assimp: new package
PATCH v3 1/2 assimp: new package
----
Changes v1 -> v2:
- use github helper (thanks to J?rg Krause)
Changes v2 -> v3:
- add c++ dependency (suggested by Thomas Petazzoni)
- fix linking problem with builtin zlib (linking code with/without '-fpic' compiled, see e.g. [2]), workaround by selecting buildroot zlib package (failure detected by Thomas Petazzoni [2])
[1] https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2006-March/008482.html
[2] http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-December/146859.html
--- package/Config.in | 1 + package/assimp/Config.in | 14 ++++++++++++++ package/assimp/assimp.mk | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/assimp/Config.in create mode 100644 package/assimp/assimp.mk
package/Config.in +1 -0
@@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ menu "Filesystem" endmenu menu "Graphics" + source "package/assimp/Config.in" source "package/atk/Config.in" source "package/bullet/Config.in" source "package/cairo/Config.in"
package/assimp/Config.in new file +14 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_ASSIMP + bool "assimp" + depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP + select BR2_PACKAGE_ZLIB + help + Open Asset Import Library (assimp) is a portable Open Source + library to import various well-known 3D model formats in a uniform + manner. The most recent version also knows how to export 3d files + and is therefore suitable as a general-purpose 3D model converter. + + http://www.assimp.org + +comment "assimp needs a toolchain w/ C++" + depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
package/assimp/assimp.mk new file +16 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# assimp +# +################################################################################ + +ASSIMP_VERSION = v3.2 +ASSIMP_SITE = $(call github,assimp,assimp,$(ASSIMP_VERSION)) +ASSIMP_LICENSE = BSD-3c +ASSIMP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE +ASSIMP_DEPENDENCIES = zlib +ASSIMP_INSTALL_STAGING = YES + +ASSIMP_CONF_OPTS += -DASSIMP_BUILD_TESTS=OFF + +$(eval $(cmake-package))
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
PATCH v3 2/2 qt53d: enabled assimpsceneparser plugin
- select assimp package
- copy enabled assimpsceneparser plugin
---
Depends on '[PATCH v2] qt5/qt53d: new package' (see [1]).
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/552897
Changes v1 -> v2:
- no changes
Changes v2 -> v3:
- no changes
--- package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in | 1 + package/qt5/qt53d/qt53d.mk | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in +1 -0
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_QT53D bool "qt53d" + select BR2_PACKAGE_ASSIMP select BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE select BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_GUI select BR2_PACKAGE_QT5DECLARATIVE
package/qt5/qt53d/qt53d.mk +2 -1
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ QT53D_VERSION = $(QT5_VERSION) QT53D_SITE = $(QT5_SITE) QT53D_SOURCE = qt3d-opensource-src-$(QT5SVG_VERSION).tar.xz -QT53D_DEPENDENCIES = qt5base qt5declarative +QT53D_DEPENDENCIES = assimp qt5base qt5declarative QT53D_INSTALL_STAGING = YES ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_QT5BASE_LICENSE_APPROVED),y)
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ endef ifeq ($(BR2_STATIC_LIBS),) define QT53D_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS cp -dpf $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/libQt53D*.so.* $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib + cp -dpfr $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/lib/qt/plugins/sceneparsers $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/qt/plugins cp -dpfr $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/qml/Qt3D $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/qml endef endif
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
PATCH v3 2/2 qt53d: enabled assimpsceneparser plugin
Dear Peter Seiderer,
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in line 3
Quoted 8 lines · Peter Seiderer
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in +1
-0@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_QT53D bool "qt53d" + select BR2_PACKAGE_ASSIMP
Is it really a mandatory dependency? If so, how could the original qt53d package have been submitted without it?
Thanks,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 2/2 qt53d: enabled assimpsceneparser plugin
Hello Thomas,
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Peter Seiderer,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:18:19 +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote:
Quoted 11 lines
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in line 3
Quoted 8 lines
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in +1
-0@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_QT53D bool "qt53d" + select BR2_PACKAGE_ASSIMPIs it really a mandatory dependency? If so, how could the original qt53d package have been submitted without it?
O.k, you are right, will send an updated patch...
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
Thomas
PATCH v3 2/2 qt53d: enabled assimpsceneparser plugin
Peter,
Quoted 6 lines · Peter Seiderer
Quoted 4 lines
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in line 3
Quoted 1 line
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in +1
-0+ select BR2_PACKAGE_ASSIMPIs it really a mandatory dependency? If so, how could the original qt53d package have been submitted without it?
O.k, you are right, will send an updated patch...
Unless I missed it, you did not send an updated patch?
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 2/2 qt53d: enabled assimpsceneparser plugin
Hello Thomas,
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Peter,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:26:49 +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in line 3
Quoted 1 line
package/qt5/qt53d/Config.in +1
-0+ select BR2_PACKAGE_ASSIMPIs it really a mandatory dependency? If so, how could the original qt53d package have been submitted without it?
O.k, you are right, will send an updated patch...
Unless I missed it, you did not send an updated patch?
Did not have much time for buildroot stuff the last couple of weeks..., so no updated patch yet..., but I hope I find some more time in a week or two...
Regards,
Peter
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks!
Thomas
PATCH v3 1/2 assimp: new package
In reply to Peter SeidererPeter,
Quoted 5 lines · Peter Seiderer
Signed-off-by Peter Seiderer <[email protected]>----
Changes v1 -> v2:
- use github helper (thanks to J?rg Krause)
Quoted 8 lines
Changes v2 -> v3:
- add c++ dependency (suggested by Thomas Petazzoni)
- fix linking problem with builtin zlib (linking code with/without '-fpic' compiled, see e.g. [2]), workaround by selecting buildroot zlib package (failure detected by Thomas Petazzoni [2])[1] https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2006-March/008482.html
[2] http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2015-December/146859.html
Thanks, I've applied. This time, I didn't do another test build, so I'm leaving it to the autobuilders to test your package. Please monitor autobuild.buildroot.org for any failure related to your package in the coming hours/days.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/2 assimp: new package
In reply to Peter SeidererDear Peter Seiderer,
Quoted 4 lines · Peter Seiderer
Signed-off-by Peter Seiderer <[email protected]>----
Changes v1 -> v2:
- use github helper (thanks to J?rg Krause)
This package is causing some build failures:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=assimp-v3.2
They all look similar. I guess it's because assimp needs C++11 support. Can you have a look ?
Thanks,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/2 assimp: new package
Hello,
Quoted 6 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
This package is causing some build failures:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=assimp-v3.2
They all look similar. I guess it's because assimp needs C++11 support. Can you have a look ?
One of the issue is different though:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/79e/79edc3a8c7bcc5a7ffb433bf1ecb645050e2f044/build-end.log
Thanks for your feedback,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH v3 1/2 assimp: new package
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniHello Thomas,
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Peter Seiderer,
Quoted 4 lines · Peter Seiderer
Signed-off-by Peter Seiderer <[email protected]>----
Changes v1 -> v2:
- use github helper (thanks to J?rg Krause)
Quoted 6 lines
This package is causing some build failures:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/?reason=assimp-v3.2
They all look similar. I guess it's because assimp needs C++11 support. Can you have a look ?
O.k, will have a look at it...
Regards,
Peter
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
Thomas