package/iqvlinux: new package
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
The PCI support needs to be checked since this driver is based on it. Otherwise the build fail with:
#error "This driver requires PCI support to be available"
But this message is concealed by several occurrence of this
one:
error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_find_bus' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
---
v3: changes suggested by Arnout
- remove the patch and use CC=$(TARGET_CC) instead.
- Add a 'or' between GPLv2 and BSD-3c for license information
- Add some more license files (files.txt)
- Fixes typos and indentation.
- move the check for PCI option to LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS
- redirect echo to stderr.
v2: - rename the package simply to iqvlinux (ThomasP)
- move it to "Hardware Handling" menu (ThomasP)
- Cc Yann for the kernel-module infra
- Add a check for CONFIG_PCI even if it's redundant with the message from the Makefile.
(Do we really need this check ?)
--- package/Config.in | 1 + package/iqvlinux/Config.in | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash | 5 +++++ package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/Config.in create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk
package/Config.in +1 -0
@@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ endif source "package/iostat/Config.in" source "package/ipmitool/Config.in" source "package/ipmiutil/Config.in" + source "package/iqvlinux/Config.in" source "package/irda-utils/Config.in" source "package/iucode-tool/Config.in" source "package/kbd/Config.in"
package/iqvlinux/Config.in new file +18 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX + bool "iqvlinux" + depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL + help + Intel Ethernet Adapter Debug Driver for Linux (iqvlinux), + which supports kernel versions 2.6.x up through 4.0.x. + + This debug driver supports all Intel's networking Tools based + on the SDK version 2.19.36.0 or higher which support Intel + Enthernet chip including e1000, e1000e, i210... + + Note: This driver requires PCI support to be enabled + (i.e. CONFIG_PCI). + + http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/iqvlinux/ + +comment "iqvlinux needs a Linux kernel to be built" + depends on !BR2_LINUX_KERNEL
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash new file +5 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# From http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/iqvlinux/1.1.5.3/ +sha1 bd94416e4364015dbbd78a22e51080bf7ea81fac iqvlinux.tar.gz +md5 fb6a2a4dc122d39070fcb06985c97a05 iqvlinux.tar.gz +# locally computed +sha256 8cb19f3bfe040100a13bb2d05cb2b54f2b259e55cef23f8cc5aa6f2f31e98bec iqvlinux.tar.gz
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk new file +34 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# iqvlinux +# +################################################################################ + +IQVLINUX_VERSION = 1.1.5.3 + +IQVLINUX_SITE = \ + http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/iqvlinux/$(IQVLINUX_VERSION) +IQVLINUX_SOURCE = iqvlinux.tar.gz + +IQVLINUX_LICENSE = GPLv2 or BSD-3c +IQVLINUX_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING src/linux/driver/files.txt \ + inc/linux/files.txt inc/files.txt + +IQVLINUX_MODULE_MAKE_OPTS = NALDIR=$(@D) KSRC=$(LINUX_DIR) CC=$(TARGET_CC) + +IQVLINUX_MODULE_SUBDIRS = src/linux/driver + +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX),y) +define IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK + @if ! grep -Fqx 'CONFIG_PCI=y' $(LINUX_DIR)/.config; then \ + echo "ERROR: Enable CONFIG_PCI in the linux kernel config." 1>&2 ; \ + exit 1; \ + fi +endef + +# Check if PCI is enabled in the Linux kernel build by Buildroot. +LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK +endif + +$(eval $(kernel-module)) +$(eval $(generic-package))
Signature · 1 line
2.4.3
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Romain, All,
On 2015-10-09 15:26 +0200, Romain Naour spake thusly:
Quoted 11 lines
The PCI support needs to be checked since this driver is based on it. Otherwise the build fail with:
#error "This driver requires PCI support to be available"But this message is concealed by several occurrence of this
one:
error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_find_bus' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]Signed-off-by Romain Naour <[email protected]>Cc Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>Cc Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]>
[--SNIP--]
package/iqvlinux/Config.in line 6
Quoted 12 lines
package/iqvlinux/Config.in new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX + bool "iqvlinux" + depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL + help + Intel Ethernet Adapter Debug Driver for Linux (iqvlinux), + which supports kernel versions 2.6.x up through 4.0.x.
What about 4.1+ ?
Should we do a version-check at configure time, or is there such a check already done by the package itself?
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 13 lines
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk new file +7
-0@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# iqvlinux +# +################################################################################ + +IQVLINUX_VERSION = 1.1.5.3
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk line 17
Quoted 10 lines
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk new file +10
-0+ +IQVLINUX_SITE = \ + http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/iqvlinux/$(IQVLINUX_VERSION) +IQVLINUX_SOURCE = iqvlinux.tar.gz + +IQVLINUX_LICENSE = GPLv2 or BSD-3c +IQVLINUX_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING src/linux/driver/files.txt \ + inc/linux/files.txt inc/files.txt + +IQVLINUX_MODULE_MAKE_OPTS = NALDIR=$(@D) KSRC=$(LINUX_DIR) CC=$(TARGET_CC)
Are you sure CC is needed? The kernel buildsystem should already set it, no?
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk line 31
Quoted 13 lines
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk new file +13
-0+IQVLINUX_MODULE_SUBDIRS = src/linux/driver + +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX),y) +define IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK + @if ! grep -Fqx 'CONFIG_PCI=y' $(LINUX_DIR)/.config; then \ + echo "ERROR: Enable CONFIG_PCI in the linux kernel config." 1>&2 ; \ + exit 1; \ + fi +endef + +# Check if PCI is enabled in the Linux kernel build by Buildroot. +LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK +endif
I really do not like that a package meddles in the affairs of another package, like setting hooks for it.
I'd rather we add a variable that packages could set to require specific kernel config options, something like:
IQVLINUX_LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS = CONFIG_PCI
Then in package/pkg-generic, in the inner-generic-package macro:
LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS += $$($(2)_NEEDS_LINUX_CONFIG)
And finally in linux/linux.mk:
define LINUX_CHECK_CONFIG_OPTS
$(foreach cfg,$(strip $(LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS)),\
if ! grep -E '^$(cfg)=y$$' $(@D)/.config >/dev/null; then \
printf "ERROR: Enable %s in your linux kernel config." "$(cfg)"; \
exit 1; \
fi;)
endef
LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += LINUX_CHECK_CONFIG_OPTSRegards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 5 lines
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk new file +2
-0+$(eval $(kernel-module)) +$(eval $(generic-package))Signature · 1 line
2.4.3
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Hello,
Quoted 15 lines · Yann E. MORIN
package/iqvlinux/Config.in line 6
Quoted 12 lines
package/iqvlinux/Config.in new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX + bool "iqvlinux" + depends on BR2_LINUX_KERNEL + help + Intel Ethernet Adapter Debug Driver for Linux (iqvlinux), + which supports kernel versions 2.6.x up through 4.0.x.What about 4.1+ ?
Quoted 2 lines
Should we do a version-check at configure time, or is there such a check already done by the package itself?
I think we don't really care. There are lots of other kernel modules or Linux kernel extensions (Xenomai, RTAI) for which we don't do such version checks.
Quoted 28 lines
package/iqvlinux/Config.in
Quoted 13 lines
package/iqvlinux/Config.in new file +13
-0+IQVLINUX_MODULE_SUBDIRS = src/linux/driver + +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX),y) +define IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK + @if ! grep -Fqx 'CONFIG_PCI=y' $(LINUX_DIR)/.config; then \ + echo "ERROR: Enable CONFIG_PCI in the linux kernel config." 1>&2 ; \ + exit 1; \ + fi +endef + +# Check if PCI is enabled in the Linux kernel build by Buildroot. +LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK +endifI really do not like that a package meddles in the affairs of another package, like setting hooks for it.
I'd rather we add a variable that packages could set to require specific kernel config options, something like:
IQVLINUX_LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS=CONFIG_PCIThen in package/pkg-generic, in the inner-generic-package macro:
LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS += $$($(2)_NEEDS_LINUX_CONFIG)And finally in
linux/linux.mk:
Quoted 8 lines
define LINUX_CHECK_CONFIG_OPTS
$(foreach cfg,$(strip $(LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS)),\
if ! grep -E '^$(cfg)=y$$' $(@D)/.config >/dev/null; then \
printf "ERROR: Enable %s in your linux kernel config." "$(cfg)"; \
exit 1; \
fi;)
endef
LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += LINUX_CHECK_CONFIG_OPTSI agree on the principle, but I think we should rather handle that like we do for other options: enable automatically the needed option.
Remember how someone proposed to check for CONFIG_MODULES=y and error out if not available? Instead, you implemented b7c32c98bc810b88e0391117f225658f82b44995.
So a little bit in the direction of what you proposed, what about refactoring the LINUX_NEEDS_MODULES mechanism into a more generic mechanism that allows package to express which kernel option(s) they need, and automatically enable such options in linux/linux.mk when configuring the kernel.
Best regards,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Thomas, All,
On 2015-10-12 22:44 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
Quoted 1 line · Yann E. MORIN
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 26 lines
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk line 31
Quoted 11 lines
package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk new file +11
-0+ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_IQVLINUX),y) +define IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK + @if ! grep -Fqx 'CONFIG_PCI=y' $(LINUX_DIR)/.config; then \ + echo "ERROR: Enable CONFIG_PCI in the linux kernel config." 1>&2 ; \ + exit 1; \ + fi +endef + +# Check if PCI is enabled in the Linux kernel build by Buildroot. +LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK +endifI really do not like that a package meddles in the affairs of another package, like setting hooks for it.
I'd rather we add a variable that packages could set to require specific kernel config options, something like:
IQVLINUX_LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS=CONFIG_PCIThen in package/pkg-generic, in the inner-generic-package macro:
LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS += $$($(2)_NEEDS_LINUX_CONFIG)And finally in
linux/linux.mk:Quoted 8 lines
define LINUX_CHECK_CONFIG_OPTS $(foreach cfg,$(strip $(LINUX_NEEDS_CONFIG_OPTS)),\ if ! grep -E '^$(cfg)=y$$' $(@D)/.config >/dev/null; then \ printf "ERROR: Enable %s in your linux kernel config." "$(cfg)"; \ exit 1; \ fi;) endef LINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS += LINUX_CHECK_CONFIG_OPTS
Quoted 2 lines
I agree on the principle, but I think we should rather handle that like we do for other options: enable automatically the needed option.
Except for PCI it does not really makes sense, see Arnout's explanations:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-October/141178.html
Quoted 3 lines
Remember how someone proposed to check for
CONFIG_MODULES=yand error out if not available? Instead, you implementedb7c32c98bc810b88e0391117f225658f82b44995.
Meh... ;-)
Quoted 5 lines
So a little bit in the direction of what you proposed, what about refactoring the
LINUX_NEEDS_MODULESmechanism into a more generic mechanism that allows package to express which kernel option(s) they need, and automatically enable such options inlinux/linux.mkwhen configuring the kernel.
I'm not totally oposed to this idea.
However, there are cases, like PCI, for which it does not make sense to just enable it (as Arnout explained).
Unless we don't care about runtime consistency, and just care about the buildability of the configuration...
However, I like doing such little tiny bit of infra, so I can append that to my todo-list. What do you prefer: setting the option (like for modules), or checking the option?
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Dear Yann E. MORIN,
Quoted 5 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 2 lines
I agree on the principle, but I think we should rather handle that like we do for other options: enable automatically the needed option.
Except for PCI it does not really makes sense, see Arnout's explanations:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-October/141178.html
Except that I disagree with Arnout :)
Arnout is not making the difference between being able to *build* and being able to *run*.
CONFIG_PCI is needed for the build to proceed, so it is normal that we enable it automatically. The PCI root complex drivers are only needed for the PCI support to actually work on the target, not for iqvlinux to build.
And the story is the same for xtable-addons: the additions in linux.mk were made because those kernel options were needed for xtable-addons to simply *build*.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Remember how someone proposed to check for
CONFIG_MODULES=yand error out if not available? Instead, you implementedb7c32c98bc810b88e0391117f225658f82b44995.Meh... ;-)
No, your commit is good I believe.
Quoted 4 lines
I'm not totally oposed to this idea.
However, there are cases, like PCI, for which it does not make sense to just enable it (as Arnout explained).
See above :)
Quoted 6 lines
Unless we don't care about runtime consistency, and just care about the buildability of the configuration...
However, I like doing such little tiny bit of infra, so I can append that to my todo-list. What do you prefer: setting the option (like for modules), or checking the option?
Setting the option, when it is needed to build the external modules.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Quoted 14 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Yann E. MORIN,
Quoted 5 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I agree on the principle, but I think we should rather handle that like we do for other options: enable automatically the needed option.
Except for PCI it does not really makes sense, see Arnout's explanations:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-October/141178.htmlExcept that I disagree with Arnout :)
Arnout is not making the difference between being able to *build* and being able to *run*.
Quoted 8 lines
CONFIG_PCIis needed for the build to proceed, so it is normal that we enable it automatically. The PCI root complex drivers are only needed for the PCI support to actually work on the target, not for iqvlinux to build.And the story is the same for xtable-addons: the additions in linux.mk were made because those kernel options were needed for xtable-addons to simply *build*.
And of course I disagree with Thomas :-)
I think we should follow the principle of least surprise. We should avoid
situations where a package builds and we know for sure it will not work at runtime. In many cases, this cannot be avoided, but if we can avoid it, we should.
With xtables it's slightly different since if we enable those kernel config
options, it will actually work at runtime (at least as far as we can tell). Similar for the systemd options - which BTW are really runtime-only, systemd doesn't check for them at all at build time.
Fortunately, what you've committed amounts to a build-time check: the iqvlinux
build will error out if CONFIG_PCI isn't enabled. The error message will be cryptic and will not tell the user how to fix it, but at least it is less cryptic than when the user enables the package and it simply doesn't do anything without any error message at all.
So basically, the check added by Romain is just making the build error message
less cryptic, so it is really optional.
Regards,
Arnout
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
And the story is the same for xtable-addons: the additions in linux.mk were made because those kernel options were needed for xtable-addons to simply *build*.
And of course I disagree with Thomas :-)
Heh ;)
Quoted 3 lines
I think we should follow the principle of least surprise. We should avoid
situations where a package builds and we know for sure it will not work at runtime. In many cases, this cannot be avoided, but if we can avoid it, we should.
It's not really that we *KNOW* that it won't build, it is more that we cannot *GUARANTEE* that it will.
For this specific case, I think the issue is moot as people using this package are most likely on x86 (where having a kernel config without PCI is very unlikely), or atleast on a platform with PCI support enabled (otherwise they cannot use the Intel MAC).
But yeah, I agree that we should try to make things work out of the box (both build and runtime) where possible.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
In reply to Yann E. MORINYann,
Quoted 3 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 1 line
+IQVLINUX_MODULE_MAKE_OPTS = NALDIR=$(@D) KSRC=$(LINUX_DIR) CC=$(TARGET_CC)
Are you sure CC is needed? The kernel buildsystem should already set it, no?
Yes, it is really needed. The kernel buildsystem indeed defines CC, but it gets re-defined by the iqvlinux Makefile, which gets included by the kernel buildsystem since we do M=/path/to/iqvlinux to build the iqvlinux module.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Thomas, Romain, All,
On 2015-10-12 23:16 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
Quoted 9 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
+IQVLINUX_MODULE_MAKE_OPTS = NALDIR=$(@D) KSRC=$(LINUX_DIR) CC=$(TARGET_CC)
Are you sure CC is needed? The kernel buildsystem should already set it, no?
Yes, it is really needed. The kernel buildsystem indeed defines CC, but it gets re-defined by the iqvlinux
Makefile, which gets included by the kernel buildsystem since we do M=/path/to/iqvlinux to build the iqvlinux module.
OK, maybe that could have been explained either as a comment in the .mk or in the commit log. ;-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
In reply to Romain NaourDear Romain Naour,
Quoted 25 lines · Romain Naour
The PCI support needs to be checked since this driver is based on it. Otherwise the build fail with:
#error "This driver requires PCI support to be available"But this message is concealed by several occurrence of this
one:
error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_find_bus' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]Signed-off-by Romain Naour <[email protected]>Cc Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>Cc Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]>---
v3: changes suggested by Arnout
- remove the patch and use CC=$(TARGET_CC) instead.
- Add a 'or' between GPLv2 and BSD-3c for license information
- Add some more license files (files.txt)
- Fixes typos and indentation.
- move the check for PCI option toLINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS
- redirect echo to stderr.
v2: - rename the package simply to iqvlinux (ThomasP)
- move it to "Hardware Handling" menu (ThomasP)
- Cc Yann for the kernel-module infra
- Add a check forCONFIG_PCIeven if it's redundant with the message from theMakefile.
(Do we really need this check ?)
Quoted 9 lines
--- package/Config.in | 1 + package/iqvlinux/Config.in | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash | 5 +++++ package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/Config.in create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk
Applied after doing the following changes:
[Thomas:
- fix minor typo in Config.in: s/Enthernet/Ethernet/
- license is "GPLv2, BSD-3c", not "GPLv2 or BSD-3c"
- remove IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK, until a proper generic solution is implemented.]
As you can see, I've removed the IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK so that a nicer solution can be discussed/implemented with Yann. However, since this check was not really mandatory, I decided to add the package nonetheless (albeit without the check).
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/1 package/iqvlinux: new package
Hi Thomas,
Le 12/10/2015 23:17, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit :
Quoted 46 lines
Dear Romain Naour,
Quoted 25 lines · Romain Naour
The PCI support needs to be checked since this driver is based on it. Otherwise the build fail with:
#error "This driver requires PCI support to be available"But this message is concealed by several occurrence of this
one:
error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_find_bus' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]Signed-off-by Romain Naour <[email protected]>Cc Yann E. MORIN <[email protected]>Cc Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]>---
v3: changes suggested by Arnout
- remove the patch and use CC=$(TARGET_CC) instead.
- Add a 'or' between GPLv2 and BSD-3c for license information
- Add some more license files (files.txt)
- Fixes typos and indentation.
- move the check for PCI option toLINUX_POST_CONFIGURE_HOOKS
- redirect echo to stderr.
v2: - rename the package simply to iqvlinux (ThomasP)
- move it to "Hardware Handling" menu (ThomasP)
- Cc Yann for the kernel-module infra
- Add a check forCONFIG_PCIeven if it's redundant with the message from theMakefile.
(Do we really need this check ?)Quoted 9 lines
--- package/Config.in | 1 + package/iqvlinux/Config.in | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash | 5 +++++ package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mk | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/Config.in create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.hash create mode 100644 package/iqvlinux/iqvlinux.mkApplied after doing the following changes:
[Thomas:
- fix minor typo in Config.in: s/Enthernet/Ethernet/
- license is "GPLv2, BSD-3c", not "GPLv2 or BSD-3c"
- removeIQVLINUX_PCI_CHECK, until a proper generic solution is implemented.]
Quoted 4 lines
As you can see, I've removed the
IQVLINUX_PCI_CHECKso that a nicer solution can be discussed/implemented with Yann. However, since this check was not really mandatory, I decided to add the package nonetheless (albeit without the check).
Ok, it's not a problem for me. The kernel I use already have CONFIG_PCI enabled. I'll follow the discussion about the kernel option check.
Best regards,
Romain
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks!
Thomas