Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mfd: axp20x: Add a cell for the power button part of the,axp288 PMICs

PATCH Superseded Borun Fu 3 participants 6 messages Oct 12, 2015 – Oct 14, 2015

Subsystems (2)

v1 of 2 Superseded Latest is v2 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Borun Fu

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mfd: axp20x: Add a cell for the power button part of the,axp288 PMICs

This patch adds the mfd cell info for axp288 power key device.

---
 drivers/mfd/axp20x.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +20 -0
index 3f576b7..3f4e11f 100644
@@ -161,6 +161,21 @@ static struct resource axp22x_pek_resources[] = {
 	},
 };
 
+static struct resource axp288_power_button_resources[] = {
+	{
+		.name	= "PEK_DBR",
+		.start	= AXP288_IRQ_POKN,
+		.end	= AXP288_IRQ_POKN,
+		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
+	},
+	{
+		.name	= "PEK_DBF",
+		.start	= AXP288_IRQ_POKP,
+		.end	= AXP288_IRQ_POKP,
+		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
+	},
+};
+
 static struct resource axp288_fuel_gauge_resources[] = {
 	{
 		.start = AXP288_IRQ_QWBTU,
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek", /* axp20x-pek works for AXP288 as well */
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
#1 lore raw
Quoted 35 lines · Borun Fu

This patch adds the mfd cell info for axp288 power key device.

---
 drivers/mfd/axp20x.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +15 -0
index 3f576b7..3f4e11f 100644
@@ -161,6 +161,21 @@ static struct resource axp22x_pek_resources[] = {
 	},
 };
 
+static struct resource axp288_power_button_resources[] = {
+	{
+		.name	= "PEK_DBR",
+		.start	= AXP288_IRQ_POKN,
+		.end	= AXP288_IRQ_POKN,
+		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
+	},
+	{
+		.name	= "PEK_DBF",
+		.start	= AXP288_IRQ_POKP,
+		.end	= AXP288_IRQ_POKP,
+		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
+	},
+};
+
 static struct resource axp288_fuel_gauge_resources[] = {
 	{
 		.start = AXP288_IRQ_QWBTU,

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 590

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +1 -0
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek", /* axp20x-pek works for AXP288 as well */

Doesn't this change insinuate that?

If axp20x-pek didn't work for AXP288 you wouldn't have put it in this structure right?

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +4 -0
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };
Signature · 4 lines
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
#2 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 590

Quoted 8 lines

static struct resource axp288_fuel_gauge_resources[] = {

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +1 -0
 	{
 		.start = AXP288_IRQ_QWBTU,
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek", /* axp20x-pek works for AXP288 as well */

Doesn't this change insinuate that?

Quoted 2 lines

If axp20x-pek didn't work for AXP288 you wouldn't have put it in this structure right?

Are you suggesting to remove the comment? Just want to make sure I understand you correctly.

Quoted 7 lines

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 597

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +4 -0
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog ���{.n�+�������+%�����ݶ��w��{.n�+����{��G�����{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h��������z_�(�階�ݢj"���m������G������?����&���~��iO��z��v�^�m���� ������?�I�

#3 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Fei
Quoted 11 lines

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 590

Quoted 8 lines

static struct resource axp288_fuel_gauge_resources[] = {

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +1 -0
 	{
 		.start = AXP288_IRQ_QWBTU,
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek", /* axp20x-pek works for AXP288 as well */

Doesn't this change insinuate that?

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

If axp20x-pek didn't work for AXP288 you wouldn't have put it in this structure right?

Are you suggesting to remove the comment? Just want to make sure I understand you correctly.

I am.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +4 -0
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };
Signature · 4 lines
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
author
#4 lore raw

So the patch will be refined to remove the comment as follows. Any else comments? @@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
},
{
+ .name = "axp20x-pek",
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+ .resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+ },
+ {
.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
},
};

Quoted 28 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 11 lines · Fei
Quoted 11 lines

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 590

Quoted 8 lines

static struct resource axp288_fuel_gauge_resources[] = {

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +1 -0
 	{
 		.start = AXP288_IRQ_QWBTU,
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek", /* axp20x-pek works for AXP288 as well */

Doesn't this change insinuate that?

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

If axp20x-pek didn't work for AXP288 you wouldn't have put it in this structure right?

Are you suggesting to remove the comment? Just want to make sure I understand you correctly.

I am.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +4 -0
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };
#5 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Borun Fu

So the patch will be refined to remove the comment as follows. Any else comments?

Please don't top post. If you have a comment about something that was said, please make your comment directly _after_ it (a.k.a inline).

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 597

Quoted 12 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +5 -0
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek",
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };

No need to do this. It doesn't save anyone any time.

Just resubmit the next version of the patch.

Quoted 29 lines · Lee Jones
Quoted 28 lines · Fei
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = { · line 590

Quoted 9 lines

static struct resource axp288_fuel_gauge_resources[] = {

drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +1 -0
 	{
 		.start = AXP288_IRQ_QWBTU,
@@ -572,6 +587,11 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp288_cells[] = {
 		.resources = axp288_fuel_gauge_resources,
 	},
 	{
+		.name = "axp20x-pek", /* axp20x-pek works for AXP288 as well */

Doesn't this change insinuate that?

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line

If axp20x-pek didn't work for AXP288 you wouldn't have put it in this structure right?

Are you suggesting to remove the comment? Just want to make sure I understand you correctly.

I am.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +4 -0
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp288_power_button_resources),
+		.resources = axp288_power_button_resources,
+	},
+	{
 		.name = "axp288_pmic_acpi",
 	},
 };
Signature · 4 lines
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog