Skip to contentSkip to conversation

U-Boot v2016.03-rc1 released

U-Boot Tom Rini 2 participants 2 messages Feb 2, 2016 – Feb 3, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore

Tom Rini

author
#0 lore raw

Hey all,

I've pushed v2016.03-rc1 out to the repository (and I see it) and tarballs will exist soon in the usual locations.

The merge window is now closed. I intended to tag and push this on Monday but got caught up with some other stuff and decided it wouldn't hurt to just do it today, so here we are.

There's a lot of things in here now but one thing I do want to call special attention to is that we've changed some of the default targets now when OF_CONTROL is set. The full thread can be seen at
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-February/244174.html but in short, when OF_CONTROL is set before we would have u-boot-dtb.img as the thing which could boot without changes and u-boot.img as the one needing a device tree added (same with .bin) and now u-boot.img has a device tree if it should have one and u-boot-nodtb.img is for cases where you add one in some other way (again, same with .bin).

Thanks all and please report on problems you see and things I need to pickup (I know I have some stuff in my queue to apply ASAP).

Signature · 8 lines
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160202/ecae6f7f/attachment.sig>
#1 lore raw

Hi.

2016-02-03 2:37 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <[email protected]>:

Quoted 5 lines

Hey all,

I've pushed v2016.03-rc1 out to the repository (and I see it) and tarballs will exist soon in the usual locations.

Quoted 7 lines

The merge window is now closed. I intended to tag and push this on Monday but got caught up with some other stuff and decided it wouldn't hurt to just do it today, so here we are.

There's a lot of things in here now but one thing I do want to call special attention to is that we've changed some of the default targets now when OF_CONTROL is set. The full thread can be seen at

Strictly speaking, s/OF_CONTROL/OF_SEPARATE/

Quoted 2 lines

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-February/244174.html but in short, when OF_CONTROL is set before we would have u-boot-dtb.img as the

Ditto.

Quoted 16 lines

thing which could boot without changes and u-boot.img as the one needing a device tree added (same with .bin) and now u-boot.img has a device tree if it should have one and u-boot-nodtb.img is for cases where you add one in some other way (again, same with .bin).

Thanks all and please report on problems you see and things I need to pickup (I know I have some stuff in my queue to apply ASAP).

--
Tom

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot at lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Signature · 2 lines
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada