Skip to contentSkip to conversation

fsl/fman: use the ALIGN() macro

PATCH In review Dan Carpenter 2 participants 3 messages Jan 6, 2016

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 fsl/fman: use the ALIGN() macro

The original code works fine but the issue is that static checkers complain about this:

	~(u16)(OFFSET_UNITS - 1)

In that expression the cast to u16 is a no-op because we cast the value 15 to a u16 but then type promotion rules automatically cast it back to an int and then we do the bitwise negate.

It's cleaner to use the kernel's ALIGN() macro instead.

---
I think this patch is correct, but I haven't tested it, so please review carefully.

drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c +1 -5
index f9e7aa3..b527da1 100644
@@ -92,11 +92,8 @@ int fman_sp_build_buffer_struct(struct fman_sp_int_context_data_copy *
 	u32 tmp;
 
 	/* Align start of internal context data to 16 byte */
-	int_context_data_copy->ext_buf_offset = (u16)
-		((buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size & (OFFSET_UNITS - 1)) ?
-		((buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size + OFFSET_UNITS) &
-			~(u16)(OFFSET_UNITS - 1)) :
-		buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size);
+	int_context_data_copy->ext_buf_offset +		(u16)ALIGN(buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size, 16);
 
 	/* Translate margin and int_context params to FM parameters */
 	/* Initialize with illegal value. Later we'll set legal values. */
maintainer
#1 lore raw

From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:03:08 +0300

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c +0 -0
index f9e7aa3..b527da1 100644

drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c int fman_sp_build_buffer_struct(struct fman_sp_int_context_data_copy * · line 95

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c +1 -5
@@ -92,11 +92,8 @@ int fman_sp_build_buffer_struct(struct fman_sp_int_context_data_copy *
 	u32 tmp;
 
 	/* Align start of internal context data to 16 byte */
-	int_context_data_copy->ext_buf_offset = (u16)
-		((buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size & (OFFSET_UNITS - 1)) ?
-		((buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size + OFFSET_UNITS) &
-			~(u16)(OFFSET_UNITS - 1)) :
-		buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size);
+	int_context_data_copy->ext_buf_offset > +		(u16)ALIGN(buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size, 16);

Why are you using '16' instead of OFFSET_UNITS?

Unless you can come up with a good reason, please use OFFSET_UNITS instead of a magic constant.

Thanks!

#2 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · David Miller

From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:03:08 +0300

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c +0 -0
index f9e7aa3..b527da1 100644
@@ -92,11 +92,8 @@ int fman_sp_build_buffer_struct(struct fman_sp_int_context_data_copy *
 	u32 tmp;
 
Quoted 9 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c int fman_sp_build_buffer_struct(struct fman_sp_int_context_data_copy *

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_sp.c +1 -5
 	/* Align start of internal context data to 16 byte */
-	int_context_data_copy->ext_buf_offset = (u16)
-		((buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size & (OFFSET_UNITS - 1)) ?
-		((buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size + OFFSET_UNITS) &
-			~(u16)(OFFSET_UNITS - 1)) :
-		buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size);
+	int_context_data_copy->ext_buf_offset > > +		(u16)ALIGN(buffer_prefix_content->priv_data_size, 16);

Why are you using '16' instead of OFFSET_UNITS?

I made a brain fart. :/ I'll resend. Thanks.

regards,
dan carpenter