tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]
PATCH 1/1 tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm_mux[]
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
--- drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 14 +++++--------- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c +5 -9
@@ -2037,18 +2037,14 @@ static void gsm_cleanup_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm) gsm->dead =1 ; -spin_lock (&gsm_mux_lock); -for (i =0 ; i <MAX_MUX ; i++) { -if (gsm_mux[i] == gsm) { - gsm_mux[i] =NULL ; -break ; - } - } -spin_unlock (&gsm_mux_lock);/* open failed before registering => nothing to do */ -if (i ==MAX_MUX ) +if (gsm_mux[gsm->num] != gsm)return ; +spin_lock (&gsm_mux_lock); + gsm_mux[gsm->num] =NULL ; +spin_unlock (&gsm_mux_lock); +/* In theory disconnecting DLCI 0 is sufficient but for some modems this is apparently not the case. */ if (dlci) {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 5 lines · xinhui
There is one filed
gsm->numto store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So usegsm->numto remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop traverse ingsm_cleanup_mux().Signed-off-by Pan Xinhui <[email protected]>
Your "From:" line in the email needs to match your signed-off-by: line, please fix up your email client to do this properly so that your patches can be accepted.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi, Greg
Thanks for your kind reply :)
Quoted 11 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 5 lines · xinhui
There is one filed
gsm->numto store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So usegsm->numto remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop traverse ingsm_cleanup_mux().Signed-off-by Pan Xinhui <[email protected]>Your "From:" line in the email needs to match your signed-off-by: line, please fix up your email client to do this properly so that your patches can be accepted.
I will fix it ASAP. Thank you!
thanks
xinhui
Quoted 4 lines
thanks,
greg k-h