ebtables: Allow RETURN target rules in user defined chains
PATCH 1/1 ebtables: Allow RETURN target rules in user defined chains
ebtables has a bug that prevents creation of rules with RETURN target, any attempt will result in an
RETURN not allowed on base chain
error even if the chain where you want to create the rule is a user defined chain.
Reproduction scenario:
root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -N foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A OUTPUT -j foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A foo -j mark --mark-or 3 --mark-target RETURN --mark-target RETURN not allowed on base chain.
My email client will probably replace tabs in the patch below, but it is a one-liner patch after all, easy to spot the actual change.
libebtc.c +1 -1
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ void ebt_check_for_loops(struct ebt_u_replace *replace)/* check if we've dealt with this chain already */ if (entries2->hook_mask & (1 <<i)) goto letscontinue; - entries2->hook_mask |= entries->hook_mask; + entries2->hook_mask |= entries->hook_mask & ~(1 <<NF_BR_NUMHOOKS );/* Jump to the chain, make sure we know how to get back */ stack[sp].chain_nr = chain_nr; stack[sp].n = j;
Florian Westphal
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Alin Nastac
ebtables has a bug that prevents creation of rules with RETURN target, any attempt will result in an
RETURN not allowed on base chain
error even if the chain where you want to create the rule is a user defined chain.Reproduction scenario:
root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -N foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A OUTPUT -j foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A foo -j mark --mark-or 3 --mark-target RETURN --mark-target RETURN not allowed on base chain.My email client will probably replace tabs in the patch below, but
Yes, I applied this manually (with minor edits to commit message).
Thanks.
Pablo Neira Ayuso
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Florian Westphal
Quoted 10 lines · Alin Nastac
ebtables has a bug that prevents creation of rules with RETURN target, any attempt will result in an
RETURN not allowed on base chain
error even if the chain where you want to create the rule is a user defined chain.Reproduction scenario:
root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -N foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A OUTPUT -j foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A foo -j mark --mark-or 3 --mark-target RETURN --mark-target RETURN not allowed on base chain.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
My email client will probably replace tabs in the patch below, but
Yes, I applied this manually (with minor edits to commit message).
Thanks, I wonder since then this has been broken BTW.
Pablo Neira Ayuso
maintainerQuoted 12 lines · Pablo Neira Ayuso
Quoted 11 lines · Florian Westphal
Quoted 10 lines · Alin Nastac
ebtables has a bug that prevents creation of rules with RETURN target, any attempt will result in an
RETURN not allowed on base chain
error even if the chain where you want to create the rule is a user defined chain.Reproduction scenario:
root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -N foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A OUTPUT -j foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A foo -j mark --mark-or 3 --mark-target RETURN --mark-target RETURN not allowed on base chain.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
My email client will probably replace tabs in the patch below, but
Yes, I applied this manually (with minor edits to commit message).
Thanks, I wonder since then this has been broken BTW.
s/then/when/
Florian Westphal
maintainerQuoted 13 lines · Pablo Neira Ayuso
Quoted 12 lines · Pablo Neira Ayuso
Quoted 11 lines · Florian Westphal
Quoted 10 lines · Alin Nastac
ebtables has a bug that prevents creation of rules with RETURN target, any attempt will result in an
RETURN not allowed on base chain
error even if the chain where you want to create the rule is a user defined chain.Reproduction scenario:
root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -N foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A OUTPUT -j foo root@OpenWrt:~# ebtables -A foo -j mark --mark-or 3 --mark-target RETURN --mark-target RETURN not allowed on base chain.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
My email client will probably replace tabs in the patch below, but
Yes, I applied this manually (with minor edits to commit message).
Thanks, I wonder since then this has been broken BTW.
s/then/when/
Seems it never worked.
I hacked 'allow checking for --xxxx--target RETURN rules on base chains' commit from 2002 to build and it rejects RETURN unconditionally.