DAX fsync/msync support
Subsystems (11)
v6 cover DAX fsync/msync support
Changes since v5 [1]:
1) Merged with Dan's changes to fs/dax.c that were staged in -mm and -next.
2) Store sectors in the address_space radix tree for DAX entries instead of addresses. This allows us to get the addresses from the block driver via dax_map_atomic() during fsync/msync so that we can protect against races with block device removal. (Dan)
3) Reordered things a bit in dax_writeback_one() so we clear the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE tag even if the radix tree entry is corrupt. This prevents us from getting into an infinite loop where we don't proceed far enough in dax_writeback_one() to clear that flag, but dax_writeback_mapping_range() will keep finding that entry via find_get_entries_tag().
4) Changed the ordering of the radix tree insertion so that it happens before the page insertion into the page tables. This ensures that we don't end up in a case where the page table insertion succeeds and the radix tree insertion fails which could give us a writeable PTE that has no corresponding radix tree entry.
5) Got rid of the 'nrdax' variable in struct address_space and renamed 'nrshadows' to 'nrexceptional' so that it can be used for both DAX and shadow exceptional entries. We explicitly prevent shadow entries from being added to radix trees for DAX mappings, so the single counter can safely be reused for both purposes. (Jan)
6) Updated all my WARN_ON() calls so I use the return value to know whether I've hit an erorr. (Andrew)
This series applies cleanly and was tested against next-20151223.
A working tree can be found here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/zwisler/linux.git/log/?h=fsync_v6
[1]: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-December/003588.html
Ross Zwisler (7):
pmem: add wb_cache_pmem() to the PMEM API
dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
mm: add find_get_entries_tag()
dax: add support for fsync/msync
ext2: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync
ext4: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync
xfs: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync
arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h | 11 +-- fs/block_dev.c | 2 +- fs/dax.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- fs/ext2/file.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/file.c | 4 +- fs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +- include/linux/dax.h | 7 ++ include/linux/fs.h | 3 +- include/linux/pagemap.h | 3 + include/linux/pmem.h | 22 ++++- include/linux/radix-tree.h | 9 ++ mm/filemap.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++-- mm/truncate.c | 69 +++++++++------- mm/vmscan.c | 9 +- mm/workingset.c | 4 +- 16 files changed, 384 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v6 1/7 pmem: add wb_cache_pmem() to the PMEM API
The function __arch_wb_cache_pmem() was already an internal implementation detail of the x86 PMEM API, but this functionality needs to be exported as part of the general PMEM API to handle the fsync/msync case for DAX mmaps.
One thing worth noting is that we really do want this to be part of the PMEM API as opposed to a stand-alone function like clflush_cache_range() because of ordering restrictions. By having wb_cache_pmem() as part of the PMEM API we can leave it unordered, call it multiple times to write back large amounts of memory, and then order the multiple calls with a single wmb_pmem().
--- arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h | 11 ++++++----- include/linux/pmem.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h +6 -5
@@ -67,18 +67,19 @@ static inline void arch_wmb_pmem(void) }/** -* __arch_wb_cache_pmem - write back a cache range with CLWB +* arch_wb_cache_pmem - write back a cache range with CLWB * @vaddr: virtual start address * @size: number of bytes to write back * * Write back a cache range using the CLWB (cache line write back) * instruction. This function requires explicit ordering with an -* arch_wmb_pmem() call. This API is internal to the x86 PMEM implementation. +* arch_wmb_pmem() call. */ -static inline void __arch_wb_cache_pmem (void *vaddr,size_t size) +static inline void arch_wb_cache_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size) {u16 x86_clflush_size = boot_cpu_data.x86_clflush_size;unsigned long clflush_mask = x86_clflush_size -1 ; +void *vaddr = (void __force *)addr;void *vend = vaddr + size;void *p;
@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ static inline size_t arch_copy_from_iter_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t bytes, len =copy_from_iter_nocache (vaddr, bytes, i);if (__iter_needs_pmem_wb (i)) -__arch_wb_cache_pmem (vaddr, bytes); +arch_wb_cache_pmem (addr, bytes);return len; }
@@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ static inline void arch_clear_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size)void *vaddr = (void __force *)addr;memset (vaddr,0 , size); -__arch_wb_cache_pmem (vaddr, size); +arch_wb_cache_pmem (addr, size); }static inline bool __arch_has_wmb_pmem (void )
include/linux/pmem.h +21 -1
@@ -53,12 +53,18 @@ static inline void arch_clear_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size) {BUG (); } + +static inline void arch_wb_cache_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size) +{ +BUG (); +}#endif /* * Architectures that define ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API must provide * implementations for arch_memcpy_to_pmem(), arch_wmb_pmem(), -* arch_copy_from_iter_pmem(), arch_clear_pmem() and arch_has_wmb_pmem(). +* arch_copy_from_iter_pmem(), arch_clear_pmem(), arch_wb_cache_pmem() +* and arch_has_wmb_pmem(). */ static inline void memcpy_from_pmem(void *dst, void __pmem const *src, size_t size) {
@@ -178,4 +184,18 @@ static inline void clear_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size) else default_clear_pmem(addr, size); } + +/** +* wb_cache_pmem - write back processor cache for PMEM memory range +* @addr: virtual start address +* @size: number of bytes to write back +* +* Write back the processor cache range starting at 'addr' for 'size' bytes. +* This function requires explicit ordering with a wmb_pmem() call. +*/ +static inline void wb_cache_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size) +{ +if (arch_has_pmem_api ()) +arch_wb_cache_pmem (addr, size); +}#endif /* __PMEM_H__ */
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v6 2/7 dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
In reply to Ross ZwislerAdd support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct address_space radix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries.
In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages. These exceptional entries will also contain the writeback sectors for the PTE or PMD faults that we can use at fsync/msync time.
There are currently two types of exceptional entries (shmem and shadow) that can be placed into the radix tree, and this adds a third. We rely on the fact that only one type of exceptional entry can be found in a given radix tree based on its usage. This happens for free with DAX vs shmem but we explicitly prevent shadow entries from being added to radix trees for DAX mappings.
The only shadow entries that would be generated for DAX radix trees would be to track zero page mappings that were created for holes. These pages would receive minimal benefit from having shadow entries, and the choice to have only one type of exceptional entry in a given radix tree makes the logic simpler both in clear_exceptional_entry() and in the rest of DAX.
--- fs/block_dev.c | 2 +- fs/inode.c | 2 +- include/linux/dax.h | 5 ++++ include/linux/fs.h | 3 +- include/linux/radix-tree.h | 9 ++++++ mm/filemap.c | 17 ++++++++---- mm/truncate.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++++- mm/workingset.c | 4 +-- 9 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
fs/block_dev.c +1 -1
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void kill_bdev(struct block_device *bdev) {struct address_space *mapping = bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping; -if (mapping->nrpages ==0 && mapping->nrshadows ==0 ) +if (mapping->nrpages ==0 && mapping->nrexceptional ==0 )return ;invalidate_bh_lrus ();
fs/inode.c +1 -1
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ void clear_inode(struct inode *inode)*/ spin_lock_irq (&inode->i_data.tree_lock);BUG_ON (inode->i_data.nrpages); -BUG_ON (inode->i_data.nrshadows); +BUG_ON (inode->i_data.nrexceptional);spin_unlock_irq (&inode->i_data.tree_lock);BUG_ON (!list_empty (&inode->i_data.private_list));BUG_ON (!(inode->i_state &I_FREEING ));
include/linux/dax.h +5 -0
@@ -36,4 +36,9 @@ static inline bool vma_is_dax(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {return vma->vm_file &&IS_DAX (vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host); } + +static inline bool dax_mapping (struct address_space *mapping) +{ +return mapping->host &&IS_DAX (mapping->host); +}#endif
include/linux/fs.h +2 -1
@@ -432,7 +432,8 @@ struct address_space {struct rw_semaphore i_mmap_rwsem;/* protect tree, count, list */ /* Protected by tree_lock together with the radix tree */ unsigned long nrpages;/* number of total pages */ -unsigned long nrshadows;/* number of shadow entries */ +/* number of shadow or DAX exceptional entries */ +unsigned long nrexceptional;pgoff_t writeback_index;/* writeback starts here */ const struct address_space_operations *a_ops;/* methods */ unsigned long flags;/* error bits/gfp mask */
include/linux/radix-tree.h +9 -0
@@ -51,6 +51,15 @@#define RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY 2#define RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT 2 +#define RADIX_DAX_MASK 0xf +#define RADIX_DAX_SHIFT 4 +#define RADIX_DAX_PTE (0x4 | RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY) +#define RADIX_DAX_PMD (0x8 | RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY) +#define RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry) ((unsigned long)entry & RADIX_DAX_MASK) +#define RADIX_DAX_SECTOR (entry) (((unsigned long)entry >> RADIX_DAX_SHIFT)) +#define RADIX_DAX_ENTRY (sector, pmd) ((void *)((unsigned long)sector << \ + RADIX_DAX_SHIFT | (pmd ? RADIX_DAX_PMD : RADIX_DAX_PTE))) +static inline int radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr (void *ptr) {return (int )((unsigned long )ptr &RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR );
mm/filemap.c +11 -6
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@*/ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/compiler.h> +#include <linux/dax.h> #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <linux/capability.h>
@@ -123,9 +124,9 @@ static void page_cache_tree_delete(struct address_space *mapping,__radix_tree_lookup (&mapping->page_tree, page->index, &node, &slot);if (shadow) { - mapping->nrshadows++; + mapping->nrexceptional++;/* -* Make sure the nrshadows update is committed before +* Make sure the nrexceptional update is committed before * the nrpages update so that final truncate racing * with reclaim does not see both counters 0 at the * same time and miss a shadow entry.
@@ -579,9 +580,13 @@ static int page_cache_tree_insert(struct address_space *mapping, p =radix_tree_deref_slot_protected (slot, &mapping->tree_lock);if (!radix_tree_exceptional_entry (p))return -EEXIST ; + +if (WARN_ON (dax_mapping (mapping))) +return -EINVAL ; +if (shadowp) *shadowp = p; - mapping->nrshadows--; + mapping->nrexceptional--;if (node)workingset_node_shadows_dec (node); }
@@ -1245,9 +1250,9 @@ repeat:if (radix_tree_deref_retry (page)) goto restart;/* -* A shadow entry of a recently evicted page, -* or a swap entry from shmem/tmpfs. Return -* it without attempting to raise page count. +* A shadow entry of a recently evicted page, a swap +* entry from shmem/tmpfs or a DAX entry. Return it +* without attempting to raise page count. */ goto export; }
mm/truncate.c +39 -30
104 lines not on this page · raw message
mm/vmscan.c +8 -1
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@#include <linux/oom.h> #include <linux/prefetch.h> #include <linux/printk.h> +#include <linux/dax.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h> #include <asm/div64.h>
@@ -671,9 +672,15 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page,* inode reclaim needs to empty out the radix tree or * the nodes are lost. Don't plant shadows behind its * back. +* +* We also don't store shadows for DAX mappings because the +* only page cache pages found in these are zero pages +* covering holes, and because we don't want to mix DAX +* exceptional entries and shadow exceptional entries in the +* same page_tree. */ if (reclaimed &&page_is_file_cache (page) && - !mapping_exiting (mapping)) + !mapping_exiting (mapping) && !dax_mapping (mapping)) shadow =workingset_eviction (mapping, page);__delete_from_page_cache (page, shadow, memcg);spin_unlock_irqrestore (&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
mm/workingset.c +2 -2
@@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ static enum lru_status shadow_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item, node->slots[i] =NULL ;BUG_ON (node->count < (1U <<RADIX_TREE_COUNT_SHIFT )); node->count -=1U <<RADIX_TREE_COUNT_SHIFT ; -BUG_ON (!mapping->nrshadows); - mapping->nrshadows--; +BUG_ON (!mapping->nrexceptional); + mapping->nrexceptional--; } }BUG_ON (node->count);
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
Hi Ross,
Quoted 6 lines · Ross Zwisler
Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct
address_spaceradix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries.In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages.
I may get it wrong, but there is "struct page" for persistent memory after "[PATCH v4 00/18]get_user_pages() for dax pte and pmd mappings".
So why not just add "struct page" to radix tree directly just like normal page cache?
Then we don't need to deal with any exceptional entries and special writeback.
Thanks,
Bob
Quoted 17 lines
These exceptional entries will also contain the writeback sectors for the PTE or PMD faults that we can use at fsync/msync time.
There are currently two types of exceptional entries (shmem and shadow) that can be placed into the radix tree, and this adds a third. We rely on the fact that only one type of exceptional entry can be found in a given radix tree based on its usage. This happens for free with DAX vs shmem but we explicitly prevent shadow entries from being added to radix trees for DAX mappings.
The only shadow entries that would be generated for DAX radix trees would be to track zero page mappings that were created for holes. These pages would receive minimal benefit from having shadow entries, and the choice to have only one type of exceptional entry in a given radix tree makes the logic simpler both in
clear_exceptional_entry()and in the rest of DAX.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>
Quoted 11 lines
--- fs/block_dev.c | 2 +- fs/inode.c | 2 +- include/linux/dax.h | 5 ++++ include/linux/fs.h | 3 +- include/linux/radix-tree.h | 9 ++++++ mm/filemap.c | 17 ++++++++---- mm/truncate.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- mm/vmscan.c | 9 +++++- mm/workingset.c | 4 +-- 9 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
Quoted 7 lines · Bob Liu
Hi Ross,
Quoted 4 lines · Ross Zwisler
Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct
address_spaceradix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages.
I may get it wrong, but there is "struct page" for persistent memory after "[PATCH v4 00/18]get_user_pages() for dax pte and pmd mappings".
So why not just add "struct page" to radix tree directly just like normal page cache?Then we don't need to deal with any exceptional entries and special writeback.
That "struct page" is optional and fsync/msync needs to operate in its absence.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
Quoted 11 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 10 lines · Bob Liu
Hi Ross,
Quoted 6 lines · Ross Zwisler
Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct
address_spaceradix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries.In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I may get it wrong, but there is "struct page" for persistent memory after "[PATCH v4 00/18]get_user_pages() for dax pte and pmd mappings".
So why not just add "struct page" to radix tree directly just like normal page cache?Then we don't need to deal with any exceptional entries and special writeback.
That "struct page" is optional and fsync/msync needs to operate in its absence.
Any special reason or scenario that "struct page" should not be enabled?
I didn't see any disadvantages if always enable "struct page" by force when using DAX model for pmem. The benefits would be things can be more simple and less potential bugs because of smaller patches.
Happy New Year!
Bob
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
Quoted 17 lines · Bob Liu
Quoted 15 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 14 lines · Bob Liu
Hi Ross,
Quoted 6 lines · Ross Zwisler
Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct
address_spaceradix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries.In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages.
I may get it wrong, but there is "struct page" for persistent memory after "[PATCH v4 00/18]get_user_pages() for dax pte and pmd mappings".
So why not just add "struct page" to radix tree directly just like normal page cache?
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Then we don't need to deal with any exceptional entries and special writeback.
That "struct page" is optional and fsync/msync needs to operate in its absence.
Any special reason or scenario that "struct page" should not be enabled?
I didn't see any disadvantages if always enable "struct page" by force when using DAX model for pmem. The benefits would be things can be more simple and less potential bugs because of smaller patches.
We can't enable struct page coverage by default.
The persistent memory capacity may be too large to allocate the memmap array from DRAM. Allocating it from pmem reduces the size of the device and we can't have a block device change sizes just by booting a different kernel (any kernel less than 4.5). So, enabling struct page must be an explicit action.
Quoted 1 line
Happy New Year!
Happy New Year!
Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
In reply to Ross ZwislerQuoted 16 lines · Ross Zwisler
Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct
address_spaceradix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries.In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages. These exceptional entries will also contain the writeback sectors for the PTE or PMD faults that we can use at fsync/msync time.
There are currently two types of exceptional entries (shmem and shadow) that can be placed into the radix tree, and this adds a third. We rely on the fact that only one type of exceptional entry can be found in a given radix tree based on its usage. This happens for free with DAX vs shmem but we explicitly prevent shadow entries from being added to radix trees for DAX mappings.
Quoted 7 lines
The only shadow entries that would be generated for DAX radix trees would be to track zero page mappings that were created for holes. These pages would receive minimal benefit from having shadow entries, and the choice to have only one type of exceptional entry in a given radix tree makes the logic simpler both in
clear_exceptional_entry()and in the rest of DAX.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>
The patch looks good to me. You can add:
Honza
Signature · 8 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v6 3/7 mm: add find_get_entries_tag()
In reply to Ross ZwislerAdd find_get_entries_tag() to the family of functions that include find_get_entries(), find_get_pages() and find_get_pages_tag(). This is needed for DAX dirty page handling because we need a list of both page offsets and radix tree entries ('indices' and 'entries' in this function) that are marked with the PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE tag.
--- include/linux/pagemap.h | 3 +++ mm/filemap.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
include/linux/pagemap.h +3 -0
@@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ unsigned find_get_pages_contig(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start, unsigned int nr_pages, struct page **pages);unsigned find_get_pages_tag (struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t *index,int tag,unsigned int nr_pages,struct page **pages); +unsigned find_get_entries_tag (struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t start, +int tag,unsigned int nr_entries, +struct page **entries,pgoff_t *indices);struct page *grab_cache_page_write_begin (struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index,unsigned flags);
mm/filemap.c +68 -0
74 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
RE: [PATCH v6 3/7] mm: add find_get_entries_tag()
Quoted 6 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Linux-nvdimm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ross Zwisler
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 1:39 PM
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/7] mm: addfind_get_entries_tag()
...
Quoted 1 line
mm/filemap.c +0
-0
...
Quoted 6 lines
mm/filemap.c +6
-0+unsigned find_get_entries_tag (struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t start, +int tag,unsigned int nr_entries, +struct page **entries,pgoff_t *indices) +{ +void **slot; +unsigned int ret =0 ;
...
Quoted 2 lines
mm/filemap.c +2
-0+radix_tree_for_each_tagged (slot, &mapping->page_tree, + &iter, start, tag) {
...
mm/filemap.c repeat: · line 1564
Quoted 5 lines
mm/filemap.c +5
-0+ indices[ret] = iter.index; + entries[ret] = page; +if (++ret == nr_entries) +break ; + }
Using >= would provide more safety from buffer overflow problems in case ret ever jumped ahead by more than one.
---
Robert Elliott, HPE Persistent Memory
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v6 4/7 dax: add support for fsync/msync
In reply to Ross ZwislerTo properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.
--- fs/dax.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/dax.h | 2 + mm/filemap.c | 6 ++ 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
fs/dax.c +190 -6
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@#include <linux/memcontrol.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/pagevec.h> #include <linux/pmem.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/uio.h>
@@ -323,6 +324,176 @@ static int copy_user_bh(struct page *to, struct inode *inode,return 0 ; } +#define NO_SECTOR -1 + +static int dax_radix_entry (struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index, +sector_t sector,bool pmd_entry,bool dirty) +{ +struct radix_tree_root *page_tree = &mapping->page_tree; +int error =0 ; +void *entry; + +__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES ); + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); + entry =radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index); + +if (entry) { +if (!pmd_entry ||RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry) ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ) + goto dirty; +radix_tree_delete (&mapping->page_tree, index); + mapping->nrexceptional--; + } + +if (sector ==NO_SECTOR ) { +/* +* This can happen during correct operation if our pfn_mkwrite +* fault raced against a hole punch operation. If this +* happens the pte that was hole punched will have been +* unmapped and the radix tree entry will have been removed by +* the time we are called, but the call will still happen. We +* will return all the way up to wp_pfn_shared(), where the +* pte_same() check will fail, eventually causing page fault +* to be retried by the CPU. +*/ + goto unlock; + } + + error =radix_tree_insert (page_tree, index, +RADIX_DAX_ENTRY (sector, pmd_entry)); +if (error) + goto unlock; + + mapping->nrexceptional++; + dirty: +if (dirty) +radix_tree_tag_set (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY ); + unlock: +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +return error; +} + +static int dax_writeback_one (struct block_device *bdev, +struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index,void *entry) +{ +struct radix_tree_root *page_tree = &mapping->page_tree; +int type =RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry); +struct radix_tree_node *node; +struct blk_dax_ctl dax; +void **slot; +int ret =0 ; + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* Regular page slots are stabilized by the page lock even +* without the tree itself locked. These unlocked entries +* need verification under the tree lock. +*/ +if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unlock; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unlock; + +/* another fsync thread may have already written back this entry */ +if (!radix_tree_tag_get (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE )) + goto unlock; + +radix_tree_tag_clear (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE ); + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (type !=RADIX_DAX_PTE && type !=RADIX_DAX_PMD )) { + ret = -EIO ; + goto unlock; + } + + dax.sector =RADIX_DAX_SECTOR (entry); + dax.size = (type ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ?PMD_SIZE :PAGE_SIZE ); +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); + +/* +* We cannot hold tree_lock while calling dax_map_atomic() because it +* eventually calls cond_resched(). +*/ + ret =dax_map_atomic (bdev, &dax); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (ret < dax.size)) { + ret = -EIO ; +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); +return ret; + } + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* We need to revalidate our radix entry while holding tree_lock +* before we do the writeback. +*/ +if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unmap; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unmap; + +wb_cache_pmem (dax.addr, dax.size); + unmap: +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); + unlock: +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +return ret; +} + +/* +* Flush the mapping to the persistent domain within the byte range of [start, +* end]. This is required by data integrity operations to ensure file data is +* on persistent storage prior to completion of the operation. +*/ +int dax_writeback_mapping_range (struct address_space *mapping,loff_t start, +loff_t end) +{ +struct inode *inode = mapping->host; +struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev; +pgoff_t indices[PAGEVEC_SIZE ]; +pgoff_t start_page, end_page; +struct pagevec pvec; +void *entry; +int i, ret =0 ; + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (inode->i_blkbits !=PAGE_SHIFT )) +return -EIO ; + +rcu_read_lock (); + entry =radix_tree_lookup (&mapping->page_tree, start &PMD_MASK ); +rcu_read_unlock (); + +/* see if the start of our range is covered by a PMD entry */ +if (entry &&RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry) ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ) + start &=PMD_MASK ; + + start_page = start >>PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT ; + end_page = end >>PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT ; + +tag_pages_for_writeback (mapping, start_page, end_page); + +pagevec_init (&pvec,0 ); +while (1 ) { + pvec.nr =find_get_entries_tag (mapping, start_page, +PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE ,PAGEVEC_SIZE , + pvec.pages, indices); + +if (pvec.nr ==0 ) +break ; + +for (i =0 ; i < pvec.nr; i++) { + ret =dax_writeback_one (bdev, mapping, indices[i], + pvec.pages[i]); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + } + } +wmb_pmem (); +return 0 ; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dax_writeback_mapping_range); +static int dax_insert_mapping (struct inode *inode,struct buffer_head *bh,struct vm_area_struct *vma,struct vm_fault *vmf) {
@@ -362,6 +533,11 @@ static int dax_insert_mapping(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head *bh, }dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); + error =dax_radix_entry (mapping, vmf->pgoff, dax.sector, false, + vmf->flags &FAULT_FLAG_WRITE ); +if (error) + goto out; + error =vm_insert_mixed (vma, vaddr, dax.pfn); out:
@@ -486,6 +662,7 @@ int __dax_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf,delete_from_page_cache (page);unlock_page (page);page_cache_release (page); + page =NULL ; }/*
@@ -579,7 +756,7 @@ int __dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,struct block_device *bdev =NULL ;pgoff_t size, pgoff;sector_t block; -int result =0 ; +int error, result =0 ;/* dax pmd mappings require pfn_t_devmap() */ if (!IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_FS_DAX_PMD ))
@@ -721,6 +898,16 @@ int __dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, }dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); +if (write) { + error =dax_radix_entry (mapping, pgoff, dax.sector, + true, true); +if (error) { +dax_pmd_dbg (bdev, address, +"PMD radix insertion failed" ); + goto fallback; + } + } + dev_dbg(part_to_dev(bdev->bd_part), "%s: %s addr: %lx pfn: %lx sect: %llx\n", __func__, current->comm, address,
@@ -779,15 +966,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_pmd_fault);* dax_pfn_mkwrite - handle first write to DAX page * @vma: The virtual memory area where the fault occurred * @vmf: The description of the fault -* */ int dax_pfn_mkwrite (struct vm_area_struct *vma,struct vm_fault *vmf) { -struct super_block *sb =file_inode (vma->vm_file)->i_sb; +struct file *file = vma->vm_file; -sb_start_pagefault (sb); -file_update_time (vma->vm_file); -sb_end_pagefault (sb); +dax_radix_entry (file->f_mapping, vmf->pgoff,NO_SECTOR , false, true);return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE ; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (dax_pfn_mkwrite);
include/linux/dax.h +2 -0
@@ -41,4 +41,6 @@ static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping) {return mapping->host &&IS_DAX (mapping->host); } +int dax_writeback_mapping_range (struct address_space *mapping,loff_t start, +loff_t end);#endif
mm/filemap.c +6 -0
@@ -482,6 +482,12 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct address_space *mapping, {int err =0 ; +if (dax_mapping (mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional) { + err =dax_writeback_mapping_range (mapping, lstart, lend); +if (err) +return err; + } +if (mapping->nrpages) { err =__filemap_fdatawrite_range (mapping, lstart, lend,WB_SYNC_ALL );
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>
I'm hitting the following report with the ndctl dax test [1] on next-20151231. I bisected it to
commit 3cb108f941de "dax-add-support-for-fsync-sync-v6". I'll take a
closer look tomorrow, but in case someone can beat me to it, here's the back-trace:
------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:497! [..] CPU: 1 PID: 3001 Comm: umount Tainted: G O 4.4.0-rc7+ #2412 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff8800da2a5a00 ti: ffff880307794000 task.ti: ffff880307794000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81280171>] [<ffffffff81280171>] clear_inode+0x71/0x80 RSP: 0018:ffff880307797d50 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: ffff8800da2a5a00 RBX: ffff8800ca2e7328 RCX: ffff8800da2a5a28 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000005 RDI: ffff8800ca2e7530 RBP: ffff880307797d60 R08: ffffffff82900ae0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8800ca2e7548 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800ca2e7530 R13: ffff8800ca2e7328 R14: ffff8800da2e88d0 R15: ffff8800da2e88d0 FS: 00007f2b22f4a880(0000) GS:ffff88031fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005648abd933e8 CR3: 000000007f3fc000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Stack: ffff8800ca2e7328 ffff8800ca2e7000 ffff880307797d88 ffffffffa01c18af ffff8800ca2e7328 ffff8800ca2e74d0 ffffffffa01ec740 ffff880307797db0 ffffffff81281038 ffff8800ca2e74c0 ffff880307797e00 ffff8800ca2e7328 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa01c18af>] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0x5f/0x110 [xfs] [<ffffffff81281038>] evict+0xb8/0x180 [<ffffffff8128113b>] dispose_list+0x3b/0x50 [<ffffffff81282014>] evict_inodes+0x144/0x170 [<ffffffff8126447f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x3f/0xf0 [<ffffffff81264837>] kill_block_super+0x27/0x70 [<ffffffff81264a53>] deactivate_locked_super+0x43/0x70 [<ffffffff81264e9c>] deactivate_super+0x5c/0x60 [<ffffffff81285aff>] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90 [<ffffffff81285b92>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 [<ffffffff810c4f26>] task_work_run+0x76/0x90 [<ffffffff81003e3a>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x20a/0x280 [<ffffffff8192671a>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f Code: 48 8d 93 30 03 00 00 48 39 c2 75 23 48 8b 83 d0 00 00 00 a8 20
74 1a a8 40 75 18 48 c7 8
3 d0 00 00 00 60 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f
44 00 00 55
RIP [<ffffffff81280171>] clear_inode+0x71/0x80
RSP <ffff880307797d50>
---[ end trace 3b1d8898a94a4fc1 ]---
[1]: git://[email protected]:pmem/ndctl.git pending
make TESTS="test/dax.sh" check
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Jan Kara
maintainerRe: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 14 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
I'm hitting the following report with the ndctl dax test [1] on next-20151231. I bisected it to
commit3cb108f941de"dax-add-support-for-fsync-sync-v6". I'll take a
closer look tomorrow, but in case someone can beat me to it, here's the back-trace:------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:497!
I suppose this is the check that mapping->nr_exceptional is zero, isn't it? Hum, I don't see how that could happen given we call truncate_inode_pages_final() just before the clear_inode() call which removes all the exceptional entries from the radix tree. And there's not much room for a race during umount... Does the radix tree really contain any entry or is it an accounting bug?
Honza
Quoted 44 lines
[..]
CPU: 1 PID: 3001 Comm: umount Tainted: G O 4.4.0-rc7+ #2412 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff8800da2a5a00 ti: ffff880307794000 task.ti: ffff880307794000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81280171>] [<ffffffff81280171>] clear_inode+0x71/0x80 RSP: 0018:ffff880307797d50 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: ffff8800da2a5a00 RBX: ffff8800ca2e7328 RCX: ffff8800da2a5a28 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000005 RDI: ffff8800ca2e7530 RBP: ffff880307797d60 R08: ffffffff82900ae0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8800ca2e7548 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800ca2e7530 R13: ffff8800ca2e7328 R14: ffff8800da2e88d0 R15: ffff8800da2e88d0 FS: 00007f2b22f4a880(0000) GS:ffff88031fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005648abd933e8 CR3: 000000007f3fc000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Stack: ffff8800ca2e7328 ffff8800ca2e7000 ffff880307797d88 ffffffffa01c18af ffff8800ca2e7328 ffff8800ca2e74d0 ffffffffa01ec740 ffff880307797db0 ffffffff81281038 ffff8800ca2e74c0 ffff880307797e00 ffff8800ca2e7328 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa01c18af>] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0x5f/0x110 [xfs] [<ffffffff81281038>] evict+0xb8/0x180 [<ffffffff8128113b>] dispose_list+0x3b/0x50 [<ffffffff81282014>] evict_inodes+0x144/0x170 [<ffffffff8126447f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x3f/0xf0 [<ffffffff81264837>] kill_block_super+0x27/0x70 [<ffffffff81264a53>] deactivate_locked_super+0x43/0x70 [<ffffffff81264e9c>] deactivate_super+0x5c/0x60 [<ffffffff81285aff>] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90 [<ffffffff81285b92>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 [<ffffffff810c4f26>] task_work_run+0x76/0x90 [<ffffffff81003e3a>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x20a/0x280 [<ffffffff8192671a>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f Code: 48 8d 93 30 03 00 00 48 39 c2 75 23 48 8b 83 d0 00 00 00 a8 2074 1a a8 40 75 18 48 c7 8
3 d0 00 00 00 60 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f
44 00 00 55
RIP [<ffffffff81280171>]clear_inode+0x71/0x80
RSP <ffff880307797d50>---[ end trace 3b1d8898a94a4fc1 ]---[1]:
git://[email protected]:pmem/ndctl.gitpending
make TESTS="test/dax.sh" check
Signature · 8 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 24 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 14 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>Quoted 8 lines
I'm hitting the following report with the ndctl dax test [1] on next-20151231. I bisected it to
commit3cb108f941de"dax-add-support-for-fsync-sync-v6". I'll take a
closer look tomorrow, but in case someone can beat me to it, here's the back-trace:------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:497!
Quoted 8 lines
I suppose this is the check that
mapping->nr_exceptionalis zero, isn't it? Hum, I don't see how that could happen given we calltruncate_inode_pages_final()just before theclear_inode()call which removes all the exceptional entries from the radix tree. And there's not much room for a race during umount... Does the radix tree really contain any entry or is it an accounting bug?Honza
I think this is a bug with the existing way that we handle PMD faults. The issue is that the PMD path doesn't properly remove radix tree entries for zero pages covering holes. The PMD path calls unmap_mapping_range() to unmap the range out of the struct address_space, but it is missing a call to truncate_inode_pages_range() or similar to clear out those entries in the radix tree. Up until now we didn't notice, we just had an orphaned entry in the radix tree, but with my code we then find the page entry in the radix tree when handling a PMD fault, we remove it and add in a PMD entry. This causes us to be off on both our mapping->nrpages and mapping->nrexceptional counts.
In the PTE path we properly remove the pages from the radix tree when upgrading from a hole to a real DAX entry via the delete_from_page_cache() call, which eventually calls page_cache_tree_delete().
I'm working on a fix now (and making sure all the above is correct).
- Ross
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
In reply to Dan WilliamsQuoted 61 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>I'm hitting the following report with the ndctl dax test [1] on next-20151231. I bisected it to
commit3cb108f941de"dax-add-support-for-fsync-sync-v6". I'll take a
closer look tomorrow, but in case someone can beat me to it, here's the back-trace:------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:497! [..] CPU: 1 PID: 3001 Comm: umount Tainted: G O 4.4.0-rc7+ #2412 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff8800da2a5a00 ti: ffff880307794000 task.ti: ffff880307794000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81280171>] [<ffffffff81280171>] clear_inode+0x71/0x80 RSP: 0018:ffff880307797d50 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: ffff8800da2a5a00 RBX: ffff8800ca2e7328 RCX: ffff8800da2a5a28 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000005 RDI: ffff8800ca2e7530 RBP: ffff880307797d60 R08: ffffffff82900ae0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff8800ca2e7548 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800ca2e7530 R13: ffff8800ca2e7328 R14: ffff8800da2e88d0 R15: ffff8800da2e88d0 FS: 00007f2b22f4a880(0000) GS:ffff88031fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005648abd933e8 CR3: 000000007f3fc000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Stack: ffff8800ca2e7328 ffff8800ca2e7000 ffff880307797d88 ffffffffa01c18af ffff8800ca2e7328 ffff8800ca2e74d0 ffffffffa01ec740 ffff880307797db0 ffffffff81281038 ffff8800ca2e74c0 ffff880307797e00 ffff8800ca2e7328 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa01c18af>] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0x5f/0x110 [xfs] [<ffffffff81281038>] evict+0xb8/0x180 [<ffffffff8128113b>] dispose_list+0x3b/0x50 [<ffffffff81282014>] evict_inodes+0x144/0x170 [<ffffffff8126447f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x3f/0xf0 [<ffffffff81264837>] kill_block_super+0x27/0x70 [<ffffffff81264a53>] deactivate_locked_super+0x43/0x70 [<ffffffff81264e9c>] deactivate_super+0x5c/0x60 [<ffffffff81285aff>] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90 [<ffffffff81285b92>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 [<ffffffff810c4f26>] task_work_run+0x76/0x90 [<ffffffff81003e3a>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x20a/0x280 [<ffffffff8192671a>] int_ret_from_sys_call+0x25/0x9f Code: 48 8d 93 30 03 00 00 48 39 c2 75 23 48 8b 83 d0 00 00 00 a8 2074 1a a8 40 75 18 48 c7 8
3 d0 00 00 00 60 00 00 00 5b 41 5c 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f
44 00 00 55
RIP [<ffffffff81280171>]clear_inode+0x71/0x80
RSP <ffff880307797d50>
Quoted 4 lines
---[ end trace 3b1d8898a94a4fc1 ]---[1]:
git://[email protected]:pmem/ndctl.gitpending
make TESTS="test/dax.sh" check
This issue is fixed with patch 2 of v7:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-January/003888.html
Thanks for the report!
Jan Kara
maintainerRe: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
In reply to Ross ZwislerQuoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>
...
Quoted 45 lines
fs/dax.c +45
-0+static int dax_writeback_one (struct block_device *bdev, +struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index,void *entry) +{ +struct radix_tree_root *page_tree = &mapping->page_tree; +int type =RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry); +struct radix_tree_node *node; +struct blk_dax_ctl dax; +void **slot; +int ret =0 ; + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* Regular page slots are stabilized by the page lock even +* without the tree itself locked. These unlocked entries +* need verification under the tree lock. +*/ +if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unlock; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unlock; + +/* another fsync thread may have already written back this entry */ +if (!radix_tree_tag_get (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE )) + goto unlock; + +radix_tree_tag_clear (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE ); + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (type !=RADIX_DAX_PTE && type !=RADIX_DAX_PMD )) { + ret = -EIO ; + goto unlock; + } + + dax.sector =RADIX_DAX_SECTOR (entry); + dax.size = (type ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ?PMD_SIZE :PAGE_SIZE ); +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); + +/* +* We cannot hold tree_lock while calling dax_map_atomic() because it +* eventually calls cond_resched(). +*/ + ret =dax_map_atomic (bdev, &dax); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (ret < dax.size)) {
fs/dax.c static int copy_user_bh(struct page *to, struct inode *inode, · line 430
Quoted 10 lines
fs/dax.c +10
-0+ ret = -EIO ; +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); +return ret; + } + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* We need to revalidate our radix entry while holding tree_lock +* before we do the writeback. +*/
Do we really need to revalidate here? dax_map_atomic() makes sure the addr & size is still part of the device. I guess you are concerned that due to truncate or similar operation those sectors needn't belong to the same file anymore but we don't really care about flushing sectors for someone else, do we?
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
fs/dax.c static int copy_user_bh(struct page *to, struct inode *inode, · line 442
Quoted 12 lines
fs/dax.c +12
-0+if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unmap; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unmap; + +wb_cache_pmem (dax.addr, dax.size); + unmap: +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); + unlock: +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +return ret; +}
Honza
Signature · 8 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 75 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>...
Quoted 45 lines
fs/dax.c +45
-0+static int dax_writeback_one (struct block_device *bdev, +struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index,void *entry) +{ +struct radix_tree_root *page_tree = &mapping->page_tree; +int type =RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry); +struct radix_tree_node *node; +struct blk_dax_ctl dax; +void **slot; +int ret =0 ; + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* Regular page slots are stabilized by the page lock even +* without the tree itself locked. These unlocked entries +* need verification under the tree lock. +*/ +if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unlock; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unlock; + +/* another fsync thread may have already written back this entry */ +if (!radix_tree_tag_get (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE )) + goto unlock; + +radix_tree_tag_clear (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE ); + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (type !=RADIX_DAX_PTE && type !=RADIX_DAX_PMD )) { + ret = -EIO ; + goto unlock; + } + + dax.sector =RADIX_DAX_SECTOR (entry); + dax.size = (type ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ?PMD_SIZE :PAGE_SIZE ); +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); + +/* +* We cannot hold tree_lock while calling dax_map_atomic() because it +* eventually calls cond_resched(). +*/ + ret =dax_map_atomic (bdev, &dax); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (ret < dax.size)) {fs/dax.c static int copy_user_bh(struct page *to, struct inode *inode, · line 430
Quoted 10 lines
fs/dax.c +10
-0+ ret = -EIO ; +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); +return ret; + } + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* We need to revalidate our radix entry while holding tree_lock +* before we do the writeback. +*/ Do we really need to revalidate here?
dax_map_atomic()makes sure the addr & size is still part of the device. I guess you are concerned that due to truncate or similar operation those sectors needn't belong to the same file anymore but we don't really care about flushing sectors for someone else, do we?
Quoted 1 line
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Yep, the concern is that we could have somehow raced against a truncate operation while we weren't holding the tree_lock, and that now the address we are about to flush belongs to another file or is unallocated by the filesystem.
I agree that this should be non-destructive - if you think the additional check and locking isn't worth the overhead, I'm happy to take it out. I don't have a strong opinion either way.
Thanks for the review!
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 78 lines · Ross Zwisler
Quoted 75 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>...
Quoted 45 lines
fs/dax.c +45
-0+static int dax_writeback_one (struct block_device *bdev, +struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index,void *entry) +{ +struct radix_tree_root *page_tree = &mapping->page_tree; +int type =RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry); +struct radix_tree_node *node; +struct blk_dax_ctl dax; +void **slot; +int ret =0 ; + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* Regular page slots are stabilized by the page lock even +* without the tree itself locked. These unlocked entries +* need verification under the tree lock. +*/ +if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unlock; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unlock; + +/* another fsync thread may have already written back this entry */ +if (!radix_tree_tag_get (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE )) + goto unlock; + +radix_tree_tag_clear (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE ); + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (type !=RADIX_DAX_PTE && type !=RADIX_DAX_PMD )) { + ret = -EIO ; + goto unlock; + } + + dax.sector =RADIX_DAX_SECTOR (entry); + dax.size = (type ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ?PMD_SIZE :PAGE_SIZE ); +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); + +/* +* We cannot hold tree_lock while calling dax_map_atomic() because it +* eventually calls cond_resched(). +*/ + ret =dax_map_atomic (bdev, &dax); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (ret < dax.size)) {fs/dax.c static int copy_user_bh(struct page *to, struct inode *inode, · line 430
Quoted 10 lines
fs/dax.c +10
-0+ ret = -EIO ; +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); +return ret; + } + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* We need to revalidate our radix entry while holding tree_lock +* before we do the writeback. +*/ Do we really need to revalidate here?
dax_map_atomic()makes sure the addr & size is still part of the device. I guess you are concerned that due to truncate or similar operation those sectors needn't belong to the same file anymore but we don't really care about flushing sectors for someone else, do we?Quoted 1 line
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Quoted 9 lines
Yep, the concern is that we could have somehow raced against a truncate operation while we weren't holding the
tree_lock, and that now the address we are about to flush belongs to another file or is unallocated by the filesystem.I agree that this should be non-destructive - if you think the additional check and locking isn't worth the overhead, I'm happy to take it out. I don't have a strong opinion either way.
My concern is whether flushing potentially invalid virtual addresses is problematic on some architectures. Maybe it's just FUD, but it's less work in my opinion to just revalidate the address versus auditing each arch for this concern.
At a minimum we can change the comment to not say "We need to" and instead say "TODO: are all archs ok with flushing potentially invalid addresses?"
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 90 lines · Dan Williams
Quoted 78 lines · Ross Zwisler
Quoted 75 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 11 lines · Ross Zwisler
To properly handle fsync/msync in an efficient way DAX needs to track dirty pages so it is able to flush them durably to media on demand.
The tracking of dirty pages is done via the radix tree in struct
address_space. This radix tree is already used by the page writeback infrastructure for tracking dirty pages associated with an open file, and it already has support for exceptional (non struct page*) entries. We build upon these features to add exceptional entries to the radix tree for DAX dirty PMD or PTE pages at fault time.Signed-off-by Ross Zwisler <[email protected]>...
Quoted 45 lines
fs/dax.c +45
-0+static int dax_writeback_one (struct block_device *bdev, +struct address_space *mapping,pgoff_t index,void *entry) +{ +struct radix_tree_root *page_tree = &mapping->page_tree; +int type =RADIX_DAX_TYPE (entry); +struct radix_tree_node *node; +struct blk_dax_ctl dax; +void **slot; +int ret =0 ; + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* Regular page slots are stabilized by the page lock even +* without the tree itself locked. These unlocked entries +* need verification under the tree lock. +*/ +if (!__radix_tree_lookup (page_tree, index, &node, &slot)) + goto unlock; +if (*slot != entry) + goto unlock; + +/* another fsync thread may have already written back this entry */ +if (!radix_tree_tag_get (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE )) + goto unlock; + +radix_tree_tag_clear (page_tree, index,PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE ); + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (type !=RADIX_DAX_PTE && type !=RADIX_DAX_PMD )) { + ret = -EIO ; + goto unlock; + } + + dax.sector =RADIX_DAX_SECTOR (entry); + dax.size = (type ==RADIX_DAX_PMD ?PMD_SIZE :PAGE_SIZE ); +spin_unlock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); + +/* +* We cannot hold tree_lock while calling dax_map_atomic() because it +* eventually calls cond_resched(). +*/ + ret =dax_map_atomic (bdev, &dax); +if (ret <0 ) +return ret; + +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (ret < dax.size)) {fs/dax.c static int copy_user_bh(struct page *to, struct inode *inode, · line 430
Quoted 10 lines
fs/dax.c +10
-0+ ret = -EIO ; +dax_unmap_atomic (bdev, &dax); +return ret; + } + +spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock); +/* +* We need to revalidate our radix entry while holding tree_lock +* before we do the writeback. +*/ Do we really need to revalidate here?
dax_map_atomic()makes sure the addr & size is still part of the device. I guess you are concerned that due to truncate or similar operation those sectors needn't belong to the same file anymore but we don't really care about flushing sectors for someone else, do we?Quoted 1 line
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Quoted 9 lines
Yep, the concern is that we could have somehow raced against a truncate operation while we weren't holding the
tree_lock, and that now the address we are about to flush belongs to another file or is unallocated by the filesystem.I agree that this should be non-destructive - if you think the additional check and locking isn't worth the overhead, I'm happy to take it out. I don't have a strong opinion either way.
Quoted 4 lines
My concern is whether flushing potentially invalid virtual addresses is problematic on some architectures. Maybe it's just FUD, but it's less work in my opinion to just revalidate the address versus auditing each arch for this concern.
I don't think that the addresses have the potential of being invalid from the driver's point of view - we are still holding a reference on the block queue via dax_map_atomic(), so we should be protected against races vs block device removal. I think the only question is whether it is okay to flush an address that we know to be valid from the block device's point of view, but which the filesystem may have truncated from being allocated to our inode.
Does that all make sense?
Quoted 3 lines
At a minimum we can change the comment to not say "We need to" and instead say "TODO: are all archs ok with flushing potentially invalid addresses?"
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] dax: add support for fsync/msync
Quoted 1 line · Ross Zwisler
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:20:47AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
[..]
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines
My concern is whether flushing potentially invalid virtual addresses is problematic on some architectures. Maybe it's just FUD, but it's less work in my opinion to just revalidate the address versus auditing each arch for this concern.
Quoted 8 lines
I don't think that the addresses have the potential of being invalid from the driver's point of view - we are still holding a reference on the block queue via
dax_map_atomic(), so we should be protected against races vs block device removal. I think the only question is whether it is okay to flush an address that we know to be valid from the block device's point of view, but which the filesystem may have truncated from being allocated to our inode.Does that all make sense?
Yes, I was confusing which revalidation we were talking about. As long as the dax_map_atomic() is there I don't think we need any further revalidation.
PATCH 1/1 dax: dirty inode only if required
In reply to Ross Zwisler--- fs/dax.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/dax.c +2 -1
@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static int dax_radix_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,void *entry;WARN_ON_ONCE (pmd_entry && !dirty); -__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES ); +if (dirty) +__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES );spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock);
Signature · 7 lines
1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Re: [PATCH] dax: dirty inode only if required
Quoted 2 lines · Dmitry Monakhov
Signed-off-by Dmitry Monakhov <[email protected]>
Makes sense. You can add:
Honza
Quoted 21 lines
--- fs/dax.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/dax.c +2
-1@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static int dax_radix_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,void *entry;WARN_ON_ONCE (pmd_entry && !dirty); -__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES ); +if (dirty) +__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES );spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock);Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1
Signature · 8 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Ross Zwisler
Reviewed-byRe: [PATCH] dax: dirty inode only if required
Quoted 7 lines · Jan Kara
Quoted 2 lines · Dmitry Monakhov
Signed-off-by Dmitry Monakhov <[email protected]>Makes sense. You can add:
Reviewed-by Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Looks good to me as well.
Quoted 25 lines
Honza
Quoted 21 lines
--- fs/dax.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/dax.c +2
-1@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static int dax_radix_entry(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,void *entry;WARN_ON_ONCE (pmd_entry && !dirty); -__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES ); +if (dirty) +__mark_inode_dirty (mapping->host,I_DIRTY_PAGES );spin_lock_irq (&mapping->tree_lock);Signature · 1 line
1.8.3.1Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
PATCH v6 5/7 ext2: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync
In reply to Ross ZwislerTo properly support the new DAX fsync/msync infrastructure filesystems need to call dax_pfn_mkwrite() so that DAX can track when user pages are dirtied.
--- fs/ext2/file.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/ext2/file.c +3 -1
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, {struct inode *inode =file_inode (vma->vm_file);struct ext2_inode_info *ei =EXT2_I (inode); -int ret =VM_FAULT_NOPAGE ;loff_t size; +int ret;sb_start_pagefault (inode->i_sb);file_update_time (vma->vm_file);
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, size = (i_size_read (inode) +PAGE_SIZE -1 ) >>PAGE_SHIFT ;if (vmf->pgoff >= size) ret =VM_FAULT_SIGBUS ; +else + ret =dax_pfn_mkwrite (vma, vmf);up_read (&ei->dax_sem);sb_end_pagefault (inode->i_sb);
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v6 6/7 ext4: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync
In reply to Ross ZwislerTo properly support the new DAX fsync/msync infrastructure filesystems need to call dax_pfn_mkwrite() so that DAX can track when user pages are dirtied.
--- fs/ext4/file.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/ext4/file.c +3 -1
@@ -291,8 +291,8 @@ static int ext4_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, {struct inode *inode =file_inode (vma->vm_file);struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; -int ret =VM_FAULT_NOPAGE ;loff_t size; +int ret;sb_start_pagefault (sb);file_update_time (vma->vm_file);
@@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ static int ext4_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, size = (i_size_read (inode) +PAGE_SIZE -1 ) >>PAGE_SHIFT ;if (vmf->pgoff >= size) ret =VM_FAULT_SIGBUS ; +else + ret =dax_pfn_mkwrite (vma, vmf);up_read (&EXT4_I (inode)->i_mmap_sem);sb_end_pagefault (sb);
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v6 7/7 xfs: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync
In reply to Ross ZwislerTo properly support the new DAX fsync/msync infrastructure filesystems need to call dax_pfn_mkwrite() so that DAX can track when user pages are dirtied.
--- fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c +4 -3
@@ -1603,9 +1603,8 @@ xfs_filemap_pmd_fault(/* * pfn_mkwrite was originally inteneded to ensure we capture time stamp * updates on write faults. In reality, it's need to serialise against -* truncate similar to page_mkwrite. Hence we open-code dax_pfn_mkwrite() -* here and cycle the XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED to ensure we serialise the fault -* barrier in place. +* truncate similar to page_mkwrite. Hence we cycle the XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED +* to ensure we serialise the fault barrier in place. */ static int xfs_filemap_pfn_mkwrite(
@@ -1628,6 +1627,8 @@ xfs_filemap_pfn_mkwrite( size = (i_size_read (inode) +PAGE_SIZE -1 ) >>PAGE_SHIFT ;if (vmf->pgoff >= size) ret =VM_FAULT_SIGBUS ; +else if (IS_DAX (inode)) + ret =dax_pfn_mkwrite (vma, vmf);xfs_iunlock (ip,XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED );sb_end_pagefault (inode->i_sb);return ret;
Signature · 7 lines
2.6.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>