RDS-TCP: Reset tcp callbacks if re-using an outgoing socket in rds_tcp_accept_one()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 RDS-TCP: Reset tcp callbacks if re-using an outgoing socket in rds_tcp_accept_one()
Consider the following "duelling syn" sequence between two peers A and B:
A B
SYN1 -->
<-- SYN2
SYN2ACK -->Note that the SYN/ACK has already been sent out by TCP before rds_tcp_accept_one() gets invoked as part of callbacks.
If the inet_addr(A) is numerically less than inet_addr(B), the arbitration scheme in rds_tcp_accept_one() will prefer the TCP connection triggered by SYN1, and will send a CLOSE for the SYN2 (just after the SYN2ACK was sent).
Since B also follows the same arbitration scheme, it will send the SYN-ACK for SYN1 that will set up a healthy ESTABLISHED connection on both sides. B will also get a CLOSE for SYN2, which should result in the cleanup of the TCP state machine for SYN2, but it should not trigger any stale RDS-TCP callbacks (such as ->writespace, ->state_change etc), that would disrupt the progress of the SYN2 based RDS-TCP connection.
Thus the arbitration scheme in rds_tcp_accept_one() should restore rds_tcp callbacks for the winner before setting them up for the new accept socket, and also make sure that conn->c_outgoing is set to 0 so that we do not trigger any reconnect attempts on the passive side of the tcp socket in the future, in conformance with commit c82ac7e69efe ("net/rds: RDS-TCP: only initiate reconnect attempt on outgoing TCP socket.")
--- net/rds/tcp_listen.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
net/rds/tcp_listen.c +3 -0
@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ int rds_tcp_accept_one(struct socket *sock) new_sock =NULL ; ret =0 ; goto out; + }else if (rs_tcp->t_sock) { +rds_tcp_restore_callbacks (rs_tcp->t_sock, rs_tcp); + conn->c_outgoing =0 ; }rds_conn_transition (conn,RDS_CONN_DOWN ,RDS_CONN_CONNECTING );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Quoted 30 lines · Sowmini Varadhan
Consider the following "duelling syn" sequence between two peers A and B:
A B SYN1 --> <-- SYN2 SYN2ACK -->Note that the SYN/ACK has already been sent out by TCP before
rds_tcp_accept_one()gets invoked as part of callbacks.If the
inet_addr(A)is numerically less thaninet_addr(B), the arbitration scheme inrds_tcp_accept_one()will prefer the TCP connection triggered by SYN1, and will send a CLOSE for the SYN2 (just after the SYN2ACK was sent).Since B also follows the same arbitration scheme, it will send the SYN-ACK for SYN1 that will set up a healthy ESTABLISHED connection on both sides. B will also get a CLOSE for SYN2, which should result in the cleanup of the TCP state machine for SYN2, but it should not trigger any stale RDS-TCP callbacks (such as ->writespace, ->state_change etc), that would disrupt the progress of the SYN2 based RDS-TCP connection.
Thus the arbitration scheme in
rds_tcp_accept_one()should restorerds_tcpcallbacks for the winner before setting them up for the new accept socket, and also make sure thatconn->c_outgoingis set to 0 so that we do not trigger any reconnect attempts on the passive side of the tcp socket in the future, in conformance with commitc82ac7e69efe("net/rds: RDS-TCP: only initiate reconnect attempt on outgoing TCP socket.")
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Sowmini Varadhan <[email protected]>---
Looks fine to me.
From: Sowmini Varadhan <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:49:44 -0400
Quoted 30 lines
Consider the following "duelling syn" sequence between two peers A and B:
A B SYN1 --> <-- SYN2 SYN2ACK -->Note that the SYN/ACK has already been sent out by TCP before
rds_tcp_accept_one()gets invoked as part of callbacks.If the
inet_addr(A)is numerically less thaninet_addr(B), the arbitration scheme inrds_tcp_accept_one()will prefer the TCP connection triggered by SYN1, and will send a CLOSE for the SYN2 (just after the SYN2ACK was sent).Since B also follows the same arbitration scheme, it will send the SYN-ACK for SYN1 that will set up a healthy ESTABLISHED connection on both sides. B will also get a CLOSE for SYN2, which should result in the cleanup of the TCP state machine for SYN2, but it should not trigger any stale RDS-TCP callbacks (such as ->writespace, ->state_change etc), that would disrupt the progress of the SYN2 based RDS-TCP connection.
Thus the arbitration scheme in
rds_tcp_accept_one()should restorerds_tcpcallbacks for the winner before setting them up for the new accept socket, and also make sure thatconn->c_outgoingis set to 0 so that we do not trigger any reconnect attempts on the passive side of the tcp socket in the future, in conformance with commitc82ac7e69efe("net/rds: RDS-TCP: only initiate reconnect attempt on outgoing TCP socket.")
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Sowmini Varadhan <[email protected]>
Applied.