regulator: core: remove some dead code
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 regulator: core: remove some dead code
Originally queue_delayed_work() used to negative error codes or 0 and 1 on success depending if the work was queued or not. It caused a lot of bugs where people treated all non-zero returns as failures so we changed it to return bool instead in d4283e937861 ('workqueue: make queueing functions return bool'). Now it never returns failure.
Checking for negative values causes a static checker warning since it is impossible based on the bool type.
drivers/regulator/core.c +3 -8
@@ -2368,7 +2368,6 @@ static void regulator_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)int regulator_disable_deferred (struct regulator *regulator,int ms) {struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev; -int ret;if (regulator->always_on)return 0 ;
@@ -2380,13 +2379,9 @@ int regulator_disable_deferred(struct regulator *regulator, int ms) rdev->deferred_disables++;mutex_unlock (&rdev->mutex); - ret =queue_delayed_work (system_power_efficient_wq, - &rdev->disable_work, -msecs_to_jiffies (ms)); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; -else -return 0 ; +queue_delayed_work (system_power_efficient_wq, &rdev->disable_work, +msecs_to_jiffies (ms)); +return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (regulator_disable_deferred);
Mark Brown
maintainerApplied "regulator: core: remove some dead code" to the regulator tree
The patch
regulator: core: remove some dead code
has been applied to the regulator tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Quoted 1 line
From
70dc6daff090afaab588e800fca3db59bfac694eMon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:03:08 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: remove some dead code
Originally queue_delayed_work() used to negative error codes or 0 and 1 on success depending if the work was queued or not. It caused a lot of bugs where people treated all non-zero returns as failures so we changed it to return bool instead in d4283e937861 ('workqueue: make queueing functions return bool'). Now it never returns failure.
Checking for negative values causes a static checker warning since it is impossible based on the bool type.
--- drivers/regulator/core.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/core.c +3 -8
@@ -2368,7 +2368,6 @@ static void regulator_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)int regulator_disable_deferred (struct regulator *regulator,int ms) {struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev; -int ret;if (regulator->always_on)return 0 ;
@@ -2380,13 +2379,9 @@ int regulator_disable_deferred(struct regulator *regulator, int ms) rdev->deferred_disables++;mutex_unlock (&rdev->mutex); - ret =queue_delayed_work (system_power_efficient_wq, - &rdev->disable_work, -msecs_to_jiffies (ms)); -if (ret <0 ) -return ret; -else -return 0 ; +queue_delayed_work (system_power_efficient_wq, &rdev->disable_work, +msecs_to_jiffies (ms)); +return 0 ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (regulator_disable_deferred);
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0.rc3