Skip to contentSkip to conversation

usb: xhci: zynqmp: Removing unused function usb_phy_reset

PATCH New Marek Vasut 1 participant 2 messages Dec 2, 2015

Subsystems (3)
USB Arm/Zynq architecture USB xHCI driver
lore
Share & tools
lore

Marek Vasut

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 usb: xhci: zynqmp: Removing unused function usb_phy_reset

This patch removes unsued function usb_phy_reset, rather common function dwc3_phy_reset is used.

Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-zynqmp.c | 17 -----------------
 include/linux/usb/dwc3.h       |  1 -
 2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/host/xhci-zynqmp.c +0 -17
index 530d97c..a735369 100644
@@ -65,23 +65,6 @@ static struct zynqmp_xhci zynqmp_xhci;
 
 unsigned long ctr_addr[] = CONFIG_ZYNQMP_XHCI_LIST;
 
-void usb_phy_reset(struct dwc3 *dwc3_reg)
-{
-	/* Assert USB3 PHY reset */
-	setbits_le32(&dwc3_reg->g_usb3pipectl[0], DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_PHYSOFTRST);
-
-	/* Assert USB2 PHY reset */
-	setbits_le32(&dwc3_reg->g_usb2phycfg, DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG_PHYSOFTRST);
-
-	udelay(10);
-
-	/* Clear USB3 PHY reset */
-	clrbits_le32(&dwc3_reg->g_usb3pipectl[0], DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_PHYSOFTRST);
-
-	/* Clear USB2 PHY reset */
-	clrbits_le32(&dwc3_reg->g_usb2phycfg, DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG_PHYSOFTRST);
-}
-
 static int zynqmp_xhci_core_init(struct zynqmp_xhci *zynqmp_xhci)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
include/linux/usb/dwc3.h +0 -1
index dd934a0..6d1e365 100644
@@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ struct dwc3 {					/* offset: 0xC100 */
 void dwc3_set_mode(struct dwc3 *dwc3_reg, u32 mode);
 void dwc3_core_soft_reset(struct dwc3 *dwc3_reg);
 int dwc3_core_init(struct dwc3 *dwc3_reg);
-void usb_phy_reset(struct dwc3 *dwc3_reg);
 void dwc3_set_fladj(struct dwc3 *dwc3_reg, u32 val);
 #endif
 #endif /* __DWC3_H_ */
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 usb: xhci: zynqmp: Removing unused function usb_phy_reset

Quoted 4 lines · Marek Vasut

This patch removes unsued function usb_phy_reset, rather common function dwc3_phy_reset is used.

Signed-off-by Marek Vasut <[email protected]>

Yes, it's a copy-paste mistake, so applied.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut