nios2: use common sequence for reserve_uboot

Use common sequence for reserve_uboot, as the result is the same.

Signed-off-by Thomas Chou <[email protected]>

Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Chou

Use common sequence for reserve_uboot, as the result is the same.

Signed-off-by Thomas Chou <[email protected]>

Shouldn't we just implement relocation properly ?

Hi Marek,

Quoted 7 lines · Thomas Chou

Quoted 4 lines

Use common sequence for reserve_uboot, as the result is the same.

Signed-off-by Thomas Chou <[email protected]>

Shouldn't we just implement relocation properly ?

This patch is not quite related to relocation. It just says that nios2 can use the same order (early or late) of init sequence about the reserve_uboot() call as most other archs. Only blackfin is special in this.

I did look into the relocation of nios2 a little. And realized that nios2 does not have the relative call instruction like ARM's "bl". It will be almost impossible to do relocation without support from compiler, eg, emulate the relative call. ><

Use common sequence for reserve_uboot, as the result is the same.

Signed-off-by Thomas Chou <[email protected]>

---
  common/board_f.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

common/board_f.c +2 -2

index d88ada3..64c33b3 100644
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
  	 *  - board info struct
  	 */
  	setup_dest_addr,
-#if defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN) || defined(CONFIG_NIOS2)
+#if defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN)
  	/* Blackfin u-boot monitor should be on top of the ram */
  	reserve_uboot,
  #endif

@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
  		!defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN) && !defined(CONFIG_M68K)
  	reserve_video,
  #endif
-#if !defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN) && !defined(CONFIG_NIOS2)
+#if !defined(CONFIG_BLACKFIN)
  	reserve_uboot,
  #endif
  #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD