailing list. ?
Thanks, Anand
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 17 lines
Qu Wenruo (1):
btrfs:async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
initializingTsutomu Itoh (1):
Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check beforebtrfs_free_pathis
calledZhao Lei (6):
btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
btrfs: Remove nousedchunk_treeandchunk_objectidfrom
scrub_enumerate_chunksandscrub_chunk
btrfs: Cleanup forbtrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failuresinbtrfs_balance
btrfs: Remove useless condition instart_log_trans
btrfs: Remove unused arguments intree-log.c
Hi Chris,
Any comment on the git pull?
As it's not picked yet nor any objection here.
Thanks,
Qu
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/08/21 10:18 +0800:
Quoted 75 lines
Hi Chris,
Would you please consider merging the following fixes for your integration-4.3 branch?
https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.3_part1_cleanup
Most of them are harmless cleanups, like removing unused parameters/judgment, or comment/variant name change.
We have already tested them for about 2 days, and it would be safe.
Based on
46cd28555ffaa40162290dba203daad0ff6f7abd.
And can be merged with pull from Filipe automatically without any conflict.
P.S:
Schedule for rest pull:
Part2: btrfs/070 fix.
The patchset is already updated sometime ago, but we are using more test to make sure it won't cause any new bug.PartN: qgroup reserve space leak fix. (maybe for 4.4)
This one will involve some huge change in btrfs qgroup reserve mechanism.The idea is to keep a per-inode map for which range of space is already reserved, to avoid double reserve for same range but only freed once case.
It's still under development, and it may not be able to meet current merge windows.
So it's will be for 4.4.PartN+1: Metadata and data qgroup support. (maybe for 4.4 with PartN)
Some old patches from Yang, but needs some updates for new qgroup accounting/reserve mechanism.Thanks,
QuQu Wenruo (1):
btrfs:async_thread: Fix workqueue 'max_active' value when
initializingTsutomu Itoh (1):
Btrfs: cleanup: remove unnecessary check beforebtrfs_free_pathis
calledZhao Lei (6):
btrfs: Update out-of-date "skip parity stripe" comment
btrfs: Remove nousedchunk_treeandchunk_objectidfrom
scrub_enumerate_chunksandscrub_chunk
btrfs: Cleanup forbtrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures
btrfs: Add raid56 support for updating
num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failuresinbtrfs_balance
btrfs: Remove useless condition instart_log_trans
btrfs: Remove unused arguments intree-log.cfs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- fs/btrfs/async-thread.h | 2 +- fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- fs/btrfs/disk-io.h | 1 + fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 12 ++------ fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 3 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 +++----------- 10 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 4 lines · Qu Wenruo
Hi Chris,
Any comment on the git pull?
As it's not picked yet nor any objection here.
Hi Qu,
Some of these were already in integration, but I've picked the rest.
Thanks!
-chris