Skip to contentSkip to conversation

spi: zynq_qspi: Minor cleanups

PATCH Superseded Jagan Teki 2 participants 3 messages Oct 25, 2015 – Oct 26, 2015

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Jagan Teki

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 spi: zynq_qspi: Minor cleanups

- Use __func__ on debug
- Removed unnecessary comment
- Fix function name in debug as zynq_qspi_xfer instead of spi_xfer

---
Changes for v2:
- Fix commit message - Use meaningful commit header, add proper details for all fixes.
- Fix debug print in zynq_qspi_xfer

 drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +3 -5
index 8aa61d7..6963c13 100644
@@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int zynq_qspi_start_transfer(struct zynq_qspi_priv *priv)
 		zynq_qspi_fill_tx_fifo(priv, priv->fifo_depth);
 
 	writel(ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_ALL_MASK, &regs->ier);
-	/* Start the transfer by enabling manual start bit */
 
 	/* wait for completion */
 	do {
@@ -516,7 +515,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
 	priv->rx_buf = din;
 	priv->len = bitlen / 8;
 
-	debug("spi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
+	debug("zynq_qspi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
 	      bus->seq, slave_plat->cs, bitlen, priv->len, flags);
 
 	/*
@@ -569,8 +568,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_set_speed(struct udevice *bus, uint speed)
 	writel(confr, &regs->cr);
 	priv->freq = speed;
 
-	debug("zynq_spi_set_speed: regs=%p, speed=%d\n",
-	      priv->regs, priv->freq);
+	debug("%s: regs=%p, speed=%d\n", __func__, priv->regs, priv->freq);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -593,7 +591,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_set_mode(struct udevice *bus, uint mode)
 	writel(confr, &regs->cr);
 	priv->mode = mode;
 
-	debug("zynq_spi_set_mode: regs=%p, mode=%d\n", priv->regs, priv->mode);
+	debug("%s: regs=%p, mode=%d\n", __func__, priv->regs, priv->mode);
 
 	return 0;
 }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 spi: zynq_qspi: Minor cleanups

Quoted 28 lines · Jagan Teki

- Use __func__ on debug
- Removed unnecessary comment
- Fix function name in debug as zynq_qspi_xfer instead of spi_xfer

---
Changes for v2:
- Fix commit message - Use meaningful commit header, add proper details for all fixes.
- Fix debug print in zynq_qspi_xfer

 drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +0 -1
index 8aa61d7..6963c13 100644
@@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int zynq_qspi_start_transfer(struct zynq_qspi_priv *priv)
 		zynq_qspi_fill_tx_fifo(priv, priv->fifo_depth);
 
 	writel(ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_ALL_MASK, &regs->ier);
-	/* Start the transfer by enabling manual start bit */
 
 	/* wait for completion */
 	do {

drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen, · line 521

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +1 -1
@@ -516,7 +515,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
 	priv->rx_buf = din;
 	priv->len = bitlen / 8;
 
-	debug("spi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
+	debug("zynq_qspi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
 	      bus->seq, slave_plat->cs, bitlen, priv->len, flags);
 
 	/*

I'm not poking the code regularly myself so, ok, sure. But why not __func__? I don't get it.

Signature · 8 lines
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20151025/5801b397/attachment.sig>
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 spi: zynq_qspi: Minor cleanups

Quoted 32 lines · Tom Rini
Quoted 31 lines · Jagan Teki

- Use __func__ on debug
- Removed unnecessary comment
- Fix function name in debug as zynq_qspi_xfer instead of spi_xfer

---
Changes for v2:
- Fix commit message - Use meaningful commit header, add proper details for all fixes.
- Fix debug print in zynq_qspi_xfer

 drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +0 -1
index 8aa61d7..6963c13 100644
@@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int zynq_qspi_start_transfer(struct zynq_qspi_priv *priv)
              zynq_qspi_fill_tx_fifo(priv, priv->fifo_depth);
 
      writel(ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_ALL_MASK, &regs->ier);
-     /* Start the transfer by enabling manual start bit */
 
      /* wait for completion */
      do {
@@ -516,7 +515,7 @@ static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
      priv->rx_buf = din;
      priv->len = bitlen / 8;
 
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c static int zynq_qspi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen, · line 521

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/spi/zynq_qspi.c +1 -1
-     debug("spi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
+     debug("zynq_qspi_xfer: bus:%i cs:%i bitlen:%i len:%i flags:%lx\n",
            bus->seq, slave_plat->cs, bitlen, priv->len, flags);
 
      /*

I'm not poking the code regularly myself so, ok, sure. But why not __func__? I don't get it.

I prefer __func__ for large function name and function being called less times and in case zynq_qspi_xfer I would go directly use function name as it being called for each transaction and function name is also small. It's not the case with remaining once.

Signature · 1 line
Jagan | openedev.